Advertisement

Responding to Climate Disaster: The Cosmopolitan Challenge to China

  • Paul G. Harris
Part of the Environmental Politics and Theory book series (EPT)

Abstract

The 1992 Framework Convention on Climate Change aims for “stabilization of greenhouse gas [GHG] concentrations in the atmosphere at a level that would prevent dangerous anthropogenic interference with the climate system” (UNFCCC 1992: Article 2). To achieve this objective, governments have agreed that climate change is a common but differentiated responsibility: all countries are responsible for doing something about climate change, but the affluent ones, which are the largest historical polluters of the atmosphere, are obligated to act first to reduce their emissions of GHGs before the developing countries are required to limit theirs. Diplomats heeded recommendations of philosophers and experts on international cooperation who saw international justice as essential to an effective and fair climate change regime. Some governments have started to act on their obligations, as reflected in recent efforts by some European states to limit their GHG emissions (Harris 2006; 2007b). However, these efforts have been tiny compared to what is required. Nearly every day we are confronted with news about the increasing impacts of global climate change. By any reasonable measure, anthropogenic interference with the atmospheric commons is already dangerous, contributing to environmental damage and human suffering, especially in the poorest parts of the world (IPCC 2007).

Keywords

Climate Change Poor Country Climate Justice Wealthy People International Justice 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Agarwal, Anil, and Sunita Narain. 1990. Global Warming in an Unequal World: A Case of Environmental Colonialism. New Delhi: Centre for Science and Environment.Google Scholar
  2. Attfield, Robin. 1999. The Ethics of the Global Environment. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.Google Scholar
  3. Attfield, Robin. 2003. Environmental Ethics. Cambridge: Polity Press.Google Scholar
  4. Baer, Paul et al. 2000. “Equity and Greenhouse Gas Responsibility,” Science 289 (September 29, 2000): 22–87.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Barry, Brian. 1998. “International Society from a Cosmopolitan Perspective.” In International Society: Diverse Ethical Perspectives, edited by D. R. Mapel and T. Nardin. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
  6. Beitz, Charles R. 1979. Political Theory and International Relations. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
  7. Caney, Simon. 2005. “Cosmopolitan Justice, Responsibility, and Climate Change,” Leiden Journal of International Law 18: 754–755.Google Scholar
  8. Caney, Simon. 2006. “Cosmopolitan Justice, Rights and Global Climate Change,” Canadian Journal of Law and Jurisprudence 19: 255–278.Google Scholar
  9. China Daily. 2004. “China to Have 140 Million Cars by 2020,” China Daily, 4 September; http://www.chinadaily.com.cn/english/doc/2004-09/04/content_371641.htm.
  10. Cochran, Molly. 1999. Normative Theory in International Relations: A Pragmatic Approach. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Cronin, Ciaran, and Pablo De Greiff. 2002. “Introduction: Normative Responses to Current Challenges of Global Governance.” In Global Justice and Transnational Politics: Essays on the Moral and Political Challenges of Globalization, edited by C. Cronin and P. De Greiff. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
  12. Dyer, Gwynne. 2006. “Adding Fuel to the Fire,” South China Morning Post, 21 April: A15.Google Scholar
  13. The Economist. 2005. “Cars in China: Dream Machines,” The Economist, 2 June 2005; http://www.economist.com/business/displaystory.cfm?story_id=4032842.
  14. Gallagher, Kelly S. 2006. China Shifts Gears: Automakers, Oil, Pollution, and Development. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
  15. Gardiner, Stephen M. 2004. “Ethics and Global Climate Change,” Ethics 114: 578–583.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Garner, Jonathan. 2006. The Rise of the Chinese Consumer: Theory and Evidence. Chichester, UK: John Wiley and Sons.Google Scholar
  17. Harris, Paul G. 2001. International Equity and Global Environmental Politics. Alder-shot, UK: Ashgate.Google Scholar
  18. Harris, Paul G. 2003. “Fairness, Responsibility, and Climate Change,” Ethics and International Affairs 17: 149–156.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Harris, Paul G. 2006. “Europe and Environmental Change: Sharing the Burdens of Global Warming,” Colorado Journal of International Environmental Law and Policy 17: 309–355.Google Scholar
  20. Harris, Paul G. 2007a. “Collective Action on Climate Change: The Logic of Regime Failure,” Natural Resources Journal 47: 195–224.Google Scholar
  21. Harris, Paul G, ed. 2007b. Europe and Global Climate Change. Cheltenham, UK: Edward Elgar.Google Scholar
  22. Harris, Paul G. (2008a.) “Climate Change and Global Citizenship.” Law and Policy 30, 4: 481–501.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Harris, Paul G. 2008b. “Climate Change and the Impotence of International Environmental Law: Seeking a Cosmopolitan Cure.” Penn State Environmental Law Review 16, 2: 323–368.Google Scholar
  24. Harris, Paul G. 2010. World Ethics and Climate Change: From International to Global Justice. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.Google Scholar
  25. Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC). 2007. Climate Change 2007: Synthesis Report, <http://www.ipcc.ch/ipccreports/ar4-syr.htm>.
  26. International Herald Tribune. 2006. “How Dare They Use Our Oil!” (editorial), International Herald Tribune, 21 April: 6.Google Scholar
  27. Jamieson, Dale. 1997. “Global Responsibilities: Ethics, Public Health, and Global Environmental Change,” Indiana Journal of Global Legal Studies 5: 99–119.Google Scholar
  28. Mellor, William, and Allen T. Cheng. 2006. “To Get Rich Is Glorious and Risky,” International Herald, Tribune, 24 May: 21.Google Scholar
  29. Moellendorf, Darrel. 2002. Cosmopolitan Justice. Boulder, CO: Westview.Google Scholar
  30. Myers, Norman, and Jennifer Kent. 2004. The New Consumers: The Influence of Affluence on the Environment. Washington, D.C.: Island Press.Google Scholar
  31. National Public Radio. 2005. Marketplace, August 1.Google Scholar
  32. Netherlands Environmental Assessment Agency. 2007. “China Now No. 1 in CO2 Emissions; USA in Second Position,” Press Releases, June 19; http://www.mnp.nl/en/service/pressreleases/2007/20070619ChinanownolinCO2emissions USAinsecondposition.html.
  33. Nielson, Kai. 2003. “Cosmopolitanism,” presentation to the Institute for Ethics and Public Affairs, San Diego State University, November 18; http://ethics.sdsu.edu/Past-GlobalJustice.html.
  34. Parks, Bradley C, and Roberts, J. Timmons. 2006. “Environmental and Ecological Justice.” In Palgrave Advances in International Environmental Politics, edited by M. M. Betsill, K. Hochstetler, and D. Stevis. Houndmills, UK: Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar
  35. Pogge, Thomas. 2002. “Human Rights and Human Responsibilities.” In Global Justice and Transnational Politics, edited by P. De Greiffand C. Cronin. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
  36. Pogge, Thomas. (2002.) World Poverty and Human Rights. Cambridge, UK: Polity.Google Scholar
  37. Rawls, John. 1971. A Theory of Justice. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
  38. Sachs, Wolfgang. 2001. “EcoEquity Interview with Wolfgang Sachs,” EcoEquity Website, 18 May; http://www.ecoequity.org/ceo/ceo_3_4.htm.
  39. Sachs, Wolfgang. 2004. “Environment and Human Rights,” Development 47: 42–49.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Satz, Debra. 2005. “What Do We Owe the Global Poor?” Ethics and International Affairs 19: 47–54.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Seyfang, Gill. 2005. “Shopping for Sustainability: Can Sustainable Consumption Promote Ecological Citizenship?” Environmental Politics 14: 290–306.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Shue, Henry. 1992. “The Unavoidability of Justice.” In The International Politics of the Environment, edited by A. Hurrell and B. Kingsbury. Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
  43. Shue, Henry. 1993. “Subsistence Emissions and Luxury Emissions,” Law and Policy 15: 39–59.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Shue, Henry. 1994. “Equity in an International Agreement on Climate Change.” In Equity and Social Considerations Related to Climate Change, edited by R. S. Odingo, A. L. Alusa, F. Mugo, J. K. Njihia, and A. Heidenreich. Nairobi: ICIPE Science Press.Google Scholar
  45. Shue, Henry. 1999. “Global Environment and International Inequality,” International Affairs 75: 536–537.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Singer, Peter. 1972. “Famine, Affluence and Morality,” Philosophy and Public Affairs 1: 229–243. Reprinted in World Hunger and Morality, edited by W Aiken and H. LaFollette. Upper Saddle River: Prentice Hall.Google Scholar
  47. Singer, Peter. 2003. “Books for Breakfast,” transcript of remarks to the Carnegie Council on Ethics and International Affairs, October 29; http://cceia.org/viewMedia. php/prmTemplateID/8/prmID/164.
  48. Singer, Peter. 2004. One World: The Ethics of Globalization. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
  49. United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change (UNFCCC) 9 May 1992, 1771 UNTS 107; 31 ILM 849 (1992); http://unfccc.int/resource/docs/convkp/conveng.pdf.
  50. Wilson, David. 2006. “Designs on Sustainable Development,” South China, Morning Post, 14 February: T6.Google Scholar
  51. World Resources Institute. 2006. State of the World 2006. New York: W W. Norton.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Joel Jay Kassiola and Sujian Guo 2010

Authors and Affiliations

  • Paul G. Harris

There are no affiliations available

Personalised recommendations