“‘A mixed young lady, rather’”: Melodrama, Technology, and Dis/Embodied Sensation in A Laodicean

  • Richard Nemesvari

Abstract

As with Desperate Remedies, A Laodicean comes ready-made with a biographical anecdote that has proven useful for critics to explain (away) its melodrama and sensationalism. In his 1896 Preface Hardy observes that “[t]he writing of the tale was rendered memorable to two persons, at least, by a tedious illness of five months that laid hold of the author soon after the story was begun in a well-known magazine; during which period the narrative had to be strenuously continued by dictation to a predetermined cheerful ending.”1 This brief description is then expanded upon considerably in the Life.

Keywords

Sensational Body Disciplinary Regime Genre Expectation Ambivalent Agency Modern Spirit 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Notes

  1. 1.
    Thomas Hardy, “Preface,” ALaodicean. 1912. (New York: AMS P, 1984) vii.Google Scholar
  2. 3.
    Jane Gatewood, “Introduction,” A Laodicean (Oxford: Oxford UP, 1991) xvi.Google Scholar
  3. 4.
    Arthur McDowall, Thomas Hardy: A Critical Study (London: Faber and Faber, 1931) 7.Google Scholar
  4. 8.
    Thomas Postlewait, “From Melodrama to Realsim: The Suspect History of American Drama,” Melodrama: The Cultural Emergence of a Genre, eds. Michael Hayes and Anastasia Nikolopoulou (New York: St. Martin’s P, 1996) 54.Google Scholar
  5. 9.
    Thomas Hardy, A Laodicean (Oxford: Oxford UP, 1991) 50.Google Scholar
  6. 12.
    Anna Maria Jones, Problem Novels: Victorian Fiction Theorizes the Sensational Self (Columbus: Ohio State UP, 2007) 14.Google Scholar
  7. 15.
    Peter Widdowson, “Hardy’s ‘Quite Worthless’ Novel: ALaodicean,” On Thomas Hardy: Late Essays and Earlier (Houndmills, Basingstoke: Macmillan, 1998) 111.Google Scholar
  8. 19.
    Jay Clayton, Charles Dickens in Cyberspace: The Afterlife of the Nineteenth Century in Postmodern Culture (Oxford: Oxford UP, 2003) 70.Google Scholar
  9. 21.
    Keep, Christopher, “‘An Unintelligible Language’: Telegraphy and Technological Fetishism in A Laodicean,” unpublished paper delivered at the Hardy at Yale conference, June 16, 2007.Google Scholar
  10. 23.
    Iwan Rhys Morus, “The Electric Ariel: Telegraphy and Commercial Culture in Early Victorian England,” Victorian Studies, 39.3 (1996): 339–340.Google Scholar
  11. 25.
    Roger Ebbatson, “A Laodicean: Hardy and the Philosophy of Money,” Thomas Hardy and Contemporary Literary Studies, eds. Tim Dolin and Peter Widdowson (Houndmills, Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan, 2004) 85.Google Scholar
  12. 30.
    John Donne, Ofthe Progress of the Soul: The Second Anniversary, John Donne: The Complete English Poems, ed. A. J. Smith (Harmondsworth, Middlesex: Penguin, 1971) 293–294, ll. 241–246.Google Scholar
  13. 31.
    Ruth Bernard Yeazell, Fictions of Modesty: Women and Courtship in the English Novel (Chicago: U of Chicago P, 1991) 74.Google Scholar
  14. 32.
    William A. Cohen, “Faciality and Sensation in Hardy’s The Return of the Native,” PMLA 121.1 (March 2006): 439.Google Scholar
  15. 33.
    Gilles Deleuze and Félix Guattari, A Thousand Plateaus, vol.2 of Capitalism and Schizophrenia, trans. Brian Massumi (Minneapolis: U of Minnesota P, 1987) 178, 181.Google Scholar
  16. 41.
    Giles Deleuze and Claire Parnet, Dialogues II, trans. Hugh Tomlinson and Barbara Habberjam (New York: Columbia UP, 2002) 41.Google Scholar
  17. 44.
    Jil Larson, Ethics and Narrative in the English Novel, 1880–1914 (Cambridge: Cambridge UP, 2001) 70.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Richard Nemesvari 2011

Authors and Affiliations

  • Richard Nemesvari

There are no affiliations available

Personalised recommendations