The Imagery of Power Facing the Power of Imagery: Toward a Visual Analysis of Social Movements

  • Nicole Doerr
  • Simon Teune
Chapter
Part of the Palgrave Macmillan Transnational History Series book series (PMSTH)

Abstract

An athletic body holds aloft a hammer in one hand, ready to strike the sword held in the other. A red circle frames this blue icon, surrounded by a biblical quotation in black lettering that reads “Swords into Ploughshares” (see figure 3.1). East Germans wore cloth patches bearing this symbol in the early 1980s as a call for peace between the Eastern and Western blocs.1 The patch was modeled on a statue by the decorated representative of Soviet Realism Yevgeny Vuchetich. The Soviet Union donated the statue to the United Nations in 1959. Warsaw Pact countries used the icon as a positive reference point in their apology for the Soviet world as a stronghold of world peace. However, when the patch was distributed throughout the Protestant Church during protests against the military training of East German students in the early 1980s, the government forbade wearing the symbol in order to prevent its “misuse.” In reaction, peace activists cut out the print and continued to wear the patch with a hole in the center, thereby highlighting the absence of the image.

Keywords

Social Movement Visual Analysis Collective Identity Visual Aspect Social Movement Research 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in to check access.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Notes

  1. 1.
    Anke Silomon, “Schwerter zu Pflugscharen” und die DDR. Die Friedensarbeit der evangelischen Kirchen in der DDR im Rahmen der Friedensdekaden 1980–1982 (Göttingen: Vandenhoeck and Ruprecht, 1999).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Ehrhart Neubert, Geschichte der Opposition in der DDR 1949–1989 (Bonn: Bundeszentrale für politische Bildung, 1997).Google Scholar
  3. 2.
    Francesca Polletta demonstrates that good stories “move people” merely through their ambiguity. See Francesca Polletta, It was Like a Fever: Storytelling in Protest and Politics (Chicago: Chicago University Press, 2006).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 3.
    Nicholas Mirzoeff, “What is Visual Culture?” in Nicholas Mirzoeff, ed., Visual Culture Reader (London and New York: Routledge, 1998), 8.Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Thomas Leif, “Ohne die Kraft der Symbole bleibt die (Bewegungs-) Politik wirkungslos [Without the Power of Symbols (Movement) Politics remains Ineffective],” Forschungsjournal Neue Soziale Bewegungen 1 (1988): 8.Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    As defined by Doug McAdam, Sidney G. Tarrow, and Charles Tilly, Dynamics of Contention (Cambridge, New York: Cambridge University Press, 2001): 15–18.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    For an overview, see Rhys H. Williams, “The Cultural Contexts of Collective Action: Constraints, Opportunities, and the Cultural Life of Social Movements,” in David A. Snow, Sarah A. Soule, and Hanspeter Kriesi, eds, The Blackwell Companion to Social Movements (Malden, Oxford, Carlton: Blackwell, 2004); and Francesca Polletta, “Culture and Movements,” The Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science 619/1 (2008): 8–96.Google Scholar
  8. For an overview, see Rhys H. Williams, “The Cultural Contexts of Collective Action: Constraints, Opportunities, and the Cultural Life of Social Movements,” in David A. Snow, Sarah A. Soule, and Hanspeter Kriesi, eds, The Blackwell Companion to Social Movements (Malden, Oxford, Carlton: Blackwell, 2004); and Francesca Polletta, “Culture and Movements,” The Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science 619/1 (2008): 8–96.Google Scholar
  9. 8.
    Jacqueline Adams, “Art in Social Movements: Shantytown Women’s Protest in Pinochet’s Chile,” Sociological Forum 17/1 (2002): 21.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 11.
    Christian Lahusen, The Rhetoric of Moral Protest: Public Campaigns, Celebrity Endorsement and Political Mobilization (Berlin, New York: de Gruyter, 1996).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 12.
    See also William A. Gamson, David Croteau, William Hoynes, and Theodore Sasson, “Media Images and the Social Construction of Reality,” Annual Review of Sociology 18 (1992), 373–393.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 13.
    Kathrin Fahlenbrach, Protestinszenierungen. Visuelle Kommunikation und kollektive Identitäten in Neuen Sozialen Bewegungen (Wiesbaden: Westdeutscher Verlag, 2002).Google Scholar
  13. 14.
    Andrew Szasz, Ecopopulism: Toxic Waste and the Movement for Environmental Justice (Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press, 1994).Google Scholar
  14. Lance Bennett and Regina G. Lawrence, “News Icons and the Mainstreaming of Social Change,” Journal of Communication 45/3 (1995), 20–39.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Jeffrey S. Juris, “Performing Politics: Image, Embodiment, and Affective Solidarity During Anti-Corporate Globalization Protests,” Ethnography 9/1 (2008), 61–97.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 15.
    John W. Delicath and Kevin Michael DeLuca, “Image Events, the Public Sphere, and Argumentative Practice: The Case of Radical Environmental Groups,” Argumentation 17/3 (2003), 315–333.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 16.
    Nicole Doerr, “Politicizing Precarity, Producing Visual Dialogues on Migration: Transnational Public Spaces in Social Movement,” Forum Qualitative Social Research 11/2 (2010).Google Scholar
  18. 17.
    Elizabeth Wilson, “Deviant Dress,” Feminist Review 35 (1990), 67–74.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Dick Hebdidge, Subculture. The Meaning of Style (London: Routledge, 1988).Google Scholar
  20. 18.
    Jesus Casquete, From Imagination to Visualization: Protest Rituals in the Basque Country 2003. http://skylla.wz-berlin.depdf/2003/iv03-401.pdf (accessed November 15, 2010).Google Scholar
  21. 19.
    Marian Sawer, “Wearing Your Politics on Your Sleeve: The Role of Political Colours in Social Movements,” Social Movement Studies 6/1 (2007), 39–56.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 20.
    Graeme Chesters and Ian Welsh, “Rebel Colours: ‘Framing’ in Global Social Movements,” The Sociological Review 52/3 (2004), 314–335.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 21.
    Antke Engel, “No Sex, No Crime, No Shame. Privatized Care and the Seduction into Responsibility,” Nora. Nordic Journal of Women’s Studies 15/3 (2007), 114–132.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 25.
    For example, Sergei Tschachotin, Dreipfeil gegen Hakenkreuz (Copenhagen: Verlag Aktiver Sozialismus, 1933).Google Scholar
  25. 26.
    See, for instance, Frank Kämpfer, Der rote Keil. Das politische Plakat, Theorie und Geschichte (Berlin: Mann 1985).Google Scholar
  26. Karlheinz Weissmann, Schwarze Fahnen, Runenzeichen: die Entwicklung der politischen Symbolik der deutschen Rechten zwischen 1890 und 1945 (Düsseldorf: Droste, 1991).Google Scholar
  27. Josef Seiter, Blutigrot und silbrig hell. Bild, Symbolik und Agitation der frühen sozialdemokratischen Arbeiterbewegung in Österreich (Wien: Böhlau 1991).Google Scholar
  28. Victoria E. Bonnell, Iconography of Power: Soviet Political Posters under Lenin and Stalin (Berkeley: University of California Press 1999).Google Scholar
  29. 27.
    See W. J. T. Mitchell, “The Pictorial Turn,” chapter 1 in Picture Theory (Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1994).Google Scholar
  30. Nicholas Mirzoeff, An Introduction to Visual Culture (London and New York: Routledge, 1999).Google Scholar
  31. 28.
    Irit Rogoff, “Studying Visual Culture,” in Nicholas Mirzoeff, ed., Visual Culture Reader (Routledge: New York, 1998), 24–36.Google Scholar
  32. See also Kathrin Fahlenbrach, “Studentenrevolte. Mediale Protestbilder der Studentenbewegung,” in Gerhard Paul, ed., Das Jahrhundert der Bilder. Bildatlas 1949 bis heute (Göttingen: Vandenhoek & Ruprecht, 2008), 362–370.Google Scholar
  33. Michael Diers, Schlagbilder. Zur politischen Ikonographie der Gegenwart (Frankfurt am Main: Fischer, 1997).Google Scholar
  34. 29.
    Murray Edelman, The Symbolic Uses of Politics (Urbana: University of Illinois Press, 1964).Google Scholar
  35. Ulrich Sarcinelli, Symbolische Politik. Zur Bedeutung symbolischer Politik in der Wahlkampfkommunikation der Bundesrepublik Deutschland (Opladen: Westdeutscher Verlag, 1987).Google Scholar
  36. 30.
    Benjamin Burkhardt, “Politikwissenschaftliche Bildforschung—eine Skizze,” in Matthias Bruhn and Karsten Borgmann, eds, Sichtbarkeit der Geschichte: Beiträge zu einer Historiografie der Bilder (Berlin: Clio-online und Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, 2005), 101–110.Google Scholar
  37. Marion G. Müller, Grundlagen der visuellen Kommunikation (Konstanz: UVK, 2003).Google Scholar
  38. Martin Warnke, “Politische Ikonographie. Hinweise auf eine sichtbare Politik,” in Claus Leggewie, ed., Wozu Politikwissenschaft? Über das Neue in der Politik (Darmstadt: Wissenschaftliche Buchgesellschaft, 1997), 170–178.Google Scholar
  39. 32.
    See, for instance, Herfried Münkler, “Die Visibilität der Macht und die Strategien der Machtvisualisierung,” in Gerhard Göhler, ed., Macht der Öffentlichkeit—Öffentlichkeit der Macht Nomos: Baden-Baden, 1995).Google Scholar
  40. Tom Holert, ed., Imagineering. Visuelle Kultur und Politik der Sichtbarkeit (Bonn: Oktagon, 2000).Google Scholar
  41. Bryan C. Taylor, “‘Our Bruised Arms Hung Up as Monuments’: Nuclear Iconography in Post-Cold War Culture,” Critical Studies in Media Communication 20/1 (2003).Google Scholar
  42. Thomas Olesen, “The Porous Public and the Transnational Dialectic: The Muhammed Cartoons Conflict,” Acta Sociologica 50/3 (2007), 295–308.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. 34.
    See John Rajchman, “Foucault’s Art of Seeing,” October 44 (1988).Google Scholar
  44. 34.
    Holert, Imagineering; Hebdidge, Subculture; Tom Holert and Mark Terkessidis, Fliehkraft—Gesellschaft in Bewegung—Von Migranten und Touristen (Köln: Kiepenheuer und Witsch, 2006); Marion Von Osten, “Producing Publics—Making Worlds! Zum Verhältnis von Kunstöffentlichkeit und Gegenöffentlichkeit,” in Gerald Raunig and Ulf Wuggenig, eds, Publicum, Theorien der Öffentlichkeit, republicart 5 (Turia + Kant, Wien, 2005), 124–139.Google Scholar
  45. Marion Von Osten, “Producing Publics—Making Worlds! Zum Verhältnis von Kunstöffentlichkeit und Gegenöffentlichkeit,” in Gerald Raunig and Ulf Wuggenig, eds, Publicum, Theorien der Öffentlichkeit, republicart 5 (Turia + Kant, Wien, 2005), 124–139.Google Scholar
  46. 35.
    Marion Von Osten, “Producing Publics”; Alice Cantaluppi, Elke Aus dem Moore, eds, Maskharat—Strategien der Maskerade in der zeitgenössischen Kunst (Stuttgart: Künstlerhaus Stuttgart, 2007).Google Scholar
  47. Alice Cantaluppi, Isabell Reiss, and Anna Voswinckel, “Lost and Found—Von Verlusten und Strategien der kulturellen Selbstermächtigung,” Catalogue of the exhibition “Lost and Found,” Shedhalle Zurich, May-July 2007.Google Scholar
  48. 36.
    Cf. Paula A. Treichler, Lisa Cartwright, and Constance Penley, The Visible Woman: Imaging Technologies, Gender and Science (New York and London: New York University Press, 1998).Google Scholar
  49. Maneesha Deckha, “Disturbing Images. Peta and the Feminist Ethics of Animal Advocacy,” Ethics & the Environment 13/2 (2008), 35–76.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. 39.
    Stuart Hall, “Encoding/Decoding,” in Stuart Hall, Dorothy Hobson, Andrew Lowe, and Paul Willis, eds, Culture, Media, Language. Working Papers in Cultural Studies, 1972–1979 (London: Routledge, 2004), 128–138.Google Scholar
  51. 40.
    See Gillian Rose, Visual Methodologies (London: Sage, 2007).Google Scholar
  52. Marion G. Müller and Esra Özcan, “The Political Iconography of Muhammad Cartoons: Understanding Cultural Conflict and Political Action,” Politics and Society 4 (2007), 287–291.Google Scholar
  53. 42.
    Aleida Assmann, “Aufmerksamkeit im Zeitalter der Bilderflut,” lecture given at the University of Konstanz, Studium Generale Wintersemester, 2006/2007). Unpublished document provided by the author.Google Scholar
  54. 45.
    See, for instance, Morley Winograd and Michael Hais, Millennial Makeover: My Space, YouTube & the Future of American Politics (New Brunswick: Rutgers University Press, 2008).Google Scholar
  55. 46.
    Erving Goffman, The Presentation of Self in Everyday Life (New York: Anchor, 1956).Google Scholar
  56. 47.
    Alberto Melucci, Challenging Codes (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1996).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  57. 50.
    David D. Perlmutter and Gretchen L. Wagner “The Anatomy of a Photojournalistic Icon: Marginalization of Dissent in the Selection and Framing of a ‘Death in Genoa,’” Visual Communication 3/1 (2004), 91–108.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Kathrin Fahlenbrach, Martin Klimke, Joachim Scharloth, and Laura Wong 2012

Authors and Affiliations

  • Nicole Doerr
  • Simon Teune

There are no affiliations available

Personalised recommendations