Advertisement

Creative Inequality in the Mid-sized University City. Socio-spatial Reflections on the Brazilian Rural–Urban Interface: The Case of Cachoeira

  • Wendel Henrique Baumgartner
  • Eberhard Rothfuß
Chapter

Abstract

This chapter draws attention to the ‘shadow spaces’ of the creativity paradigm: Small and mid-size cities at the fringes of the Global South that are constructed as irrelevant places in the branding circus of the universal creativity phantasm, and can therefore not compete with cities in the Global North. However, most of the global population growth will take place in these urban spaces of the Global South. Speaking with Fernand Braudel’s famous statement that the ‘fate of the world is decided in cities’, attention has to be shifted to small cities. By presenting the case of Cachoeira, Northeast Brazil, we show that the establishment of an academic knowledge institution is shaping profoundly the urban milieu to a creative bourgeois life-world and that the socio-spatial arrangements of medium cities are the main ‘boost’ for implementing the creativity paradigm and will therefore ‘cement’ inequality.

Keywords

Urban Space Creative Industry Global City Creative Class Urban Society 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Bibliography

  1. Adorno, Theodor W., and Max Horkheimer. 2002. Dialectic of Enlightenment. Philosophical Fragments. Stanford: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
  2. Appadurai, Arjun. 1996. Modernity at Large: Cultural Dimensions of Globalization. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.Google Scholar
  3. Baumgartner, Wendel H. 2009. A instalação da UFRB, a ação do Programa Monumenta e o turismo étnico na reestruturação urbana e no cotidiano de Cachoeira-BA: Notas preliminares de pesquisa. Geotextos 5(1): 89–112.Google Scholar
  4. ———. 2014. Small city and new university. Perspectives and conflicts after the establishment of new public Brazilian universities in small cities. In Proceedings of Colloque Aux frontières de l’urbain. Petites villes du monde: émergence, croissance, rôle économique et social, intégration territoriale, gouvernance, 759–775. Avignon.Google Scholar
  5. Boschma, Ron A. 2005. Proximity and innovation: A critical assessment. Regional Studies 39: 61–74.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Brenner, Neil, and Christian Schmidt. 2015. Towards a new epistemology of the urban? CITY 19(2–3): 151–182.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Castello, Lineu. 2010. Rethinking the Meaning of Place: Conceiving Place in Architecture-Urbanism. Surrey: Ashgate.Google Scholar
  8. Florida, Richard. 1995. Toward the Learning Region. Futures 27: 527–536.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. ———. 2004. The Rise of the Creative Class. New York: Basic Books.Google Scholar
  10. Granovetter, Marc. 1973. The strength of weak ties. American Journal of Sociology 78(6): 1360–1380.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Gust-Bardon, Natali I. 2012. The role of geographical proximity in innovation: Do regional and local levels really matter? Working Papers Firms and Region no. R4:1438–9843. Karlsruhe: Fraunhofer ISI.Google Scholar
  12. IBGE (Instituto Brasileiro de Geografia e Estatísticas). Cidades 2015. Available from http://www.ibge.gov.br/cidadesat/link.php?codmun=290490.
  13. Korff, Rüdiger. 2003. Local enclosures of globalization. The power of locality. Dialectical Anthropology 27(1): 1–18.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Landry, Charles. 2000. The Creative City: A Toolkit for Urban Innovators. London: Earthscan.Google Scholar
  15. Lefebvre, Henri. 1973. De lo rural a lo urbano. Barcelona: Ediciones Peninsula.Google Scholar
  16. ———. 2000. Everyday Life in the Modern World. New York: Continuum.Google Scholar
  17. ———. 2003. Urban Revolution. Minneapolis: Minneapolis University Press.Google Scholar
  18. Lubell, H. 1984. Third world urbanization and international assistance. Urban Studies 21: 1–13.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. McGee, Terry G. 1991. The emergence of desakota regions in Asia: expanding a hypothesis. In The Extended Metropolis: Settlement Transition in Asia, ed. Norton S. Ginsburg, Bruce Koppel, and Terry G. McGee, 3–25. Honolulu: University of Hawaii Press.Google Scholar
  20. Peck, Jamie. 2005. Struggling with the creative class. International Journal of Urban and Regional Research 29(4): 740–770.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. ———. 2007. The Creativity Fix. Available from http://www.eurozine.com/articles/2007-06-28-peck-en.html
  22. Robinson, Jennifer. 2006. Ordinary Cities: Between Modernity and Development. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  23. Rondinelli, Dennis A. 1983. Towns and small cities in developing countries. The Geographical Review 73(4): 379–395.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Rosa, Hartmut. 2013. Acceleration and Alienation—Towards a Critical Theory of Late-Modern Temporality. Frankfurt: Suhrkamp.Google Scholar
  25. Rothfuß, Eberhard, and Ruediger Korff. 2015. Urban self-organisation in the global south: The everyday life of the poor as a collective resource to enhance the politics of sustainability. In The Politics of the Urban Sustainability Concept, ed. David Wilson, 152–166. Champaign: Common Ground Publishing.Google Scholar
  26. Roy, Aananya. 2005. Urban informality: toward an epistemology of planning. Journal of the American Planning Association 71(2): 147–158.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Santos, Milton. 1979/2004. O espaço dividido: os dois circuitos da economia urbana dos países subdesenvolvidos. São Paulo: Edusp.Google Scholar
  28. Satterthwaite, David, and Jorge Hardoy (ed). 1986. Small and Intermediate Urban Centres. Their Role in National and Regional Development in the Third World. London: Hodder & Stroughton.Google Scholar
  29. Sennett, Richard. 1977. The Fall of Public Man. London: Penguin Books.Google Scholar
  30. Tönnies, Ferdinand. 1957. Community and Society. East Lansing: Michigan State University Press.Google Scholar
  31. UNDP/PNUD (Programa das Nações Unidas para o Desenvolvimento). 2013. Perfil municipal de Cachoeira/BA. Atlas do Desenvolvimento Humano no Brasil. Available from www.atlasbrasil.org.br/2013/perfil/cachoeira_bawww.atlasbrasil.org.br/2013/perfil/cachoeira_ba.
  32. United Nations. (2014). World Urbanization Prospects. The 2014 Revision. Highlights (https://esa.un.org/unpd/wup/Publications/Files/WUP2014-Highlights.pdf)UN (United Nations) 2014.Google Scholar
  33. UNESCO. 2005. Towards Knowledge Societies. Available from http://www.unesdoc.unesco.org/images/0014/001418/141843e.pdf
  34. Wallerstein, Immanuel. 1979. The Capitalist World-Economy. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  35. Wilson, David. 2007. Cities and Race: America’s New Black Ghetto. London: Routledge.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© The Author(s) 2017

Authors and Affiliations

  • Wendel Henrique Baumgartner
    • 1
  • Eberhard Rothfuß
    • 2
  1. 1.Departamento de GeografiaUniversidade Federal da BahiaSalvadorBrasil
  2. 2.Geographical InstituteUniversity of BayreuthBayreuthGermany

Personalised recommendations