Nordic Eurosceptic Voting in 2014: Denmark, Norway, and Sweden

  • Catharina Sørensen
Part of the Palgrave Studies in European Union Politics book series (PSEUP)


What determined the strong euroscepticism voiced at the 2014 European Parliament (EP) election in Denmark, Finland, and Sweden? This chapter argues that there is no such thing as a uniform Nordic model. Across the three countries, there is pronounced sovereignty-based euroscepticism and a weak democratic euroscepticism, but notable differences concerning perceptions of the European Union’s (EU’s) economic utility and expectations as to its level of social engagement. Yet, Nordic voters do not reject the idea of EU cooperation: no widespread hard euroscepticism exists. In fact, Nordic hard euroscepticism was at one of its historic lowest levels in 2014. A content analysis of eurosceptic party manifestos shows considerable alignment between the eurosceptic profiles of Nordic citizens and the policy stances of the parties they voted for.


Euroscepticism • Public opinion • European integration • Nordic model 


  1. Aylott, N., & Blomgren, M. (2014). EU election: Campaign in Sweden centres on ‘more or less’ Europe. The Conversation. (webpage consulted May 2016).
  2. Boomgaarden, H. G., Schuck, A. R. T., Elenbaas De, M., & De Vreese, C. H. (2011). Mapping EU attitudes: Conceptual and empirical dimensions of Euroskepticism and EU support. European Union Politics, 12(2), 241–266.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Borre, O., & Andersen, J. G. (1997). Voting and political attitudes in Denmark. Aarhus: Aarhus University Press.Google Scholar
  4. Brack, N., & Startin, N. (2015). Introduction: Euroscepticism, from the margins to the mainstream. International Political Science Review, 36(3), 239–249.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. De Vreese, C. H. (2004). Why European citizens will reject the EU constitution (Working Paper No. 116). Center for European Studies.Google Scholar
  6. Franklin, M. N., Marsh, M., & McLaren, L. (1994). Uncorking the bottle: Popular opposition to European unification in the wake of Maastricht. Journal of Common Market Studies, 32(4), 455–472.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Føllesdal, A., & Hix, S. (2006). Why there is a democratic deficit in the EU: A response to Majone and Moravcsik. Journal of Common Market Studies, 44(3), 533–562.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Gabel, M. (1998). Public support for European integration: An empirical test of five theories. Journal of Politics, 60(2), 333–354.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Garry, J., Marsh, M., & Sinnott, R. (2005). Second-order versus issue-voting effects in EU Referendums. Evidence from the Irish Nice Treaty Referendums. European Union Politics, 6(2), 201–221.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Hix, S., & Marsh, M. (2011). Second order effects plus pan-European political swings: An analysis of European parliament elections across time. Electoral Studies, 30, 4–15.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Hobolt, S. B. (2014). Ever closer or ever wider? Public attitudes towards further enlargement and integration in the European Union. Journal of European Public Policy, 21(5), 664–680.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Hobolt, S. B., & Wittrock, J. (2011). The second order election model revisited: An experimental test of vote choices in European parliament elections. Electoral Studies, 30, 29–40.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Hobolt, S. B., Spoon, J. J., & Tilley, J. (2008). A vote against Europe? Explaining defection at the 1999 and 2004 European parliament elections. British Journal of Political Science, 39, 93–115.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Hooghe, L., Marks, G., & Wilson, C. (2004). Does left/right structure party positions on European integration? In G. Marks & M. Steenbergen (Eds.), European integration and political conflict (pp. 120–140). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  15. Hooghe, L., & Marks, G. (2005). Calculation, community and cues. Public opinion on European integration. European Union Politics, 6(4), 419–443.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Manners, I., & Sørensen, C. (2007). New political contestation in the European Union. Copenhagen: DIIS Brief.Google Scholar
  17. Møller, B., & Sørensen, C. (2015). Uden kursændring risikerer ja-siden at tabe folkeafstemning, notat, Tænketanken Europa.Google Scholar
  18. Nicolaïdis, K., & Youngs, R. (2014). Europe’s democracy trilemma. International Affairs, 90(6), 1403–1419.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Reif, K., & Schmitt, H. (1980). Nine second order national elections: A conceptual framework for the analysis of European election results. European Journal of Political Research, 8(1), 3–44.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Schmitt, H. (2005). The European parliament elections of June 2004: Still second-order? West European Politics, 28(3), 650–679.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Serricchio, T., & Quaglia, L. (2013). Euroscepticism and the global financial crisis. Journal of Common Market Studies, 51(1), 51–64.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Svensson, P. (2002). Five Danish referendums on the European Community and European Union: A critical assessment of the Franklin thesis. European Journal of Political Research, 41, 733–750.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Sørensen, C. (2007). Euroscepticism. A conceptual analysis and a longitudinal, cross-country examination of public scepticism towards the European Union. Ph.D. dissertation, University of Copenhagen.Google Scholar
  24. Szczerbiak, A., & Taggart, P. (2003). Theorising Party-Based euroscepticism: Problems of Definition, Measurement and Causality (EPERN Working Paper No. 12).Google Scholar
  25. Usherwood, S., & Startin, N. (2013). Euroscepticism as a persistent phenomenon. Journal of Common Market Studies, 51(1), 1–16.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Van Spanje, J., & De Vreese, C. H. (2011). So what’s wrong with the EU? Motivations underlying the eurosceptic vote in the 2009 European elections. European Union Politics, 12(3), 405–429.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Weiler, J. (2012). In the face of crisis: Input legitimacy, output legitimacy and the political messianism of European integration. Journal of European integration, 34(7), 825–841.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© The Author(s) 2017

Authors and Affiliations

  • Catharina Sørensen
    • 1
  1. 1.Think Tank EuropeCopenhagenDenmark

Personalised recommendations