German Euroscepticism: Alternative für Deutschland in 2014

  • Stefanie Reher
Part of the Palgrave Studies in European Union Politics book series (PSEUP)


The 2014 European Parliament (EP) election in Germany was marked by the success of the Alternative für Deutschland (AfD), a new eurosceptic party that gained 7 percent of the vote. The party had been founded in protest against the government’s euro policies, calling for the end of the common currency. Its electoral performance might thus be attributed to critical views of the European Union (EU) in Germany. However, the AfD also advocated stricter immigration policies. Moreover, its success might have been at least partly due to voters’ desire to signal government disenchantment. While AfD supporters were indeed strongly opposed to immigration and critical of the political establishment and the government, analyses of survey data reveal that it was in fact euroscepticism that drove their vote choice.


Euroscepticism • Alternative für Deutschland • Populism • Anti-immigration politics 


  1. AfD. (2013, April 14). “Wahlprogramm”. Alternative für Deutschland. Accessed November 27, 2015, from (webpage consulted May 2016).
  2. AfD. (2014, March 22). Mut zu Deutschland. Für ein Europa der Vielfalt. Alternative für Deutschland. Accessed November 27, 2015, from
  3. AfD. (2015). Wer ist die AfD? Alternative für Deutschland. Accessed October 17, 2015 From
  4. De Vries, C. E., van der Brug, W., van Egmond, M. H., & van der Eijk, C. (2011). Individual and contextual variation in EU issue voting: The role of political information. Electoral Studies, 30, 16–28.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Easton, D. (1975). A re-assessment of the concept of political support. British Journal of Political Science, 5, 435–457.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Ferrera, F., & Weishaupt, J. T. (2004). Get your act together: Party performance in European parliament elections. European Union Politics, 53, 283–306.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Grimm, R. (2015). The rise of the German Eurosceptic party alternative für Deutschland, between ordoliberal critique and popular anxiety. International Political Science Review, 36(3), 264–278.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Hix, S., & Marsh, M. (2007). Punishment or protest? Understanding European Parliament Elections. Journal of Politics, 69(2), 495–510.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Hobolt, S. B., Spoon, J. J., & Tilley, J. (2009). A vote against Europe? Explaining defection at the 1999 and 2004 European parliament elections. British Journal of Political Science, 391, 93–115.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Lachmann, G. (2012, Oct 04). Enttäuschte CDU-Politiker gründen Wahlalternative. Die Welt. Accessed October 15, 2015 from
  11. Lachmann, G. (2013, March 03). Anti-Euro-Partei geißelt die Politik der Kanzlerin. Die Welt. Accessed October 15, 2015 from
  12. Rattinger, H, Roßteutscher, S., Schmitt-Beck, R., Weßels, B., & Wolf, C. (2015). Long-term Online Tracking, T24 (GLES). GESIS Data Archive, Cologne. ZA5724 Data file Version 1.2.0, doi: 10.4232/1.12279.
  13. Reif, K., & Schmitt, H. (1980). Nine second-order national elections: A conceptual Framework for the analysis of European election results. European Journal of Political Research, 8, 3–44.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Schmitt-Beck, R. (2014). Euro-Kritik, Wirtschaftspessimismus und Einwanderungsskepsis: Hintergründe des Beinah-Wahlerfolges der Alternative für Deutschland (AfD) bei der Bundestagswahl 2013. Zeitschrift für Parlamentsfragen, 1(2014), 94–112.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Schuler, K. (2014, April 04). Merkel muss es wieder richten. Die Zeit. Accessed October 10, 2015, from
  16. Treib, O. (2014). The voter says no, but nobody listens: causes and consequences of the Eurosceptic vote in the 2014 European elections. Journal of European Public Policy, 21(10), 1541–1554.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© The Author(s) 2017

Authors and Affiliations

  • Stefanie Reher
    • 1
  1. 1.European University InstituteSan Domenico di FiesoleItaly

Personalised recommendations