Advertisement

Interart Relations and Self-Reflexivity in Contemporary Irish Drama

  • Csilla Bertha
Chapter

Abstract

This examination of contemporary Irish artist-plays (künstlerdrama), dramatizing artist-protagonists and/or presenting artworks (music, painting, sculpture, or theatre art and performance itself), attempts to illuminate some of the ways in which the different manifestations of the artist and art on stage are integrated into drama and theatrical performance. The discussion focuses on questions of (re)presentation, such as the dramatic and/or structural implications of having an artist protagonist and/or art works in the stage space; how one form of art becomes incorporated into another, how the boundaries between them are kept or transcended, how those art forms interact with each other and, most importantly, how such interactions enhance the self-reflexivity of drama and theatre.

Whether or not the establishment of modern theatre language—the language of space, light, scenography, body and choreography, and frequently other art forms—happened due to the increasing distrust of language’s power, as some theoreticians maintain, I argue that in the Irish intellectual tradition the destabilization of language’s dominance does not necessarily lead to its replacement by other forms of art. Rather, the art of words, together with other art forms, may all participate in interart relationships on the stage, as seen in many contemporary Irish plays. The critical approach focusing on interart relationships helps to highlight how the collaboration of different arts, including rather than substituting verbal language, enhances theatricality. Plays discussed in some detail include Brian Friel’s Faith Healer and Performances; Frank McGuinness’s The Bird Sanctuary and Innocence, Thomas Kilroy’s The Shape of Metal and Blake and Jim Nolan’s Backwater Angel.

Bibliography

  1. Bertha, Csilla. “Borderlines Destabilized--Witches and Witchcraft in Frank McGuinness’s Plays.” Hungarian Journal of English and American Studies 20:2 (Fall 2014): 33–49.Google Scholar
  2. ———. “Memory, Art, Lieux de Mémoire in Brian Friel’s The Home Place.” In Christopher Murray. The Theatre of Brian Friel: Tradition and Modernity, 230–45. London: Bloomsbury Methuen, 2015.Google Scholar
  3. ———. “Theatricality and Self-Reflexivity: The Play-Within-the-Play in Select Contemporary Irish Plays.” In Irish Theatre in Transition, edited by Donald E. Morse, 99–121. Houndsmills, Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan, 2015.Google Scholar
  4. Coveney, Michael. “The Cordelia Dream in Wilton’s Music Hall, London.” Independent, 1 Jan (2009). Accessed April 15, 2017. http://www.independent.co.uk/arts-entertainment/theatre-dance/reviews/the-cordelia-dream-wiltions-music-hall-london-1219767.html
  5. Dubost, Thierry. The Plays of Thomas Kilroy. Jefferson, North Carolina: McFarland, 2007.Google Scholar
  6. Fischer-Lichte, Erika. “Introduction: From Comparative Arts to Interart Studies.” Paragrana 25:2 (2016): 12–26.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Friel, Brian. Faith Healer. In Selected Plays. London: Faber, 1984. 327–76.Google Scholar
  8. ———. Dancing at Lughnasa. London: Faber, 1990.Google Scholar
  9. ———. Wonderful Tennessee. London: Faber, 1993.Google Scholar
  10. ———. “Seven Notes for a Festival Programme.” In Brian Friel: Essays, Diaries, Interviews, 1964–1999, edited by Christopher Murray, 173–80. London: Faber, 1999.Google Scholar
  11. ———. Performances. Loughcrew: Gallery, 2003.Google Scholar
  12. Grene, Nicholas. “Friel and Transparency.” Irish University Review 29:1 (Spring/Summer 1999): 136–44.Google Scholar
  13. Jordan, Eamonn. “The Masquerade of the Damned and the Deprivileging of Innocence: Frank McGuinness’s Innocence.” In The Theatre of Frank McGuinness. Stages of Mutability, edited by Helen Heusner Lojek, 50–78. Dublin: Carysfort, 2002.Google Scholar
  14. Kearney, Richard. “Introduction: An Irish Intellectual Tradition.” In The Irish Mind, edited by Richard Kearney, 7–14. Dublin: Wolfhound, 1985.Google Scholar
  15. Kilroy, Thomas. Blake. Loughcrew: Gallery, 2015.Google Scholar
  16. ———. The Shape of Metal. Loughcrew: Gallery, 2003.Google Scholar
  17. Kurdi, Mária. “‘The Whole Idea of Writing Historical Fiction Is Paradoxical.’ Talk with Irish Playwright Thomas Kilroy.” Hungarian Journal of English and American Studies 8:1 (Spring 2002): 259–67.Google Scholar
  18. Lagerroth, Ulla-Britta. “Reading Musicalized Texts as Self-Reflexive Texts. Some Aspects of Interart Discourse.” In Word and Music Studies. Defining the Field, edited by Walter Bernhart, Steven Paul Scher, and Werner Wolf, 205–20. Amsterdam: Rodopi, 1999.Google Scholar
  19. Lojek, Helen Heusner. Contexts for McGuinness’ Drama. Washington, D.C.: The Catholic University of America Press, 2004.Google Scholar
  20. McAuley, Gay. Space in Performance: Making Meaning in the Theatre. Ann Arbor, MI: University of Michigan, 1999.Google Scholar
  21. McGuinness, Frank. Innocence. London: Faber, 1987.Google Scholar
  22. ———. The Bird Sanctuary. In Plays 2. London: Faber, 2002. 265–342.Google Scholar
  23. Mikami, Hiroko. Frank McGuinness and His Theatre of Paradox. Gerrards Cross, Bucks.: Colin Smythe, 2002.Google Scholar
  24. Mitchell, W.J.T. Picture Theory. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1994.Google Scholar
  25. Murray, Christopher. “Triumph of the Literary Play? Jim Nolan’s Blackwater Angel.Irish Literary Supplement, March 22 (2002): 16.Google Scholar
  26. ———. “Joyce, Yeats and The Bird Sanctuary.” Irish University Review 40:1 (Spring/Summer, 2010), 69–80.Google Scholar
  27. ———. “The Plays of Enda Walsh: An Interim Report.” Hungarian Journal of English and American Studies 23:1 (Spring 2017): 13–33.Google Scholar
  28. Nolan, Jim. Blackwater Angel. Loughcrew: Gallery, 2001.Google Scholar
  29. O’Rowe, Mark. Terminus. London: Nick Hern Books, 2007.Google Scholar
  30. Rajewsky, Irina O. “Intermediality, Intertextuality, and Remediation: A Literary Perspective on Intermediality.” Intermedialities 6 (Automne, 2005): 43–64.Google Scholar
  31. Roche, Anthony. Brian Friel. Theatre and Politics. Houndmills, Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan, 2011.Google Scholar
  32. Russell, Richard Rankin. Modernity, Community, and Place in Brian Friel’s Drama. Syracuse, NY: Syracuse University Press, 2014.Google Scholar
  33. Wallace, Claire. “‘… Ultimately Alone and Walking Around in Your Own Private Universe.’ Metatheatre and Metaphysics in Three Plays by Enda Walsh.” Hungarian Journal of English and American Studies 23:1 (2017): 35–50.Google Scholar
  34. Walsh, Enda. Ballyturk. London, Nick Hern Books, 2014.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Yeats, William Butler. Collected Poems. London: Macmillan, 1971.Google Scholar
  36. da Vinci, Leonardo. Tudomány és művészet [Science and Art], edited and translated by Tibor Kardos. Budapest: Magyar Helikon, 1960. [Selection of essays on art in Hungarian]Google Scholar

Copyright information

© The Author(s) 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  • Csilla Bertha
    • 1
  1. 1.University of DebrecenDebrecenHungary

Personalised recommendations