Advertisement

Abstract

This chapter presents a philosophical and methodological background for conducting and evaluating interview and focus group research in applied linguistics. It discusses the strengths and limitations of various approaches and deconstructs ‘commonsense’ assumptions about interviewing by examining the influence of two prevalent perspectives: ‘interview as research instrument’ and ‘interview as social practice’. Emphasizing researcher responsibility, ethical conduct, and reflexivity, Prior also gives attention to issues related to rapport, language choice, interculturality, and ‘naturalness’ of interview and focus group data. The chapter concludes by considering recent directions in interview research and provides an annotated list of resources for further reading.

Keywords

Interviews Focus groups Research practice 

References

  1. Arksey, H., & Knight, P. (1999). Interviewing for social scientists: An introductory resource with examples. London: SAGE.Google Scholar
  2. Atkinson, P. (2015). For ethnography. London: SAGE.Google Scholar
  3. Atkinson, P., & Silverman, D. (1997). Kundera’s Immortality: The interview society and the invention of the self. Qualitative Inquiry, 3(3), 304–325.Google Scholar
  4. Atkinson, R. (1998). The life story interview. London: SAGE.Google Scholar
  5. Baker, C. D. (2002). Ethnomethodological analyses of interviews. In J. Holstein & J. Gubrium (Eds.), Inside interviewing: New lenses, new concerns (pp. 395–412). London: SAGE.Google Scholar
  6. Barkhuizen, G., Benson, P., & Chik, A. (2014). Narrative inquiry in language teaching and learning research. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
  7. van den Berg, H., Wetherell, M., & Houtkoop-Steenstra, H. (Eds.). (2003). Analyzing race talk: Multidisciplinary approaches to the interview. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  8. Briggs, C. L. (1986). Learning how to ask: A sociolinguistic appraisal of the role of the interview in social science research. New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  9. Brinkmann, S., & Kvale, S. (2015). InterViews: Learning the craft of qualitative research interviewing (3rd ed.). London: SAGE.Google Scholar
  10. Canagarajah, A. S. (2008). Language shift and the family: Questions from the Sri Lankan Tamil diaspora. Journal of Sociolinguistics, 12(2), 143–176.Google Scholar
  11. Chase, S. (2011). Narrative inquiry: Still a field in the making. In N. Denzin & Y. Lincoln (Eds.), The Sage handbook of qualitative research (4th ed., pp. 421–434). London: SAGE.Google Scholar
  12. Chen, S.-H. (2011). Power relations between the researcher and the researched: An analysis of native and nonnative ethnographic interviews. Field Methods, 23(2), 119–135.Google Scholar
  13. Chiu, L.-F., & Knight, D. (1999). Developing focus group research: Politics, theory, and practice. In J. Kitzinger & R. Barbour (Eds.), Developing focus group research: Politics, theory and practice (pp. 99–112). London: SAGE.Google Scholar
  14. Codó, E. (2008). Interviews and questionnaires. In L. Wei & M. Moyer (Eds.), Blackwell guide to research methods in bilingualism and multilingualism (pp. 158–176). Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
  15. Currivan, D. B. (2008). Conversational interviewing. In P. J. Lavrakas (Ed.), Encyclopedia of survey research methods (p. 152). London: SAGE.Google Scholar
  16. De Fina, A., & Georgakopoulou, A. (2012). Analyzing narrative: Discourse and sociolinguistic perspectives. New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  17. Dörnyei, Z. (2007). Research methods in applied linguistics. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  18. Duncombe, J., & Jessop, J. (2012). Doing rapport and the ethics of “faking friendship”. In T. Miller, M. Birch, M. Mauthner, & J. Jessop (Eds.), Ethics in qualitative research (2nd ed., pp. 107–122). London: SAGE.Google Scholar
  19. Dushku, S. (2000). Conducting individual and focus group interviews in research in Albania. TESOL Quarterly, 34(4), 763–768.Google Scholar
  20. Edley, N., & Litosseliti, L. (2010). Contemplating interviews and focus groups. In L. Litosseliti (Ed.), Research methods in linguistics (pp. 155–179). London: Continuum.Google Scholar
  21. Fern, E. F. (2001). Advanced focus group research. London: SAGE.Google Scholar
  22. Flick, U. (2014). An introduction to qualitative research. London: SAGE.Google Scholar
  23. Foley, L. (2012). Constructing the respondent. In J. F. Gubrium, J. A. Holstein, A. B. Marvast, & K. D. McKinney (Eds.), The Sage handbook of interview research: The complexity of the craft (pp. 305–315). London: SAGE.Google Scholar
  24. Fulcher, G., & Davidson, F. (Eds.). (2013). The Routledge handbook of language testing. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  25. Goodman, S., & Speer, S. (2016). Natural and contrived data. In C. Tileagă & E. Stokoe (Eds.), Discursive psychology: Classic and contemporary issues (pp. 57–69). London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  26. Goodwin, J. (2012). Sage biographical research (Vol. 1: Biographical research: Starting points, debates and approaches). London: SAGE.Google Scholar
  27. Griffin, G. (2015). Cross-cultural interviewing: Feminist experiences and reflections. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  28. Gubrium, J. F., & Holstein, J. A. (2002). From the individual to the interview society. In J. F. Gubrium & J. A. Holstein (Eds.), Handbook of interview research (pp. 3–32). London: SAGE.Google Scholar
  29. Gubrium, J. F., Holstein, J. A., Marvasti, A. B., & McKinney, K. D. (Eds.). (2012). The SAGE handbook of interview research: The complexity of the craft (2nd ed.). London: SAGE.Google Scholar
  30. Heyl, B. S. (2001). Ethnographic interviewing. In P. Atkinson, A. Coffey, S. Delamont, J. Lofland, & L. Lofland (Eds.), Handbook of ethnography (pp. 369–383). London: SAGE.Google Scholar
  31. Ho, D. (2006). The Focus group interview: Rising to the challenge in qualitative research methodology. Australian Review of Applied Linguistics, 29(1), 5.1–5.19.Google Scholar
  32. Holstein, J. A., & Gubrium, J. F. (2004). The active interview. In D. Silverman (Ed.), Qualitative research: Theory, method, and practice (pp. 140–161). London: SAGE.Google Scholar
  33. Horowitz, R. (1986). Remaining an outsider: Membership as a threat to research rapport. Urban Life, 14(4), 409–430.Google Scholar
  34. Hyland, K. (2002). Directives: Argument and engagement in academic writing. Applied Linguistics in Academic Writing, 23(2), 215–239.Google Scholar
  35. Kasper, G., & Omori, M. (2010). Language and culture. In N. H. Hornberger & S. L. McKay (Eds.), Sociolinguistics and language education (pp. 455–491). Bristol: Multilingual Matters.Google Scholar
  36. Kasper, G., & Prior, M. T. (2015). Analyzing storytelling in TESOL interview research. TESOL Quarterly, 49(2), 226–255.Google Scholar
  37. Kecskes, I. (2012). Interculturality and intercultural pragmatics. In J. Jackson (Ed.), Routledge handbook of language and intercultural communication (pp. 67–84). London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  38. Kenney, R., & Akita, K. (2008). When West writes East: In search of an ethic for cross-cultural interviewing. Journal of Mass Media Ethics, 23, 280–295.Google Scholar
  39. Kitzinger, J. (1995). Introducing focus groups. British Medical Journal, 311, 299–311.Google Scholar
  40. Kropf, M. E. (2004). Survey methods. In J. G. Greer (Ed.), Public opinion and polling around the world: A historical encyclopedia (Vol. 1, pp. 468–474). Oxford: ABC-CLIO.Google Scholar
  41. Krueger, R. A., & Casey, M. A. (2015). Focus groups: A practical guide for applied research. London: SAGE.Google Scholar
  42. Labov, W. (1972). Language in the inner city: Studies in the Black English Vernacular. Philadelphia: University of Philadelphia Press.Google Scholar
  43. Lavrakas, P. (Ed.). (2008). Encyclopedia of survey methods. London: SAGE.Google Scholar
  44. Liamputtong, P. (2011). Focus group methodology: Principle and practice. London: SAGE.Google Scholar
  45. Lillrank, A. (2012). Managing the interviewer self. In J. F. Gubrium, J. A. Holstein, A. B. Marvasti, & K. D. McKinney (Eds.), The SAGE handbook of interview research: The complexity of the craft (2nd ed., pp. 281–294). London: SAGE.Google Scholar
  46. Litosseliti, L. (2007). Using focus groups in research. London: Continuum.Google Scholar
  47. Malinowski, B. (1922). Argonauts of the Western Pacific. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  48. Maryns, K. (2012). Multilingualism in legal settings. In M. Martin-Jones, A. Blackledge, & A. Creese (Eds.), Routledge handbook of multilingualism (pp. 297–313). London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  49. Menard-Warwick, J. (2009). Gendered identities and immigrant language learning. Bristol: Multilingual Matters.Google Scholar
  50. Miller, E. (2011). Indeterminacy and interview research: Co-constructing ambiguity and clarity in interviews with an adult immigrant learner of English. Applied Linguistics, 32(1), 43–59.Google Scholar
  51. Miller, E. R. (2014). The language of adult immigrants: Agency in the making. Bristol: Multilingual Matters.Google Scholar
  52. Mishler, E. G. (1986). Research interviewing: Context and narrative. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
  53. Morgan, D. L. (1997). Focus groups as qualitative research. London: SAGE.Google Scholar
  54. Myers, G. (1998). Displaying opinions: Topics and disagreement in focus groups. Language in Society, 27, 85–111.Google Scholar
  55. Nairn, K., Munro, J., & Smith, A. B. (2005). A counter-narrative of a “failed” interview. Qualitative Research, 5(2), 221–244.Google Scholar
  56. Parkinson, J., & Crouch, A. (2011). Education, language, and identity amongst students at a South African university. Journal of Language, Identity, and Education, 10(2), 83–98.Google Scholar
  57. Pavlenko, A. (2007). Autobiographical narratives as data in applied linguistics. Applied Linguistics, 28(2), 163–188.Google Scholar
  58. Potter, J. (2004). Discourse analysis as a way of analysing naturally occurring talk. In D. Silverman (Ed.), Qualitative research: Theory, method and practice (pp. 200–221). London: SAGE.Google Scholar
  59. Potter, J., & Hepburn, A. (2005). Qualitative interviews in psychology: Problems and possibilities. Qualitative Research in Psychology, 2, 281–307.Google Scholar
  60. Potter, J., & Hepburn, A. (2008). Discursive constructionism. In J. A. Holstein & J. F. Gubrium (Eds.), Handbook of constructionist research (pp. 275–293). New York: Guildford.Google Scholar
  61. Potter, J., & Hepburn, A. (2012). Eight challenges for interview researchers. In J. F. Gubrium, J. A. Holstein, A. B. Marvasti, & K. D. McKinney (Eds.), The SAGE handbook of interview research: The complexity of the craft (2nd ed., pp. 555–570). London: SAGE.Google Scholar
  62. Prior, M. T. (2014). Re-examining alignment in a ‘failed’ L2 autobiographic research interview. Qualitative Inquiry, 20(4), 495–508.Google Scholar
  63. Prior, M. T. (2016). Emotion and discourse in L2 narrative research. Bristol: Multilingual Matters.Google Scholar
  64. Prior, M. T. (2017). Accomplishing “rapport” in qualitative research interviews: Empathic moments in interaction. Applied Linguistics Review. https://doi.org/10.1515/applirev-2017-0029.Google Scholar
  65. Rapley, T. J. (2007). Doing conversation, discourse, and document. London: SAGE.Google Scholar
  66. Rapley, T. J. (2012). The (extra)ordinary practices of qualitative interviewing. In J. F. Gubrium, J. A. Holstein, A. B. Marvasti, & K. D. McKinney (Eds.), The SAGE handbook of interview research: The complexity of the craft (2nd ed., pp. 541–554). London: SAGE.Google Scholar
  67. Reddy, M. J. (1979). The conduit metaphor—A case of frame conflict in our language about language. In A. Ortony (Ed.), Metaphor and thought (pp. 284–310). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  68. Richards, K. (2003). Qualitative inquiry in TESOL. New York: Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar
  69. Richards, K. (2009). Interviews. In J. Heigham & R. A. Croker (Eds.), Qualitative research in applied linguistics: A practical introduction (pp. 182–199). New York: Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar
  70. Richards, K. (2011). Using micro-analysis in interviewer training: ‘Continuers’ and interviewer positioning. Applied Linguistics, 32(1), 95–112.Google Scholar
  71. Riemann, G., & Schütze, E. (1991). “Trajectory” as a basic theoretical concept for analyzing suffering and disorderly social processes. In D. R. Maines (Ed.), Social organization and social process: Essays in honor of Anselm Strauss (pp. 333–357). New York: de Gruyter.Google Scholar
  72. Ritchie, D. A. (Ed.). (2011). The Oxford handbook of oral history. Oxford: Oxford University press.Google Scholar
  73. Roulston, K. (2010). Reflective interviewing: A guide to theory and practice. London: SAGE.Google Scholar
  74. Roulston, K. (2011). Working through challenges in doing interview research. International Journal of Qualitative Methods, 10(4), 348–366.Google Scholar
  75. Roulston, K. (2012). The pedagogy of interviewing. In J. F. Gubrium, J. A. Holstein, A. B. Marvasti, & K. D. McKinney (Eds.), The SAGE handbook of interview research: The complexity of the craft (2nd ed., pp. 61–74). London: SAGE.Google Scholar
  76. Roulston, K. (2014). Interaction problems in research interviews. Qualitative Research, 14(3), 277–293.Google Scholar
  77. Rubin, H. R., & Rubin, I. S. (2012). Qualitative interviewing: The art of hearing data (3rd ed.). London: SAGE.Google Scholar
  78. Sapsford, R. (2007). Survey research (2nd ed.). London: SAGE.Google Scholar
  79. Schaeffer, N. C. (1991). Conversation with a purpose—Or conversation? Interaction in the standardized interview. In P. P. Biemer, R. M. Groves, L. E. Lyberg, N. A. Mathiowetz, & S. Sudman (Eds.), Measurement errors in surveys (pp. 367–391). Hoboken, NJ: John Wiley & Sons.Google Scholar
  80. Seidman, I. (2013). Interviewing as qualitative research: A guide for researchers in education and the social sciences (4th ed.). New York: Teachers College Press.Google Scholar
  81. Silverman, D. (2014). Interpreting qualitative data (5th ed.). London: SAGE.Google Scholar
  82. Skinner, J. (2012). The interview: An ethnographic approach. London: Berg.Google Scholar
  83. Smith, L. T. (2012). Decolonizing methodologies: Research and indigenous peoples (2nd ed.). London: Zed Books.Google Scholar
  84. Speer, S. A. (2002). ‘Natural’ and ‘contrived’ data: A sustainable distinction? Discourse Studies, 4(4), 511–525.Google Scholar
  85. Spradley, J. P. (1979). The ethnographic interview. New York: Holt, Rinehart, & Winston.Google Scholar
  86. Stewart, D. W., & Shamdasani, P. N. (2014). Focus groups: Theory and practice (3rd ed.). London: SAGE.Google Scholar
  87. Talmy, S. (2010). Qualitative interviews in applied linguistics: From research instrument to social practice. ARAL, 30, 128–148.Google Scholar
  88. Talmy, S. (2011). The interview as collaborative achievement: Interaction, identity, and ideology in a speech event. Applied Linguistics, 32(1), 35–42.Google Scholar
  89. Talmy, S., & Richards, K. (Eds.). (2011). Qualitative interviews in applied linguistics: Discursive perspectives [Special issue]. Applied Linguistics, 32(1), 1–128.Google Scholar
  90. Watson-Gegeo, K. A. (1988). Ethnography in ESL: Defining the essentials. TESOL Quarterly, 22(4), 575–592.Google Scholar
  91. Weiss, R. S. (1995). Learning from strangers: The art and method of qualitative interview studies. New York: The Free Press.Google Scholar
  92. Wengraf, T. (2001). Qualitative research interviewing. London: SAGE.Google Scholar
  93. Wilkinson, S. (2004). Focus group research. In D. Silverman (Ed.), Qualitative research: Theory, method and practice (pp. 177–199). London: SAGE.Google Scholar
  94. Winchatz, M. R. (2006). Fieldworker or foreigner? Ethnographic interviewing in nonnative languages. Field Methods, 18, 83–97.Google Scholar
  95. Zimmerman, D. H. (1998). Identity, context and interaction. In C. Antaki & S. Widdicombe (Eds.), Identities in talk (pp. 87–106). London: SAGE.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© The Author(s) 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of EnglishArizona State UniversityTempeUSA

Personalised recommendations