• Roxana Moroşanu
Part of the Palgrave Studies in Anthropology of Sustainability book series (PSAS)


The concept of spontaneity as a mode of action and an approach to time is developed here. The ethnographic material focuses, specifically, on the ways in which digital media technologies are employed for immediately accomplishing momentary needs and desires. By drawing upon a reinterpretation of the Aristotelian concept of “practical truth” in British analytical philosophy, a theoretical framework for situating spontaneity is proposed. The ways in which achieving immediacy can contribute to extending one’s ethical imagination and the development of new forms of sociality are discussed.


  1. Anscombe, Gertrude Elizabeth. 1981. From Parmenides to Wittgenstein: Collected Philosophical Papers of G.E.M. Anscombe. I. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
  2. Anscombe, Gertrude Elizabeth. 2000. Intention. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
  3. Austen, Jane. 1993. Pride and Prejudice. London: Wordsworth Classics.Google Scholar
  4. Bialski, Paula. 2012. Becoming Intimately Mobile. Frankfurt am Main: Peter Lang.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Coleman, Gabriella. 2013. Coding Freedom: The Ethics and Aesthetics of Hacking. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
  6. Degnen, Cathrine. 2009. “On Vegetable Love : Gardening, Plants, and People in the North of England.” Journal of the Royal Anthropological Institute 15: 151–167.Google Scholar
  7. Faubion, James D. 2001. “Toward an Anthropology of Ethics : Foucault and the Pedagogies of Autopoiesis.” Representations 74 (1): 83–104.Google Scholar
  8. Foucault, Michel. 1990. The History of Sexuality, vol. 2. London: Penguin Books.Google Scholar
  9. Foucault, Michel. 2000. Ethics: Subjectiviy and Truth (Essential Works of Foucault 1954–1984). London: Penguin Books.Google Scholar
  10. Gershon, Ilana. 2011. “Neoliberal Agency.” Current Anthropology 52 (4): 537–555.Google Scholar
  11. Green, Sarah. 2002. “Culture in a Network: Dykes, Webs and Women in London and Manchester.” In British Subjects: An Anthropology of Britain, edited by Nigel Rapport, 181–202. Oxford: Berg.Google Scholar
  12. Hochschild, Arlie. 1997. The Time Bind: When Work Becomes Home and Home Becomes Work. New York: Metropolitan Books.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Luhrmann, T. M. 2006. “Subjectivity.” Anthropological Theory 6 (3): 345–361.Google Scholar
  14. Madianou, Mirca, and Daniel Miller. 2011. Migration and New Media: Transnational Families and Polymedia. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  15. Mauss, Marcel. 1979 [1935]. “Body Techniques.” In Sociology and Psychology: Essays by Marcel Mauss, translated by B. Brewster, vol. 2, 95–123. London: Routledge & Kegan Paul.Google Scholar
  16. Moore, Henrietta L. 2011. Still Life: Hopes, Desires and Satisfactions. Cambridge: Polity Press.Google Scholar
  17. Robbins, Joel. 2013. “Beyond the Suffering Subject : Toward an Anthropology of the Good.” Journal of the Royal Anthropological Institute 19: 447–462.Google Scholar
  18. Shove, Elizabeth. 2009. “Everyday Practice and the Production and Consumption of Time.” In Time, Consumption and Everyday Life, edited by Elizabeth Shove, Frank Trentmann, and Richard Wilk, 17–34. Oxford: Berg.Google Scholar
  19. Slade, Peter. 1968. Experience of Spontaneity. London: Longmans.Google Scholar
  20. Taylor, Charles. 1979. “Action as Expression.” In Intention and Intentionality: Essays in Honour of G.E.M. Anscombe, edited by Cora Diamond and Jenny Teichmann, 73–89. Brighton, UK: Harvester Press.Google Scholar
  21. Teichmann, Roger. 2008. The Philosophy of Elizabeth Anscombe. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Tilley, Christopher. 2006. “The Sensory Dimensions of Gardening.” Senses and Society 1 (3): 311–330.Google Scholar
  23. Uimonen, Paula. 2012. Digital Drama: Teaching and Learning Art and Media in Tanzania. London: Routledge.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© The Author(s) 2016

Open Access This chapter is licensed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 2.5 International License (, which permits any noncommercial use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license and indicate if changes were made.

The images or other third party material in this chapter are included in the chapter's Creative Commons license, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the chapter's Creative Commons license and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder.

Authors and Affiliations

  • Roxana Moroşanu
    • 1
  1. 1.Loughborough UniversityLoughboroughUK

Personalised recommendations