Skip to main content

Campaigning for Gender Equality Through Social Media: The European Women’s Lobby

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Social Media and European Politics

Part of the book series: Palgrave Studies in European Political Sociology ((PSEPS))

Abstract

Social media plays an increasingly important role in women’s advocacy as women’s interests are often not reflected in mainstream political debates. This means that non-formal political activities, such as the use of online social media platforms, can provide women with the opportunity to network across borders at a low cost and influence the political agenda. However, despite social media’s political and awareness-raising potential, we know little about how women’s NGOs in the EU make use of this enhanced communication environment and to what degree they empower women’s publics. This chapter, therefore, evaluates the effectiveness of the online advocacy work of the largest European umbrella network of women’s associations, the European Women’s Lobby.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 79.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 99.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 129.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Altides, C. (2013). Information strategies of organised civil society. In: B. Kohler-Koch and C. Quittkat, (eds.), De-mystification of Participatory Democracy, Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Auger, G. (2013). Fostering democracy through social media: Evaluating diametrically opposed nonprofit advocacy organization’s use of Facebook, Twitter and YouTube. Public Relations Review, 39, pp. 369–376.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Barnett, S. (1997). New media, old problems. New technology and the political process. European Journal of Communication, 12(2), pp. 193–218.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Baumgartner, F. and Leech, B. (1998). Basic Interests: The Importance of Groups in Politics and Political Science. Princeton: Princeton University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Bennett, L. and Segerberg, A. (2012). The logic of connective action: Digital media and the personalization of contentious politics. Information, Communication & Society, 15(5), pp. 739–768.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bentivegna, S. (2006). Rethinking politics in the world of ICTs. European Journal of Communication, 21(3), pp. 331–343.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Binderkrantz, A. (2008). Different groups, different strategies: How interest groups pursue their political ambitions. Scandinavian Political Studies, 31(2), pp. 173–200.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Binderkrantz, A. (2012). Interest groups in the media: Bias and diversity over time. European Journal of Political Research, 51, pp. 117–139.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cammaerts, B. (2008). Internet-Mediated Participation Beyond the Nation State. Manchester: Manchester University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chadwick, A. (2007). Digital network repertoires and organizational hybridity. Political Communication, 24(3), pp. 283–301.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chalmers, W. and Shotton, A. (2015). Changing the face of advocacy? Explaining interest organisations’ use of social media strategies. Political Communication, 33(3), pp. 374–391.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Checkel, J.T. (1999). Social construction and integration. Journal of European Public Policy, 6(4), pp. 545–560.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Corneliussen, H. (2012). Gender-Technology Relations: Exploring Stability and Change. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Edwards, H. and Hoefer, R. (2010). Are social work advocacy groups using web 2.0 effectively?. Journal of Policy Practice, 9(3–4), pp. 220–239.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • European Parliament, O.R. (2013). Women in Decision-Making: The Role of the New Media for Increased Political Participation. PE 493.010. Brussels: European Parliament.

    Google Scholar 

  • EWL communications officer (2016). Interviewed by Helena Seibicke, 04 April.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fotopoulou, A. (2014). Digital and networked by default? Women’s organisations and the social imaginary of networked feminism. New Media & Society, 18(6), pp. 989–1005.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fraser, N. (1992). Rethinking the public sphere: A contribution to the critique of actually existing democracy. Social Text, 25/26, pp. 56–80.

    Google Scholar 

  • Garza, A. (2016). A herstory of the #blacklivesmatter movement. In: J. Hobson, (ed.), Are all the Women Still White? Rethinking Race, Expanding Feminism, Albany: State University of New York Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gerbaudo, P. and Treré, E. (2015). In search of the ‘we’ of social media activism: introduction to the special issue on social media and protest identities. Information, Communication & Society, 18(8), pp. 865–871.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gillin, P. (2007). The New Influencers: A Marketer’s Guide to the New Social Media. Sanger, CA: Quill Driver Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hestres, L. (2013). Preaching to the choir: Internet-mediated advocacy, issue public mobilization, and climate change. New Media & Society, 16(2), pp. 323–339.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Howard, P.N., Duffy, A., Freelon, D., Hussain, M., Mari, W. and Mazaid, M. (2011). Opening closed regimes: What was the role of social media during the Arab Spring? pITPI Working Paper 2011.1. Seattle: University of Washington.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jacquot, S. (2015). Transformations in EU Gender Equality- From Emergence to Dismantling. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Kaplan, A. and Haenlein, M. (2010). Users of the world, unite! The challenges and opportunities of social media. Business Horizons, 53, pp. 59–68.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Knappe, H. and Lang, S. (2014). Between whisper and voice: Online women’s movement outreach in the UK and Germany. European Journal of Women’s Studies, 21(4), pp. 361–381.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kohler-Koch, B. (2013). Civil society participation: More democracy or pluralization of the European lobby?. In: B. Kohler-Koch and C. Quittkat, (eds.), De-mystification of Participatory Democracy, Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Kriesi, H., Tresche, A. and Jochum, M. (2007). Going public in the EU: Action repertoire of Western European collective political actors. Comparative Political Studies, 40(1), pp. 48–73.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lang, S. (2014). Women’s transnational advocacy in the European Union: Empowering leaders, organizations, or publics. In: C. Lemke, (ed.), Women in Leadership: Can Women have it all?, New York: Max Weber Conference.

    Google Scholar 

  • Obar, J., Zube, P. and Lampe, C. (2012). Advocacy 2.0: An analysis of how advocacy groups in the United States perceive and use social media as tools for facilitating civic engagement and collective action. Journal of Information Policy, 2, pp. 1–25.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • OECD (2015). Can social media effectively include women’s voices in decision-making processes? Available at: https://www.oecd.org/dev/development-gender/DEV_socialmedia-issuespaper-March2015.pdf [Accessed 16 August 2016].

  • Olson, M. (1965). The Logic of Collective Action. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Polat, R. (2005). The internet and political participation: Exploring the explanatory links. European Journal of Communication, 20(4), pp. 435–459.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pudrovska, T. and Marx Ferree, M. (2004). Global activism in “virtual space”: The European women’s lobby in the network of transnational women’s NGOs on the web. Social Politics, 11(1), pp. 117–143.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rodriguez, N.S. (2016). Review communicating global inequalities: How LGBTIasylum-specific NGOs use social media as public relations. Public Relations Review, 42(2), pp. 322–332.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Saxton, G.D., Guo, S.C. and Brown, W.A. (2007). New dimensions of nonprofit responsiveness: The application and promise of internet-based technologies. Public Performance & Management Review, 31(2), pp. 144–173.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Segerberg, A. and Bennett, W.L. (2011). Social media and the organization of collective action: Using Twitter to explore the ecologies of two climate change protests. The Communication Review, 14(3), pp. 197–215.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Seibicke, H. and Holst, C. (2017). Gender expertise in the EU: The case of the European women’s lobby. In: C. Holst, M. Gora and M. Warat, (eds.), Expertisation and Democracy in Europe, London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Seo, H., Kim, J.Y. and Yang, S.-U. (2009). Global activism and new media: A study of transnational NGOs’ online public relations. Public Relations Review, 35(2), pp. 123–126.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Solis, B. and Breakenridge, D. (2009). Putting the Public Back in Public Relations. Upper Saddle River, NJ: FT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stache, L.C. (2015). Advocacy and political potential at the convergence of hashtag activism and commerce. Feminist Media Studies, 15(1), pp. 162–164.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tallberg, J., Dellmuth, L.M., Agné, H. and Duit, A.K. (2015). NGO influence in international organisations: Information, access and exchange. British Journal of Political Science, pp. 1–26.

    Google Scholar 

  • Thrall, T., Stecula, D. and Sweet, D. (2014). May we have your attention please? Human-rights NGOs and the problem of global communication. The International Journal of Press/Politics, 19, pp. 1–25.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Treem, J. and Leonardi, P.M. (2012). Social media use in organizations. Exploring the affordances of visibility, editability, persistence, and association. Communication Yearbook, 36, pp. 143–189.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tresch, A. and Fischer, M. (2014). In search of political influence: Outside lobbying behaviour and media coverage of social movements, interest groups and political parties in six Western European countries. International Political Science Review, 14, pp. 1–18.

    Google Scholar 

  • Van Der Graaf, A., Otjes, S. and Rasmussen, A. (2016). Weapon of the weak? The social media landscape of interest groups. European Journal of Communication, 31(2), pp. 120–135.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wessler, H., Brueggemann, M., Kleinen-Von Koenigsloew, K., Sifft, S. and Wimmel, A. (2007). The quest for a European public sphere: News media and democratic legitimacy. In: J. Debardeleben and A. Hurrelmann, (eds.), Democratic Dilemmas of Multilevel Governance: Legitimacy, Representation and Accountability in the European Union, Berlin: Springer.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Helena Seibicke .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Copyright information

© 2017 The Author(s)

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Seibicke, H. (2017). Campaigning for Gender Equality Through Social Media: The European Women’s Lobby. In: Barisione, M., Michailidou, A. (eds) Social Media and European Politics. Palgrave Studies in European Political Sociology. Palgrave Macmillan, London. https://doi.org/10.1057/978-1-137-59890-5_6

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/978-1-137-59890-5_6

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, London

  • Print ISBN: 978-1-137-59889-9

  • Online ISBN: 978-1-137-59890-5

  • eBook Packages: Social SciencesSocial Sciences (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics