Advertisement

Transnationalism in Education: Theoretical Discussions and the Implications for Teaching Global Citizenship Education

  • Hannah Soong
Chapter

Abstract

This chapter uses the construct of transnationalism as a conceptual lens to examine the tenets of educating for global citizenship. While the goals for educating students for global citizenship are important, the key argument that this chapter offers is that the meaning of ‘global’ should be depicted as trans-centric instead of nation-centric. Furthermore, within an age of mobility, transnationalism can offer new insights on the importance of global citizenship. In doing so, it provokes readers to consider how transnationalism can move citizenship education practices beyond political and geographic boundaries to theory building.

References

  1. Basch, L. G., Schiller, N. G., & Blanc-Szanton, C. (1994). Nations unbound: Transnational projects, post-colonial predicaments, and de-terriorialized nation-states. Langhorne: Gordon and Breach.Google Scholar
  2. Beck, U. (2000). The cosmopolitan perspective: Sociology in the second age of modernity. British Journal of Sociology, 5(1), 79–107.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Boccagni, P., Lafleur, J.-M., & Levitt, P. (2016). Transnational politics as cultureal circulation: Toward a conceptual understanding of migrant politcal participation on the move. Mobilities, 11(3), 444–463.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Bourdieu, P. (1990). The logic of practice. London: Polity Press.Google Scholar
  5. Castles, S. (1999). Thirty years of research on migration and multicultural societies. In S. Castles (Ed.), From migrant worker to transnational citizen. London: Sage.Google Scholar
  6. Castles, S. (2015). International human mobility: Key issues and challenges to social theory. In S. Castles, D. Ozkul, & M. A. Cubas (Eds.), Social transformation and migration: National and local experiences in South Korea, Turkey, Mexico and Australia. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Castles, S., De Haas, H., & Miller, M. (2014). The age of migration: International population movements in the modern world. New York: Guilford Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Chu, J. (2010). Cosmologies of credit: Transnational mobility and the politics of destination in China. United States: Duke University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Clavin, P. (2005). Defining transnationalism. Contemporary European History, 14(4), 421–439.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Faist, T. (2000). The volume and dynamics of international migration and transnational social spaces. Oxford: Oxford Univesrsity Press.Google Scholar
  11. Goldring, L. (2003). Gender status and the state in transnational spaces: The gendering of political participation in Mexican hometown association. In P. Hondagneu-Sotelo (Ed.), Gender and U.S. immigration. Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar
  12. Guarnizo, L. E. (2012). “Going home”: Class, gender, and household transformation among Dominican return migration. Special issue: Caribbean circuit new directions in the study of Caribbean migration, 16(4), 13–60.Google Scholar
  13. Guarnizo, L. E., Portes, A., & Haller, W. (2003). Assimilation and transnationalism: Determinants of transnational political action among contemporary migrants. American Journal of Sociology, 108(6), 1211–1248.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Held, D. (2005). Globalization: The dangers and the answers. In D. Held (Ed.), Debating globalization. Cambridge: Polity Press.Google Scholar
  15. International Organization for Migration. (2011). Protection of migrants. Accessed on 16 September 2014. http://www.un.org/ga/search/view_doc.asp?symbol=%20A/RES/66/172.
  16. Itzigsohn, J. (2000). Immigration and the boundaries of citizenship: The institution of immigrants’ political transnationalism. International Migration Review, 34, 1126–1154.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Khagram, S., & Levitt, P. (2004). Conceptualising transnational studies. Retrieved from Harvard University.Google Scholar
  18. Levitt, P., & Schiller, G. (2004). Conceptualizing simultaneity: A transnational social field perspective on society. International migration review, 38, 1002–1039.Google Scholar
  19. Lionnet, F., & Shih, S.-M. (2005). Minor transnationalism. Durham: Duke University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Ong, A. (1999). Flexible citizenship: The cultural logistics of transnationality. Durham: Duke University Press.Google Scholar
  21. Oxley, L., & Morris, P. (2013). Global citizenship: A typology for distinguishing its multiple conception. British Journal of Educational Studies, 61(3), 301–325.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Peterson, A. (2011). The common good and citzenship education in England: A moral enterprise? Journal of Moral Education, 40(1), 19–35.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Peterson, A. (2012). The educational limits of ethical cosmopolitanism: Toward a virtue theory of political and cultural cosmopolitan communities. British Journal of Educational Studies, 60(3), 227–242.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Peterson, A. (2013). An introduction to education and values. In J. Artur & T. Lovat (Eds.), The Routledge international handbook of Education (pp. 108–113). United Kingdom: Sage.Google Scholar
  25. Portes, A. (2001). Introduction: The debates and significance of immigration transnationalism. Global Networks, 1(3), 181–193.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Portes, A., & Rumbaut, R. (2001). Legacies: The story of the immigrant second generation. Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar
  27. Reid, A., Gill, J., & Sears, A. (2010). Globalization, the nation-state and the citizen. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  28. Robertson, S. (2008). Negotiated transnationality: Memberships, mobilities and the student-turned-migrant experience. Melbourne: RMIT University.Google Scholar
  29. Rumbaut, R. (2002). “Severed and sustained attachments? Language, identity, and imagined communities in the post-immigrant generation. In L. Peggy, S. Glick, L. G. Basch, & C. Blanc-Szanton (Eds.), Towards a transnational perspective on migration: Race, class ethnicity and nationalism reconsidered. New York: SAGE.Google Scholar
  30. Sassen, S. (1999). Globalization and its discontents. New York: The Free Press.Google Scholar
  31. Sassen, S. (2001). The global city: New York, London, Tokyo. Princeton: Princeton University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Sassen, S. (2007). Deciphering the global: Its spaces, scale and subjects. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  33. Sassen, S. (2008). Territory, authority, rights: From medieval to global assemblages. Princeton: Princeton University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Schiller, G. (2004). Transnational theory and beyond. In D. Nugent & J. Vincent (Eds.), A Companion to the Anthropology of Politics. Malden, MA: Blackwell.Google Scholar
  35. Schiller, G., Basch, L. G., & Szanton, B. C. (1995). From immigrant to transmigrant: Theorizing transnational migration. Anthropological Quarterly, 68(1), 48–63.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Schiller, G., & Faist, T. (Eds.). (2010). Migration, development and transnationalization: A critical stance. Google Scholar
  37. Soong, H. (2016). Transnational students and mobilities: Lived experiences of migration. Milton Park and New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
  38. Soong, H. & Comber, B. (forthcoming). ‘An imagined ‘haven’ for refugee Muslim families: Slowly re-making the school’. International Journal of Innovation in Education (accepted for publication on 5th September 2016).Google Scholar
  39. Soong, H., Stalh, G., & Shan, H. (forthcoming). Transnational mobility through education: A Bourdieusian insight on life as middle transnationals in Australia and Canada. Globalisation, education and societies.Google Scholar
  40. Taylor, S., & Sidhu, K. (2012). Supporting refugee students in schools: What constitutes inclusive education? International Journal of Inclusive Education, 16(1), 39–56.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Tudball, L., & Henderson, D. (2014). Contested notions of civics and citizenship education as national education in the Australia curriculum.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Venn, C. (2000). Occidentalism, modernity and subjectivity. London: SAGE.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Veretovec, S. (2004). Migrant transnationalism and modes of transformation. International Migration Review, 38(2), 970–1001.Google Scholar
  44. Veretovec, S. (2009). Transnationalism. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  45. Waters, J., & Leung, M. (2014). ”These are not the best students”: Continuing education, transnationalisation and Hong Kong’s young adult “educational non-elite”. Children’s Geographies, 12(2), 56–69.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Wimmer, A., & Schiller, G. N. (2003). Methodological nationalism, the social sciences, and the study of migration: An essay in historical epistemology. International Migration Review, 37, 576–610.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Yeoh, B., Huang, S., & Willis, K. (2000). Global cities, transnational flows and gender dimensions: The view from Singapore. Journal of Economic and Social Geography, 2, 147–158.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© The Author(s) 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.University of South AustraliaNorth AdelaideAustralia

Personalised recommendations