Advertisement

Encountering Middleborough: Impressions, Methods, and Tacit Knowledge

  • Roxana Moroşanu
Chapter
Part of the Palgrave Studies in Anthropology of Sustainability book series (PSAS)

Abstract

How to address tacit knowledge in ethnographic research is the focus of this chapter. The first part is an arrival story; the field site is situated in relation to conceptualizations of locality and place in the anthropology of Britain, and reflections are developed on the tacit knowledge that emerged from the ethnographer’s everyday experiences outside the applied research. The position of the author in relation to the “academic-applied divide” in anthropological research is outlined. A specific methodological approach to ethnographic research that addresses tacit knowledge—“sensory ethnography”—is discussed. A set of participant-led and arts-based methods—the Tactile Time collage, the Evening Times video diary, and the Five Cups of Tea self-interviewing with video activity—are described in relation to the knowledge that emerged through their employment.

References

  1. Barry, Desmond. 2005. “A Job on the Line.” Granta (89): The Factory.Google Scholar
  2. Bloch, Maurice. 1985. “From Cognition to Ideology.” In Power and Knowledge: Anthropological and Sociological Approaches, edited by Richard Fardon, 21–48. Edinburgh: Scottish Academic Press.Google Scholar
  3. Borofsky, R. 2000. “To Laugh or to Cry?” Anthropology News February: 9–10.Google Scholar
  4. Drazin, Adam. 2006. “The Need to Engage with Non-Ethnographic Research Methods: A Personal View.” In Applications of Anthropology: Professional Anthropology in the Twenty-First Century, edited by Sarah Pink. Oxford: Berghahn Books.Google Scholar
  5. Edwards, Jeanette. 2000. Born and Bred: Idioms of Kinship and New Reproductive Technologies in England. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  6. Foucault, Michel. 1990. The History of Sexuality, vol. 2. London: Penguin Books.Google Scholar
  7. Grasseni, Cristina. 2004. “Skilled Visions: An Apprenticeship in Breeding Aesthetics.” Social Anthropology 12: 41–55.Google Scholar
  8. Grasseni, Cristina. 2007. “Communities of Practice and Forms of Life: Towards a Rehabilitation of Vision?” In Ways of Knowing, edited by Mark Harris, 201–223. Oxford: Berghahn Books.Google Scholar
  9. Harris, Mark. 2007. “Introduction: ‘Ways of Knowing.’” In Ways of Knowing: New Approaches in the Anthropology of Experience and Learning, edited by Mark Harris, 1–24. Oxford: Berghahn Books.Google Scholar
  10. Ingold, Tim. 2000. The Perception of the Environment. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  11. Jewell, Helen. 1994. The North-South Divide: The Origins of Northern Consciousness in England. Manchester: Manchester University Press.Google Scholar
  12. Kligman, Gail. 1981. Calus: Symbolic Transformation in Romanian Ritual. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
  13. Lewis, Jim, and Alan Townsend. 1989. “Introduction.” In The North-South Divide: Regional Change in Britain in the 1980s, edited by Jim Lewis and Alan Townsend, 1–20. London: Paul Chapman Publishing.Google Scholar
  14. Lury, Celia, and Nina Wakeford. 2012. “Introduction: A Perpetual Inventory.” In Inventive Methods: The Happening of the Social, edited by Celia Lury and Nina Wakeford, 1–24. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  15. Moore, Henrietta L. 2011. Still Life: Hopes, Desires and Satisfactions. Cambridge: Polity Press.Google Scholar
  16. Pink, Sarah. 2004. Home Truths: Gender, Domestic Objects and Everyday Life. Oxford: Berg.Google Scholar
  17. Pink, Sarah. 2009. Doing Sensory Ethnography. London: Sage.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Rapport, Nigel. 1993. Diverse World-Views in an English Village. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.Google Scholar
  19. Roberts, S. 2006. “The Pure and the Impure? Reflections on Applying Anthropology and Doing Ethnography.” In Applications of Anthropology: Professional Anthropology in the Twenty-First Century, edited by Sarah Pink. Oxford: Berghahn Books.Google Scholar
  20. Ryle, Gilbert. 1949. The Concept of Mind. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
  21. Seremetakis, N. 1996. “The Memory of the Senses: Historical Perception, Commensal Exchange, and Modernity’.” In Visualizing Theory, edited by L. Taylor. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  22. Singer, M. 2000. “Why I Am Not a Public Anthropologist.” Anthropology News 6–7, September.Google Scholar
  23. Stoller, P. 1989. The Taste of Ethnographic Things: The Senses in Ethnography. Philadelphia, PA: University of Philadelphia Press.Google Scholar
  24. Stoller, P. 1997. Sensuous Scholarship. Philadelphia, PA: University of Philadelphia Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Strathern, Marilyn. 1981. Kinship at the Core: An Anthropology of Elmdon, a Village in the N-W Essex in the 1960s. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  26. Sunderland, P.L., and R.M. Denny. 2007. Doing Anthropology in Consumer Research. Walnut Creek, CA: Left Coast Press.Google Scholar
  27. Williams, Raymond. 1973. The Country and the City. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  28. Wright, S. 2006. “Machetes into a Jungle? A History of Anthropology in Policy and Practice, 1981–2000.” In Applications of Anthropology: Professional Anthropology in the Twenty-First Century, edited by Sarah Pink. Oxford: Berghahn Books.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© The Author(s) 2016

Open Access This chapter is licensed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 2.5 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/2.5/), which permits any noncommercial use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license and indicate if changes were made.

The images or other third party material in this chapter are included in the chapter's Creative Commons license, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the chapter's Creative Commons license and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder.

Authors and Affiliations

  • Roxana Moroşanu
    • 1
  1. 1.Loughborough UniversityLoughboroughUK

Personalised recommendations