Advertisement

Theorizing About Human Capacity: A View from the Nineteenth Century

  • Sandra J. Peart
  • David M. Levy
Chapter
Part of the Jepson Studies in Leadership book series (JSL)

Abstract

Political economy from Adam Smith through John Stuart Mill presupposed a race-blind account of human nature. As such, it maintained that left to their devices, ordinary people would find the best paths to attain happiness. In the second half of the nineteenth century, the historian Thomas Carlyle, joined by anthropologists and biologists, attacked and overthrew this view. In this chapter, Sandra J. Peart and David M. Levy bring together their previous work by focusing on the economic writings of W. R. Greg. His views on Irish inferiority, central to his argument against Mill’s abstract human, was cited by Charles Darwin as a consequence of the “failure” of natural selection in humans. Greg proposed eugenic policies to remedy this failure.

References

  1. Bennett, Charles H., and Robert B. Brough. 1860. Shadow and substance. London: W. Kent.Google Scholar
  2. Carlyle, Thomas. 1849. Occasional discourse on the negro question. Fraser’s Magazine for Town and Country 40: 670–679.Google Scholar
  3. Darwin, Charles. 1871. The descent of man, and selection in relation to sex. New York: Appleton and Company.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Edgeworth, F.Y. 1881. Mathematical psychics. London: C. Kegan Paul & Co.Google Scholar
  5. Greg, W.R. 1866. The Jamaica problem. Fraser’s Magazine for Town and Country 73: 277–305.Google Scholar
  6. ———. 1868. On the failure of “natural selection” in the case of man. Fraser’s Magazine for Town and Country 78: 353–362.Google Scholar
  7. ———. 1869a. The doom of the negro race. In Literary and social judgments, 339–389. London: N. Trubner.Google Scholar
  8. ———. 1869b. Realities of Irish life. Quarterly Review 126: 61–80.Google Scholar
  9. Levy, David M., and Sandra J. Peart. 2005. From ordinal to cardinal utility: Darwin and differential capacity for happiness. American Journal of Economics and Sociology 64: 851–880.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. ———. 2006. Charles Kingsley and the theological interpretation of natural selection. Journal of Bioeconomics 8: 197–218.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. ———. 2009. Sympathy, evolution and the economist. Journal of Economic Behavior and Organization 71: 29–36.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. ———. 2015. Sympathy caught between Darwin and eugenics. In Sympathy: A history, ed. Eric Schliesser, 323–358. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. ———. 2016. Group analytics in Adam Smith’s work. Eastern Economic Journal 42: 514–527.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. ———. 2017. Gordon Tullock’s ill-fated appendix: “Flatland revisited”. Constitutional Political Economy. 28 (1): 18–34. doi: 10.1007/s10602-016-9232-8 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Mill, J.S. 1965. The principles of political economy with some of their applications to social philosophy. In Collected works of John Stuart Mill, ed. John Robson. Toronto: University of Toronto Press.Google Scholar
  16. Peart, Sandra J., and David M. Levy. 2004. Sympathy and its discontents: “Greatest happiness” versus the ‘general good’. European Journal of the History of Economic Thought 11: 453–478.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. ———. 2005. The “vanity of the philosopher”: From equality to hierarchy in post-classical economics. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. ———. 2008. Darwin’s unpublished letter at the Bradlaugh–Besant trial: A question of divided expert judgment. European Journal of Political Economy 24: 343–353.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Political Economy Club of London. 1872. Names of members, 1821–1872, rules of the club, and list of questions discussed, 1860–1872. London: Political Economy Club of London.Google Scholar
  20. Rawls, John. 1971. A theory of justice. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
  21. Semmel, Bernard. 1962. The Governor Eyre controversy. London: McGibbon & Kee.Google Scholar
  22. Smith, Adam. 1904. In An inquiry into the nature and causes of the wealth of nations, ed. Edwin Cannan. London: Methuen & Co., Ltd.Google Scholar
  23. Tullock, Gordon. 1966. The organization of inquiry. Durham: Duke University Press.Google Scholar
  24. Wallace, Alfred R. 1864. The origin of human races and the antiquity of man deduced from the theory of ‘natural selection’. Journal of the Anthropological Society of London 2: clviii–clxxxvii.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Winch, Donald. 1965. Classical political economy and colonies. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
  26. ———. 2001. Darwin fallen among political economists. Proceedings of the American Philosophical Society 145: 415–437.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© The Author(s) 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  • Sandra J. Peart
    • 1
  • David M. Levy
    • 2
  1. 1.University of RichmondRichmondUSA
  2. 2.George Mason UniversityFairfaxUSA

Personalised recommendations