Introduction

  • Anita Lacey
Chapter
First Online:
Part of the Gender, Development and Social Change book series (GDSC)

Abstract

The volume presents compelling insight into women’s experiences, practices and resistances of and to urbanization, focussing on women’s urban lives in the global South. It centres on new modes of sustainable practice that engage women in solutions to insecure livelihoods, land and tenure in Part One, food and water access and insecurity in Part Two, and to dislocation, exclusion and violence in Part Three. The authors of this volume call for a gender-just sustainable urbanization and in doing so critically examines sustainability, including of existing practices of and forecast and imagined focuses on sustainability. Sustainable urbanization is argued to necessarily centre on food security, land and housing tenure, and realization of rights and freedoms for all while recognizing the vital gendered differences of our lives. Livelihood security is key too to this vision of practice- and policy-based sustainable urbanization, one that is at some odds with dominant global frameworks. Importantly, the focus is on sustainable lives within cities, rather than sustainable cities per se. The gendered nature of contemporary urbanization is also examined, with particular emphasis on women-identifying individuals’ and collectives’ experiences of urbanization. It is not supposed that the experiences of un/sustainable urbanization are binarized, nor that gender itself is. There is no universal woman subject at the heart of this collection of essays. The Introduction outlines the key arguments of the volume, the threads that bind the diverse case-studies and ways in which women are striving for sustainable futures in urban settings.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in to check access.

References

  1. Agarwal, A. 1992. The gender and environment debate: lessons from India. Feminist Studies 18(1): 119–158.Google Scholar
  2. Agyeman, J., R. Evans, and R. Bullard 2003. Just Sustainabilities: Development in an Unequal World (London: Earthscan Publications).Google Scholar
  3. Appadurai, Arjun 2001. Deep democracy: urban governmentality and the horizon of politics. Environment and Urbanization, (Vol. 13 No. 2), pp. 23–43.Google Scholar
  4. Beall, Jo 1996. Participation in the city: where do women fit in? Gender and Development 4(1): 9–16.Google Scholar
  5. Benería, L., G. Berik and M. Floro 2003. Gender, development, and globalization: Economics as if all people mattered (New York: Routledge).Google Scholar
  6. Boserup, Ester 1970. Women’s Role in Economic Development (New York: St Martin’s Press).Google Scholar
  7. Bradshaw, Sarah 2013. Women’s decision-making in rural and urban households in Nicaragua: the influence of income and ideology. Environment and Urbanization 25(1): 81–94.Google Scholar
  8. Braidotti, Rosi, Ewa Charkiewicz, Sabine Hausler and Saskia Wieringa 1994. Women, the Environment and Sustainable Development: Towards a Theoretical Synthesis (London: Zed Books in association with INSTRAW).Google Scholar
  9. Chant, Sylvia 1996. Gender, urban development and housing (New York: UNDP).Google Scholar
  10. Chant, Sylvia 2007. Gender, generation and poverty: exploring the ‘feminisation of poverty’ in Africa, Asia and Latin America (Cheltenham, UK: Edward Elgar).Google Scholar
  11. Chant, Sylvia 2008. The ‘feminisation of poverty’ and the ‘feminisation of anti-poverty programmes: room for revision?’ Journal of Development Studies 44(2): 165–197.Google Scholar
  12. Chant, Sylvia 2013. Cities through a ‘gender lens’: a golden ‘urban age’ for women in the global South? Environment and Urbanization 25(1): 9–29.Google Scholar
  13. Chant, Sylvia and Cathy McIlwhaine 2016. Cities, Slums and Gender in the Global South: Towards a Feminised Urban Future (New York: Routledge).Google Scholar
  14. Cornwall, Andrea 2007. Revisiting the “Gender Agenda.” DS Bulletin Volume 38 Number 2: 69–79.Google Scholar
  15. Desai, Vandana and Robert B. Potter 2008. Urbanization. Editorial’ in V. Desai and R. B. Potter (eds) The Companion to Development Studies (London: Hodder): 235–6.Google Scholar
  16. De Sousa Santos, Boaventura 2003. ‘The World Social Forum: Towards a Counter-hegemonic Globalisation’, pp. 73–156 in A. Anand, A. Escobar and P. Waterman (eds) The World Social Forum: Challenging Empires. (New Delhi: Viveka Foundation). Retrieved from: http://www.ces.fe.uc.pt/bss/fsm.php
  17. Drakakis-Smith, David 1997. Third World cities: sustainable urban development III—Basic needs and human rights. Urban Studies 34(5–6):797–823.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Evans, Alice 2014. ‘Women can do what men can do: the causes and consequences of growing flexibility in gender divisions of labour in Kitwe, Zambia. Journal of Southern African Studies 40(5): 981–98.Google Scholar
  19. Evans, Brad and Julian Reid 2014. Resilient Life: The Art of Living Dangerously (Cambridge: Polity).Google Scholar
  20. Foucault, Michel 1980. Truth and Power, in Gordon, C. (ed.) Power/knowledge (New York: Pantheon).Google Scholar
  21. Gabay, Clive 2011. Consenting to ‘Heaven’: The Millennium Development Goals, neo-liberal governance and global civil society in Malawi. Globalizations 8(4): 487–501.Google Scholar
  22. Gabay, Clive 2012. The Millennium Development Goals and ambitious developmental engineering. Third World Quarterly 33(7): 1249–1265.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Gabizon, Sascha 2016. Women’s movements’ engagement in the SDGs: lessons learned from the Women’s Major Group, Gender & Development 24(1): 99–110.Google Scholar
  24. Harcourt, Wendy. (ed.) 1994. Feminist Perspectives on Sustainable Development (London: Zed Books).Google Scholar
  25. Harcourt, Wendy and Ingrid Nelson 2015. Practising Feminist Political Ecologies: Moving Beyond the ‘Green Economy’ (London: Zed Books).Google Scholar
  26. Harriss-White, Barbara, Wendy Olsen, Penny Vera-Sanso and V. Suresh 2013. Multiple shocks and slum household economies in South India. Economy and Society 42(3): 400–431.Google Scholar
  27. Ilcan, S. and Lacey, A. 2015. Enacting the Millennium Development Goals: political technologies of calculation and the counter-calculation of poverty in Namibia. Globalizations 12(4): 613–28.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Ilcan, S. and Phillips, L. 2010. Developmentalities and calculative practices: the Millennium Development Goals. Antipode 42: 844–874.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Jarvis, Helen 2005. Work/Life City Limits (Basingstoke, UK: Palgrave Macmillan).Google Scholar
  30. Jarvis, Helen, Paula Kantor and Jonathan Cloke 2009. Cities and Gender (London, New York: Routledge).Google Scholar
  31. Jones, Gareth A. and Corbridge, Stuart 2010. The continuing debate about urban bias: the thesis, its critics, its influence, and its implications for poverty reduction strategies. Progress in Development Studies 10(1): 1–18.Google Scholar
  32. Kabeer, Naila 1991. Gender, Production and Wellbeing: Alternative Approaches to the Household Economy, Discussion Paper No. 288. Institute of Development Studies, Brighton.Google Scholar
  33. Lacey, Anita 2016. Biopolitical Governmentalities of Women’s Lives: Security and Development in Solomon Islands. In M. Griffiths (ed.) Biopolitics and Memory in Postcolonial Literature and Culture (Farnham, UK: Ashgate): 47–62.Google Scholar
  34. Lefebvre, Henri 1996. The Right to the City. In Eleanore Kofman, Elizabeth Lebas (eds) Writings on Cities (Oxford: Blackwell), Originally published as Le droit à la ville, Paris, Anthropos, 1968.Google Scholar
  35. Li, Tania Murray 2007. The Will to Improve: Governmentality, Development, and the Practice of Politics (Durham, NC: Duke University Press).Google Scholar
  36. McGranahan, Gordon and David Satterthwaite 2014. Urbanisation concepts and trends. IIED Working Paper. IIED, London.Google Scholar
  37. McIlwhaine, Cathy 2010 Migrant machismos: exploring gender ideologies and practices among Latin American migrants in London from a multi-scalar perspective. Gender, Place and Culture 17 (3): 281–300.Google Scholar
  38. Mohanty, C. T., A. Russo and L. Torres 1991. Third World Women and the Politics of Feminism (Bloomington: Indiana University Press).Google Scholar
  39. Moser, Caroline O. N. 1995. Women, gender and urban development policy: challenges for current and future research. Third World Planning Review 17(2): 223–35.Google Scholar
  40. Moser, Caroline O. N. 2016. Gender, Asset Accumulation and Just Cities: Pathways to Transformation (London, New York: Routledge).Google Scholar
  41. Peake, Linda and Martina Rieker 2013. Rethinking feminist interventions into the urban. In Linda Peake and Martina Rieker (eds). Rethinking Feminist Interventions into the Urban (Abingdon, Oxon: Routledge): 1–22.Google Scholar
  42. Rai, Shirin M. 2002. Gender and the political economy of development: From nationalism to globalization (Cambridge: Polity Press).Google Scholar
  43. Saith, A. 2006. From universal values to Millennium Development Goals: Lost in translation. Development and Change 37(6): 1167–1199.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Scott, Andrew and Paula Lucci 2015. Universality and Ambition in the Post-2015 Development Agenda: A Comparison of Global and National Targets. Journal of International Development 27(6): 752–775.Google Scholar
  45. Shiva, Vandana 1988. Staying Alive: Women, Ecology and Development (London: Zed Books).Google Scholar
  46. Sylvester, Christine 1999. Development studies and postcolonial studies: Disparate tales of the ‘Third World’. Third World Quarterly 20(4): 703–721.Google Scholar
  47. United Nations (UN) General Assembly 2015. Resolution adopted by the General Assembly on 25 September 2015 - Transforming our world: the 2030 Agenda for Sustainable Development. Retrieved from: http://www.un.org/ga/search/view_doc.asp?symbol=A/RES/70/1&Lang=E
  48. UN-Habitat 2016. Urbanization and Development: Emerging Futures. World Cities Report 2016 (Nairobi: United Nations Human Settlements Programme).Google Scholar
  49. UN-Habitat 2010. Port Moresby Urban Profile. Retrieved from: http://www.fukuoka.unhabitat.org/projects/papua_new_guinea/pdf/Port_Moresby_March_2010.pdf
  50. Vinthagen, Stellan and Anna Johansson 2013. Everyday Resistance; Exploration of a Concept and its Theories. Resistance Studies Magazine 1. September: 1–46.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© The Author(s) 2017

Authors and Affiliations

  • Anita Lacey
    • 1
  1. 1.Politics and International RelationsUniversity of AucklandAucklandNew Zealand

Personalised recommendations