Abstract
Adam Smith’s rhetoric lectures—first delivered in Edinburgh in 1748 and continued for over a decade in parallel with his teaching of logic and moral philosophy at the University of Glasgow—are widely acknowledged as a signal event in the history of the field of rhetoric, a key development in what has come to be known as the “new rhetoric” so much associated with the Scottish eighteenth century and subsequent figures such as Hugh Blair and George Campbell. Though Smith never published his lectures (burned at his instruction at his death, they were recovered in the form of student notes in 1958), it was he, more than any other English-speaking thinker, who instigated a decisively new approach to conceptualizing rhetoric and linguistic criticism, which in turn contributed substantially to the rise of modern literary and communication studies.1 This is all the more remarkable in that Smith, though clearly aware of the rhetorical tradition he was working within (and in some measure against), did not offer a typically preceptive art of rhetoric in Lectures on Rhetoric and Belles Lettres (LRBL).2 Although the lectures contain some prescriptive guidance, LRBL lacks any extensive treatment of (and in some cases explicitly spurns) the practical and systematic instruction— heuristic and argumentative topoi, taxonomies of arrangement, a catalog of figural devices—that one might expect if Smith’s primary objective had been simply to help his listeners acquire skill at generating persuasive speeches and writings.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
Notes
See Wilbur Samuel Howell, Eighteenth-Century British Logic and Rhetoric (Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press, 1971), 536–76.
For an account of Smith’s classical rhetorical sources, see Stephen J. McKenna, Adam Smith: The Rhetoric of Propriety (Albany: State University of New York Press, 2006), 25–51.
For a general assessment of Smith’s influence by classical thought, see Gloria Vivenza, Adam Smith and the Classics: The Classical Heritage in Adam Smith’s Thought (New York: Oxford University Press, 2001).
Nicholas T. Phillipson, Adam Smith: An Enlightened Life (London: Allen Lane, 2010), 93.
Jack Russell Weinstein, “Emotion, Context and Rhetoric: Adam Smith’s Informal Argumentation,” in Proceedings of the Fifth Conference of the International Society for the Study of Argumentation, ed. Frans van Emeren et al. (Amsterdam: Sic Sat, 2003), 1067.
Eugene Carver, Aristotle’s Rhetoric: An Art of Character (Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1994).
Alasdair MacIntyre, After Virtue: A Study in Moral Theory, 2nd ed. (London: Duckworth, 1990), 187.
Kenneth Burke, A Grammar of Motives (Berkeley and Los Angeles: University of California Press, 1969), 460.
Jerrold E. Seigel, The Idea of the Self: Thought and Experience in Western Europe Since the Seventeenth Century (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2005), 159.
Charles Taylor, Sources of the Self: The Making of the Modern Identity (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1989), 248–65.
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Copyright information
© 2011 Thomas Ahnert and Susan Manning
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
McKenna, S.J. (2011). Adam Smith’s Rhetorical Art of Character. In: Ahnert, T., Manning, S. (eds) Character, Self, and Sociability in the Scottish Enlightenment. Palgrave Studies in Cultural and Intellectual History. Palgrave Macmillan, New York. https://doi.org/10.1057/9780230119956_3
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/9780230119956_3
Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, New York
Print ISBN: 978-1-349-28869-4
Online ISBN: 978-0-230-11995-6
eBook Packages: Palgrave History CollectionHistory (R0)