Abstract
Imagine A Radical Movement That Had Suffered An Emphatic Defeat. So emphatic, in fact, that it seemed unlikely to resurface for the length of a lifetime, if at all. As time wore on, the beliefs of this movement might begin to seem less false or ineffectual than simply irrelevant. For its opponents, it would be less a matter of hotly contesting these doctrines than of contemplating them with something of the mild antiquarian interest one might have previously reserved for Ptolemaic cosmology or the scholasticism of Thomas Aquinas. Radicals might come to find themselves less overwhelmed or out-argued than simply washed up, speaking a language so quaintly out of tune with their era that, as with the language of Platonism or courtly love, nobody even bothered any longer to ask whether it was true. What would be the likely response of the left to such a dire condition?
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
Similar content being viewed by others
Editor information
Copyright information
© 2010 Terry Eagleton
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Eagleton, T. (2010). Where Do Postmodernists Come From?. In: Sitton, J.F. (eds) Marx Today. Palgrave Macmillan, New York. https://doi.org/10.1057/9780230117457_12
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/9780230117457_12
Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, New York
Print ISBN: 978-0-230-10241-5
Online ISBN: 978-0-230-11745-7
eBook Packages: Palgrave Political & Intern. Studies CollectionPolitical Science and International Studies (R0)