Civility and Academic Life

  • Norman G. Finkelstein
Chapter
Part of the Education, Politics, and Public Life book series (EPPL)

Abstract

The notion of academic freedom captures several distinct claims. It asserts that academic peers are best placed to judge scholarly competence and accordingly that on all such professional matters they should be granted autonomy. This component of academic freedom is designed to preempt extrascholarly considerations from tainting employment decisions. Beyond the right to professional autonomy, academic freedom also asserts that pursuit of the life of the mind requires complete liberty of thought. Insofar as the academic community is devoted to the discovery of truth, its mission cannot be realized, as every reader of John Stuart Mill knows, if barriers restrict the mind from meandering down paths of inquiry less traveled. The right of an academic to liberty of thought additionally means that outside the professional setting, scholars should enjoy the ordinary rights of a democratic citizen to speak their minds and accordingly that extramural utterances should not bear on the assessment of professional competence. Historically, the great battles over academic freedom in the United States were fought first to free university life from the hold of clerical bias (sponsored by private denominations, American colleges were originally the “ward of religion”), then economic bias (in particular, corporate interference),1 and then political bias (the periodic Red Scares climaxing in McCarthyism [Schrecker]).

Keywords

Affirmative Action Academic Freedom Professional Competence Academic Life Professional Autonomy 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in to check access.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Works Cited

  1. Bartov, Omer. “A Tale of Two Holocausts.” Rev. of The Holocaust Industry: Reflections on the Exploitation of Jewish Suffering, by Norman G. Finkelstein. New York Times 6 Aug. 2000, Sunday late ed., sec. 7: 8.Google Scholar
  2. Burg, Avraham. The Holocaust Is Over; We Must Rise from Its Ashes. New York: Palgrave Macmillan, 2008.Google Scholar
  3. Chomsky, Noam. Turning the Tide: U.S. Intervention in Central America and the Struggle for Peace. Cambridge: South End, 1985.Google Scholar
  4. “Decision of Justice McGeehan.” Dewey and Kallen, Appendix I. 213–25.Google Scholar
  5. “DePaul Dean Slams Finkelstein.” Blog.Camera.org. 12 Apr. 2007. Snapshots: A Camera Blog. 27 Mar. 2010 <http://blog.camera.org/archives/2007/04/depaul_dean_slams_finkelstein.html>.
  6. Dewey, John. “Social Realities versus Police Court Fictions.” Dewey and Kallen 57–74.Google Scholar
  7. Dewey, John, and Horace M. Kallen, eds. 1941. The Bertrand Russell Case. New York: Da Capo, 1972.Google Scholar
  8. Eliot, Charles William. Addresses at the Inauguration of Charles William Eliot as President of Harvard College: Tuesday, Oct. 19, 1869. 27 Mar. 2010 <http://hul.harvard.edu/huarc/eliot_inaug.html>.
  9. Finkelstein, Norman G. Beyond Chutzpah: On the Misuse of Anti-Semitism and the Abuse of History. 2005. Berkeley: U of California P, 2008.Google Scholar
  10. Finkelstein, Norman G. The Holocaust Industry: Reflections on the Exploitation of Jewish Suffering. 2nd ed. [revised and expanded]. New York: Verso, 2003.Google Scholar
  11. Foner, Philip S. When Karl Marx Died: Comments in 1883. New York: International, 1973.Google Scholar
  12. Gandhi, Mahatma. The Collected Works of Mahatma Gandhi. Vol. 64. Ahmedabad: Publications Division, Ministry of Information and Broadcasting, Government of India, 1976.Google Scholar
  13. Gates, Jr., Henry Louis. “Critical Race Theory and Freedom of Speech.” Menand, Future 119–59.Google Scholar
  14. Goodman, Amy. “It Takes an Enormous Amount of Courage to Speak the Truth When No One Else is Out There”—World-Renowned Holocaust, Israel Scholars Defend DePaul Professor Norman Finkelstein as He Fights for Tenur[e] [sic].” Democracy Now.org. 9 May 2007. 27 Mar. 2010 <http://www.democracynow.org/2007/5/9/it_takes_an_enormous_amount_of>.
  15. Hofstadter, Richard, and Walter P. Metzger. The Development of Academic Freedom in the United States. New York: Columbia UP, 1955.Google Scholar
  16. Holtschneider, Dennis. Letter to Norman Finkelstein. 8 June 2007.Google Scholar
  17. Kallen, Horace M. “Behind the Bertrand Russell Case.” Dewey and Kallen 13–53.Google Scholar
  18. Marx, Karl. Capital: A Critique of Political Economy, Vol. 1 (Das Kapital). New York: Penguin, 1976.Google Scholar
  19. Marx, Karl. “Preface to the French Edition.” 1872. Marx, Capital 104.Google Scholar
  20. Menand, Louis, ed. The Future of Academic Freedom. Chicago: U of Chicago P, 1996.Google Scholar
  21. Marx, Karl. “The Limits of Academic Freedom.” Menand, Future 3–20.Google Scholar
  22. Mill, John Stuart. On Liberty. 1859. Ed. Gertrude Himmelfarb. New York: Penguin, 1974.Google Scholar
  23. Mishani, Dror, and Aurelia Smotriez. “What Sort of Frenchmen Are They?” American Renaissance.com. 17 Nov. 2005. Haaretz. 27 Mar. 2010 <http://www.amren.com/mtnews/archives/2005/11/what_sort_of_frenchmen_are_the.php>. Modern Times. Dir. Charles Chaplin. Perf. Charles Chaplin, Paulette Goddard, Henry Bergman, and Tiny Sandford. Charles Chaplin Productions, 1936.
  24. Plato. The Republic. Trans. Benjamin Jowett. Ed. Scott Buchanan. New York: Viking, 1977.Google Scholar
  25. Reich, Tova. My Holocaust. New York: Harper, 2007.Google Scholar
  26. Russell, Bertrand. Autobiography. London: Routledge, 1998.Google Scholar
  27. Russell, Bertrand. Marriage and Morals. 1929. New York: Norton, 1970.Google Scholar
  28. Russell, Bertrand. Why I Am Not a Christian, and Other Essays on Religion and Related Subjects. Ed. Paul Edwards. New York: Allen, 1957.Google Scholar
  29. “The Russell Case.” Editorial. New York Times 20 Apr. 1940: 10.Google Scholar
  30. Said, Edward W. “Identity, Authority, and Freedom: The Potentate and the Traveler.” Menand, Future 214–28.Google Scholar
  31. Schrecker, Ellen W. No Ivory Tower: McCarthyism and the Universities. New York: Oxford UP, 1986.Google Scholar
  32. Schumpeter, Joseph Alois. Capitalism, Socialism and Democracy. New York: Harper, 1947.Google Scholar
  33. Seigel, Jerrold. Marx’s Fate: The Shape of a Life. Princeton: Princeton UP, 1978.Google Scholar
  34. Shavit, Ari. “Survival of the Fittest: Interview with Benny Morris.” CounterPunch. org. 16 Jan. 2004. Haaretz. 27 Mar. 2010 <http://www.counterpunch.org/shavit01162004.html>.
  35. Trivers, Robert. “Deceit and Self-Deception.” Mind the Gap: Tracing the Origins of Human Universals. Ed. Peter M. Rappeler and Joan Silk. Springer: Heidelberg, 2009. 373–94.Google Scholar
  36. Washburne, Carleton. “The Case As a School Administrator Sees It.” Dewey and Kallen 157–67.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Edward J. Carvalho and David B. Downing 2010

Authors and Affiliations

  • Norman G. Finkelstein

There are no affiliations available

Personalised recommendations