Advertisement

Ethical Applied Linguistics Research

  • Scott Sterling
  • Peter De Costa

Abstract

This chapter presents the historical development of research ethics in applied linguistics and then outlines core issues that applied linguists are likely to face when conducting research. Best practices within the field will be discussed and attention called to little discussed elements of research ethics, specifically issues involving academic or professional conduct and behaviors that could lead to unethical practices. Also highlighted will be the growing reliance on Institutional Review Boards (IRBs) as the benchmark for ethical research by providing cases of ethical issues that were unlikely to be covered during IRB training or in the IRB application process. While the nomenclature will differ from country to country, we will use the term IRB to refer to any research ethics board. The main thrust of this chapter is to provide support for teaching research ethics in graduate-level applied linguistics courses and afford guidance to novice applied linguists.

Keywords

Ethical research Institutional Review Boards Ethics training Ethics guidelines 

References

  1. Brown, J. D. (1988). Understanding research in second language learning. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  2. De Costa, P. I. (2014). Making ethical decisions in an ethnographic study. TESOL Quarterly, 48(3), 413–422.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. De Costa, P. I. (2015). Ethics in applied linguistics research. In B. Paltridge & A. Phakiti (Eds.), Research methods in applied linguistics: A practical resource (pp. 245–257). London: Bloomsbury.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. De Costa, P. I. (Ed.). (2016a). Ethics in applied linguistics research: Language researcher narratives. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
  5. De Costa, P. I. (2016b). The power of identity and ideology in language learning: Designer immigrants learning English in Singapore. Dordrecht: Springer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Dörnyei, Z. (2007). Research methods in applied linguistics: Quantitative, qualitative, and mixed methodologies. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  7. Duff, P. A. (2008). Case study research in applied linguistics. New York: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.Google Scholar
  8. Dufon, M. A. (1993). Ethics in TESOL research. TESOL Quarterly, 27(1), 157–160.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Emanuel, E. J., Wendler, D., & Grady, C. (2013). What makes clinical research ethical? The Journal of the American Medical Association, 283(20), 2701–2711.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Gao, X., & Tao, J. (2016). Ethical challenges in conducting text-based online applied linguistics research. In P. I. De Costa (Ed.), Ethics in applied linguistics research: Language researcher narratives (pp. 181–194). New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
  11. Guillemin, M., & Gillam, L. (2004). Ethics, reflexivity, and “ethically important moments” in research. Qualitative Inquiry, 10(2), 261–280.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Haggerty, K. D. (2004). Ethics creep: Governing social science research in the name of ethics. Qualitative Sociology, 27(4), 391–414.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Hatch, E., & Lazaraton, A. (1991). The research manual: Design and statistics for applied linguistics. Boston, MA: Heinle and Heinle.Google Scholar
  14. Kouritzin, S. (Ed.). (2011). Ethics in cross-cultural, cross-linguistic research [Special issue]. TESL Canada Journal, 28(2).Google Scholar
  15. Lee, E. (2011). Ethical issues in addressing inequity in/through ESL research. TESL Canada Journal, 28(31), 31–52.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Mackey, A., & Gass, S. (2005). Second language research: Methodology and design. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.Google Scholar
  17. Mahboob, A., Paltridge, B., Phakiti, A., Wagner, E., Starfield, S., Burns, A., … De Costa, P. I. (2016). TESOL quarterly research guidelines. TESOL Quarterly, 50(1), 42–65.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. McKay, S. L. (2006). Researching second language classrooms. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.Google Scholar
  19. Ngo, B., Bigelow, M., & Lee, S. (Eds.). (2014). Introduction: What does it mean to do ethical and engaged research with immigrant communities? Special issue: Research with immigrant communities. Diaspora, Indigenous and Migrant Education, 8(1), 1–6.Google Scholar
  20. Norris, J. M., & Ortega, L. (2000). Effectiveness of L2 instruction: A research synthesis and quantitative meta-analysis. Language Learning, 50(3), 417–528.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Ortega, L. (2005a). For what and for whom is our research? The ethical as transformative lens in instructed SLA. Modern Language Journal, 89(3), 427–443.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Ortega, L. (Ed.). (2005b). Methodology, epistemology, and ethics in instructed SLA research [Special issue]. Modern Language Journal, 89(3), 315–488.Google Scholar
  23. Paltridge, B., & Phakiti, A. (Eds.). (2015). Research methods in applied linguistics: A practical resource. London: Bloomsbury.Google Scholar
  24. Phakiti, A. (2014). Experimental research methods in language learning. London: Bloomsbury Publishing.Google Scholar
  25. Pimple, K. D. (2002). Six domains of research ethics: A heuristic framework for the responsible conduct of research. Science and Engineering Ethics, 8(2), 191–205.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Plonsky, L., & Gass, S. (2011). Quantitative research methods, study quality, and outcomes: The case of interaction research. Language Learning, 61(2), 325–366.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Shohamy, E. (2004). Reflections on research guidelines, categories, and responsibility. TESOL Quarterly, 38(4), 728–731.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Social Research Council. (2015). ESRC Framework for Research Ethics. Retrieved from http://www.esrc.ac.uk/files/funding/guidance-for-applicants/esrc-framework-for-research-ethics-2015/
  29. Sterling, S. (2017). Investigating the complexity of consent forms in ESL research. [Manuscript in preparation].Google Scholar
  30. Sterling, S., & Gass, S. (2017). Perspectives from the field on ethical behavior in applied linguistics and second language research. [Manuscript in preparation].Google Scholar
  31. Sterling, S., Winke, P., & Gass, S. (2016). Training in research ethics among applied linguistics and SLA researchers. In P. I. De Costa (Ed.), Ethics in applied linguistics research: Language researcher narratives (pp. 15–37). New York: Routledge.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© The Author(s) 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Languages, Literatures, and LinguisticsIndiana State UniversityINUSA
  2. 2.Department of Linguistics and Germanic, Slavic, Asian and African LanguagesMichigan State UniversityEast LansingUSA

Personalised recommendations