Advertisement

Let Us Tell You Our Story: We-Narration and Its Pronominal Peculiarities

  • Monika Fludernik
Chapter

Abstract

The chapter links we-narration to Fludernik’s earlier work on second-person fiction. The communicative level of we-narrative from the perspective of production is examined: who are “we”? Subsequently, the chapter explores the question of who the “we” is on the plot level of plural homodiegetic narratives. For a variety of reasons, the scope of “we” both on the levels of plot and communication are left ambiguous in many we-texts. The chapter then turns to the tensions between individual and collective experience as it plays out in many we-narratives. This tension emerges also in the deployment of inventive uses of syntax and in odd collocations that flout rules of syntactic agreement. Texts analysed include Maxine Swann’s Flower Children, Joan Chase’s During the Reign of the Queen of Persia, Ayi Kwei Armah’s Two Thousand Seasons, Julie Otsuka’s The Buddha in the Attic, Tara Shea Nesbit’s The Wives of Los Alamos as well as Joshua Ferris’s Then We Came to the End.

Keywords

Ayi Kwei Armah First-person plural narration Joan Chase Joshua Ferris Julie Otsuka Maxine Swann Tara Shea Nesbit We-narration 

Notes

Acknowledgements

The research for this chapter was undertaken during a sabbatical at the Institut des Etudes Avancées in Paris and was also financed by the German Research Foundation (DFG, Az. GRK 1767/1). Previous versions of this material were presented at invited keynotes in Columbus, OH, Bloomington, IN, and Ghent.

References

  1. Alber, J. (2015) ‘The Social Minds in Factual and Fictional We-Narratives of the Twentieth Century’, Narrative 23(2): 212–225.Google Scholar
  2. Alders, M. (2015a) ‘Introduction: Social Minds in Factual and Fictional Narration’, Narrative 23(2): 113–122.Google Scholar
  3. Alders, M. (2015b) Mind-Telling: Social Minds in Fiction and History. PhD Dissertation, University of Freiburg. Published online. https://www.freidok.uni-freiburg.de/data/10649
  4. Alders, M., and von Contzen, E. (2015) Social Minds in Factual and Fictional Narration, special issue of Narrative 23(2): 113–129.Google Scholar
  5. Armah, A. K. (1973) Two Thousand Seasons, London: Heinemann.Google Scholar
  6. Barth, J. (1984) Sabbatical [1982], London: Granada.Google Scholar
  7. Becker, A. (2011) ‘Coming to America, Lured by a Photo’, New York Times, 26 August 2011. http://www.nytimes.com/2011/08/28/books/review/the-buddha-in-the-attic-by-julie-otsuka-book-review-html?_r=0
  8. Bekhta, N. (forthcoming-a) ‘Emerging Narrative Situations: A Definition of We-Narratives Proper’, in P. K. Hansen and W. Schmid (ed.) Paradigms of Narratology. Narratologia. Berlin: de Gruyter. Manuscript.Google Scholar
  9. Bekhta, N. (forthcoming-b) ‘We-Narrators: The “Collectivity Condition” of Character Narrators in We-Narratives’, in Narrative (May 2017).Google Scholar
  10. Bochner, A. P., and Ellis, C. (1995) ‘Telling and Living. Narrative Co-Construction and the Practices of Interpersonal Relationships’, in W. Leeds-Hurwitz (ed.) Social Approaches to Communication, New York: Guilford Press, pp. 201–213.Google Scholar
  11. Chase, J. (1985) During the Reign of the Queen of Persia [1983], Harmondsworth: Penguin.Google Scholar
  12. Dybek, S. (1994) ‘We Didn’t’, in T. Wolff (ed.) The Best American Short Stories 1994, Boston: Houghton Mifflin, pp. 79–89.Google Scholar
  13. Eugenides, J. (2002) The Virgin Suicides [1993], London: Bloomsbury.Google Scholar
  14. Faulkner, W. (1950) ‘A Rose for Emily [1930]’, in Collected Stories of William Faulkner, New York: Random House, pp. 119–130.Google Scholar
  15. Ferris, J. (2007) Then We Came to the End, London: Penguin.Google Scholar
  16. Fludernik, M. (1993) ‘Second Person Fiction: Narrative YOU as Addressee and/or Protagonist’, Arbeiten aus Anglistik und Amerikanistik 18(2): 217–247.Google Scholar
  17. Fludernik, M. (1994a) ‘Introduction: Second-Person Narrative and Related Issues’, Style 28(3): 281–311.Google Scholar
  18. Fludernik, M. (1994b) ‘Second-Person Narrative as a Test Case for Narratology: The Limits of Realism’ Style 28(3): 445–479.Google Scholar
  19. Fludernik, M. (1994c) ‘Second-Person Narrative: A Bibliography’, Style 28(4): 525–548.Google Scholar
  20. Fludernik, M. (1995) ‘Pronouns of address and ‘odd’ third person forms: The mechanics of involvement in fiction’, in K. Green (ed.) New Essays in Deixis: Discourse, Narrative, Literature, Amsterdam: Rodopi, pp. 99–130.Google Scholar
  21. Fludernik, M. (1996) Towards a “Natural” Narratology, London: New York, Routledge.Google Scholar
  22. Fludernik, M. (2011a) ‘The Category of “Person” in Fiction: You and We Narrative-Multiplicity and Indeterminacy of Reference’, in Olson, G. (ed.) Current Trends in Narratology, Berlin: De Gruyter, pp. 101–141.Google Scholar
  23. Fludernik, M. (2011b) ‘The Narrative Forms of Postcolonial Fiction in English’, in A. Quayson (ed.) The Cambridge History of Postcolonial Literature, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 903–937.Google Scholar
  24. Fludernik, M. (2014) ‘Collective Minds in Fact and Fiction: Intermental Thought and Group Consciousness in Early Modern Narrative’, Poetics Today special issue ‘Theoretical Approaches to the Early Modern: Beyond New Historicism?’, Poetics Today 35(4): 689–730.Google Scholar
  25. Goodwin, C., and Goodwin, M.H. (2004) ‘Participation’, in A. Duranti (ed.) A Companion to Linguistic Anthropology, Malden, MA: Blackwell, pp. 222–244.Google Scholar
  26. Hughes, K. (2016) ‘Upsides of Being a Mail-Order Bride’, Review of Marcia A. Zug’s Buying a Bride. An Engaging History of Mail-Order Matches, The Times Literary Supplement (28 September): 4–5.Google Scholar
  27. Lagoni, F. (2016) Fiktionales versus faktuales Erzählen fremden Bewusstseins, Narratologia, 53, Berlin: de Gruyter.Google Scholar
  28. Le Guin, U. K. (2012) ‘The Buddha in the Attic by Julie Otsuka’. The Guardian, 27 January 2012. http://www.theguardian.com/books/2012/jan/27/buddha-in-the-attic-review
  29. Mandelbaum, J. (1987) ‘Couples Sharing Stories’, Communication Quarterly 35(2): 144–170.Google Scholar
  30. Marcus, A. (2008a) ‘A Contextual View of Narrative Fiction in the First Person Plural’, Narrative 16(1): 46–64.Google Scholar
  31. Marcus, A. (2008b) ‘Dialogue and Authoritativeness in “We” Fictional Narratives: A Bakhtinian Approach’, Partial Answers 6(1): 135–161.Google Scholar
  32. Marcus, A. (2008c) ‘We Are You: The Plural and the Dual in “We” Fictional Narratives’, Journal of Literary Semantics 37(1): 1–21.Google Scholar
  33. Margolin, U. (1996) ‘Telling Our Story: On “We” Literary Narratives’, Language and Literature 5: 115–133.Google Scholar
  34. Margolin, U. (2000) ‘Telling in the Plural: From Grammar to Ideology’, Poetics Today 21(3): 591–618.Google Scholar
  35. Margolin, U. (2001) ‘Collective perspective, individual perspective, and the speaker in between: On “we” literary narratives’, in Van Peer, W. and Chatman, S. (eds.) New Perspectives on Narrative Perspective, Albany, NY: State University of New York, pp. 241–253.Google Scholar
  36. Maxey, Ruth (2015) ‘The Rise of “We” Narration in Modern American Fiction’, European Journal of American Studies 10(2): Document 14. URL: http://ejas.revues.org/11068; https://doi.org/10.4000/ejas.11068.
  37. Maxey, R. (2016) ‘National Stories and Narrative Voice in the Fiction of Joshua Ferris’, Critique: Studies in Contemporary Fiction 57(2): 208–216.Google Scholar
  38. McLean, K.C. (2016) The Co-Authored Self: Family Stories and the Construction of Personal Identity, New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  39. Naylor, G. (1989) Mama Day [1988], New York: Vintage.Google Scholar
  40. Nesbit, T. (2015) The Wives of Los Alamos [2014], London: Bloomsbury.Google Scholar
  41. Norrick, N. (1997) ‘Twice-Told Tales: Collaborative Narration of Familiar Stories’, Language in Society 26(2): 199–220.Google Scholar
  42. Norrick, N. (2004) ‘Humor, Tellability, and Conarration in Conversational Storytelling’, Text 24(1): 79–111.Google Scholar
  43. Norrick, N. (2005) ‘Interactional Remembering in Conversational Narrative’, Journal of Pragmatics 37: 1819–1844.Google Scholar
  44. Otsuka, J. (2011) The Buddha in the Attic, New York: Anchor Books.Google Scholar
  45. Palmer, A. (2005) ‘Intermental Thought in the Novel: The Middlemarch Mind’, Style 39(4): 427–439.Google Scholar
  46. Palmer, A. (2008) ‘Small Intermental Units in Little Dorrit’, REAL: The Yearbook of Research in English and American Literature 24: 163–180.Google Scholar
  47. Palmer, A. (2010a) ‘Large Intermental Units in Middlemarch’, in J. Alber and M. Fludernik (eds.) Postclassical Narratology: New Essays, Columbus, OH: Ohio State University Press, pp. 83–104.Google Scholar
  48. Palmer, A. (2010b) Social Minds in the Novel, Columbus, OH: Ohio State University Press.Google Scholar
  49. Palmer, A. (2010c) ‘Storyworlds and Groups’, in L. Zunshine (ed.) Introduction to Cognitive Cultural Studies, Baltimore, MD: Johns Hopkins University Press, pp. 176–192.Google Scholar
  50. Quasthoff, U. (1980) ‘Gemeinsames Erzählen als Form und Mittel im sozialen Konflikt oder: Ein Ehepaar erzählt eine Geschichte’, in Ehlich, K. (ed.) Erzählen im Alltag, Frankfurt: Suhrkamp, pp. 109–141.Google Scholar
  51. Richardson, B. (1994) ‘I etcetera: On the Poetics and Ideology of Multipersoned Narratives’, Style 28(3): 312–328.Google Scholar
  52. Richardson, B. (2006) Unnatural Voices: Extreme Narration in Modern and Contemporary Fiction, Columbus, OH: Ohio State University Press.Google Scholar
  53. Richardson, B. (2011) ‘U.S. Ethnic and Postcolonial Fiction: Toward a Poetics of Collective Narratives’, in Aldama, F. L. (ed.) Analyzing World Fiction: New Horizons in Narrative Theory, Austin: University of Texas Press, pp. 3–16.Google Scholar
  54. Richardson, B. (2015) ‘Representing Social Minds: “We” and “They” Narratives, Natural and Unnatural’, Narrative 23(2): 200–212.Google Scholar
  55. Silvain, P. (1971) Les Eoliennes, Paris: Mercure de France.Google Scholar
  56. Sommer, R. (2009) ‘Kollektiverzählungen: Definitionen, Fallbeispiele und Erklä-rungsansätze’, in C. Klein and M. Martinez (eds.) Wirklichkeitserzählungen. Felder, Formen und Funktionen nicht-literarischen Erzählens, Stuttgart: Metzler, pp. 229–244.Google Scholar
  57. Swann, M. (2007) Flower Children, New York: Riverhead-Penguin.Google Scholar
  58. Szczepek, B. (2000) ‘Functional Aspects of Collaborate Productions in English Conversation’, Interaction and Linguistic Structures 21: 1–36.Google Scholar
  59. von Contzen, E., and M. Alders (2015) ‘Collective Experience in Narrative: Conclusions and Proposals’, Narrative 23(2): 226–229.Google Scholar
  60. Wright, R. (1988) 12 Million Black Voices [1941], New York: Thunder’s Mouth Press.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© The Author(s) 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  • Monika Fludernik
    • 1
  1. 1.University of FreiburgFreiburg im BreisgauGermany

Personalised recommendations