Advances in Technology and Policing: 21st Century America

Chapter

Abstract

The significance of technology in the development of the policing role cannot be denied, nor can it be overstated. Technology has provided the tools needed to better understand the criminal act, and to better protect the community now and in the future. This chapter provides an introduction and appraisal to many of the most common and emerging technologies in policing today. The authors hope that this chapter provides readers a basic foundation for law enforcement’s use and adoption of technologies, and how they forge the way in which policing is conducted in modern day America.

Keywords

Police Police technology Technological advances in policing Digital policing 

References

  1. 9-1-1.gov. (n.d.). Next generation 911 (NG911). Available at: http://www.911.gov/911-issues/standards.html.
  2. Ariel, B., Farrar, W. A., & Sutherland, A. (2015). The effect of police body-worn cameras on use of force and citizens’ complaints against the police: A randomized controlled trial. Journal of Quantitative Criminology, 31(3), 509–535.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Baker, T. J. (2011, April). The police chief. Retrieved September 21, 2015, from Biometrics for Intelligence-Led Policing: The Coming Trends. http://www.policechiefmagazine.org/magazine/index.cfm?fuseaction=display_arch&article_id=2358&issue_id=42011#.
  4. Clarke, R. G. Ed. (1997). Situational crime prevention. Monsey, NY: Criminal Justice Press, pp. 53–70.Google Scholar
  5. Dodge, L. D., & Flaherty, L. (2014, June 24). Intelligent transportation systems joint program office. United States Department of Transportation. Available at: http://www.its.dot.gov/ng911/.
  6. Du, S., Ibrahim, M., Shehata, M., & Badawy, W. (2013). Automatic license plate recognition (ALPR): A state-of-the-art review. Circuits and Systems for Video Technology, IEEE Transactions on, 23(2), 311–325.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Eck, J. E., & Weisburd, D. (1995). Crime places in crime theory. Crime Prevention Studies, pp. 1–33. Available at: http://citeseerx.ist.psu.edu/viewdoc/download?doi=10.1.1.362.1293&rep=rep1&type=pdf.
  8. FBI (N.D.). Next generation identification. Federal Bureau of Investigation – Services. Available at: https://www.fbi.gov/services/cjis/fingerprints-and-other-biometrics/ngi.
  9. Fu, Q. (2014). Validation of interpersonal stances. Netherlands: Ensched.Google Scholar
  10. Gallagher, S. (2013, November 13). Staking out Twitter and Facebook, new service lets police poke perps. ArsTechnica. Available at: http://arstechnica.com/information-technology/2013/11/staking-out-twitter-and-facebook-new-service-lets-police-poke-perps/.
  11. Gorodnichy, D., Granger, E., & Radtke, P. (2014). Survey of commercial technologies for face recognition in Video. Available at: http://cradpdf.drdc-rddc.gc.ca/PDFS/unc198/p800510_A1b.pdf.
  12. Grant, J. (2015). Automatic license plate recognition. Department of Computer Science and Engineering. Available at: http://www.cse.nd.edu/~jgrant3/cw/alpr.pdf.
  13. Kelly, J. (2013, August 12). Cellphone data spying: It’s not just the NSA. USA Today. Available at: http://www.usatoday.com/story/news/nation/2013/12/08/cellphone-data-spying-nsa-police/3902809/.
  14. Koper, C., Taylor, B., & Woods, D. J. (2013). A randomized test of initial and residual deterrence from directed patrols and use of license plate readers at crime hot spots. Journal of Experimental Criminology, 9(2), 213–244.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Kunz, S. N., Grove, N., & Fischer, F. (2012). Acute pathophysiological influences of conducted electrical weapons in humans: A review of current literature. Forensic Science International, 221(1), 1–4.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Miller, L., Toliver, J., & PERF. (2014). Implementing a Body-Worn Camera Program: Recommendations and Lessons Learned. Washington, DC. Available at: http://www.justice.gov/iso/opa/resources/472014912134715246869.pdf.
  17. National Institute of Justice. (2003). CCTV: Constant Cameras Track Violators. NIJ Journal (249), 16.Google Scholar
  18. National Institute of Justice. (2008). Study of Deaths Following Electro Muscular Disruption: Interim Report. Retrieved from https://www.ncjrs.gov/pdffiles1/nij/222981.pdf.
  19. National Institute of Justice. (2011, June). Less lethal technology. Office of Justice Programs. Available at: http://www.nij.gov/topics/technology/less-lethal/pages/welcome.aspx.
  20. Richmond, S. (2009, July). Advanced technology for interview & interrogation, Law and Order, Hendon Media Group: Law Enforcement Publications and Conferences. Available at: http://www.hendonpub.com/resources/article_archive/results/details?id=2171.
  21. Roufa, T. (2012). All about TASERS and electronic control devices. About Careers. Available at: http://criminologycareers.about.com/od/Career_Trends/a/Electronic-Control-Devices-Shocking-Developments-In-Police-Technology.htm.
  22. Stanley, J. (2013). Police body-mounted cameras: With right policies in place, a win for all. New York, NY: ACLU.Google Scholar
  23. Stanley, J. (2015, March). Police body-mounted cameras: With right policies in place, a win for all. [Electronic] Available at: https://www.aclu.org/police-body-mounted-cameras-right-policies-place-win-all.
  24. Stoe, D., Watkins, C. R., Kerr, J., Rost, L., & Theodosia, C. (2003, February). Using geographic information systems to map crime victim services. Office for Victims of Crime, Department of Justice and Crime. Available at: https://www.ncjrs.gov/ovc_archives/reports/geoinfosys2003/welcome.html.
  25. Toliver, L. M. (2014, October). Implementing a body-worn camera program: Recommendations and lessons learned: COPS, Vol. 7 (10). Available at: http://cops.usdoj.gov/html/dispatch/10-2014/body_worn_camera_program.asp.
  26. Wagner, S. (2013). Stopping police in their tracks: protecting cellular location information privacy in the twenty-first century. Duke L. & Tech. Rev., 12, 200.Google Scholar
  27. Weisburd, D., & Lum, C. (2005). The diffusion of computerized crime mapping in policing: Linking research and practice. Police Practice and Research, 6(5), 419–434.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Weisburd, D., Wyckoff, L. A., Ready, J., Eck, J. E., Hinkle, J. C., & Gajewski, F. (2006). Does crime just move around the corner? A controlled study of spatial displacement and diffusion of crime control benefits. Criminology, 44(3), 549–592.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Welsh, B. C., & Farrington, D. P. (2002). Crime prevention effects of closed-circuit television: A systematic review. Annual Review of Law and Social Science, 11, 111–130.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Welsh, B. C., & Farrington, D. P. (2015. Home Office Research Study 252). Effectiveness and social costs of public area surveillance for crime prevention. London, UK: The Research Development, and Statistics Directorate.Google Scholar
  31. Westphal, L. J. (2004, November 9). The in-car camera: Value and impact. Police Chief Magazine. Vol. 71 (April). Available at: http://www.policeone.com/:http://www.policeone.com/police-products/police-technology/articles/93475-The-in-car-camera-Value-and-impact.
  32. White, M. D. (2014). Police officer body-worn cameras: Assessing the evidence. Washington, DC: Office of Community Oriented Policing Services.Google Scholar
  33. Woods, D., Mackey, W., Rumler, M., Davis, J., & Litchford, H. (2013). On your page, in your head: Police use of social networking information. Law Enforcement Executive Forum, 13(2), 120–129.Google Scholar
  34. Yu, R. (2012, March 18). Social media role in police cases growing, USA Today. Available at: www.usatoday.com/tech/new/story/2012-03-18/.

Copyright information

© The Author(s) 2016

Open Access This chapter is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Noncommercial License, which permits any noncommercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author(s) and source are credited.

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of CriminologyIndiana State UniversityTerre HauteUSA
  2. 2.Department of EnglishPassaic County Community CollegePatersonUSA

Personalised recommendations