New Faculty pp 39-69 | Cite as

Teaching: Lectures and Discussion

  • Christopher J. Lucas
  • John W. MurryJr.

Abstract

The most immediate—if not the paramount—concern facing most new faculty members is doing well at teaching. Newcomers approach the challenge for the first time with a fair amount of anxiety and trepidation. As Wilbert McKeachie of the University of Michigan observes, faculty beginners want to avoid looking foolish or incompetent. They prepare their class notes with great care, but still dread the prospect of possible embarrassment if they cannot answer students’ questions.

Keywords

Faculty Member Class Discussion Academic Dishonesty Class Session Instructional Goal 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Notes

  1. 1.
    Wilbert J. McKeachie, Teaching Tips, A Guidebook for the Beginning Teacher, 8th ed. (Lexington, Mass.: D.C. Heath & Company, 1986), 3.Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Robert Boice, Advice for New Faculty Members, Nihil Nimus (Needham Heights, Mass.: Allyn Bacon, 2000), 12.Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Robert Boice, The New Faculty Member, Supporting and Fostering Professional Development (San Francisco, Calif.: Jossey-Bass, 1992), 52.Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    A. Clay Schoenfeld and Robert Magman, Mentor in a Manual, Climbing the Academic Ladder to Tenure (Madison, Wis.: Magna Publications, 1992), 113.Google Scholar
  5. See also Boice, “Quick Starters: New Faculty Who Succeed,” in Michael Theall and Jennifer Franklin, eds., Effective Practices for Improving Teaching, New Directions for Teaching and Learning 45 (Winter 1991): 25.Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Alan Wright et al., Teaching Improvement Practices, Successful Strategies for Higher Education (Boston, Mass.: Anker Publishing Company, 1995), 59.Google Scholar
  7. 8.
    Kenneth A. Eble, The Craft of Teaching (San Francisco, Calif.: Jossey-Bass, 1976), 17–18.Google Scholar
  8. 9.
    Maryellen Weimer, “It’s a Myth: Nobody Knows What Makes Teaching Good,” in Teaching College, Collected Readings for the New Instructor, ed. Weimer and Rose Ann Neff (Madison, Wis.: Magna Publications, 1990), 13.Google Scholar
  9. 10.
    Kay F. Quam, Ready, Set, Teach: Learn to Teach, Teach to Learn (Commack, New York: Kroshka Books, 1998), 93–94.Google Scholar
  10. 11.
    Consult Schoenfeld and Magman, 162; and Lynn Sorenson, “Beware the N of One,” in Relative to Teaching, Teaching and Faculty Support Center, University of Arkansas (April 1996): 1.Google Scholar
  11. 14.
    James R. Davis, Better Teaching, More Learning, Strategies for Success in Postsecondary Settings (Phoenix, Arizona: American Council on Education, Oryx Press, 1993), 13–14.Google Scholar
  12. 15.
    Louis Raths, et al., Teaching for Thinking, 2nd ed. (New York: Teachers College Press, 1986), 185–186.Google Scholar
  13. 21.
    Refer to Bill J. Frye, “Goals and Objectives for College Courses,” in Teaching in College, A Resource for College Teachers, rev. ed., Donald Grieve (Cleveland, Ohio: Info-Tec, 1990), 153–167.Google Scholar
  14. 24.
    Rebecca Brent and Richard M. Felder, “It’s a Start,” College Teaching 47 (Winter 1999): 14–17.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 25.
    Karron G. Lewis, “Teaching Large Classes (How to Do It Well and Remain Sane),” in Handbook of College Teaching, Theory and Applications ed. Keith W Prichard and R. McLaren Sawyer (Westport, Conn.: Greenwood Press, 1994), 322.Google Scholar
  16. 27.
    Benjamin S. Bloom, M. D. Englehart, et al., Taxonomy of Educational Objectives: Handbook I, The Cognitive Domain (New York: Longmans, Green, 1956).Google Scholar
  17. 29.
    See Linda B. Nilson, Teaching at Its Best, A Research-Based Resource for College Instructors (Bolton, Mass.: Anker Publishing Company, 1998), 13.Google Scholar
  18. 34.
    William E. Cashin, “Improving Lectures,” in Weimer and Neff, 59. See also Michael D. Sublett, “The Quick Fix: Turning Listeners into Active Learners,” College Teaching 47 (Winter 1999): 22CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Elaine J. Enderson, “Active Learning in the Lecture Hall,” Journal of College Science Teaching 26 (May 1997): 428Google Scholar
  20. Beth Panitz, “Stuck in the Lecture Rut?” ASEE Prism 5 (February 1996): 26Google Scholar
  21. Barbara Gross Davis, Tools for Teaching (San Francisco, Calif.: Jossey-Bass, 1993), 111–130.Google Scholar
  22. 40.
    Quoted in part from Schoenfeld and Magman, 118; and in Christopher J. Lucas, Our Western Educational Heritage (New York: Macmillan, 1972), 296–297.Google Scholar
  23. 41.
    Joseph Janes and Diane Hauer, Now What? Readings on Surviving (and Even Enjoying) Your First Experience at College Teaching (Acton, Mass.: Copley Publishing Group, 1988), 14–15; Raths, 2; Nilson, 76;Google Scholar
  24. and Charles C. Bonwell and James A. Eison, Active Learning: Creating Excitement in the Classroom, ASHE-ERIC Higher Education Report No. 1 (Washington, DC: George Washington University, School of Education and Human Development, 1991), 8.Google Scholar
  25. 28.
    See also Mathew Lippman, “Some Thoughts on the Foundations of Reflective Education,” in Teaching Thinking Skills: Theory and Practice, ed. Joan Baron and Robert Sternberg (New York: W H. Freedman, 1987), 153.Google Scholar
  26. 53.
    Maryellen Weimer, “Successful Participation Strategies,” in Weimer and Neff, 95–96; Stephen D. Brookfield and Stephen Preskill, Discussion As A Way Of Teaching, Tools and Techniques for Democratic Classrooms (San Francisco, Calif: Jossey-Bass, 1999), 37, 87–90;Google Scholar
  27. Andy Farquharson, Teaching in Practice (San Francisco, Calif.: Jossey-Bass, 1995), 163; Janes and Hauer, 34–35; Nilson, 87ff.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Christopher J. Lucas and John W. Murry, Jr. 2007

Authors and Affiliations

  • Christopher J. Lucas
    • 1
  • John W. MurryJr.
    • 1
  1. 1.University of Arkansas-FayettevilleUSA

Personalised recommendations