A Different Voice?
This chapter sets out the questions to be addressed in the book as a whole. It introduces the notion of women’s ‘different voice’ as both a linguistic and a sociopolitical construct, and reviews research dealing with gender as an influence on verbal behaviour in political and other public or institutional settings. It then outlines the context and main events of the 2015 General Election campaign in the UK, including the two televised leaders’ debates which are at the centre of this book’s case study of female political leaders’ speech. The chapter ends with a brief account of the case study approach, and summarizes the aims and methods of the present study.
KeywordsDifferent voice General Election Language ideology Male dominance UK politics Women in politics
- Baron-Cohen, S. (2003). The essential difference: Men, women and the extreme male brain. London: Allen Lane.Google Scholar
- Baxter, J. (2010). The language of female leadership. London; New York, NY: Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar
- Beard, M. (2014). The public voice of women. London Review of Books, 36(6), 11–14.Google Scholar
- Beckett, C. (2015). The battle for the stage: Broadcasting. In P. Cowley & D. Kavanagh (Eds.), The British General Election of 2015 (pp. 278–301). Basingstoke, Hampshire: Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar
- Cameron, D. (1997). New labour, no feminism? Trouble & Strife, 35, 69–72.Google Scholar
- Cameron, D. (2007). The myth of Mars and Venus: Do men and women really speak different languages? Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
- Chamorro-Premuzic, T. (2013). Why do so many incompetent men become leaders? Harvard Business Review, August 22 [online]. https://hbr.org/2013/08/why-do-so-many-incompetent-men.
- Eckert, P., & McConnell-Ginet, S. (1992). Communities of practice: Where language, gender and power all live. In K. Hall, M. Bucholtz, & B. Moonwomon (Eds.), Locating power: Proceedings of the second Berkeley women and language conference (pp. 89–99). Berkeley, CA: Berkeley Women and Language Group.Google Scholar
- Fairclough, N. (2010). Critical discourse analysis: The critical study of language (2nd ed.). London: Longman.Google Scholar
- Gilligan, C. (1982). In a different voice. Harvard: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
- Grey, J. (1992). Men are from Mars, Women are from Venus. New York: HarperCollins.Google Scholar
- Gumperz, J. (2001). Interactional sociolinguistics: A personal perspective. In D. Schiffrin, D. Tannen, & H. Hamilton (Eds.), The handbook of discourse analysis (pp. 213–228). Malden, MA: Wiley-Blackwell.Google Scholar
- Krook, M. L., & Mackay, F. (Eds.). (2011). Gender, politics and institutions: Towards a feminist institutionalism. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar
- McElhinny, B. (1995). Challenging hegemonic masculinities: Female and male police officers handling domestic violence. In K. Hall & M. Buchholtz (Eds.), Gender articulated: Language and the socially constructed self (pp. 217–244). New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
- Rawnsley, A. (2006). Gordon Brown is from Mars, David Cameron is from Venus. Observer, 19 November.Google Scholar
- Roberts, Y. (2015). Yet again men hold power: Why can’t the Labour Party change? Guardian, 13 September [online]. http://www.theguardian.com/commentisfree/2015/sep/13/women-politics-power-labour-leadership-jeremy-corbyn? CMP=share_btn_tw.
- Scannell, P. (Ed.). (1991). Broadcast talk. London: Sage Publications.Google Scholar
- Schiffrin, D. (1994). Approaches to discourse. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
- Shaw, S. (2006). Governed by the rules? The female voice in Parliamentary debates. In J. Baxter (Ed.), Speaking out: The female voice in public contexts (pp. 81–102). Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar
- Silverstein, M. (1979). Language structure and linguistic ideology. In P. Clyne, W. F. Hanks, & C. L. Hofbauer (Eds.), The elements: A parasession on linguistic units and levels (pp. 193–247). Chicago: Chicago Linguistic Society.Google Scholar
- Stake, R. E. (1995). The art of case-study research. London: Sage.Google Scholar
- Tannen, D. (1990). You just don’t understand: Men and women in conversation. New York: Ballantine.Google Scholar
- Tannen, D. (1994). Gender and discourse. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
- Uchida, A. (1998). When ‘difference’ is ‘dominance’: A critique of the ‘anti-power-based’ cultural approach to sex differences. In D. Cameron (Ed.), The feminist critique of language (pp. 280–292). London: Routledge.Google Scholar
- Walsh, C. (2001). Gender and discourse: Language and power in politics, the church and institutions. London: Longman.Google Scholar
- Way, N. (2013). Deep secrets: Boys’ friendships and the crisis of connection. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
- Yin, R. K. (2009). Case study research, design and method (4th ed.). London: Sage Publications.Google Scholar