Advertisement

Psycholinguistic Methods

  • Sarah Grey
  • Kaitlyn M. Tagarelli

Abstract

Psycholinguistic methods provide insights into the mental representation of language. In the first part of this chapter, we discuss common psycholinguistic tasks and measures together with their strengths and limitations. We review traditional behavioral measures such as response time as well as newer measures, including eye-tracking and event-related potentials. In the second part of the chapter, we discuss the major experimental paradigms that are employed with psycholinguistic tasks and measures and consider the research conducted with these paradigms. We review classic priming paradigms as well as state-of-the-art paradigms that are particularly useful for applied linguistics research, such as artificial linguistic systems. Finally, we consider future directions in applied linguistics research using psycholinguistic methodologies.

Keywords

Psycholinguistics Language learning Language processing Event-related potentials 

References

  1. Altarriba, J., & Basnight-Brown, D. M. (2007). Methodological considerations in performing semantic- and translation-priming experiments across languages. Behavior Research Methods, 39(1), 1–18.Google Scholar
  2. Altmann, G. T. M., & Kamide, Y. (2007). The real-time mediation of visual attention by language and world knowledge: Linking anticipatory (and other) eye movements to linguistic processing. Journal of Memory and Language, 57(4), 502–518.Google Scholar
  3. Arnold, J. E., Fagnano, M., & Tanenhaus, M. K. (2003). Disfluencies signal theee, um, new information. Journal of Psycholinguistic Research, 32(1), 25–36.Google Scholar
  4. Bahlmann, J., Gunter, T. C., & Friederici, A. D. (2006). Hierarchical and linear sequence processing: An electrophysiological exploration of two different grammar types. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 18(11), 1829–1842.Google Scholar
  5. Balukas, C., & Koops, C. (2015). Spanish-English bilingual voice onset time in spontaneous code-switching. International Journal of Bilingualism, 19(4), 423–443.Google Scholar
  6. Barber, H. A., Otten, L. J., Kousta, S.-T., & Vigliocco, G. (2013). Concreteness in word processing: ERP and behavioral effects in a lexical decision task. Brain and Language, 125(1), 47–53.Google Scholar
  7. Bartolotti, J., & Marian, V. (2012). Language learning and control in monolinguals and bilinguals. Cognitive Science, 36(6), 1129–1147.Google Scholar
  8. Basnight-Brown, D. M., & Altarriba, J. (2007). Differences in semantic and translation priming across languages: The role of language direction and language dominance. Memory & Cognition, 35(5), 953–965.Google Scholar
  9. Bates, E., D’Amico, S., Jacobsen, T., Székely, A., Andonova, E., Devescovi, A., & Pléh, C. (2003). Timed picture naming in seven languages. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 10(2), 344–380.Google Scholar
  10. Batterink, L., & Neville, H. (2011). Implicit and explicit mechanisms of word learning in a narrative context: An event-related potential study. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 23(11), 3181–3196.Google Scholar
  11. Batterink, L., & Neville, H. (2013). Implicit and explicit second language training recruit common neural mechanisms for syntactic processing. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 25(6), 936–951.Google Scholar
  12. Bisson, M.-J., Van Heuven, W. J. B., Conklin, K., & Tunney, R. J. (2012). Processing of native and foreign language subtitles in films: An eye-tracking study. Applied Psycholinguistics, 35(2), 399–418.Google Scholar
  13. Bock, J. K. (1986). Syntactic persistence in language production. Cognitive Psychology, 18(3), 355–387.Google Scholar
  14. Bortfeld, H., Leon, S. D., Bloom, J. E., Schober, M. F., & Brennan, S. E. (2001). Disfluency rates in conversation: Effects of age, relationship, topic, role, and gender. Language and Speech, 44(2), 123–147.Google Scholar
  15. Bosker, H. R., Quené, H., Sanders, T., & de Jong, N. H. (2014). Native ‘um’s elicit prediction of low-frequency referents, but non-native ‘um’s do not. Journal of Memory and Language, 75, 104–116.Google Scholar
  16. Bowden, H. W. (2016). Assessing second language oral proficiency for research. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 38(4), 647–675.Google Scholar
  17. Bowden, H. W., Steinhauer, K., Sanz, C., & Ullman, M. T. (2013). Native-like brain processing of syntax can be attained by university foreign language learners. Neuropsychologia, 51(13), 2492–2511.Google Scholar
  18. Breitenstein, C., Zwitserlood, P., de Vries, M. H., Feldhues, C., Knecht, S., & Dobel, C. (2007). Five days versus a lifetime: Intense associative vocabulary training generates lexically integrated words. Restorative Neurology and Neuroscience, 25(5&6), 493–500.Google Scholar
  19. Carey, S., & Bartlett, E. (1978). Acquiring a single new word. Papers and Reports on Child Language Development, 15, 17–29.Google Scholar
  20. Corley, M., & Hartsuiker, R. J. (2011). Why um helps auditory word recognition: The temporal delay hypothesis. PLoS ONE, 6(5), e19792.Google Scholar
  21. Crinion, J., Turner, R., Grogan, A., Hanakawa, T., Noppeney, U., Devlin, J. T., … Usui, K. (2006). Language control in the bilingual brain. Science, 312(5779), 1537–1540.Google Scholar
  22. Dahan, D., & Tanenhaus, M. K. (2004). Continuous mapping from sound to meaning in spoken-language comprehension: Immediate effects of verb-based thematic constraints. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 30(2), 498.Google Scholar
  23. DeLong, K. A., Groppe, D. M., Urbach, T. P., & Kutas, M. (2012). Thinking ahead or not? Natural aging and anticipation during reading. Brain and Language, 121(3), 226–239.Google Scholar
  24. Duñabeitia, J. A., Crepaldi, D., Meyer, A. S., New, B., Pliatsikas, C., Smolka, E., & Brysbaert, M. (2017). MultiPic: A standardized set of 750 drawings with norms for six European languages. The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 22, 1–24.Google Scholar
  25. Dussias, P. E., Kroff, J. R. V., Tamargo, R. E. G., & Gerfen, C. (2013). When gender and looking go hand in hand. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 35(2), 353.Google Scholar
  26. Ellis, R. (2005). Measuring implicit and explicit knowledge of a second language: A psychometric study. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 27(2), 141–172.Google Scholar
  27. Erlam, R. (2006). Elicited imitation as a measure of L2 implicit knowledge: An empirical validation study. Applied Linguistics, 27(3), 464–491.Google Scholar
  28. Ettlinger, M., Morgan-Short, K., Faretta-Stutenberg, M., & Wong, P. (2016). The relationship between artificial and second language learning. Cognitive Science, 40(4), 822–847.Google Scholar
  29. Federmeier, K. D., & Kutas, M. (1999). A rose by any other name: Long-term memory structure and sentence processing. Journal of Memory and Language, 41(4), 469–495.Google Scholar
  30. Fine, A. B., & Jaeger, F. T. (2013). Evidence for implicit learning in syntactic comprehension. Cognitive Science, 37(3), 578–591.Google Scholar
  31. Finkbeiner, M., & Nicol, J. (2003). Semantic category effects in second language word learning. Applied Psycholinguistics, 24(03), 369–383.Google Scholar
  32. Flege, J. E. (1991). Age of learning affects the authenticity of voice-onset time (VOT) in stop consonants produced in a second language. The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 89(1), 395–411.Google Scholar
  33. Fox Tree, J. E. (1995). The effects of false starts and repetitions on the processing of subsequent words in spontaneous speech. Journal of Memory and Language, 34(6), 709–738.Google Scholar
  34. Freeman, J. B., & Ambady, N. (2010). MouseTracker: Software for studying real-time mental processing using a computer mouse-tracking method. Behavior Research Methods, 42(1), 226–241.Google Scholar
  35. Frenck-Mestre, C., & Prince, P. (1997). Second language autonomy. Journal of Memory and Language, 37(4), 481–501.Google Scholar
  36. Gillon Dowens, M., Guo, T., Guo, J., Barber, H., & Carreiras, M. (2011). Gender and number processing in Chinese learners of Spanish—Evidence from event related potentials. Neuropsychologia, 49, 1651–1659.Google Scholar
  37. Godfroid, A., Housen, A., & Boers, F. (2013). An eye for words: Gauging the role of attention in L2 vocabulary acquisition by means of eye tracking. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 35(3), 483–517.Google Scholar
  38. Goslin, J., Duffy, H., & Floccia, C. (2012). An ERP investigation of regional and foreign accent processing. Brain and Language, 122(2), 92–102.Google Scholar
  39. Grey, S., Cox, J. C., Serafini, E. J., & Sanz, C. (2015). The role of individual differences in the study abroad context: Cognitive capacity and language development during short-term intensive language exposure. Modern Language Journal, 99(1), 137–157.Google Scholar
  40. Grey, S., & Van Hell, J. G. (2017). Foreign-accented speaker identity affects neural correlates of sentence comprehension. Journal of Neurolinguistics, 42, 93–108.Google Scholar
  41. Grey, S., Williams, J. N., & Rebuschat, P. (2014). Incidental exposure and L3 learning of morphosyntax. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 36(4), 611–645.Google Scholar
  42. Grodner, D., & Sedivy, J. (2011). The effect of speaker-specific information on pragmatic inferences. The processing and acquisition of reference, 2327, 239–272.Google Scholar
  43. Hamrick, P., & Sachs, R. (2017). Establishing evidence of learning in experiments employing artificial linguistic systems. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 1–17.Google Scholar
  44. Harley, T. A. (2013). The psychology of language: From data to theory. East Sussex: Psychology Press.Google Scholar
  45. Hartsuiker, R. J., Pickering, M. J., & Veltkamp, E. (2004). Is syntax separate or shared between languages? Cross-linguistic syntactic priming in Spanish-English bilinguals. Psychological Science, 15(6), 409–414.Google Scholar
  46. Huettig, F., Rommers, J., & Meyer, A. S. (2011). Using the visual world paradigm to study language processing: A review and critical evaluation. Acta Psychologica, 137(2), 151–171.Google Scholar
  47. Kaan, E., & Swaab, T. Y. (2003). Repair, revision, and complexity in syntactic reanalysis: An electrophysiological differentiation. Journal of Cognitive Neuoscience, 15, 98–110.Google Scholar
  48. Kamide, Y., Altmann, G. T. M., & Haywood, S. L. (2003). The time-course of prediction in incremental sentence processing: Evidence from anticipatory eye movements. Journal of Memory and Language, 49(1), 133–156.Google Scholar
  49. Karuza, E. A., Newport, E. L., Aslin, R. N., Starling, S. J., Tivarus, M. E., & Bavelier, D. (2013). The neural correlates of statistical learning in a word segmentation task: An fMRI study. Brain and Language, 127(1), 46–54.Google Scholar
  50. Kootstra, G. J., van Hell, J. G., & Dijkstra, T. (2010). Syntactic alignment and shared word order in code-switched sentence production: Evidence from bilingual monologue and dialogue. Journal of Memory and Language, 63(2), 210–231.Google Scholar
  51. Kroll, J. F., Van Hell, J. G., Tokowicz, N., & Green, D. W. (2010). The revised hierarchical model: A critical review and assessment. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition, 13(03), 373–381.Google Scholar
  52. Lan, Y.-J., Fang, S.-Y., Legault, J., & Li, P. (2015). Second language acquisition of Mandarin Chinese vocabulary: Context of learning effects. Educational Technology Research and Development, 63(5), 671–690.Google Scholar
  53. Lisker, L., & Abramson, A. S. (1964). A cross-language study of voicing in initial stops: Acoustical measurements. Word, 20(3), 384–422.Google Scholar
  54. Luck, S. J. (2014). An introduction to the event-related potential technique. Cambridge, MA: MIT press.Google Scholar
  55. Martin, C. D., Thierry, G., Kuipers, J.-R., Boutonnet, B., Foucart, A., & Costa, A. (2013). Bilinguals reading in their second language do not predict upcoming words as native readers do. Journal of Memory and Language, 69(4), 574–588.Google Scholar
  56. McDonough, K., & Mackey, A. (2008). Syntactic priming and ESL question development. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 30(1), 31–47.Google Scholar
  57. McDonough, K., & Trofimovich, P. (2009). Using priming methods in second language research. New York, NY: Taylor & Francis.Google Scholar
  58. McLaughlin, J., Osterhout, L., & Kim, A. (2004). Neural correlates of second-language word learning: Minimal instruction produces rapid change. Nature Reviews Neuroscience, 7, 703–704.Google Scholar
  59. Morett, L. M., & Macwhinney, B. (2013). Syntactic transfer in English-speaking Spanish learners. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition, 16(1), 132–151.Google Scholar
  60. Morgan-Short, K. (2014). Electrophysiological approaches to understanding second language acquisition: A field reaching its potential. Annual Review of Applied Linguistics, 34, 15–36.Google Scholar
  61. Morgan-Short, K., Sanz, C., Steinhauer, K., & Ullman, M. T. (2010). Second language acquisition of gender agreement in explicit and implicit training conditions: An event-related potential study. Language Learning, 60(1), 154–193.Google Scholar
  62. Mueller, J. L., Hahne, A., Fujii, Y., & Friederici, A. D. (2005). Native and nonnative speakers’ processing of a miniature version of Japanese as revealed by ERPs. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 17(8), 1229–1244.Google Scholar
  63. Neville, H. J., Nicol, J. L., Barss, A., Forster, K. I., & Garrett, M. F. (1991). Syntactically based sentence processing classes: Evidence from event-related brain potentials. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 3(2), 151–165.Google Scholar
  64. Newman, A. J., Tremblay, A., Nichols, E. S., Neville, H. J., & Ullman, M. T. (2012). The influence of language proficiency on lexical-semantic processing in native and late learners of English. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 24, 1205–1223.Google Scholar
  65. Newman, R. L., & Connolly, J. F. (2009). Electrophysiological markers of pre-lexical speech processing: Evidence for bottom–up and top–down effects on spoken word processing. Biological Psychology, 80(1), 114–121.Google Scholar
  66. Oviatt, S. (1995). Predicting spoken disfluencies during human–computer interaction. Computer Speech & Language, 9(1), 19–35.Google Scholar
  67. Perruchet, P., & Pacteau, C. (1990). Synthetic grammar learning: Implicit rule abstraction or explicit fragmentary knowledge? Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 119(3), 264.Google Scholar
  68. Pickering, M. J., & Ferreira, V. S. (2008). Structural priming: A critical review. Psychological Bulletin, 134(3), 427.Google Scholar
  69. Rassaei, E., Moinzadeh, A., & Youhannaee, M. (2012). Effects of recasts and metalinguistic corrective feedback on the acquisition of implicit and explicit L2 knowledge. The Journal of Language Teaching and Learning, 2(1), 59–75.Google Scholar
  70. Rayner, K. (1998). Eye movements in reading and information processing: 20 years of research. Psychological Bulletin, 124, 372–422.Google Scholar
  71. Reber, A. S. (1967). Implicit learning of artificial grammars. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 6, 855–863.Google Scholar
  72. Reber, A. S. (1990). On the primacy of the implicit: Comment on Perruchet and Pacteau. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 119(3), 340–342.Google Scholar
  73. Rebuschat, P., & Williams, J. N. (2012). Implicit and explicit knowledge in second language acquisition. Applied Psycholinguistics, 33(4), 829–856.Google Scholar
  74. Robinson, P. (1997). Generalizability and automaticity of second language learning under implicit, incidental, enhanced, and instructed conditions. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 19(02), 223–247.Google Scholar
  75. Robinson, P. (2005). Cognitive abilities, chunk-strength, and frequency effects in implicit artificial grammar and incidental L2 leaning: Replications of Reber, Walkenfeld, and Hernstadt (1991) and Knowlton and Squire (1996) and their relevance for SLA. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 27(2), 235–268.Google Scholar
  76. Roche, J. M., Peters, B., & Dale, R. (2015). “Your tone says it all”: The processing and interpretation of affective language. Speech Communication, 66, 47–64.Google Scholar
  77. Saffran, J. R., Aslin, R. N., & Newport, E. L. (1996). Statistical learning by 8-month-old infants. Science, 274(5294), 1926–1928.Google Scholar
  78. Sanz, C., & Grey, S. (2015). Effects of conditions on L2 development: Beyond accuracy. In P. Rebuschat (Ed.), Implicit and explicit learning of languages (pp. 301–324). Amsterdam: John Benjamins.Google Scholar
  79. Segalowitz, N. S., & Segalowitz, S. J. (1993). Skilled performance, practice, and the differentiation of speed-up from automatization effects: Evidence from second language word recognition. Applied Psycholinguistics, 14, 369–369.Google Scholar
  80. Spada, N., Shiu, J. L. J., & Tomita, Y. (2015). Validating an elicited imitation task as a measure of implicit knowledge: Comparisons with other validation studies. Language Learning, 65(3), 723–751.Google Scholar
  81. Stafford, C. A., Bowden, H. W., & Sanz, C. (2012). Optimizing language instruction: Matters of explicitness, practice, and cue learning. Language Learning, 62(3), 741–768.Google Scholar
  82. Sunderman, G., & Kroll, J. F. (2009). When study abroad fails to deliver: The internal resources threshold effect. Applied Psycholinguistics, 30, 79–99.Google Scholar
  83. Tagarelli, K. M. (2014). The neurocognition of adult second language learning: An fMRI study. (Doctoral Dissertation), Georgetown University.Google Scholar
  84. Tagarelli, K. M., Ruiz, S., Moreno Vega, J. L., & Rebuschat, P. (2016). Variability in second language learning: The roles of individual differences, learning conditions, and linguistic complexity. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 38(2), 293–316.Google Scholar
  85. Tanner, D., & Van Hell, J. G. (2014). ERPs reveal individual differences in morphosyntactic processing. Neuropsychologia, 56, 289–301.Google Scholar
  86. Weiss, D. J., Poepsel, T., & Gerfen, C. (2015). Tracking multiple inputs. In P. Rebuschat (Ed.), Implicit and explicit learning of languages (pp. 167–190). Amsterdam: John Benjamins.Google Scholar
  87. Wu, S. L., & Ortega, L. (2013). Measuring global oral proficiency in SLA research: A new elicited imitation test of L2 Chinese. Foreign Language Annals, 46(4), 680–704.Google Scholar
  88. Yan, X., Maeda, Y., Lv, J., & Ginther, A. (2016). Elicited imitation as a measure of second language proficiency: A narrative review and meta-analysis. Language Testing, 33(4), 497–528.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© The Author(s) 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Modern Languages and LiteraturesFordham UniversityBronxUSA
  2. 2.Department of NeuroscienceGeorgetown UniversityWashington, DCUSA

Personalised recommendations