Implications of the Gap Discourse for the Study of (European) Foreign Policy and European Studies

  • Henrik Larsen
Chapter
First Online:

Abstract

The focus of this chapter is on the broader implications of the gap discourse within which the analytical use of the capability-expectations gap (CEG) and other gaps and deficits are embedded. It reflects on the implications for the study of European foreign policy, national foreign policy and European studies more broadly. One concrete implication of the gap discourse, it is argued, may be the limited number of text books which analyse the making of EU foreign policy. Moreover, it is proposed that the gap discourse reinforces an ahistorical ideal type of the state in foreign policy analysis. Finally, it is argued that other references to “deficits” in European studies carry with them many of the same connotations as in the gap discourse.

Keywords

Foreign policy analysis Democratic deficit Normative power Civilian power 
This is a preview of subscription content, log in to check access.

References

  1. Ashley, R.K. 1988. “Untying the Sovereign State: A Double Reading of the Anarchy Problematique.” Millennium 17(2): 227–262.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Börtzel, T. 2005. “Mind the Gap: European Integration Between Level and Scope.” Journal of European Public Policy 12(2): 217–236.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Bretherton, C., and J. Vogler. 1999. The European Union as a Global Actor. London: Routledge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Bretherton, C., and J. Vogler. 2006. The European Union as a Global Actor. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  5. Bull, H. 1982. “Civilian Power Europe: A Contradiction in Terms?” Journal of Common Market Studies 21(2): 149–170.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Chaban, N., and M. Holland. 2008. “Introduction.” In The European Union and the Asia-Pacific – Media, Public and Elite Perceptions of the EU, ed. Chaban and Holland, London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  7. Cini, M., and N. Borragán (eds.). 2016. European Union Politics. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  8. Cooper, R. 2014. “The EU Does not have a Democratic Deficit but a Democratic Surplus.” EUROPP. http://blogs.lse/ac/uk/Europeblog. Accessed 2 January 2017.
  9. Føllesdal, A., and S. Hix. 2006. “Why There is a Democratic Deficit in the EU: A Response to Majone and Moravcsik.” Journal of Common Market Studies 44(3): 533–562.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Ginsberg, R. 1999. “Conceptualising the European Union as an International Actor: Narrowing the Theoretical Capability-Expectations Gap.” Journal of Common Market Studies 37(3): 429–454.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Hansen, L. 2006. Security as Practice: Discourse Analysis and the Bosnian War. Routledge: London.Google Scholar
  12. Harste, G. 2015. “The Democratic Surplus that Constitutionalized the European Union.” In The Evolution of Intermediary Institutions in Europe: From Corporatism to Governance, eds. P. Kjaer and E. Hartman, 199–215. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Hill, C. 1993. “The Capability-Expectations Gap, or Conceptualising’s Europe’s International Role.” Journal of Common Market Studies 31(3): 305–328.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Hill, C. 1998. “Closing the Capability-Expectations Gap?” In A Common Foreign Policy For Europe?, eds. J. Peterson and H. Sjursen, 18–38. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  15. Hill, C., and M. Smith eds. 2011a. International Relations and the European Union. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  16. Hill, C., and M. Smith. 2005. International Relations and the European Union. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  17. Hix, S., and B. Høyland. 2011. The Political System of the European Union. Palgrave Macmillan: Houndmills.Google Scholar
  18. Keukeleire, S., and J. Macnaughton. 2008. The Foreign Policy of the European Union. Basingstoke: Palgrave.Google Scholar
  19. Keukeleire, S., and T. Delreux. 2014. The Foreign Policy of the European Union. Basingstoke: Palgrave.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Larsen, H. 1997. Foreign Policy and Discourse Analysis: France, Britain and Europe. London and New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
  21. Larsen, H. 2005. Analysing the Foreign Policy of Small States in the EU: The Case of Denmark. Palgrave Macmillan: Houndmills.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Larsen, H. 2009. “A Distinct FPA for Europe? Towards a Comprehensive Framework for Analysing the Foreign Policy of EU Member States.” European Journal of International Relations 15(3): 537–566.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Lord, C. 2004. “E Pluribus Unum? Creative Disagreement af Legitimacy in the EU.” Journal of Common Market Studies 42(1): 183–202.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Majone, D. 2002. “Delegation of Regulatory Powers In a Mixed Polity.” European Law Journal 8(3): 319–339.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Marquand, D. 1979. Parliament for Europe. London: Jonathan Cape.Google Scholar
  26. McCormick, J. 2015. European Union Politics. Houndmills: Palgrave Macmillan.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Moravcsik, A. 2002. “In Defence of the ‘Democratic Deficit’: Reassessing the Legitimacy of the European Union.” Journal of Common Market Studies 40(4): 603–634.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Pan, Z. 2012. Conceptual Gaps in China-EU Relations: Global Governance, Human Rights and Strategic Partnerships. Houndmills: Palgrave Macmillan.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Peterson, J., and M. Shackleton. 2012. The Institutions of the European Union. Oxford University Press: Oxford.Google Scholar
  30. Wæver, O. 2002. “Identity, Communities and Foreign Policy: Discourse Analysis as Foreign Policy Theory”. In European Integration and National Identity: The Challenge of the Nordic States, eds. L. Hansen and O. Wæver, 22–49. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  31. Walker, R.B.J. 1993. Inside/Outside: International Relations as Political Theory. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  32. Walker, R.B.J. 2000. “Europe is not Where it is Supposed to be.” In International Relations Theory and the Politics of European Integration, eds. M. Kelstrup and M. Williams, 14–32. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  33. Wallace, H., K. Pollack and A. Young (eds.). 2014. Policy-Making in the European Union. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  34. White, Brian. 2001. Understanding European Foreign Policy. Houndsmills: Palgave.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© The Author(s) 2017

Authors and Affiliations

  • Henrik Larsen
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of Political ScienceUniversity of CopenhagenCopenhagenDenmark

Personalised recommendations