Advertisement

From Austerity to Permanent Strain? The European Union and Welfare State Reform in Italy and Spain

  • Emmanuele Pavolini
  • Margarita León
  • Ana M. Guillén
  • Ugo Ascoli
Chapter
Part of the Work and Welfare in Europe book series (RECOWE)

Abstract

This chapter makes a comparative analysis of the trajectories of welfare change in Italy and Spain since the outbreak of the financial crisis. We look at the differences in the types of institutional design to study welfare reform in these two countries and assess how recent changes have affected welfare state institutions. This chapter also assesses the level of the European Union (EU) involvement through formal instruments around the European Semester as well as by the means of agreements with the Troika and the European Central Bank (ECB). For this part of the analysis, three sets of documents have been used: Commission Recommendations and Council Decisions in relation to Excessive Deficit Procedures (EDP); Commission country-specific Recommendations based on Stability or Convergence Programmes, and Policy Measures to boost growth and jobs (National Reform Programmes). These documents allow an analysis of the contents of formal adjustment pressures. Other documents and sources (including newspaper articles) have also been analysed to look at the role of conditionality and ‘backroom’ diplomacy.

Keywords

European Union Welfare State European Central Bank European Monetary Union Labour Market Policy 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

References

  1. Ascoli, U., & Pavolini, E. (2012). Ombre rosse. Il sistema di welfare italiano dopo 20 anni di riforme. Stato e Mercato, 94(3), 429–464.Google Scholar
  2. Basile, R. (2011). Tagli al welfare. C’è un futuro per le politiche sociali? Rivista delle Politiche Sociali, 12(3), 543–558.Google Scholar
  3. Bonoli, G., & Natali, D. (Eds.). (2012). The politics of the new welfare state. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  4. CES, Consejo Económico y Social. (2011). Memoria sobre la situación socioeconómica y laboral. Madrid: CES.Google Scholar
  5. de la Porte, C., & Natali, D. (2014). Altered Europeanization of pension reform during the Great Recession: Denmark and Italy compared. West European Politics, 37(4), 732–749.Google Scholar
  6. European Commission. (2009a). Recommendation for a Council Decision on the existence of an excessive deficit in Spain SEC (2009) 561 final, 24 March. Brussels: European Commission.Google Scholar
  7. European Commission. (2009b). Recommendation for a Council Recommendation to Spain with a view to bringing an end to the situation of an excessive government deficit SEC (2009) 562, 24 March. Brussels: European Commission.Google Scholar
  8. European Commission. (2010). Communication from the Commission to the Council. Assessment of the action taken by Belgium, the Czech Republic, Germany, Ireland, Spain, France, Italy, the Netherlands, Austria, Portugal, Slovenia and Slovakia in response to the Council Recommendations of 2 December 2009 with a view to bringing an end to the situation of excessive government deficit, 15 June. Brussels: European Commission.Google Scholar
  9. European Commission. (2012). Memorandum of understanding on financial-sector policy conditionality, 20 July 2012. Brussels: European Commission.Google Scholar
  10. Eurostat. (2012–2014). EESPROS database. Brussels: European Commission.Google Scholar
  11. Ferrera, M. (2012). Verso un welfare più europeo? Conclusione. In M. Ferrera, V. Fargion, & M. Jessoula (Eds.), Alle radici del welfare all’italiana (pp. 323–344). Venice, Italy: Marsilio.Google Scholar
  12. Ferrera, M., Hemerijck, A., & Rhodes, M. (2000). The future of Social Europe. Oeiras, Portugal: Celta Editora.Google Scholar
  13. Guillén, A. M., & León, M. (Eds.). (2011). The Spanish welfare state in European context. Farnham: Ashgate.Google Scholar
  14. de Haan, J., Berger, H., & Jansen, D. (2004). Why has the stability and growth pact failed? International Finance, 7(2), 235–260.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Hall, P. (1993). Policy paradigms, social learning, and the state: The case of economic policymaking in Britain. Comparative Politics, 25(3), 275–296.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Istat. (2013a). Spesa per la protezione sociale. Rome, Italy: Istat.Google Scholar
  17. Istat. (2013b). Spesa delle Amministrazioni pubbliche per funzione. Rome, Italy: Istat.Google Scholar
  18. Jenson, J. (2008). Children, new social risks and policy change: A Lego future? Comparative Social Research, 25(1), 357–382.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Jessoula, M., & Pavolini, E. (2012). Italy annual national report 2012: Pensions, health and long-term care. In Annual ASISP report for DG employment, social affairs and equal opportunities. Brussels: European Commission.Google Scholar
  20. León, M., Pavolini, E., & Guillén, A. M. (2015). Welfare rescaling in Italy and Spain: Political strategies to deal with harsh austerity. European Journal of Social Security, 17(2), 182–201.Google Scholar
  21. Maino, F., & Neri, S. (2011). Explaining welfare reforms in Italy between economy and politics: External constraints and endogenous dynamics. Social Policy & Administration, 45(4), 445–464.Google Scholar
  22. MINHAP. (2013). Presupuestos Generales del Estado 2013. In Informe Económico-financiero. Madrid: MINHAP.Google Scholar
  23. Morel, N., Palier, B., & Palme, J. (Eds.). (2012). Towards a social investment welfare state? Ideas, policies and challenges. Bristol: The Policy Press.Google Scholar
  24. Naldini, M., & Saraceno, C. (2008). Social and family policies in Italy: Not totally frozen but far from structural reforms. Social Policy & Administration, 42(7), 733–748.Google Scholar
  25. Natali, D. (2011). Le politiche pensionistiche. In U. Ascoli (Ed.), Il welfare in Italia (pp. 57–77). Bologna: Il Mulino.Google Scholar
  26. Palier, B. (Ed.). (2010). A long good–bye to bismarck: The politics of welfare reforms in continental welfare states. Amsterdam: Amsterdam University Press.Google Scholar
  27. Pavolini, E., & Guillén, A. M. (Eds.). (2013). Health care systems under austerity. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar
  28. Pierson, P. (1998). Irresistible forces, immovable objects: Post-industrial welfare states confront permanent austerity. Journal of European Public Policy, 5(4), 539–560.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Pierson, P. (Ed.). (2001). The new politics of the welfare state. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  30. Ranci, C., & Pavolini, E. (Eds.). (2013). Reforms in long-term care policies in Europe. Investigating institutional change and social impacts. New York: Springer.Google Scholar
  31. Saraceno, C., & Keck, W. (2011). Towards an integrated approach for the analysis of gender equity in policies supporting paid work and care responsibilities. Demographic Research, 25(4), 371–406.Google Scholar
  32. Streeck, W., & Thelen, K. (Eds.). (2005). Beyond continuity. Institutional change in advanced political economies. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  33. Taylor-Gooby, P. (2004). New risks, new welfare. The transformation of the European welfare state. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© The Author(s) 2016

Authors and Affiliations

  • Emmanuele Pavolini
    • 1
  • Margarita León
    • 1
  • Ana M. Guillén
    • 1
  • Ugo Ascoli
    • 1
  1. 1.SPOCRI DepartmentMacerata UniversityMacerataItaly

Personalised recommendations