Advertisement

Two Jewish Heresies Spinozism and Sabbatianism

  • Richard Popkin

Abstract

Unlike Christianity, Judaism does not have central authorities for determining what is a heretical belief. In earlier times, when there was more coherence and control, certain views were deemed heretical, and this has stuck through the ages. In the eighth century A.D., the Caraites refused to accept the Talmud as the Oral Law, or to accept the authority of the rabbis to interpret Jewish law.1 They were expelled as heretics, and have remained so to this day, as far as Orthodox Judaism is concerned. Rabbis are supposed to refuse to marry a Jew to a Caraite. The Caraites persist in pockets in Lithuania, the Crimea, Egypt, and Turkey, and act as if they are a continuation of the Jews of ancient Palestine. Even Hitler accepted the Jewish view on this, and ranked the Caraites as “other religions.” Those in Nazi-dominated territory survived the Holocaust without suffering the horrors of the Jewish world.

Keywords

Eighteenth Century Jewish Community Jewish History Jewish World Jewish Practice 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Notes

  1. 1.
    R. Popkin, “The Lost Tribes, the Caraites, and the English Millenarians,” Journal of Jewish Studies 37, 1986, pp. 213–227;Google Scholar
  2. Yosef Kaplan, “‘Karaites’ in Early Eighteenth-Century Amsterdam” in David Katz and Jonathan Israel, eds., Sceptics, Millenarians, and Jews ( Leiden: Brill, 1990 ), pp. 196–236; Karaites,” Encyclopaedia Judaica (Jerusalem: Macmillan, 1971), pp. 761–785.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 2.
    See Gershon’ Scholem, Sabbatai Sevi: the Mystical Messiah, 1626-1676 ( Princeton: Princeton University Press, 1971 ).Google Scholar
  4. 12.
    Gershon’ Scholem, Major Trends in Jewish Mysticism ( New York: Schocken, 1946 ), p. 304.Google Scholar
  5. 13.
    Yeshayahu Leibowitz, Judaism, Human Hanes, and the Jewish State ( Cain-bridge: Harvard University Press, 1992 ).Google Scholar
  6. 27.
    David Rudennan, Jewish Enlightenment in an English Key ( Princeton: Princeton University Press, 2000 ).Google Scholar
  7. 28.
    R. Popkin,“David Levi, Anglo JewishTheologian,”Jewish Quarterly Review vol. 87, 1996, pp. 79–101.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 29.
    Alexander Altmann, Moses Mendelssohn: A Biographical Study ( Tuscaloosa: University of Alabama Press, 1973 ), pp. 638–711.Google Scholar
  9. 30.
    See Achim Engstler, Untersuchungen zum Idealismus Salomon Mairnons ( Stuttgart: Fromann-Holzboog, 1990 ).Google Scholar
  10. 1.
    Justin Champion, “‘Acceptable to Inquisitive Men’: Some Simonian Contexts for Newton’s Biblical Criticism” in James E. Force and Richard Popkin, eds., Newton and Religion: Context, Nature, and Influence ( Dordrecht: Kluwer, 1999 ), pp. 77–96.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 13.
    See Hanspeter Marti, “Litterärhistorie und Ketzergeschichte,” in M. Mulsow and H. Zedelmaier, eds., Skepsis, Providenz, Polyhistorie: Jakob Friedrich Reirnnnann (1668-1743) ( Tübingen: Niemeyer, 1998 ), pp. 60–75.Google Scholar
  12. 17.
    See J. C. Laursen, “Ludvig Holberg’s History of the Jews: Arguments for Toleration” in H. Méchoulan, R. Popkin, G. Ricuperati, and L. Simonutti, eds., La fornnazione storica dell’alteritd: Studi di storia della toleranza ( Florence: Olschki, 2001 ).Google Scholar

Copyright information

© John Christian Laursen 2002

Authors and Affiliations

  • Richard Popkin

There are no affiliations available

Personalised recommendations