Advertisement

Constraining Structures: Why Local International Relations Theory in Southeast Asia Is Having a Hard Time

  • Anchalee Rüland
Chapter
Part of the Palgrave Studies in International Relations book series (PSIR)

Abstract

Southeast Asia is often celebrated as one of the greatest success stories of late development. In the discipline of International Relations (IR), new departments have been opened, as enrollment has risen steadily. Interestingly, this growing interest is not reflected in the field of International Relations Theory (IRT), since local Southeast Asian theorizing has been marginalized. In assessing the reasons for this absence, the chapter relates to one of the overall questions of the book that seeks to understand the gatekeeping mechanisms within the discipline. Given this gap between an institutional upturn and a theoretical wasteland, the chapter inquires why there is no local Southeast Asian IRT? Six structural gatekeeping mechanisms are evaluated in order to understand the poor state of local IRT in Southeast Asia. Building on a careful evaluation of the existing literature, this chapter argues for Chong’s finding of an absence of non-Western IRT in Southeast Asia, and that IRT in the region is Western-dominated and anything but distinctive. It further shows, and thus goes beyond Chong, that local IRT in Southeast Asia is trapped in a vicious circle, since adherence to Western standards is a criterion for academic success, but also a factor guaranteeing the exclusion of local theorizing.

Keywords

International Relation International Relation Publication Practice Western Theory Western Standard 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

References

  1. Acharya, A. 1999. Imagined Proximities: The Making and Unmaking of Southeast Asia as a Region. Southeast Asian Journal of Social Science 27(1): 55–76.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Acharya, A. 2000. Ethnocentrism and Emancipatory IR Theory. In (Dis)Placing Security: Critical Re-evaluations of the Boundaries of Security, ed. S. Arnold and J. M. Beier, 1–18. Toronto, ON: Centre for International and Security Studies, York University.Google Scholar
  3. Acharya, A. 2001. Constructing a Security Community in Southeast Asia. ASEAN and the Problem of Regional Order. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  4. Acharya, A. 2004. How Ideas Spread: Whose Norms Matter? Norm Localization and Constitutional Change in Asian Regionalism. International Organization 58(2): 239–275.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Acharya, A. 2007. International Relations Theory and Western Dominance: Reassessing the Foundations of International Order. Reenvisioning Global Justice/Global Order Seminar Series, Centre for International Studies, Oxford University, 22 February 2007.Google Scholar
  6. Acharya, A. 2011. Dialogue and Discovery: In Search of International Relations Theories Beyond the West. Millennium—Journal of International Studies 39(3): 619–637.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Acharya, A. 2014. Remaking Southeast Asian Studies: Doubt, Desire and the Promise of Comparisons. Pacific Affairs 87(3): 463–483.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Acharya, A., and B. Buzan. 2007. Why Is There No Non-Western International Relations Theory? An Introduction. International Relations of the Asia-Pacific 7(3): 287–312.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Alexandra, L. 2012. Indonesia and the Responsibility to Protect. The Pacific Review 25(1): 51–74.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Anderson, B. 1991. Imagined Communities. Reflections on the Origin and Spread of Nationalism. London: Verso.Google Scholar
  11. Anderson, B. 2007. The Idea of Power in Javanese Culture. In Culture and Politics in Indonesia, ed. C. Holt, 1–69. Jakarta: Equinox.Google Scholar
  12. Aspinall, E. 2012. The Politics of Studying Indonesian Politics. Intellectuals, Political Research and Public Debate in Australia. In Knowing Indonesia: Intersections of Self, Discipline and Nation, ed. J. Purdey, 53–76. Clayton: Monash University Publishing.Google Scholar
  13. Aydinli, E., and J. Mathews. 2000. Are the Core and Periphery Irreconcilable? The Curious World of Publishing in Contemporary International Relations. International Studies Perspectives 1(3): 289–303.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Ayoob, M. 1989. The Third World in the System of States: Acute Schizophrenia or Growing Pains? International Studies Quarterly 33(1): 67–79.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Ayoob, M. 1995. The Third World Security Predicament. State Making, Regional Conflict and the International System. Boulder, CO: Lynne Rienner.Google Scholar
  16. Ayoob, M. 2002. Inequality and Theorizing in International Relations: The Case for Subaltern Realism. International Studies Review 4(3): 27–48.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Ayoob, M. 2010. Humanitarian Intervention and State Sovereignty. The International Journal of Human Rights 6(1): 81–102.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Balakrishnan, K.S. 2009. International Relations in Malaysia: Theories, History, Memory, Perception, and Context. International Relations of the Asia-Pacific 9(1): 107–130.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Bates, T. 1975. Gramsci and the Theory of Hegemony. Journal of the History of Ideas 26(2): 351–366.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Bilgin, P. 2008. Thinking Past ‘Western’ IR? Third World Quarterly 29(1): 5–23.Google Scholar
  21. Boesche, R. 2010. Kautilya’s Arthashastra: A Pendulum Theory of History. South Asian Studies 17(1): 1–6.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Bueger, C. 2012. From Epistomology to Practice. A Sociology of Science for International Relations. Journal of International Relations and Development 15(1): 97–109.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Buzan, B., and R. Little. 2000. International Systems in World History. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  24. Chen, C. 2011. The Absence of Non-Western IR Theory in Asia Reconsidered. International Relations of the Asia-Pacific 11(1): 1–23.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Chong, A. 2007. Southeast Asia: Theory Between Modernization and Tradition. International Relations of the Asia-Pacific 7(3): 391–425.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Chong, A. 2012. Premodern Southeast Asia as a Guide to International Relations Between Peoples: Prowess and Prestige in “Intersocietal Relations” in the Sejarah Melayu. Alternatives: Global, Local, Political 37(2): 1–25.Google Scholar
  27. Chong, A., and N. Hamilton-Hart. 2009. Teaching International Relations in Southeast Asia: Historical Memory, Academic Context, and Politics. International Relations in Asia-Pacific 9(1): 1–18.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Chong, A., and S.S. Tan. 2009. Teaching International Relations in Singapore 1956–2008: From Supporting Development to Global City Aspirations. International Relations of the Asia-Pacific 9(1): 19–54.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Cox, R. 1987. Production, Power and World Order: Social Forces in the Making of History. New York: Columbia University Press.Google Scholar
  30. Duszak, Anna, and Jo Lewkowicz. 2008. Publishing Academic Texts in English. A Polish Perspective. Journal of English for Academic Purposes 7: 108–120.Google Scholar
  31. Emmerson, D.K. 1984. “Southeast Asia”: What’s in a Name? Journal of Southeast Asian Studies 15(1): 1–21.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Flowerdew, J. 2008. Scholarly Writers who use English as an Additional Language: What Can Goffman’s “Stigma” Tell Us? Journal of English for Academic Purposes 7(2): 77–86.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Gleditsch, N.P. 2012. Open Access in International Relations: A Symposium. International Studies Perspectives 13(3): 211–215.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Goldmann, K. 1995. Im Westen Nichts Neues: Seven International Relations Journals in 1972 and 1992. European Journal of International Relations 1(2): 245–258.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Grey, M. 2001. Encountering the Mandala: The Mental and Political Architectures of Dependency. Culture Mandala 4(2): 1–13.Google Scholar
  36. Haacke, Jürgen. 2003. ASEAN’s Diplomacy and Security Culture. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  37. Hadiwinata, B.S. 2009. International Relations in Indonesia: Historical Legacy, Political Intrusion, and Commercialization. International Relations of the Asia-Pacific 9(1): 55–81.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Hall, D.G.E. 1981. A History of South East Asia. London: Macmillan.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. He, K. 2008. Institutional Balancing and International Relations Theory: Economic Interdependence and Balance of Power Strategies in Southeast Asia. European Journal of International Relations 14(3): 489–518.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Heryanto, A. 2007. Can There Be Southeast Asians in Southeast Asian Studies. In Knowing Southeast Asian Studies, ed. L.S. Sears, 75–269. Seattle, WA: University of Washington Press.Google Scholar
  41. Hill, H., and T.K. Wie. 2013. Indonesian Universities: Rapid Growth, Major Challenges. In Education in Indonesia, ed. D. Suryadarma and G. Jones, 160–179. Singapore: ISEAS.Google Scholar
  42. Huotari et al. M., J. Rüland, and J. Schlehe (eds.). 2014. Methodology and Research Practice in Southeast Asian Studies. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar
  43. Kraft, H.J. 2005. Human Rights in Southeast Asia: The Search for Regional Norms. East-West Center Working Papers 4: 1–40.Google Scholar
  44. Kraft, H.J. 2012. RtoP by Increments: The AICHR and Localizing the Responsibility to Protect in Southeast Asia. The Pacific Review 25(1): 27–49.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Kraisoraphong, K. 2012. Thailand and the Responsibility to Protect. The Pacific Review 25(1): 1–25.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Landolt, L. 2004. (Mis)Constructing the Third World? Constructivist Analysis of Norm Diffusion. Third World Quarterly 25(3): 579–591.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Leifer, M. 1996. The ASEAN Regional Forum: Extending ASEAN’s Model of Regional Security. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  48. Leifer, M. 1998. The ASEAN Regional Forum: A Model for Cooperative Security in the Middle East. Canberra: Australian National University.Google Scholar
  49. Indonesian Embassy Madrid. 2013. Ahead of ASEAN Community 2015, RI Has to Be a Winner, Madrid: Indonesian Embassy Madrid. Available from: http://Embajadaindonesia.Es/Ahead-of-Asean-Community-2015-Ri-Has-to-Be-a-Winner/ [Accessed 3 December 2014].
  50. Manea, M.G. 2009. How and Why Interaction Matters: ASEAN’s Regional Identity and Human Rights. Cooperation and Conflict 44(1): 27–49.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Manggala, P.U. 2013. The Mandala Culture of Anarchy: The Pre-Colonial Southeast Asian International Society. Journal of ASEAN Studies 1(1): 1–13.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Minh, P.Q. 2009. Teaching International Relations in Vietnam: Chances and Challenges. International Relations of the Asia-Pacific 9(1): 131–155.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. Modelski, G. 1964. Kautilya: Foreign Policy and International System in the Ancient Hindu World. The American Political Science Review 58(3): 549–560.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. Morfit, M. 1981. Pencasila: The Indonesian State Ideology According to the New Order Government. Asian Survey 21(8): 838–851.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. Neuman, S. 1998. International Relations Theory and the Third World. Basingstoke: Macmillan.Google Scholar
  56. Nguitragool, P. 2012. God-Kings and Indonesia: Renegotiating the Boundaries Between Western and Non-Western Perspectives on Foreign Policy. Pacific Affairs 85(4): 723–743.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  57. Prasirtsuk, K. 2009. Teaching International Relations in Thailand: Status and Prospects. International Relations of the Asia-Pacific 9(1): 83–105.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  58. Risse, T., S. Ropp, and K. Sikkink (eds.). 1999. The Power of Human Rights: International Norms and Domestic Change. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  59. Rother, S. 2012. Wendt Meets East: ASEAN Cultures of Conflict and Cooperation. Cooperation and Conflict 47(1): 49–67.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  60. Salanger-Meyer, F. 2008. Scientific Publishing in Developing Countries: Challenges for the Future. Journal of English for Academic Purposes 7(2): 121–132.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  61. Sukma, R. 2012. The Asian Political and Security Community (APSC): Opportunities and Constraints for the R2P in Southeast Asia. The Pacific Review 25(2): 135–152.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  62. Tan, S. 2009. Southeast Asia. Theory and Praxis in International Relations. In International Relations Scholarship Around the World, ed. A. Tickner and O. Weaver, 120–132. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  63. Tickner, A. 2003. Seeing IR Differently: Notes from the Third World. Millennium—Journal of International Studies 32(2): 295–324.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  64. Tickner, A., and O. Wæver. 2009. Introduction. In International Relations Scholarship around the World, ed. A. Tickner and O. Wæver, 1–31. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  65. Valbjørn, M. 2004. Toward a “Mesopotamian Turn”: Disciplinarity and the Study of the International Relations of the Middle East. Journal of Mediterranean Studies 14(1): 47–75.Google Scholar
  66. Van Schendel, W. 2002. Geographies of Knowledge, Geographies of Ignorance: Jumping Scale in Southeast Asia. Environment and Planning D: Society and Space 20(6): 647–668.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  67. Wolters, O. 1999. History, Culture and Region in Southeast Asian Perspectives. Singapore: ISEAS.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© The Author(s) 2016

Authors and Affiliations

  • Anchalee Rüland
    • 1
  1. 1.Social and Political SciencesEuropean University InstituteBadia FiesolanaItaly

Personalised recommendations