Globalization and its Effects on the Urban Socio-Spatial Structure of a Transfrontier Metropolis: El Paso, TX-Ciudad Juárez, Chih.-Sunland-Park, NM
Chapter
Abstract
The expansion of export processing zones, such as those located at international borders, as a result of globalization process, has produced a change in the development of economic activities with urban socio-spatial implications on both sides of the U.S.-Mexico border cities. It has been argued that the rapid urbanization of the U.S.-Mexican border cities has generated a number of serious problems on the Mexican side of the border, including lack of drinking water, inadequate water sanitation services, substandard housing, ineffective waste management, etc. (Canales, 1999). Besides, urban development has created enormous pressure on the transborderland markets (Fuentes and Cervera, 2006).
Keywords
Foreign Direct Investment Real Estate Dependency Ratio Land Market Global City
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
Reference List
- Asociación Mexicana de Parques Industriales (AMPI). 2000.Google Scholar
- Beauregard, R. and A. Haila. (2000). “The Unavoidable Continuities of the City”, in P. Marcuse and Van Kempen R. (eds), Globalizing Cities; A New Spatial Order. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
- Canales, A. (1999). “Industrialization, Urbanization and Population Growth on the Border”, Borderlines, 7(7).Google Scholar
- Castells, M. (2000). The Rise of the Network Society. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
- Fainstein, S., Gordon I. and Harloe, M. (1992). Divided Cities; New York & London in the Contemporary World. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
- Friedmann, J. (1986). “The World City Hypothesis”, Development and Change, 17, pp. 69–83.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Fuentes, C. (2001). “El manejo del suelo urbano en las ciudades fronterizas mexicanas” Comercio Exterior, 51(3), pp. 185–196.Google Scholar
- Fuentes, C. and Cervera, L. (2006). “Land Markets and its Effects on the Spatial Segregation” Estudios Fronterizos, 7(13), pp. 43–62.Google Scholar
- Guillén, T., and Rodríguez L. (1995). “Planeación y control urbanos: El Caso del Lote Bravo”, in Guillen, T. (eds.), Municipios en transición: Actores sociales y nuevas politicas de gobierno, México, Fundación Friedrich Ebert.Google Scholar
- Haila, A. (1991). “Four Types of Investment and Land Property”, International Journal of Urban and Regional Research, 15(3), pp. 343–365.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Hanson, H. G. (1996). “Economic Integration, Intraindustry Trade and Frontier Regions”, European Economic Review, 40, pp. 941–949.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Hernández, E. (2002). “Polarización económica en Tijuana”, Paradigmas, año 10 num. 39.Google Scholar
- Herzog, L. (1991). “Cross-national urban structure in the era of global cities: the U.S-Mexico transfrontier metropolis”, Urban Studies, 28(4), pp. 519–533.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Lindahl, D. P. (1995). “Change in Commercial Real Estate Finance and the Transformation of Regional Economics”, Paper presented at the meeting of the Association of American Geographers, Chicago.Google Scholar
- Logan, J. (1993). “Cycles and Trends in the Globalization of Real Estate.” In P. L. Knox (ed.), The Restless Urban Landscape, Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall, pp. 35–54.Google Scholar
- Llera, F. (2005). “El Paso del Norte Region: Who Governs the Urban Planning Process?” In Fuentes and Peña (Editors). Planeación Binacional y Cooperación Transfronteriza en al Frontera Mexico-Estados Unidos, COLEF-UACJ.Google Scholar
- Nathan, D. (2008). “Making a Killing: Land Deals and Girl Deaths on the U.S.-Mexico Border”, Newspaper Tree El Paso.Google Scholar
- Marcuse, P. (1989). “Dual City: A Muddy Metaphor for a Quartered City.” Journal of Urban and Regional Research, 13(4), pp. 697–708.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Mollenkopf and Castelles M. (1991). Dual City: Restructuring New York. New York: Russell Sage Foundation.Google Scholar
- Marcuse, P. and Van Kempen, R. (2000). “Introduction” in Marcuse P. and Van Kempen R. (editors) Globalizing Cities: A New Spatial Order, Blackwell Publishing.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Peña, S. (2002). “Land Use Planning on the USA-Mexico Border: A Comparison of the Legal Framework”, Journal of Borderlands Studies, 17(1), pp. 1–19.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Peña, S. (2005). “Recent Developments in Urban Marginality Along Mexico’s Northern Border”, Habitat International Journal, 29(2), pp. 285–301.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Peña S. and Fuentes, C. (2007). “Land Use Changes in Ciudad Juárez, Chihuahua: A System of Dynamic Model”, Estudios Fronterizos, 7(13), pp. 43–62.Google Scholar
- Pick, J. et al. (2000). “Spatial Measurament of Binationality in the Twin Cities of Ciudad Juárez, Mexico and El Paso, Texas, USA.” Proceedings of American Statistical Association, Statistical Graphics Section.Google Scholar
- Rabelo, J. (2006). “Segregación Socioespacial y Concentración del Ingreso en Tijuana, Baja California”, Doctoral Dissertation, Universidad Autónoma de Baja California.Google Scholar
- Sassen, S. (1991). The Global City: New York, London, Tokyo. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
- Sassen, S. (1998). Globalization and Its Discontents: Essays on the New Mobility of People and Money. New York: The New Press.Google Scholar
- Sassen, S. (2007). Ed. Deciphering the Global: Its Scales, Spaces, and Subjects. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
- Savitch, H. V. (1995). The Emergence of Global Cities. Urban Affairs Review, 31(1), pp. 137–142.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Várgas. L. (2001). “Maquiladoras: Impact on the Texas Border Cities”, Business Frontier, Federal Reserve Bank of Dallas, Branch El Paso, pp. 25–29.Google Scholar
- Ward, P. M. (1999). Colonias and Public Policy in Texas and Mexico: Urbanization by Stealth. University of Texas Press.Google Scholar
Copyright information
© Kathleen Staudt, César M. Fuentes, and Julia E. Monárrez Fragoso 2010