Advertisement

Recalling the Legacy of the 1985 Trial of the Military in Argentina

  • Mario Di Paolantonio
Part of the Perspectives on Comparative Politics book series (PCP)

Abstract

As Argentina moved toward democracy in 1983, a legal process was also set in motion to account for the dictatorship’s repressive strategy and to symbolically mark the turn to democracy. In 1985, this process led to the socalled “Trial of the Military,” which remarkably brought before the law the nine junta leaders deemed responsible for violations committed during the 1976–1983 military regime, which were discussed in Chapter 2. In light of the social divisions and conflicts that the Trial of the Military brought to the fore, igniting various military rebellions, the trial appears to illustrate why domestically prosecuting perpetrators of a prior regime is fraught with conflict, provides no clear benefits, and should be avoided. However, rather than dismiss the trial as an inevitably flawed enterprise, I want to propose that the legacy of the trials is both instructive and formative. In this chapter, I consider how the very failure and betrayed hopes of the 1985 Trial of the Military in Argentina provided civil society with the impetus for the ongoing work of righting past wrongs and restructuring the normative dimension of democracy in Argentina.

Keywords

Civil Society Criminal Responsibility Democratic Transition Military Officer Civilian Court 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Braun, Julia, and Maria Lucila Pelento. 1989. “Les vicissitudes de la pulsion de savoir dans certains deuils speciaux” In Violence d’ e’tat et psychanalyse, ed. Janine Puget. Paris: Bordas.Google Scholar
  2. Brysk, Alison. 1995. The Politics of Human Rights in Argentina: Protest, Change, and Democratization. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
  3. CELS. 1996. Informe anual sobre la situacion de los derechos humanos en la Argentina 1995. Buenos Aires: CELS.Google Scholar
  4. CELS. 2000. Derechos humanos Argentina informe anual 2000. Buenos Aires: ELS/EUDEBA.Google Scholar
  5. Nunca Mas: The Report of the Argentine National Commission on the Disappeared. 1986. New York: Farrar Straus Giroux.Google Scholar
  6. Feitlowitz, Marguerite. 1998. A Lexicon of Terror: Argentina and the Legacies of Torture. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  7. Gray, Evan. 1986. “Human Rights: Conviction of Former Argentine Military Commanders for Human Rights Abuses Committed by Subordinates: Decision of the Argentine National Chamber of Federal Criminal and Correctional Appeals.” Harvard International Law Journal 27:688–698.Google Scholar
  8. Human Rights Watch. 2001. Argentina: Reluctant Partner. Available at: http://www.nuncamas.org/investig/hrw_121201_08.htm.Google Scholar
  9. Kaiser, Susana. 2002. “Escraches: Demonstrations, Communication and Political Memory in Post-Dictatorial Argentina.” Media, Culture & Society 24:499–516.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Mignone, Emilio. F. 1992. “Beyond Fear: Forms of Justice and Compensation.” In Fear at the Edge: State Terror and Resistance in Latin America, ed. Juan Corradi, Patricia Weiss Fagen, and Manuel Antornio Garreton. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.Google Scholar
  11. Nino, Carlos Santiago. 1996. Radical Evil on Trial. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
  12. Osiel, Mark. 1997. Mass Atrocity, Collective Memory, and the Law. New Brunswick, NJ: Transaction Publishers.Google Scholar
  13. Osiel, Mark. 1986. “The Making of Human Rights Policy in Argentina: The Impact of Ideas and Interests on a Legal Conflict.” Journal of Latin American Studies 18:135–80.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Peruzzotti, Enrique. 2002. “Towards a New Politics: Citizenship and Rights in Contemporary Argentina.” Citizenship Studies 16:77–93.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Roniger, Luis, and Mario Sznajder. 1999. The Legacy of Human-Rights Violations in the Southern Cone: Argentina, Chile, and Uruguay. New York: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Roniger, Luis, and Mario Sznajder. 1998. “The Politics of Memory and Oblivion in Redemocratized Argentina and Uruguay.” History and Memory 10:133–169.Google Scholar
  17. Skaar, Elin. 2001. “Judicial Independence and Human Rights Policies in Argentina and Chile.” Working Paper 15. Bergen: C. Michelsen Institute.Google Scholar
  18. Smulovitz, Catalina. 2002. “The Discovery of Law: Political Consequences in the Argentine Case. In Global Prescriptions: The Production, Exportation, and Importation of a New Legal Orthodoxy, eds. Yves Dezalay and Bryant G. Garth. Ann Arbor, MI: University of Michigan Press.Google Scholar
  19. Verbitsky, Horacio. 1987. Civiles y militares: Memoria secreta de la transicion. Buenos Aires: Editorial Contrapunto.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Lilian A. Barria and Steven D. Roper 2010

Authors and Affiliations

  • Mario Di Paolantonio

There are no affiliations available

Personalised recommendations