Advertisement

Assembling Shared Ownership

  • Dave Cowan
  • Helen Carr
  • Alison Wallace
Chapter
Part of the Palgrave Socio-Legal Studies book series (PSLS)

Abstract

In this chapter, we draw together our analysis of the key themes of this book around five randomly selected narratives provided by the shared owner buyers we interviewed. In these narratives, complex stories are told about ownership, as “merchants of morality” (Goffman 1956: 253), and about what Paul Watt has described as “selective belonging”, a “spatially uneven sense of belonging and attachment” (2009: 2888; see also Jackson and Benson 2014). They are stories of differentiation, picking up on one of the themes of Chap.  5. They are narratives through which identities are performed and co-constituted with objects around the interviewees’ homes, over time. As Benson and Jackson (2017: 6) put it: “The repeated and reiterative narration of negotiations in relation to housing – triumphs, anxieties and ambivalences – reveal differences in what people have, how they make sense of this and how they cope.”

Bibliography

  1. Ashworth, M. (2017), ‘Affective Governmentality: Governing Through Disgust in Uganda’, 26(2), Social and Legal Studies: 188–207.Google Scholar
  2. Benson, M. and Jackson, E. (2017), ‘Making the Middle Classes on Shifting Ground? Residential Status, Performativity and Middle-Class Subjectivities in Contemporary London’, online first, British Journal of Sociology.Google Scholar
  3. Bennett, J. (2010), Vibrant Matter: A Political Ecology of Things, Durham: Duke UP.Google Scholar
  4. Blunt, A. and Dowling, R. (2006), Home, London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  5. Cabinet Office (2015), The Red Tape Challenge Reports on Progress, available at http://webarchive.nationalarchives.gov.uk/20150522175321/ http://www.redtapechallenge.cabinetoffice.gov.uk/home/index
  6. Clarke, A. (2001), ‘The Aesthetics of Social Aspiration’, in D. Miller (ed), Home Possessions, Oxford: Berg.Google Scholar
  7. Cook, N., Smith, S. and Searle, B. (2013), ‘Debted Objects: Homemaking in an Era of Mortgage-Enabled Consumption’, 30(3), Housing, Theory and Society: 293–311.Google Scholar
  8. Douglas, M. (1966), Purity and Danger: An Analysis of the Concepts of Pollution and Taboo, London: Routledge & Kegan Paul.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Ghertner, D. (2010), ‘Calculating Without Numbers: Aesthetic Governmentality in Delhi’s Slums’, 39(2), Economy and Society: 185–217.Google Scholar
  10. Goffman, E. (1956), The Presentation of Self in Everyday Life, London: Random House.Google Scholar
  11. Gurney, C. (1999a), ‘Lowering the Drawbridge: A Case Study of Analogy and Metaphor in the Social Construction of Home-Ownership’, 36(7), Urban Studies: 1705–22.Google Scholar
  12. Gurney, C. (1999b), ‘Pride and Prejudice: Discourses of Normalisation in Public and Private Accounts of Home Ownership’, 14(2), Housing Studies: 163–85.Google Scholar
  13. Hurdley, R. (2006), ‘Dismantling Mantelpieces: Narrating Identities and Materializing Culture in the Home’, 40(4), Sociology: 717–33.Google Scholar
  14. Jacobs, J. and Smith, S. (2008), ‘Living Room: Rematerialising Home’, 40(3), Environment and Planning A: 515–9.Google Scholar
  15. Jacobs, K. and Gabriel, M. (2013), ‘Introduction: Homes, Objects and Things’, 30(3), Housing, Theory and Society: 213–8.Google Scholar
  16. Jacobs, K. and Malpas, J. (2013), ‘Material Objects, Identity and the Home: Towards a Relational Housing Research Agenda’, 30(3), Housing, Theory and Society: 281–92.Google Scholar
  17. Jackson, E. and Beson, M. (2014), ‘Neither ‘Deepest, Darkest Peckham’ nor ‘Run-of-the-Mill’ East Dulwich: The Middle Classes and Their ‘Others’ in an Inner-London Neighbourhood’, 38(4), International Journal of Urban and Regional Research: 1195–1210.Google Scholar
  18. Kleinhans, R. and Elsingha, M. (2010), ‘“Buy Your Home and Feel Control”: Does Home Ownership Achieve the Empowerment of Former Tenants of Social Housing’, 10(1), International Journal of Housing Policy: 41–61.Google Scholar
  19. Miller, D. (2010), Stuff, Cambridge: Polity.Google Scholar
  20. Rowlands, R. and Gurney, C. (2001), ‘Young Peoples’ Perception of Housing Tenure: A Case Study in the Socialization of Tenure Prejudice’, 17(2), Housing, Theory and Society: 121–30.Google Scholar
  21. Watt, P. (2009), ‘Living in an Oasis: Middle-Class Disaffiliation and Selective Belonging in an English Suburb’, 41(12), Environment and Planning A: 2874–92.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© The Author(s) 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  • Dave Cowan
    • 1
  • Helen Carr
    • 2
  • Alison Wallace
    • 3
  1. 1.School of LawUniversity of BristolBristolUK
  2. 2.Kent Law SchoolUniversity of KentCanterburyUK
  3. 3.Centre for Housing PolicyUniversity of YorkYorkUK

Personalised recommendations