A Different Voice?

  • Deborah Cameron
  • Sylvia Shaw
Chapter

Abstract

This chapter sets out the questions to be addressed in the book as a whole. It introduces the notion of women’s ‘different voice’ as both a linguistic and a sociopolitical construct, and reviews research dealing with gender as an influence on verbal behaviour in political and other public or institutional settings. It then outlines the context and main events of the 2015 General Election campaign in the UK, including the two televised leaders’ debates which are at the centre of this book’s case study of female political leaders’ speech. The chapter ends with a brief account of the case study approach, and summarizes the aims and methods of the present study.

Keywords

Different voice General Election Language ideology Male dominance UK politics Women in politics 

References

  1. Baron-Cohen, S. (2003). The essential difference: Men, women and the extreme male brain. London: Allen Lane.Google Scholar
  2. Baxter, J. (2010). The language of female leadership. London; New York, NY: Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar
  3. Beard, M. (2014). The public voice of women. London Review of Books, 36(6), 11–14.Google Scholar
  4. Beckett, C. (2015). The battle for the stage: Broadcasting. In P. Cowley & D. Kavanagh (Eds.), The British General Election of 2015 (pp. 278–301). Basingstoke, Hampshire: Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar
  5. Cameron, D. (1997). New labour, no feminism? Trouble & Strife, 35, 69–72.Google Scholar
  6. Cameron, D. (2003). Gender and language ideologies. In J. Holmes & M. Meyerhoff (Eds.), The handbook of language and gender (pp. 447–467). Malden, MA: Blackwell.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Cameron, D. (2007). The myth of Mars and Venus: Do men and women really speak different languages? Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  8. Chamorro-Premuzic, T. (2013). Why do so many incompetent men become leaders? Harvard Business Review, August 22 [online]. https://hbr.org/2013/08/why-do-so-many-incompetent-men.
  9. Chaney, P. (2012). Critical actors vs. critical mass: The substantive representation of women in the Scottish Parliament. British Journal of Politics and International Relations, 14, 441–457.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Childs, S. (2004). A feminised style of politics? Women MPs in the House of Commons. British Journal of Politics and International Relations, 6(1), 3–19.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Childs, S., & Krook, M. L. (2009). Analyzing women’s substantive representation: From critical mass to critical actors. Government and Opposition, 44(2), 125–145.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Eckert, P., & McConnell-Ginet, S. (1992). Communities of practice: Where language, gender and power all live. In K. Hall, M. Bucholtz, & B. Moonwomon (Eds.), Locating power: Proceedings of the second Berkeley women and language conference (pp. 89–99). Berkeley, CA: Berkeley Women and Language Group.Google Scholar
  13. Fairclough, N. (2010). Critical discourse analysis: The critical study of language (2nd ed.). London: Longman.Google Scholar
  14. Fox, R. L., & Lawless, J. L. (2011). Gendered perceptions and political candidacies: a central barrier to women’s equality in electoral politics. American Journal of Political Science, 55(1), 59–73.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Gilligan, C. (1982). In a different voice. Harvard: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
  16. Goodwin, M. H. (2006). The hidden life of girls: Games of stance, status and exclusion. Malden, MA: Blackwell.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Grey, J. (1992). Men are from Mars, Women are from Venus. New York: HarperCollins.Google Scholar
  18. Gumperz, J. (2001). Interactional sociolinguistics: A personal perspective. In D. Schiffrin, D. Tannen, & H. Hamilton (Eds.), The handbook of discourse analysis (pp. 213–228). Malden, MA: Wiley-Blackwell.Google Scholar
  19. Holmes, J. (2006). Gendered talk in the workplace. Oxford: Blackwell.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Irvine, J. T. (1989). When talk isn’t cheap: Language and political economy. American Ethnologist, 16, 248–267.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Karpowitz, C., & Mendelberg, T. (2014). The silent sex. Princeton: Princeton University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Karpowitz, C., Mendelberg, T., & Shaker, L. (2012). Gender inequality in deliberative participation. American Political Science Review, 106(3), 533–547.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Kathlene, L. (1994). Power and influence in state legislative policymaking: The interaction of gender and position in committee hearing debates. American Political Science Review, 88(3), 560–576.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Krook, M. L., & Mackay, F. (Eds.). (2011). Gender, politics and institutions: Towards a feminist institutionalism. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar
  25. Mackay, F. (2004). Gender and political representation in the UK: The state of the ‘discipline’. British Journal of Politics and International Relations, 6(1), 99–100.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. McDowell, J. (2015). Masculinity and non-traditional occupations: Men’s talk in women’s work, Gender. Work & Organization, 22(3), 273–291.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. McElhinny, B. (1995). Challenging hegemonic masculinities: Female and male police officers handling domestic violence. In K. Hall & M. Buchholtz (Eds.), Gender articulated: Language and the socially constructed self (pp. 217–244). New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
  28. Montgomery, M. (2001). The uses of authenticity: ‘Speaking from experience’ in a UK election broadcast. The Communication Review, 4(4), 447–462.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Phillips, S. U. (2003). The power of gender ideologies in discourse. In J. Holmes & M. Meyerhoff (Eds.), The handbook of language and gender (pp. 252–276). Malden, MA: Blackwell.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Rawnsley, A. (2006). Gordon Brown is from Mars, David Cameron is from Venus. Observer, 19 November.Google Scholar
  31. Roberts, Y. (2015). Yet again men hold power: Why can’t the Labour Party change? Guardian, 13 September [online]. http://www.theguardian.com/commentisfree/2015/sep/13/women-politics-power-labour-leadership-jeremy-corbyn? CMP=share_btn_tw.
  32. Rudman, L. A. (1998). Self-promotion as a risk factor for women: The costs and benefits of counterstereotypical impression management. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 74, 629–645.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Rudman, L. A., & Fairchild, R. (2004). Reactions to counterstereotypic behaviour: The role of backlash in cultural stereotype maintenance. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 87, 157–176.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Scannell, P. (Ed.). (1991). Broadcast talk. London: Sage Publications.Google Scholar
  35. Schiffrin, D. (1994). Approaches to discourse. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
  36. Shaw, S. (2000). Language, gender and floor apportionment in political debates. Discourse & Society, 11(3), 401–418.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Shaw, S. (2006). Governed by the rules? The female voice in Parliamentary debates. In J. Baxter (Ed.), Speaking out: The female voice in public contexts (pp. 81–102). Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar
  38. Sherzer, J. (1987). A diversity of voices: Men’s and women’s speech in ethnographic perspective. In S. Phillips, S. Steele, & C. Tanz (Eds.), Language, gender and sex in comparative perspective (pp. 95–120). New York: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Silverstein, M. (1979). Language structure and linguistic ideology. In P. Clyne, W. F. Hanks, & C. L. Hofbauer (Eds.), The elements: A parasession on linguistic units and levels (pp. 193–247). Chicago: Chicago Linguistic Society.Google Scholar
  40. Stake, R. E. (1995). The art of case-study research. London: Sage.Google Scholar
  41. Tannen, D. (1990). You just don’t understand: Men and women in conversation. New York: Ballantine.Google Scholar
  42. Tannen, D. (1994). Gender and discourse. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  43. Uchida, A. (1998). When ‘difference’ is ‘dominance’: A critique of the ‘anti-power-based’ cultural approach to sex differences. In D. Cameron (Ed.), The feminist critique of language (pp. 280–292). London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  44. van Dijk, T. A. (1993). Principles of critical discourse analysis. Discourse & Society, 4(2), 249–283.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Walsh, C. (2001). Gender and discourse: Language and power in politics, the church and institutions. London: Longman.Google Scholar
  46. Way, N. (2013). Deep secrets: Boys’ friendships and the crisis of connection. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
  47. Yin, R. K. (2009). Case study research, design and method (4th ed.). London: Sage Publications.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© The Editor(s) (if applicable) and The Author(s) 2016

Authors and Affiliations

  • Deborah Cameron
    • 1
  • Sylvia Shaw
    • 2
  1. 1.Worcester CollegeUniversity of OxfordOxfordUK
  2. 2.Media DepartmentMiddlesex UniversityLondonUK

Personalised recommendations