Advertisement

Finland and NATO: Strategic Choices and Identity Conceptions

  • Tuomas Forsberg
Chapter
Part of the New Security Challenges book series (NSECH)

Abstract

This chapter explores Finland’s relationship with NATO, analysing the evolution of the relationship since the Cold War, as well as the ongoing political debate over joining the Alliance. It argues that psychological factors, identity issues and domestic politics explain the nature of Finland’s policy towards NATO at least as much as geopolitical determinants and strategic calculations based on national interest. The role of the key outside drivers for change in Finland’s policy towards NATO—Russia, NATO itself and the United States, as well as Sweden—are also assessed. The chapter concludes that despite many changes in Finland’s security environment, NATO membership remains only ‘an option’, since domestic politics, identity conceptions and psychological factors all work in favour of policy continuity.

References

  1. Advisory Board on Defence Information. (2016). Finns’ Opinions on Foreign and Security Policy, National Defence and Security. Bulletin 2/2016 (Helsinki: Advisory Board on Defence Information, Ministry of Defence). Available: http://www.defmin.fi/files/3579/ABDI_(MTS)_December_2016_Report_in_english.pdf (17 January 2017).
  2. Andersson, J. J. (2014, April 30). Nordic NATO: Why It’s Time for Finland and Sweden to Join the Alliance. Foreign Affairs Online. Available: https://www.foreignaffairs.com/articles/finland/2014-04-30/nordic-nato (17 January 2017).
  3. Antola, E. (1989). The Finnish Strategy: Adaptation with Restrictions. In K. Möttölä & H. Patomäki (Eds.), Facing the Change in Europe: EFTA Countries’ Integration Strategies (pp. 55–70). Helsinki: The Finnish Institute of International Affairs.Google Scholar
  4. Arter, D. (1995). The EU Referendum in Finland on 16 October 1994: A Vote for the West, Not for Maastricht. Journal of Common Market Studies, 33(3), 361–387.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Arter, D. (1996). Finland: From Neutrality to NATO? European Security, 5(4), 614–632.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Barber, T. (1997, March 19). Finns Shun Prospect of Security in Larger Nato. The Independent. Available: http://www.independent.co.uk/news/world/finns-shun-prospect-of-security-in-larger-nato-1273730.html (17 January 2017).
  7. Bergquist, M., Heisbourg, F., Nyberg, R., & Tiilikainen, T. (2016). The Effects of Finland’s Possible NATO Membership: An Assessment. Helsinki: Ministry for Foreign Affairs.Google Scholar
  8. Blair, D. (2015, June 26). Russian Forces “Practised Invasion of Norway, Finland, Denmark and Sweden”. The Telegraph. Available: http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/worldnews/europe/russia/11702328/Russian-forces-practised-invasion-of-Norway-Finland-Denmark-and-Sweden.html (17 January 2017).
  9. Blank, S. (1996, September 27). Finnish Security and European Security Policy. U.S. Army War College. Available: http://www.globalsecurity.org/military/library/report/1996/ssi_blank.pdf (17 January 2017).
  10. Blombergs, F. (2016). Suomen NATO-jäsenyys realismin näkökulmasta tarkasteltuna. In F. Blombergs (Ed.), Suomen turvallisuuspoliittisen ratkaisun lähtökohtia (pp. 277–337). Helsinki: National Defence University.Google Scholar
  11. Browning, C. S. (2002). Coming Home or Moving Home? Westernizing Narratives in Finnish Foreign Policy and the Reinterpretation of Past Identities. Cooperation and Conflict, 37(1), 47–72.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Buhne, N. (2015, November 3). Russia and the Baltics: Hard Choices—Finland and NATO. McGill International Review Online. Available: http://mironline.ca/?p=6110 (17 January 2017).
  13. Chakarova, L., Kokcharov, A., & Imeri, D. (2015, October 13). Finnish and Swedish NATO Membership Unlikely Before 2020 Despite Growing Support, Russia to Retaliate Economically. Jane’s Intelligence Review. Available: http://www.janes.com/article/55246/finnish-and-swedish-nato-membership-unlikely-before-2020-despite-growing-support-russia-to-retaliate-economically (17 January 2017).
  14. Crossette, B. (1992, May 8). Finland in $3 Billion Deal for 64 McDonnell Douglas Combat Jets. The New York Times. Google Scholar
  15. Doeser, F. (2017). Strategic Culture, Domestic Politics, and Foreign Policy: Finland’s Decision to Refrain from Operation Unified Protector. Foreign Policy Analysis, 13(3), 741–759.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Finland Today. (2016, November 9). President Niinistö: The Relations Between Finland and the U.S. Are Closer Than Ever. Available: http://finlandtoday.fi/president-niinisto-the-relations-between-finland-and-the-us-are-closer-than-ever (17 January 2017).
  17. Finnish Ministry for Foreign Affairs. (2015). Review on Finland’s Security Cooperation (Publications of the Ministry for Foreign Affairs, 3/2015, pp. 58–64). Helsinki: Ministry for Foreign Affairs of Finland.Google Scholar
  18. Finnish Ministry of Defence. (nd). Finnish Security and Defence Policy. Helsinki: Finnish Ministry of Defence. Available: http://www.defmin.fi/en/publications/finnish_security_and_defence_policy (17 January 2017).
  19. Finnish Ministry of Defence. (2001). Finnish Security and Defence Policy 2001. Helsinki: Finnish Ministry of Defence. Available: http://www.defmin.fi/files/1149/InEnglish.pdf (17 January 2017).
  20. Finnish Ministry of Defence. (2004). Finnish Security and Defence Policy 2004 (Government Report 6/2004). Helsinki: Finnish Ministry of Defence. Available: http://www.defmin.fi/files/311/2574_2160_English_White_paper_2004_1_.pdf (17 January 2017).
  21. Forsberg, T. (2000). Finland and the Kosovo Crisis: At the Crossroads of Neutrality and Europeanism. InFinnish Institute of International Affairs Northern Dimensions: Yearbook of Finnish Foreign Policy 1999 (pp. 41–49). Helsinki: Finnish Institute of International Affairs.Google Scholar
  22. Forsberg, T. (2002). Nato-kirja. Helsinki: Ajatus.Google Scholar
  23. Forsberg, T. (2006). Is Russia Still Seen as a Threat? In H. Smith (Ed.), The Two-Level Game: Russia’s Relations with Great Britain, Finland and the European Union. Helsinki: Aleksanteri Institute.Google Scholar
  24. Forsberg, T. (2013). The Rise of Nordic Defence Cooperation: A Return to Regionalism? International Affairs, 89(5), 1161–1181.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Forsberg, T. (2016). Suomen Nato-politiikka konstruktivismin näkökulmasta. In F. Blombergs (Ed.), Suomen turvallisuuspoliittisen ratkaisun lähtökohtia (pp. 363–378). Helsinki: National Defence University.Google Scholar
  26. Forsberg, T., & Pesu, M. (2016). The “Finlandisation” of Finland: The Ideal Type, the Historical Model, and the Lessons Learnt. Diplomacy and Statecraft, 27(3), 473–495.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Forsberg, T., & Pesu, M. (2017). The Role of Public Opinion in Finland’s Foreign and Security Policy. In T.-J. Cheng & W. Lee (Eds.), National Security, Public Opinion, and Regime Asymmetry: a Six-Country Study (pp. 147–174). Singapore/London: World Scientific Publishing/Imperial College Press.Google Scholar
  28. Forsberg, T., & Vaahtoranta, T. (2001). Inside the EU, Outside NATO: Paradoxes of Finland and Sweden’s Post-Neutrality. European Security, 10(1), 68–93.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Giles, K., & Eskola, S. (2009). Waking the Neighbour—Finland, NATO and Russia (Special Series No. 09/14). Shrivenham: Research & Assessment Branch, Defence Academy of United Kingdom.Google Scholar
  30. Grüne, Y. (2009). Kyse on vaikutusvallasta. In T. Suominen & J. Karvinen (Eds.), Suomi ja Nato – Suomen Atlantti-Seuran 10-vuotisjulkaisu (pp. 33–37). Helsinki: The Atlantic Council of Finland.Google Scholar
  31. Hanhimäki, J. M. (1997). Containing Coexistence: America, Russian and the ‘Finnish Solution’ 1945–1956. Kent: The Kent State University Press.Google Scholar
  32. Harle, V., & Moisio, S. (2000). Missä on Suomi? Kansallisen identiteettipolitiikan historia ja geopolitiikka. Tampere: Vastapaino.Google Scholar
  33. Haukkala, H., & Vaahtoranta, T. (2016). ’Suomen turvallisuuspolitiikan linjat ja koulukunnat’. In F. Blombergs (Ed.), Suomen turvallisuuspoliittisen ratkaisun lähtökohtia (pp. 55–76). Helsinki: National Defence University.Google Scholar
  34. Haynes, W. (2017, January 28). Balancing Neutrality Between Russia and NATO: The Case of Finland. Georgetown Security Studies Review, The Forum. http://georgetownsecuritystudiesreview.org/2017/01/28/balancing-neutrality-between-russia-and-nato-the-case-of-finland/
  35. Honkanen, K., & Kuusela, J. (2014). Uusi Nato? Helsinki: Atlantic Council of Finland.Google Scholar
  36. Iloniemi, J. (2015). Maantieteelle emme mahda mitään. Jyväskylä: Docendo.Google Scholar
  37. Karvinen, J., & Puistola, J.-A. (2015). Nato ja Suomi. Helsinki: Auditorium.Google Scholar
  38. Kekkonen, U. (1961, October 17). Finland’s Position in International Politics, Speech Given at the 855 National Press Club, Washington. Available: www.doria.fi/bitstream/handle/10024/8542/TMP.objres.1454.html?sequence=1 (23 January 2017).
  39. Keskinen, J. (1995, May 15). Lipponen muistuttaa Venäjän merkityksestä. Demari.Google Scholar
  40. Koivisto, M. (1997). Witness to the History: The Memoirs of Mauno Koivisto President of Finland 1982–1994. London: Hurst.Google Scholar
  41. Lauren, A.-L. (2014, June 8). Vill ni vara med och starta ett tredje världskrig?, interview with Sergei Markov. Hufvudstadsbladet.Google Scholar
  42. Laurén, A.-L. (2016, June 16). Finlands president tror på dialog med Putin. Dagens Nyheter. Available: http://www.dn.se/nyheter/varlden/finlands-president-tror-pa-dialog-med-putin/ (23 January 2017).
  43. Martikainen, T. (2015). Merikasarmin iloinen isäntä, interview with Timo Soini. Ulkopolitiikka, 3, 3–7.Google Scholar
  44. Ministry of Defence of Finland. (2016, October 7). Statement of Intent on Bilateral Defence Cooperation Between Finland and US, Press Release, Available: http://www.defmin.fi/en/topical/press_releases/statement_of_intent_on_bilateral_defence_cooperation_between_finland_and_us.8013.news (23 January 2017).
  45. MTV Uutiset. (2015, October 17). Niinistö tuskastui Nato-kysymyksestä: “En vastaa siihenkään, jos taivas putoaisi niskaan”. MTV Uutiset. Available: http://www.mtv.fi/uutiset/kotimaa/artikkeli/niinisto-tuskastui-nato-kysymyksesta-en-vastaa-siihenkaan-jos-taivas-putoaisi-niskaan/5502464 (23 January 2017).
  46. Niinistö, S. (2013, August 27). Speech at the Annual Ambassadors’ Meeting, Finlandia Hall, Helsinki. Available: http://www.presidentti.fi/public/default.aspx?contentid=282762&nodeid=44809&contentlan=2&culture=en-US (23 January 2017).
  47. O’Dwyer, G. (2014, June 5). Finland to Put NATO Membership to Referendum. Defense News. Available: http://www.defensenews.com/article/20140605/DEFREG01/306050039/Finland-Put-NATO-Membership-Referendum (23 January 2017).
  48. Penttilä, R. E. J. (1991). Finland’s Search for Security through Defence, 1944–89. New York: Palgrave Macmillan.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Penttilä, R. E. J. (1994). Finland’s Security in a Changing Europe: a Historical Perspective. Helsinki: National Defence College.Google Scholar
  50. President of Finland. (2016, November 9). President Niinistö and Secretary General Stoltenberg Stressed the Importance of Dialogue in Relations with Russia. President of the Republic of Finland Webpage., Available: http://www.presidentti.fi/Public/default.aspx?contentid=354114&nodeid=44810&contentlan=2&culture=en-US (23 January 2017).
  51. Prime Minister’s Office. (2016). Foreign and Security Policy Review 2016 (Government Report 7/2016). Available: http://formin.finland.fi/public/download.aspx?ID=159273&GUID={BE1F0734-B715-4C7F-94AA-CBFD3AF7EA5A} (23 January 2017).
  52. Pyykönen, J. (2016). Nordic Partners of NATO: How Similar Are Finland and Sweden within NATO Cooperation? (FIIA Report No. 48). Helsinki: The Finnish Institute of International Affiairs.Google Scholar
  53. Rahkonen, J. (2006). Journalismi taistelukenttänä: Suomen Nato-jäsenyydestä käyty julki-nen keskustelu 2003–04 (Tampereen yliopiston tiedotusopin laitoksen julkaisuja). Tampere: University of Tampere.Google Scholar
  54. Rahkonen, J. (2007). Public Opinion, Journalism and the Question of Finland’s Membership of NATO. Nordicom Review, 28(2), 81–92.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. Rainio-Niemi, J. (2003). A People Too Well Educated: Truths of the Second Republic and Public Opinion in the Finnish NATO debate. In Finnish Institute of International Affairs Yearbook of Finnish Foreign Policy. Helsinki: Finnish Institute of International Affairs.Google Scholar
  56. Rasmussen, A. F. (2012, November 12). NATO and Finland: Building Security Together in the 21st Century, speech by NATO Secretary General Anders Fogh Rasmussen in Helsinki. Available: http://www.nato.int/cps/en/natohq/opinions_91346.htm (23 January 2017).
  57. Ries, T. (1999). Finland and NATO. Helsinki: National Defence College, Department of Strategic and Defence Studies.Google Scholar
  58. RT.com. (2016, July 1). Putin: Russia to Respond If Finland Joins NATO. RT. Available: https://www.rt.com/news/349185-putin-nato-dialogue-start/ (23 January 2017).
  59. Saari, S., & Pursiainen, C. (2002). Et tu Brute! Finland’s NATO Option and Russia (Working Paper No. 1). Helsinki: Finnish Institute of International Affairs.Google Scholar
  60. Salomaa, M. (2015). Puhutaan Natosta. Jyväskylä: Docendo.Google Scholar
  61. Schauman, S. (2016, June 19). Sauli Niinistö Nato-ajankohdasta: Emme tietenkään odota niin kauan, että se olisi liian myöhäistä. Verkkouutiset. Available: http://www.verkkouutiset.fi/kotimaa/sauli%20niinisto%20nato%20ajankohta-51949 (23 January 2017).
  62. Seip, M. (2015, June 4). Is It Time For Finland to Join NATO? National Interest Online. Available: http://nationalinterest.org/blog/the-buzz/it-time-finland-join-nato-13044 (23 January 2017).
  63. Sierla, A. (2007). Suomen mahdollisen Nato-jäsenyyden vaikutukset. Helsinki: Ministry for Foreign Affairs.Google Scholar
  64. Sputnik News. (2015, March 23). Entering NATO Would Pose Security Risks for Finland—Finance Minister. Sputnik News. Available: http://sputniknews.com/europe/20150322/1019844251.html (23 January 2017).
  65. Stoltenberg, J. (2015, March 5). Opening Remarks by NATO Secretary General Jens Stoltenberg at the Joint Press Point with the Prime Minister of Finland, Alexander Stubb. Helsinki. Available: http://www.nato.int/cps/en/natohq/opinions_117895.htm?selectedLocale=en (23 January 2017).
  66. Vanhanen, M. (2016). Ulkopolitiikkaa. Nurmijärvi: Matti Vanhanen.Google Scholar
  67. Vento, H. (2016, February 26). Sotilaat haluavat Natoon. Suomen Kuvalehti.Google Scholar
  68. Visuri, P. (1994). Puolustusvoimat kylmässä sodassa. Helsinki: WSOY.Google Scholar
  69. YLE News. (2008, October 11). Martti Ahtisaari Wants Finland in Nato. YLE News. Available: http://yle.fi/uutiset/martti_ahtisaari_wants_finland_in_nato/6114764 (23 January 2017).
  70. YLE News. (2010, December 18). Ahtisaari: Nato ei ole uhka Venäjälle. YLE. Available: http://yle.fi/uutiset/ahtisaari_nato_ei_ole_uhka_venajalle/2230099 (23 January 2017).
  71. YLE News. (2015, March 22). Interview with Antti Rinne.Google Scholar
  72. YLE News. (2016, August 22). Defence Minister: Finland Wants Defence Pact Before US Elects New President. YLE. Available: http://yle.fi/uutiset/defence_minister_finland_wants_defence_pact_before_us_elects_new_president/9112666 (23 January 2017).

Copyright information

© The Author(s) 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  • Tuomas Forsberg
    • 1
  1. 1.University of TampereTampereFinland

Personalised recommendations