Understanding the Drivers of Broadband Adoption: The Case of Rural and Remote Scotland

  • S. Howick
  • J. Whalley
Part of the OR Essentials book series (ORESS)


Broadband has been described as a transforming technology and is now widely available in many developed countries. However, broadband availability is not the same as broadband adoption. If the socio-economic benefits of broadband are to be realized, then adoption needs to be both understood and encouraged. This is particularly important in rural and remote areas. This paper explores the factors that drive broadband adoption in one particular rural and remote area; rural and remote Scotland. A causal model and a quantitative simulation model are developed indicating how the various drivers of adoption interact with one another. Both models show that past policy initiatives have impacted on the rate of adoption. However, the greatest impact could be achieved if future policy initiatives target those people who show no interest in adopting broadband. The paper concludes by suggesting that this work has implications for rural and remote areas all around the world.


Broadband Rural and remote Scotland Causal diagrams System dynamics 


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. Andersen D and Richardson G (1997). Scripts for group model building. Syst Dynam Rev 13(2): 107–129.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Bass FM (1969). A new product growth model for consumer durables. Mngt Sci 15(5): 215–227.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Bauer JM, Kim JH and Wildman SS (2005). Effects of national policy on the diffusion of broadband in OECD countries. Paper presented at the UFL-LBS Workshop the Future of Broadband: Wired and Wireless, Gainsville, FL, February.Google Scholar
  4. Biggs P and Kelly T (2006). Broadband pricing strategies. Info 8(6): 3–14.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Brignall S (2006). Broadband and phone services going down the tube, say customers. The Guardian, 14 November, available at
  6. Cava-Ferreruela I and Alabau-Mun˜oz A (2006). Broadband policy assessment: A cross-national empirical analysis. Telecommun Pol 30(8/9): 445–463.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. DEFRA (2005). ICT in England’s rural economies: A final report to DEFRA, available online at
  8. Fildes R and Kumar V (2002). Telecommunications demand forecasting—A review. Int J Fore 18: 489–522.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Forrester JW (1961). Industrial Dynamics. Portland, OR: Productivity Press.Google Scholar
  10. Forrester JW and Senge PM (1980). Tests for building confidence in system dynamics models. In: Legasto AA Jr, Forrester JW and Lyneis JM (eds). TIMS Studies in the Management Sciences, vol. 14. Amsterdam: North-Holland.Google Scholar
  11. Fransman M (2006). Global Broadband Battle—Why the US and Europe Lag While Asia Leads. Stanford, CA: Stanford Business Books.Google Scholar
  12. Galloway L and Mochie R (2005). The use of ICT in rural firms: A policy-orientated literature review. Info 7(3): 33–46.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. General Register Office for Scotland (2004). Household projections for Scotland: 2002-based, available online at
  14. Geroski PA (2000). Models of technology diffusion. Res Pol 29(4/5): 603–625.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Hollifield CA and Donnermeyer JF (2003). Creating demand: Influencing information technology diffusion in rural communities. Gov Inform Quart 20(2): 135–150.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Hope S, Murray L and Martin C (2004). In-Migration to the Highlands & Islands. Edinburgh: NFO Soc Research.Google Scholar
  17. Hudson HE (2006). From Rural Village to Global Village. Mahwah, NJ: LEA.Google Scholar
  18. ITU (2003). Birth of Broadband—ITU Internet Reports. Geneva: ITU.Google Scholar
  19. ITU (2006). Trends in Telecommunication Reform 2006—Regulating in the Broadband World. Geneva: ITU.Google Scholar
  20. Kim M and Kim H (2004). Innovation diffusion of telecommunications: General patterns, diffusion clusters and differences by technological attribute. Int J Innov Mngt 8(2): 223–241.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Lattemann C (2006). Public Private Partnerships im Brietband-sektor—Fallbeispiele aus den La¨ndern Schweden, Großbritannien, Frankreich und Deutschland. Germany: MMC Multimedia Campus, Kiel.Google Scholar
  22. Lindmark S and Bjo¨rstedt P (2006). The Swedish broadband market. In: Fransman M (ed). Global Broadband Battle—Why the US and Europe Lag While Asia Leads. Stanford, CA: Stanford Business Books.Google Scholar
  23. Lyons MH, Adjali I, Collings D and Jensen KO (2003). Complex systems models for strategic decision making. BT Technol J 21(2): 11–27.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Madden G and Simpson M (1997). Residential broadband subscription demand: An econometric analysis of Australian choice experiment data. Appl Econ 29(8): 1073–1078.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Mahajan V, Muller E and Bass FM (1990). New product diffusion models in marketing: A review and directions for research. J Marketing 54(1): 1–26.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Mahajan V, Muller E and Wind Y (2000). New-Product Diffusion Models. Dordrecht, Netherlands: Kluwer Academic Publishers.Google Scholar
  27. Maier FH (1998). New product diffusion models in innovation management—A system dynamics perspective. Syst Dynam Rev 14(4): 285–308.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Milling PM (1996). Modeling innovation processes for decision support and management simulation. Syst Dynam Rev 12(3): 211–234.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. National Statistics (2003). Yearbook 2003—The Official Yearbook of the United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland. London: Office of National Statistics.Google Scholar
  30. Ofcom (2004). The Ofcom Internet and Broadband Update. London: Ofcom, April.Google Scholar
  31. Ofcom (2006a). The Communications Market: Nations and Regions. London: Ofcom, April.Google Scholar
  32. Ofcom (2006b). The Communications Market: Nations and Regions—Scotland. London: Ofcom, April.Google Scholar
  33. Ofcom (2006c). Media Literacy Audit: Report on Media Literacy Amongst People in the Nations and Regions. London: Ofcom, April.Google Scholar
  34. Ofcom (2006d). The Communications Market 2006. London: Ofco, 10 August.Google Scholar
  35. Ofcom (2006e). Policy Implications Arising from the Communications Market: Nations and Regions Research. London: Ofcom, 12 October.Google Scholar
  36. Oh S, Ahn J and Kim B (2003). Adoption of broadband internet in Korea: The role of experience in building attitudes. J Inform Technol 18(4): 267–280.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Osborne J (1999). Dynamic modelling to assist in the understanding of consumer take-up and the diffusion of new telecommunications services. Paper presented at the. 17th International Conference of the System Dynamics Society and 5th Australian & New Zealand Systems Conference, 20–23 July, Wellington, New Zealand.Google Scholar
  38. Ovum (2006). UK broadband status summary March 2006—covering the period October 2005 to end December 2005. A Report for the Department of Trade and Industry. London: Ovum.Google Scholar
  39. Parker PM (1994). Aggregate diffusion forecasting models in marketing: A critical review. Int J Forecast 10: 353–380.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Registrar General for Scotland (2005). Projected Population of Scotland (2004-based). Edinburgh: HMSO.Google Scholar
  41. Roberts JH and Lattin JM (2000). Disaggregate-level diffusion model. In: Mahajan V, Muller E and Wind Y (eds). New-Product Diffusion Models. New York: Springer.Google Scholar
  42. Robertson A, Soopramanien D and Fildes R (2004). Understanding residential Internet service adoption patterns in the UK. Teletronikk 100(4): 84–94.Google Scholar
  43. Rogers EM (2003). Diffusion of Innovations, 5th ed, New York: Free Press.Google Scholar
  44. Saeed K (1998). Constructing reference mode. Paper presented at the 16th International Conference of the System Dynamics Society, Quebec City.Google Scholar
  45. Savage SJ and Waldman D (2005). Broadband internet access, awareness and use: Analysis of United States household data. Telecommun Pol 29: 615–633.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Scottish Enterprise (2004). Still time to plug into broadband payment, 26 January, available at
  47. Scottish Executive (2001a). Connecting Scotland. Edinburgh: Scottish Executive.Google Scholar
  48. Scottish Executive (2001b). Digital Inclusion. Edinburgh: Scottish Executive.Google Scholar
  49. Scottish Executive (2002). Making it Happen. Edinburgh: Scottish Executive.Google Scholar
  50. Scottish Executive (2005). Scotland’s People: Annual Report: Results from the 2003/2004 Scottish Household Survey. Edinburgh: Scottish Executive.Google Scholar
  51. Sterman JD (2000). Business Dynamics: Systems Thinking and Modeling for a Complex World. Chicago: Irwin/McGraw-Hill.Google Scholar
  52. Strover S (2001). Rural Internet Connectivity. Telecommun Pol 25(5): 331–347.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. Teng JTC, Grover V and Guttler W (2002). Information technology innovation: General diffusion patterns and its relationships to innovation characteristics. IEEE Trans Eng Mngt 49: 13–27.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. Tookey A, Whalley J and Howick S (2006). Broadband diffusion in remote and rural Scotland. Telecommun Pol 30(8/9): 481–495.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. Varian H, Litan RE, Elder A and Shutter J (2002). The net impact study: The projected economic benefits of the Internet in the United States, United Kingdom, France and Germany, available online at
  56. Vigden R, Francis D, Powell P and Woerndl W (2004). Web service business transformation: Collaborative commerce opportunities in SMEs. J Enterprise Inform Mngt 17(5): 372–381.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  57. Warren M (2004). Farmers online: Drivers and impediments in adoption of Internet in UK agricultural businesses. J Small Bus Environ Develop 11(3): 371–381.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  58. Whalley JL (2005). Local loop unbundling in the United Kingdom: Strategic reviews, institutional responses and equivalence. Paper presented at International Telecommunications Society European Regional Conference, Porto, Portugal, September.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© The Author(s) 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  • S. Howick
    • 1
    • 2
  • J. Whalley
    • 1
  1. 1.University of StrathclydeGlasgowUK
  2. 2.Department of Management ScienceUniversity of StrathclyGlasgowUK

Personalised recommendations