Byron, Polidori, and the Epistemology of Romantic Pleasure

  • Richard C. Sha
Chapter
Part of the Nineteenth-Century Major Lives and Letters book series (19CMLL)

Abstract

Pleasure in Romanticism provided the very basis of moral theory. Locke not only insisted that all action is directed towards pleasure and the avoidance of pain (Foot 83), but he also linked pleasure with good, and pain with evil.1 Jeremy Bentham believed so strongly in the motivating force of pleasure that he went so far as to invent a means of calculating it, his infamous felicific calculus. Immanuel Kant linked pleasure with self-interest and mere empirical knowledge, and this meant not only that pleasure was potentially selfish, but also that, unless it could be universally shared, it was not knowledge. Pleasure could be a form of knowledge only when it was apprehended in terms of purposiveness (Kant 68). The pleasurable sensation of beauty could become knowledge only if one thought of its sensuousness as if it were designed, without assuming any actual designer. By linking form with purposiveness, the inescapably subjective feelings of pleasure could be transformed into necessary and shareable knowledge. Kant thus made pleasure central to his moral theory, stipulating that feeling good could often be at odds with moral knowledge.

Keywords

Moral Theory Moral Good Pleasurable Sensation Break Heart Syllable Count 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in to check access.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Works Cited

  1. Bersani, Leo. The Freudian Body. Psychoanalysis and Art. New York: Columbia UP, 1986. Print.Google Scholar
  2. Burke, Edmund. A Philosophical Inquiry into the Origins of Our Ideas of the Sublime and Beautiful. New York: PP Collier, 1969. Print.Google Scholar
  3. Catlow, Lawrence. “Fact, Imagination, and Memory in Horace: ‘Odes’ 1.9.” Greece and Rome. 23. 1 (April 1976): 74–81. Print.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Crompton, Louis. Byron and Greek Love. London: Faber and Faber, 1985. Print.Google Scholar
  5. Elfenbein, Andrew. Romantic Genius. New York: Columbia UP, 1999. Print. Foot, Philippa. “Locke, Hume, and Modern Moral Theory: A Legacy of Seventeenth- and Eighteenth-Century Philosophies of Mind.” The Languages of Psyche. Ed. George S. Rousseau. Berkeley: U of California P, 1990. 81–104. Print.Google Scholar
  6. Holmes, Richard. The Age of Wonder: How the R omantie Generation Discovered the Beauty and Terror of Science. London: HarperPress, 2008. Print.Google Scholar
  7. Hume, David. A Treatise of Human Nature. London: Penguin Books, 1984. Print.Google Scholar
  8. Jackson, Noel. Science and Sensation in Romantic Poetry. Cambridge: Cambridge UP, 2008. Print.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Kant, Immanuel. Critique of Judgment. Trans. Werner S. Pluhar. Indianapolis: Hackett Publishing, 1987. Print.Google Scholar
  10. Lockridge, Laurence. The Ethics of Romanticism. Cambridge: Cambridge UP, 1989. Print.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. MacCarthy, Fiona. Byron: Life and Legend. New York: Farrar, Straus and Giroux, 2002. Print.Google Scholar
  12. Mack, Ruth. Literary Historicity: Literature and Historical Experience in Eighteenth-Century Fiction. Stanford, CA: Stanford UP, 2009. Print.Google Scholar
  13. Marchand, Leslie. Byron: A Biography. 3 vols. New York: Alfred Knopf, 1957. Print.Google Scholar
  14. Marchand, Leslie., ed. Byron’s Letters and Journals. 11 vols. Cambridge, MA: Harvard UP, 1973–81. Print.Google Scholar
  15. McGann, Jerome J., Byron, Lord. Childe Harold’s Pilgrimage. Lord Byron: The Complete Poetical Works. 7 vols. Oxford: Oxford UP, 1980–93. Vol. 2. Print.Google Scholar
  16. Milton, John. Complete Poems and Major Prose. Ed. Merritt Y. Hughes. Indianapolis: Bobbs-Merrill, 1957. Print.Google Scholar
  17. Pfau, Thomas. Romantic Moods: Paranoia, Trauma, and Melancholy, 1790–1840. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins UP, 2005. Print.Google Scholar
  18. Pinch, Adela. Strange Fits of Passion: Epistemologies of Emotion, Hume to Austen. Stanford, CA: Stanford UP, 1996. Print.Google Scholar
  19. Polidori, John William. The Diary of Dr. John William Polidori 1816. Ed. William Michael Rossetti. London: Elkin Mathews, 1911. Print.Google Scholar
  20. Polidori, John William. An Essay on the Source of Positive Pleasure. London: Longman, 1818. Print.Google Scholar
  21. Richardson, Alan. “Rethinking Romantic Incest: Human Universals, Literary Representation, and the Biology of Mind.” New Literary History 31.3 (2000): 553–72. Print.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Rudd, Niall, ed. and trans. Horace: Odes and Epodes. Cambridge, MA: Harvard UP, 2004. Print.Google Scholar
  23. Schliefer, Ronald. Intangible Materialism: The Body, Scientific Knowledge, and the Power of Language. Minneapolis: U of Minnesota P, 2009. Print.Google Scholar
  24. Sha, Richard C. Perverse Romanticism: Aesthetics and Sexuality in Britain, 1750–1832. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins UP, 2009. Print.Google Scholar
  25. Viets, Henry R. “John William Polidori, MD and Lord Byron—A Brief Interlude in 1816.” The New England Journal of Medicine 264.11 (1961): 553–7. Print.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. West, David. Horace Odes I: Carpe Diem. Oxford: Clarendon P, 1995. Print.Google Scholar
  27. Wilson, Leonard G. “Fevers.” Companion Encyclopedia of the History of Medicine. Ed. W. F. Bynum and Roy Porter. Vol. 1. London: Routledge, 1993. 382–411. Print.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Thomas H. Schmid and Michelle Faubert 2010

Authors and Affiliations

  • Richard C. Sha

There are no affiliations available

Personalised recommendations