Advertisement

Nationalism as Conservative Centrism: United Russia

  • Marlène Laruelle
Part of the The Sciences Po Series in International Relations and Political Economy book series (SPIRP)

Abstract

In this chapter, I define nationalism as a conservative centrism that has permitted the Kremlin to appropriate the nationalist rhetoric that had, for some years, been in the hands of the opposition. In the second half of the 1990s, the ruling elites began to invest in this field of discourse and, in the following decade, succeeded in virtually monopolizing references to the nation, dispossessing both the extra-parliamentary opposition and the populist parliamentary parties of it. If the latter continue to lay claim to the right to express the needs and concerns of the nation, they have many difficulties in making their voices heard and are largely stifled by the patriotic slogans put forth by the Kremlin.

Keywords

Legislative Election Russian People Deputy Prime Minister Conservative Centrism Presidential Administration 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Notes

  1. 2.
    V. Gel’man, “Le parti dominant en Russie: Quelles perspectives?”, in A. Merlin (ed.), Où va la Russie? (Bruxelles: Éditions de l’Université de Bruxelles, 2007), p. 51.Google Scholar
  2. 3.
    R. Davies, Soviet History in the Yeltsin Era (London: Macmillan, 1997).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 4.
    B. Kernen, “The Russian Parliamentary Election of 1993: A Quasi-Historical Interpretation in Light of the 1995 Elections”, East European Quarterly, vol. 30, no. 2 (1996), pp. 235–250.Google Scholar
  4. 5.
    H. Phillips, “Leaving the Past Behind: The Russian Presidential Elections of 1996”, Kennan Occasional Papers, no. 273 (1999); R. Rose, E. Tikhomirov, “Understanding the Multi-Party Choice: The 1995 Duma Election”, Europe-Asia Studies, vol. 49, no. 5 (1997), pp. 799–824.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 10.
    I. Chubais, Ot russkoi idei k idee novoi Rossii (Moscow: CI TIS, 1996).Google Scholar
  6. 12.
    N. A. Kosolapov, “An Integrative Ideology for Russia”, Russian Social Science Review, vol. 37, no. 1 (1996), pp. 60–96.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 14.
    F. Hill, In Search of Great Russia: Elites, Ideas, Power, the State, and the Pre-Revolutionnary Past in the New Russia, 1991–1996 (Ph.D., Cambridge: Harvard University, 1998).Google Scholar
  8. 15.
    W. Allensworth, “Aleksandr Lebed’s Vision for Russia”, Problems of Post-Communism, vol. 45, no. 2 (1998), pp. 51–58.Google Scholar
  9. 16.
    J. W. Kipp, “The Political Ballet of General Aleksandr Lebed”, Problems of Post-Communism, vol. 43, no. 4 (1996), pp. 43–54.Google Scholar
  10. 18.
    J. W. Kipp, “A. Lebed: The Man, His Program, and His Political Prospects”, Problems of Post-Communism, vol. 46, no. 5 (1999), pp. 55–63.Google Scholar
  11. 19.
    A. Lebed’, Za derzhavu obidno (Kirov: Viatskoe slovo, 1995)Google Scholar
  12. 20.
    T. J. Colton, “Understanding Iurii Luzhkov”, Problems of Post-Communism, vol. 46, no. 5 (1999), pp. 14–26.Google Scholar
  13. 24.
    R. V. Daniels, “Evguenii Primakov, Contender by Chance”, Problems of Post-Communism, vol. 46, no. 5 (1999), pp. 27–36.Google Scholar
  14. 25.
    R. Sakwa, “Russia’s ‘Permanent’ (Uninterrupted) Elections of 1999–2000”, Journal of Communist Studies & Transition Politics, vol. 16, no. 3 (2000), p. 98.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 26.
    J. R. Raviot, “Le triomphe de l’ordre établi”, Le Courrier des Pays de l’Est, no. 1004 (2000), pp. 4-26; M. McFaul, “One Step Forward, Two Steps Back”, Journal of Democracy, vol. 11, no. 3 (2000), pp. 19–33.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 27.
    S. Oates, “The 1999 Russian Duma Elections”, Problems of Post-Communism, vol. 47, no. 3 (2000), pp. 3–14.Google Scholar
  17. 29.
    H. E. Hale, “The Origins of United Russia and the Putin Presidency: The Role of Contingency in Party-System Development”, Demokraüzatsiya, vol. 12, no. 2 (2004), pp. 169–194.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 30.
    T. F. Remington, “Putin, the Duma, and Political Parties”, in D. H. Herspring, Putin’s Russia: Past Imperfect, Future Uncertain (Lanham, MD: Rowman & Little field, 2005), pp. 31–54.Google Scholar
  19. 32.
    S. Prozorov, “Russian Conservatism in the Putin Presidency: The Dispersion of a Hegemonic Discourse”, Journal of Political Ideologies, vol. 10, no. 2, 2005, pp. 121–143.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 34.
    For a more involved analysis of the question of mobilization, see A. Chadaev, Putin. Ego ideologiia (Moscow: Evropa, 2006), p. 20.Google Scholar
  21. 35.
    V. Shlapentokh, “Putin as flexible politician. Does he imitate Stalin?”, Communist and Post-Communist Studies, vol. 41, no. 2, 2008, pp. 205–216.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 38.
    V. Ivanov, Partiia Putina: Istoriia “Edinoi Rossii” (Moscow: Olma, 2008), p. 331.Google Scholar
  23. 40.
    R. Clem, “Russia’s Electoral Geography: A Review”, Eurasian Geography and Economics, vol. 47, no. 4 (2006), pp. 381–406.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 41.
    T. Remington, “Patronage and the Party of Power: President-Parliament Relations Under Vladimir Putin”, Europe-Asia Studies, vol. 60, no. 6 (2008), pp. 959–987.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. 43.
    A. Chadaev, V. Bykova (eds.), Tekhnologiia sozdaniia partii (Moscow: Evropa, 2007), p. 53.Google Scholar
  26. 45.
    V. Ryzhkov, “Tranzit zapreshchen: Edinaia Rossiia kak KPSS light”, Neprikosnovennyi zapas, vol. 43, no. 3 (2007), p. 25.Google Scholar
  27. 47.
    S. K. Wegren, A. Konitzer, “Prospects for Managed Democracy in Russia”, Europe-Asia Studies, vol. 59, no. 6 (2007), pp. 1025–1047.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. 48.
    V. O. Kazantsev, Prioritetnye natsionaV nye proekty i novaia ideologiia dlia Rossii (Moscow: Vagrius, 2007).Google Scholar
  29. 55.
    A. Isaev, Edinaia Rossiia, partiia russkoi politicheskoi kul’tury (Moscow: Evropa, 2006), p. 38.Google Scholar
  30. 60.
    P. Danilin, N. Kryshtal’, D. Poliakov, Vragi Putina (Moscow: Evropa, 2007), p. 3.Google Scholar
  31. 63.
    V. Ivanov, Antirevoliutsioner: Pochemu Rossii ne nuzhna “’oranzhevaia revoliutsiia” (Moscow: Evropa, 2006), p. 161.Google Scholar
  32. 80.
    V. Surkov, “Suverenitet—eto politicheskii sinonim konkurentosposobnost”, in N. Garadzha (ed.), Suverenitet (Moscow: Evropa, 2006), p. 76.Google Scholar
  33. 81.
    A. Okara, “Sovereign Democracy: A New Russian Idea or PR project?”, Russia in Global Affairs, vol. 5, no. 3, 2007, pp. 8–20.Google Scholar
  34. 96.
    On this topic, see the demonstration proposed by D. Trenin, Integratsiia i identichnost’. Rossiia kak “novyi zapad” (Moscow: Evropa, 2006)Google Scholar
  35. 97.
    A. Stent, “Reluctant Europeans: Three Centuries of Russian Ambivalence toward the West”, in R. Legvold (ed.), Russian Foreign Policy in the 21st Century and the Shadow of the Past (New York: Columbia University Press, 2007), pp. 393–439.Google Scholar
  36. 102.
    S. G. Simonsen, Pain of Partition: Nationalism, National Identity, and the Military in Post-Soviet Russia (Oslo: PRIO, 2001), p. 66.Google Scholar
  37. 108.
    S. Sokolovski, “Essentsializm v rossiiskom konstitutsionnom prave (na prime re terminologii, izpol’zuemoi v konstitutsiiakh respublik v sostave RF)”, in M. Lamelle (ed.), Russkii natsionalizm: sotsial’nyi i kul’turnyi kontekst (Moscow: NLO, 2008), pp. 184–232.Google Scholar
  38. 115.
    V. Martiianov, “Mnogopartiinaia partiia vlasti”, Neprikosnovennyi zapas, vol. 43, no. 3 (2007), p. 12.Google Scholar
  39. 116.
    A. B. Evans Jr, “Putin’s Legacy and Russia’s Identity”, Europe-Asia Studies, vol. 60, no. 6 (2007), pp. 899–912.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. 117.
    G. M. Easter, “The Russian State in the Time of Putin”, Post-Soviet Affairs, vol. 24, no. 3 (2008), pp. 199–230.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. 118.
    A. S. Makarychev, “Politics, the State, and De-Politicization: Putin’s Project Reassessed”, Problems of Post-Communism, vol. 55, no. 5 (2008), pp. 62–71.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Marlène Laruelle 2009

Authors and Affiliations

  • Marlène Laruelle

There are no affiliations available

Personalised recommendations