Advertisement

Governing Water with Market-Based Instruments: Preferences and Skepticism in Switzerland

  • Florence Metz
  • Philip Leifeld
Chapter
Part of the Palgrave Studies in Water Governance: Policy and Practice book series (PSWG)

Abstract

With an increasing awareness of newly detected but unregulated pollutants in waterbodies, the question arises as to how these emerging issues concerning water quality should be politically addressed. Environmental economists have advocated market-based instruments because of their effectiveness, cost-efficiency, and flexibility. However, lessons from past experiences where market forces were used to solve public problems indicate that issues related to administrative complexities, legitimacy, or uncertainty can arise. Turning the academic debate into an empirical one, this chapter takes an actor perspective and assesses the potential for introducing market-based instruments through the example of Switzerland, a forerunner in developing water policy to control emerging pollutants. Findings show that Swiss policy actors have a preference for command-and-control or voluntary instruments ahead of market-based approaches for reducing emerging pollutants in water.

References

  1. Ajzen, Icek, and Martin Fishbein. 1980. Understanding Attitudes and Predicting Social Behavior. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.Google Scholar
  2. Altmann, Dominik, Heidemarie Schaar, Cordula Bartel, Dirk Louis Schorkopf, Ingrid Miller, Norbert Kreuzinger, Erich Möstl, and Britta Grillitsch. 2012. Impact of Ozonation on Ecotoxicity and Endocrine Activity of Tertiary Treated Wastewater Effluent. Water Research 46 (11): 3693–3702.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Andersen, Mikael Skou, and Rolf-Ulrich Sprenger, eds. 2000. Market-based Instruments for Environmental Management. Politics and Institutions. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.Google Scholar
  4. Bercu, Joel, Neil Parke, Janice Fiori, and Roger Meyerhoff. 2008. Human Health Risk Assessments for Three Neuropharmaceutical Compounds in Surface Waters. Regulatory Toxicology and Pharmacology 50 (3): 420–427.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Bressers, Hans, and Dave Huitema. 2000. What the Doctor Should Know: Politicians are Special Patients. The Impact of the Policy-Making Process on the Design of Economic Instruments. In Market-based Instruments for Environmental Management, ed. Mikael Skou Andersen and Rolf-Ulrich Sprenger, 67–88. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.Google Scholar
  6. Brodin, Thomas, Jerker Fick, Micael Jonsson, and Jonatan Klaminder. 2013. Dilute Concentrations of a Psychiatric Drug Alter Behavior of Fish from Natural Populations. Science 339 (6121): 814–815.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Coase, Ronald. 1960. The Problem of Social Cost. Journal of Law and Economics 3: 1–44.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Cordes, Joseph J. 2002. Corrective Taxes, Charges, and Tradable Permits. In Tools of Government, ed. Lester Salamon, 255–281. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  9. Cunningham, Virginia, Stephen Binks, and Michael Olson. 2009. Human Health Risk Assessment from the Presence of Human Pharmaceuticals in the Aquatic Environment. Regulatory Toxicology and Pharmacology 53 (1): 39–45.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Dermont, Clau, Karin Ingold, Lorenz Kammermann, and Isabelle Stadelmann-Steffen. 2017. Bringing the policy making perspective in: A political science approach to social acceptance. Energy Policy 108: 359–368.Google Scholar
  11. Doris, Daley. 2007. Voluntary Approaches to Environmental Problems: Exploring the Rise of Nontraditional Public Policy. Policy Studies Journal 35 (2): 165–180.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Downing, Pau B., and Lawrence J. White. 1986. Innovation in Pollution Control. Journal of Environmental Economics and Management 13 (1): 18–29. doi: 10.1016/0095-0696(86)90014-8.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Farrow, R. Scott, Martin T. Schultz, Pinar Celikkol, and George L. Van Houtven. 2005. Pollution Trading in Water Quality Limited Areas: Use of Benefits Assessment and Cost-effective Trading Ratios. Land Economics 81: 191–205.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Gunningham, Neil, and Darren Sinclair. 1991. Regulatory Pluralism: Designing Policy Mixes for Environmental Protection. Law and Policy 21 (1): 49–76.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Hahn, Robert. 1989. Economic Prescriptions for Environmental Problems: How the Patient followed the Doctor’s Orders. Journal of Economic Perspectives 3 (2): 95–114.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Harring, Niklas. 2015. Reward or Punish? Understanding Preferences Toward Economic or Regulatory Instruments in a Cross-National Perspective. Political Studies 64 (3): 573–592. doi: 10.1111/1467-9248.12209.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Hollender, Juliane, Heinz Singer, and Christa McArdell. 2008. Polar Organic Micropollutants in the Water Cycle. In Dangerous Pollutants (Xenobiotics) in Urban Water Cycle, ed. Petr Hlavinek, Ongjen Bonacci, Jiri Marsalek, and Ivana Mahrikova, 103–116. Dodrecht: Springer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Howlett, Michael. 2005. What is a Policy Instrument? Tool, Mixes, and Implementation Styles. In Designing Government. From Instruments to Governance, ed. Pearl Eliadis, Margaret Hill, and Michael Howlett, 31–49. Montreal, Kingston: McGill-Queen’s University Press.Google Scholar
  19. ———. 2011. Designing Public Policies: Principles and Instruments. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
  20. Howlett, Michael, and Jeremy Rayner. 2007. Design Principles for Policy Mixes: Cohesion and Coherence in ‘New Governance Arrangements’. Policy and Society 26 (4): 1–18.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Hung, Ming-Feng, and Daigee Shaw. 2005. A Trading-ratio System for Trading Water Pollution Discharge Permits. Journal of Environmental Economics and Management 49: 83–102.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Johnson, Andrew, Monika Jürgens, Richard Williams, Klaus Kümmerer, Andreas Kortenkamp, and John Sumpter. 2008. Do Cytotoxic Chemotherapy Drugs Discharged into Rivers Pose a Risk to the Environment and Human Health? An Overview and UK Case Study. Journal of Hydrology 348 (1–2): 167–175.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Jordan, Andrew, Rüdiger Wurzel, and Anthony Zito. 2013. Still the Century of ‘New’ Environmental Policy Instruments? Exploring Patterns of Innovation and Continuity. Environmental Politics 22 (1): 155–173.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Kidd, Karen, Paul Blanchfield, Kenneth Mills, Vince Palace, Robert Evans, James Lazorchak, and Robert Flick. 2007. Collapse of a Fish Population After Exposure to a Synthetic Estrogen. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 104 (21): 8897–8901.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Knill, Christoph, and Jale Tosun. 2012. Public Policy: A New Introduction. New York: Palgrave Macmillan.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Knoke, David. 1994. Networks of Elite Structure and Decision Making. In Advances in Social Network Analysis: Research in the Social and Behavioral Sciences, ed. Stanley Wasserman and Joseph Galaskiewicz, 274–295. Thousand Oaks: Sage.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Laumann, Edward, Peter Marsden, and David Prensky. 1983. The Boundary Specification Problem in Network Analysis. In Applied Network Analysis: A Methodological Introduction, ed. Ronald Burt and Michael Minor. Beverly Hills: Sage.Google Scholar
  28. Lemaire, Donald. 1998. The Stick: Regulation as a Tool of Government. In Carrots, Sticks & Sermons. Policy Instruments & Their Evaluation, ed. Marie-Louise Bemelmans-Videc, Ray Rist, and Ewert Vedung, 59–76. Brunswick and London: Transaction Publishers.Google Scholar
  29. Metz, Florence, and Karin Ingold. 2014. Sustainable Wastewater Management: Is it Possible to Regulate Micropollution in the Future by Learning from the Past? A Policy Analysis. Sustainability 6 (4): 1992–2012.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Mostafa, Fadwa, and Charles Helling. 2002. Impact of Four Pesticides on the Growth and Metabolic Activities of Two Photosynthetic Algae. Journal of Environmental Science and Health, Part B 37 (5): 417–444.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Oates, Wallace E., and Paul R. Portney. 2003. The Political Economy of Environmental Policy. In Handbook of Environmental Economics, ed. Karl-Göran Mäler and Jeffrey R. Vincent, 325–354. Amsterdam: Elsevier.Google Scholar
  32. Olmstead, Sheila M. 2010. The Economics of Water Quality. Review of Environmental Economics and Policy 4 (1): 44–62. doi: 10.1093/reep/rep016.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Rogers, P., R. de Silva, and R. Bhatia. 2002. Water is an Economic Good: How to Use Prices to Promote Equity, Efficiency, and Sustainability. Water Policy 4: 1–17.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Rowney, Nicole, Andrew Johnson, and Richard Williams. 2009. Cytotoxic Drugs in Drinking Water: A Prediction and Risk Assessment Exercise for the Thames Catchment in the United Kingdom. Environmental Toxicology and Chemistry 28 (12): 2733–2743.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Sabatier, Paul, and Hank Jenkins-Smith. 1993. Policy Change and Learning: An Advocacy Coalition Approach. Boulder: Westview Press.Google Scholar
  36. Sager, Fritz. 2009. Governance and Coercion. Political Studies 57 (3): 537–558.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Schwarzenbach, René, Beate Escher, Kathrin Fenner, Thomas Hofstetter, Annette Johnson, Urs Von Gunten, and Bernhard Wehrli. 2006. The Challenge of Micropollutants in Aquatic Systems. Science 313 (5790): 1072–1077.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Sedlak, David, James Gray, and Karen Pinkston. 2000. Peer Reviewed: Understanding Microcontaminants in Recycled Water. Environmental Science & Technology 34 (23): 508A–515A.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Stavins, R.N. 1989. Clean Profits: Using Economic Incentives to Protect the Environment. Policy Review 48: 58–63.Google Scholar
  40. Stavins, Robert. 2004. The Political Economy of Environmental Regulation. Northampton, MA: Edward Elgar.Google Scholar
  41. Stavins, Robert N., and Robert W. Hahn. 1991. Incentive-based Environmental Regulation: A New Era for an Old Idea? Ecology Law Quarterly 18 (1): 1–42.Google Scholar
  42. Touraud, Evelyne, Benoit Roig, John Sumpter, and Clémence Coetsier. 2011. Drug Residues and Endocrine Disruptors in Drinking Water: Risk for Humans? International Journal of Hygiene and Environmental Health 214 (6): 437–441.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. USEPA. 2008. White Paper Aquatic Life Criteria for Contaminants of Emerging Concern. Part I. General Challenges and Recommendations. Washington, DC: U.S. Environmental Protection Agency.Google Scholar
  44. Vedung, Evert. 1998. Policy Instruments: Typologies and Theories. In Carrots, Sticks & Sermons: Policy Instruments and Their Evaluation, ed. Marie-Louise Bemelmans-Videc, Ray Rist, and Evert Vedung, 21–58. New Brunswick, NJ: Transaction Publisher.Google Scholar
  45. Weiss, Janet A., and Mary Tschirhart. 1994. Public Information Campaigns as Policy Instruments. Journal of Policy Analysis and Management 13 (1): 82–119. doi: 10.2307/3325092.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Wittmer, Irene, Hans-Peter Bader, Ruth Scheidegger, Heinz Singer, Alfred Lück, Irene Hanke, C. Carlsson, and Christian Stamm. 2010. Significance of Urban and Agricultural Land Use for Biocide and Pesticide Dynamics in Surface Waters. Water Research 44 (9): 2850–2862.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© The Author(s) 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  • Florence Metz
    • 1
    • 2
  • Philip Leifeld
    • 3
  1. 1.Institute of Political Science, University of BernBernSwitzerland
  2. 2.Oeschger Centre for Climate Change ResearchUniversity of BernBernSwitzerland
  3. 3.School of Social and Political SciencesUniversity of GlasgowGlasgowUK

Personalised recommendations