Abstract
The practicality of this proposal for a limited federal world government is based upon one simple but profound insight: it is possible to create a meaningful and effective federal government without requiring its component political units to be militarily defenseless, and without forbidding them from detaching themselves from the union if that is their wish. Needless to emphasize, few national governments in the contemporary world would be comfortable about explicitly authorizing their subsidiary units (states, provinces, districts, and so on) to maintain whatever military forces they desire, and to declare their independence from the nation whenever they desire. Such liberties are commonly perceived as contradictory to the core principle of national sovereignty. The armed forces of subsidiary political units are typically regarded as potential threats to the authority of the national government. And history is littered with examples similar to the U.S. Civil War of 1861–1865, precipitated by unauthorized declarations of independence by the Southern states. These declarations were regarded as treasonous and were met with force.
Keywords
Vote Weight Federal World National Sovereignty Poor Nation Rich NationPreview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
Notes
- 1.Derek Heater, World Citizenship and Government: Cosmopolitan Ideas in the History of Western Political Thought (New York: St. Martin’s Press, 1996).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 2.Edith Wynner and Georgia Lloyd, Searchlight on Peace Plans: Choose Your Road to World Government (New York: Dutton, 1944).Google Scholar
- 3.Joseph P. Baratta, The Politics of World Federation, Volume I: United Nations, UN Reform, Atomic Control, Volume II: From World Federalism to Global Governance (Westport, CT: Praeger, 2004).Google Scholar
- 4.Emery Reves, The Anatomy of Peace, (New York: Harper, 1945).Google Scholar
- 5.Giuseppe Borgese, Foundations of the World Republic (1953).Google Scholar
- 7.Errol E. Harris One World or None: Prescription for Survival (Atlantic Highlands, NJ: Humanities Press, 1993).Google Scholar
- Errol E. Harris and James A. Yunker, eds., Toward Genuine Global Governance: Critical Reactions to “Our Global Neighborhood” (Westport, CT: Praeger, 1999).Google Scholar
- 8.Fremont Rider, The Great Dilemma of World Organization (New York: Reynal and Hitchcock, 1946).Google Scholar
- 9.David Christensen, Healing the World: A Primer about the World and How We Must Fix It for Our Children (Bloomington, IN: Universe, 2005), pp. 174–175.Google Scholar
- 10.Rollin S. Armour, Islam, Christianity and the West: A Troubled History (Maryknoll, NY: Orbis Books, 2002).Google Scholar
- Andrew Wheatcroft, Infidels: A History of the Conflict between Christendom and Islam (New York: Random House, 2005).Google Scholar