Advertisement

Collateral Consequences of a Conviction and Circuits of Exclusion

  • Margaret Fitzgerald O’Reilly
Chapter

Abstract

This chapter focuses upon the informal collateral consequences of a conviction. A criminal record can inhibit access to socially inclusive activities such as employment, housing, and travel. The problem of reintegrating into society is augmented by the offender label and by the fact that a criminal conviction remains permanently upon the individual’s record. The law can encourage such marginalisation by preventing individuals from overcoming criminogenic factors such as unemployment. These issues and more are explored in this chapter.

Bibliography

  1. Ahmed, A., & Lang, E. (2017). The Employability of Ex-Offenders: A Field Experiment in the Swedish Labor Market. Journal of Labour Policy, 6(1), 1–23.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Allan, A., & Steffensmeier, D. (1989). Youth, Unemployment and Property Crime: Differential Effects of Job Availability and Job Quality on Juvenile and Young Adult Arrest Rates. American Sociological Review, 53, 107–123.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Apex Trust. (1989). Making Rehabilitation Work: From High Hopes to Practical Failure. London: Apex Trust.Google Scholar
  4. Australian Law Reform Commission. (LRC 37-1989). Report on Spent Convictions. Australian Law Reform Commission.Google Scholar
  5. Bardon, S. (2017, July 17). Law Would Allow Employers Access to Criminal Records. The Irish Times.Google Scholar
  6. Bäckman, O., Estrada, F., & Nilsson, A. (2017). Locked Up and Locked Out? The Impact of Imprisonment on Labour Market Attachment. British Journal of Criminology.  https://doi.org/10.1093/bjc/azx071.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Burns, S. (2018, June 11). UN Backs Calls to Make Housing a Constitutional Right in Ireland. The Irish Times.Google Scholar
  8. Burton Jr., V. S., Fisher, C., Jonson, C. L., & Cullen, F. T. (2014). Confronting the Collateral Consequences of a Criminal Conviction: A Special Challenge for Social Work With Offenders. Journal of Forensic Social Work, 4(2), 80–103.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Butler, B. (1999). Conference Report, Accessing Employment, 2000 and Beyond, 1999. Dublin and Hillsborough Castle.Google Scholar
  10. Carmody, P., & McEvoy, M. (1996). A Study of Irish Female Prisoners. Dublin: Stationary Office.Google Scholar
  11. Carswell, D. (2018, June 20). David Drumm Jailed for Six Years for Conspiracy to Defraud. The Irish Times.Google Scholar
  12. Commission of Inquiry Into the Penal System. (1985). Report of the Commission of Inquiry Into the Penal System. Dublin: Stationary Office.Google Scholar
  13. Department of Justice and Equality. (2009). The Management of Sex Offenders: A Discussion Document. Dublin: Department of Justice and Equality.Google Scholar
  14. Dolan, K., & Carr, J. (2015). The Poor Get Prison: The Alarming Spread of the Criminalization of Poverty. Washington, DC: Institute for Policy Studies.Google Scholar
  15. Edwards, E. (2018, January 17). Women Being ‘Thrown’ Into Homelessness After Leaving Prison. The Irish Times.Google Scholar
  16. Ellis, H. (1990). Disclosure and Good Faith in Insurance Contracts. Irish Law Times, 8, 45.Google Scholar
  17. Foucault, M. (1977). Discipline and Punish: The Birth of the Prison (A. Sheridan, Trans.). London: Penguin Books.Google Scholar
  18. Garland, D. (2001). The Culture of Control: Crime and Social Order in Contemporary Society. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Greenslade, B. (1986). Eyes Open Policy: Employment of a Person with a Criminal Record. New Zealand Law Journal, 386.Google Scholar
  20. Hartmann McNamara, R., Crawford, C., & Burns, R. (2013). Policing the Homeless: Policy, Practice, and Perceptions. Policing: An International Journal of Police Strategies & Management, 36(2), 357–374.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Hasson, R. A. (1969). The Doctrine of Uberrimae Fides in Insurance Law-A Critical Evaluation. Modern Law Review, 32, 615–637.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Hickey, C. (2002). Crime and Homelessness. Dublin: Focus Ireland and PACE.Google Scholar
  23. Holland, K. (2018, March 29). ‘Loss of Confidence’ as Number of Homeless Families Rise. The Irish Times.Google Scholar
  24. Home Office. (2001). Building Bridges to Employment for Offenders, Research Study 226. London: Home Office.Google Scholar
  25. Home Office. (2002). Breaking the Cycle—A Report on the Review of the Rehabilitation of Offenders Act 1974. London: Home Office.Google Scholar
  26. Hoskins, J. (2014). Ex Offender Restrictions. Journal of Applied Philosophy, 31(1), 33–48.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Houses of the Oireachtas Joint Committee on Justice and Equality. (2018). Report on Penal Reform and Sentencing. Dublin: Houses of the Oireachtas Joint Committee on Justice and Equality.Google Scholar
  28. Ingle, R. (2008, July 1). Building a Better Life on the Outside. The Irish Times.Google Scholar
  29. Ipsa-Landa, S., & Loeffler, C. E. (2016). Indefinite Punishment and the Criminal Record: Stigma Reports Among Expungement Seekers in Illinois. Criminology, 54(3), 387–412.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Irish Human Rights Commission. (2009). Observations on the Spent Convictions Bill 2007. Dublin: Irish Human Rights Commission.Google Scholar
  31. Irish Penal Reform Trust. (2008). Position Paper on Spent Convictions Bill 2007. Dublin: Irish Penal Reform Trust.Google Scholar
  32. Irish Penal Reform Trust. (2012). The Vicious Circle of Social Exclusion and Crime: Ireland’s Disproportionate Punishment of the Poor. Dublin: Irish Penal Reform Trust.Google Scholar
  33. Irish Prison Service. (2013). Recidivism Study. Dublin: Irish Prison Service.Google Scholar
  34. Jacobs, J. B. (2015). The Eternal Criminal Record. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Jacobs, J. B., & Larrauri, E. (2015). European Criminal Records & Ex-Offender Employment. New York University Public Law and Legal Theory Working Papers, Paper 532.Google Scholar
  36. Jones, D. (2015). When the Fallout of a Criminal Conviction Goes Too Far: Challenging Collateral Consequences. Stanford Journal of Civil Rights & Civil Liberties, 11(2), 237–268.Google Scholar
  37. Justice, The Howard League for Penal Reform. (1972). Living it Down-The Problem of Old Convictions. London: Stevens & Sons.Google Scholar
  38. Kilcommins, S. (2002). The Duty to Disclose Previous Criminal Convictions in Irish Insurance Law. The Irish Jurist, 37, 167–186.Google Scholar
  39. Kilcommins, S., McClean, E., McDonagh, M., Mullally, S., & Whelan, D. (2004). Extending the Scope of Employment Equality Legislation: Comparative Perspectives on the Prohibited Grounds of Discrimination. Dublin: Department of Justice and Equality.Google Scholar
  40. Kingston, S., & Webster, C. (2015). The Most ‘Undeserving’ of All? How Poverty Drives Young Men to Victimisation and Crime. The Journal of Poverty and Social Justice, 23(3), 215–227.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Larrauri, E. (2011). Conviction Records in Spain: Obstacles to Reintegration of Offenders? European Journal of Probation, 3(1), 50–62.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Larrauri, E., & Jacobs, J. B. (2013). A Spanish Window on European Law and Policy on Employment Discrimination Based on Criminal Record. In T. Daems, D. van Zyl Smit, & S. Snacken (Eds.), European Penology? Oxford: Hart Publishing.Google Scholar
  43. Law Reform Commission. (LRC 84-2007). Report on Spent Convictions. Dublin: Law Reform Commission.Google Scholar
  44. Lawlor, P., & McDonald, E. (2001). Story of Success: Irish Prisons Connect Project, 1998–2000. Dublin: The Stationary Office.Google Scholar
  45. LeBel, T., Ritchie, M., & Maruna, S. (2017). Can Released Prisoners “Make It?” Examining Formerly Incarcerated Persons’ Belief in Upward Mobility and the American Dream. In S. Stojkovic (Ed.), Prisoner Reentry: Critical Issues and Policy Directions. New York: Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar
  46. Levenson, J. S. (2016). Hidden Challenges: Sex Offenders Legislated Into Homelessness. Journal of Social Work.  https://doi.org/10.1177/1468017316654811.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Levenson, J. S., & Zgoba, K. (2015). Community Protection Policies and Repeat Sexual Offenses in Florida. International Journal of Offender Therapy and Comparative Criminology.  https://doi.org/10.1177/0306624X15573946.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Levenson, J. S., Ackerman, A. R., & Harris, A. J. (2013). Catch Me If You Can: An Analysis of Fugitive Sex Offenders. Sexual Abuse: Journal of Research and Treatment.  https://doi.org/10.1177/1079063213480820.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Martynowicz, A., & Quigley, M. (2010). “It’s Like Stepping on a Landmine…”—Reintegration of Prisoners in Ireland. Dublin: Irish Penal Reform Trust.Google Scholar
  50. Maruna, S. (2001). Making Good: How Ex-Convicts Reform and Rebuild Their Lives. Washington, DC: American Psychological Association Books.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Maruna, S. (2014). Reintegration as a Right and the Rites of Reintegration: A Comparative Review of De-stigmatization Practices. In J. A. Humphrey & P. Cordella (Eds.), Effective Interventions in the Lives of Criminal Offenders. New York: Springer.Google Scholar
  52. Mayfield, M. (1997). Revisiting Expungement: Concealing Information in an Information Age. Utah Law Review, 1057–1085.Google Scholar
  53. Mayock, P., Sheridan, S., & Parker, S. (2015). The Dynamics of Long-Term Homelessness Among Women in Ireland. Dublin: Homeless Executive.Google Scholar
  54. McCartan, K., & Kemshall, H. (2015). Sex Offender (Re)Integration Into the Community: Realities and Challenges. Journal of Sexual Aggression, 21(1), 1–3.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. McCullagh, C. (1992). Unemployment and Imprisonment: Examining and Interpreting the Relationship in the Republic of Ireland. Irish Journal of Sociology, 2, 1–19.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. McGahey, R. (1986). Economic Conditions, Neighbourhood Organisation and Urban Crime. In A. J. Reiss Jr. & M. Tonry (Eds.), Communities and Crime. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
  57. McHugh, R. (2013). Tracking the Needs and Service Provision for Women Ex-Prisoners. Dublin: Association for Criminal Justice Research and Development.Google Scholar
  58. Mears, D., & Cochran, J. (2015). Prisoner Reentry in the Era of Mass Incarceration. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  59. Middlemass, K. M. (2017). Convicted and Condemned: The Politics and Policies of Prisoner Reentry. New York: NYU Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  60. Morgan, M., & Kett, M. (2003). The Prison Adult Literacy Survey: Results and Implications. Dublin: Irish Prison Service.Google Scholar
  61. NACRO. (2010). Developing Proposals for Sentencing and Achieving a Rehabilitation Revolution, Submission to Ministry of Justice. London: NACR.Google Scholar
  62. National Economic and Social Reform. (2002). Re-integration of Prisoners Forum Report, No. 22. Dublin: National Economic and Social Reform.Google Scholar
  63. O’Brien, T. (2004, July 27). No Licence for Those Convicted. The Irish Times.Google Scholar
  64. O’Brien, C. (2018, February 6). Half of Prisoners Drop Out of School Before Junior Certificate. The Irish Times.Google Scholar
  65. O’Donnell, I. (1998). Crime, Punishment and Poverty. In I. Bacik & M. O’Connell (Eds.), Crime and Poverty in Ireland. Dublin: Round Hall Sweet and Maxwell.Google Scholar
  66. O’Donnell, I. (2002). The Re-integration of Prisoners. Administration, 50(2), 80–96.Google Scholar
  67. O’Donnell, I., Baumer, E. P., & Hughes, N. (2008). Recidivism in the Republic of Ireland. Criminology & Criminal Justice, 8(2), 123–146.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  68. O’Loingsigh, G. (2004). Getting Out, Staying Out: The Experiences of Prisoners Upon Release. Dublin: Community Technical Aid.Google Scholar
  69. O’Mahony, P. (1997). Mountjoy Prisoners: A Sociological and Criminological Profile. Dublin: Stationary Office.Google Scholar
  70. O’Mahony, P. (1998). Punishing Poverty and Personal Adversity. In I. Bacik & M. O’Connell (Eds.), Crime and Poverty in Ireland. Dublin: Round Hall Sweet and Maxwell.Google Scholar
  71. Payne, J., Macgregor, S., & McDonald, H. (2015). Homelessness and Housing Stress Among Police Detainees: Results from the DUMA Program. Trends & Issues in Crime and Criminal Justice, 492, 1–8.Google Scholar
  72. Petersilia, J. (2001). Prisoner Reentry: Public Safety and Reintegration Challenges. The Prison Journal, 81(3), 360–375.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  73. Pijoan, E. L. (2014). Legal Protections Against Criminal Background Checks in Europe. Punishment and Society, 16(1), 50–73.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  74. Prison Reform Trust. (2014). Working It Out: Employment for Women Offenders. London: Prison Reform Trust.Google Scholar
  75. Ramakers, A., Nieuwbeerta, P., Van Wilsem, J., & Dirkzwager, A. (2017). Not Just Any Job Will Do: A Study on Employment Characteristics and Recidivism Risks After Release. International Journal of Offender Therapy and Comparative Criminolology, 61(16), 1795–1818.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  76. Rhodes, J. (2008). Ex-Offenders, Social Ties and the Routes Into Employment. Internet Journal of Criminology, 1, 1–20.Google Scholar
  77. Rose, N. (2000). Government and Control. British Journal of Criminology, 40, 321–339.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  78. Rydberg, J., Grommon, E., Huebner, B. M., & Bynum, T. (2014). The Effect of Statewide Residency Restrictions on Sex Offender Post Release Housing Mobility. Justice Quarterly, 31(2), 421–444.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  79. Schmitts, J., & Warner, K. (2010). Ex-Offenders and the Labour Market. Washington, DC: Centre for Economic and Policy Research.Google Scholar
  80. Schwartz, R., & Skolnick, J. H. (1962). Two Studies of Legal Stigma. Social Problems, 10(2), 133–142.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  81. Seymour, M. (2007). Homelessness and Offending: Marginalisation, Segregation and the Challenges to Social Inclusion. 10th Annual Conference of the Association for Criminal Justice Research and Development: Community, Custody and Aftercare, The Journey Towards Social Inclusion.Google Scholar
  82. Seymour, M., & Costello, L. (2005). A Study of the Number, Profile and Progression Routes of Homeless Persons Before the Court and in Custody. Dublin: Dublin Institute of Technology.Google Scholar
  83. Steiner, B., Makarios, M. D., & Travis, L. F. (2015). Examining the Effects of Residential Situations and Residential Mobility on Offender Recidivism. Crime & Delinquency, 61(3), 375–401.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  84. Tewksbury, R. (2014). Evidence of Ineffectiveness: Advancing Argument Against Sex Offender Residence Restrictions. Criminology and Public Policy, 13(1), 135–138.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  85. Travis, J. (2002). Invisible Punishment: An Instrument of Social Exclusion. In M. Mauer & M. Chesney-Lind (Eds.), Invisible Punishment: The Collateral Consequences of Mass Imprisonment. New York: The New Press.Google Scholar
  86. Uggen, C. (2000). Work as a Turning Point in the Life Course of Criminals: A Duration Model of Age, Employment, and Recidivism. American Sociological Review, 65, 529–546.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  87. Uggen, C., & Blahnik, L. (2015). The Increasing Stickiness of Public Labels. In J. Shapland, S. Farrall, & A. Bottoms (Eds.), Global Perspectives on Desistance. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  88. Visher, C. A., & Travis, J. (2003). Transitions from Prison to Community: Understanding Individual Pathways. Annual Review of Sociology, 29(1), 89–113.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  89. White Paper on Crime. (2010). Consultation Process, Discussion Document 1: Crime Prevention and Community Safety. Dublin: Department of Justice and Equality.Google Scholar
  90. Williams, K., Papadopoulou, V., & Booth, N. (2012). Prisoners’ Childhood and Family Backgrounds. London: Ministry of Justice.Google Scholar
  91. Zgoba, K., & Ragbir, D. (2016). Sex Offender Registration and Notification Act (SORNA). Sexual Violence, 33–49.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© The Author(s) 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  • Margaret Fitzgerald O’Reilly
    • 1
  1. 1.University of LimerickLimerickIreland

Personalised recommendations