Advertisement

The Advent of Black Thinkers and the Limits of Continental Philosophy

  • Walter D. Mignolo
Chapter

Abstract

In this chapter, Mignolo interrogates Eurocentrism as an epistemic and not a geographic issue. The chapter contends that local knowledge generated in Europe from the Renaissance onward piggybacked on economic, political, and military expansion to become global. Renaissance epistemology, basic theological, was keen to push the concept of “universal” inherited from the European Middle Age. Hence, the concept of universal, curiously enough, became global and the global was confused with universal. Theological philosophy and, since the Enlightenment, secular philosophy were the army and the soldiers of the European epistemic and ontological march on the rest of the world. Without going into the responses that Europe is getting nowadays with migrants, refugees, and angry people called terrorists, Mignolo examines in this chapter the epistemic responses from and by people whose histories of knowing, being, living, and doing were not that of the local history of European forms of knowing, being, living, and doing. Such responses are always trapped in the categories that Eurocentrism imposed through Western languages and its fountains, Greek and Latin. Mignolo argues that there is no fundamental justification to trap thinking in the cage of Western philosophy. This is because human beings think, and have done so for millions if not billions of years, and Greek philosophers only conceived their own thinking as philosophy. The chapter then explores means by which philosophy can be decolonized in order to liberate thinking.

Keywords

Eurocentrism African philosophy Decoloniality Latin American philosophy Colonialism Difference Humanitas Thinking Anthropos Racism Philosophy Enlightenment 

References

  1. Appiah, Anthony. 2006. Cosmopolitanism: Ethics in a World of Strangers. New York: W.W. Norton.Google Scholar
  2. Balibar, Etienne, and Immanuel Wallerstein. 1988. Race, Nation, Class: Ambiguous Identities, 1988. London: Verso.Google Scholar
  3. Béji, Hélé. 2008. Nous, décolonisés. Paris: Arléa.Google Scholar
  4. Bernasconi, Robert. 1997. African Philosophy’s Challenge to Continental Philosophy. In Postcolonial African Philosophy: A Critical Reader, ed. Emmanuel Chukwudi Eze, 183–196. London: Blackwell.Google Scholar
  5. Boroujerdi, Mehrzad. 1995. Iranian Intellectuals and the West. Syracuse: Syracuse University Press.Google Scholar
  6. Cabral, Amilcar. 1973. Return to the Source: Selected Speeches of Amilcar Cabral. New York: Monthly Review Press.Google Scholar
  7. Cabral, Amilcar. 2000. National Liberation and Culture (Return to the Sources). In African Philosophy. An Anthology, ed. Emmanuel Chkwudi Eze, 260–265. London: Blackwell.Google Scholar
  8. Dabashi, Hamid. 2015. Can non-European Think? London: Zed Book.Google Scholar
  9. Dussel, Enrique. 1985. Philosophy of Liberation, Trans. Aquilina Martinez and Christine Morkovsky. Eugene, Oregon: Wipf and Stock Publishers.Google Scholar
  10. Eze, Emmanuel Chukwudi (ed.). 1997. Race and the Enlightenment: A Reader. London: Blackwell.Google Scholar
  11. Gordon, Lewis. 2008. An Introduction to Africana Philosophy. Oxford: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Greer, Margaret, Walter Mignolo, and Maureen Quilligan (eds.). 2008. Re-reading the Black Legend: The Discourses of Race and Religions in the Renaissance Empires. Chicago: Chicago University Press.Google Scholar
  13. Heidegger, Martin. 1969. The End of Philosophy and the Task of Thinking. In Basic Writing, ed. David Farrell Krell, 427–449, London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  14. Kusch, Rodolfo. 1976. Geocultura del hombre Americano. Buenos Aires: Garcia Cambeiro.Google Scholar
  15. Maldonado-Torres, Nelson. 2009. On the Coloniality of Being: Contribution to the Development of a Concept. In Globalization and the Decolonial Option, ed. Walter Mignolo, and Arturo Escobar, 240–270. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  16. Mendieta, Eduardo. 1999. Is There Latin American Philosophy? Philosophy Today 43: 50–61.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Mendieta, Eduardo. 2003. Latin American Philosophy: Current, Issues, Debates. Bloomington: Indiana University Press.Google Scholar
  18. Mignolo, Walter. 2006. Islamophobia/Hispanophobia: The (Re) Configuration of the Racial Imperial/Colonial Matrix. Human Architecture: Journal of the Sociology of Self-Knowledge 1: 13–28.Google Scholar
  19. Mignolo, Walter. 2009. Epistemic Disobedience, Independent Thought and Decolonial Freedom. Theory, Culture and Society 26 (7–8): 1–23.Google Scholar
  20. Mignolo, Walter. 2014. Foreword: Yes, We Can. In Can Non-European Think?, ed. Hamid Dabashi, viii–lxii. London: Zed Book.Google Scholar
  21. Onyewuenyi, Innocent. 1991. Is there an African Philosophy? In African Philosophy: The Essential Reading, ed. Tsenay Serequeberhan, 3–28. New York: Paragon Press.Google Scholar
  22. Osamu, Nishitani. 2006. Anthropos and Humanitas: Two Wesern Concepts of ‘Human Being’. In Translation, Biopolitics, Colonial Difference, ed. Jon Solomon and Naoki Sakai, 259–274. Hong Kong: Hong Kong University Press.Google Scholar
  23. Tlostanova, Madina. 2006. Life in Samarkand: Caucasus and Central Asia vis-à-vis Russia, the West, and Islam. Human Architecture: Journal of the Sociology of Self-Knowledge 5 (1): 105–116.Google Scholar
  24. Zea, Leopoldo. 1969. La filosofía americana como filosofía sin más. English Translation: The American Philosophy as Philosophy without further ado. Mexico: Siglo XXI.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© The Author(s) 2017

Authors and Affiliations

  • Walter D. Mignolo
    • 1
  1. 1.Duke UniversityDurhamUSA

Personalised recommendations