Taming Business? Understanding Effectiveness in the Control of Corporate and White-collar Crime

  • Fiona Haines
Chapter
First Online:

Abstract

The harms generated by business activity are undeniable and their persistence, despite efforts at their control, striking. Criminologists, amongst others, have documented the range of these harms from financial (Snider 2007), to the deaths and injuries of workers (Tombs and Whyte 2007) and of the public (Hutter 2001), devastation of the environment (Beirne and South 2007), the abuse of market system ideals through insider trading (Polk and Weston 1990, cf. Bhidé 2009) and market manipulation (Punch 1996). The focus of this chapter is to analyse critically the possibilities of control and reduction of these harms by placing them in their economic and political context. It argues that control measures are best understood when framed not only around the methods of control (punishment or persuasion) but also around the degree to which they explicitly attempt to reshape who can and should influence business behaviour and the institutional conditions under which business activity occurs.

Keywords

Multinational Enterprise Inside Trading Capitalist System Political Legitimacy Corporate Crime 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in to check access.

References

  1. Aubert, W. (1952). White collar crime and social structure. American Journal of Sociology, 58, 263–271.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Ayres, I., & Braithwaite, J. (1992). Responsive regulation: Transcending the deregulation debate. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  3. Balaton-Chrimes, S. (2015). POSCO’s Odisha project: OECD National Contact Point complaints and a decade of resistance. Available from http://www.deakin.edu.au/__data/assets/pdf_file/0008/385838/POSCO-report-FINAL.pdf. Accessed 28 Aug 2015.
  4. Balaton-Chrimes, S., & Haines, F. (2015). The depoliticisation of accountability processes for land-based grievances, and the IFC CAO. Global Policy, 6(4), 446-454.Google Scholar
  5. Baldwin, R. (2014). From regulation to behaviour change: Giving nudge the third degree. The Modern Law Review, 77(6), 831–857.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Beaton-Wells, C., & Haines, F. (2009). Making cartel conduct criminal: A case study of ambiguity in controlling business conduct. Australian and New Zealand Journal of Criminology, 42(2), 218–243.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Beirne, P., & South, N. (2007). Issues in green criminology: Confronting harms against environments, humanity and other animals. Cullompton/Portland: Willan.Google Scholar
  8. Bhagwati, J. (2004). Corporations: Predatory or beneficial? In Defense of globalization (pp. 162–195). New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  9. Bhidé, A. (2009). An accident waiting to happen. Critical Review, 21(2–3), 211–247.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Block, F. (1981). The fiscal crisis of the capitalist state. Annual Review of Sociology, 7, 1–27.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Block, F. (2001). Introduction. In K. Polanyi (Ed.), The great transformation: The political and economic origins of our time (pp. xviii–xxxviii). Boston: Beacon Press.Google Scholar
  12. Bourdieu, P. (2001). Practical reason. Cambridge: Blackwell.Google Scholar
  13. Braithwaite, J. (1993). The nursing home industry. In M. Tonry & A.J. Reiss (Eds.), Beyond the law: Crimes in complex organizations (Crime and justice: A review of research, Vol. 18, pp. 11–54). Chicago: University of Chicago.Google Scholar
  14. Braithwaite, J. (2002). Restorative justice and responsive regulation. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  15. Braithwaite, J. (2003). Through the eyes of the advisors: A fresh look at high wealth individuals. In V. Braithwaite (Ed.), Taxing democracy: Understanding tax avoidance and tax evasion (pp. 245–268). Aldershot: Ashgate.Google Scholar
  16. Braithwaite, J. (2008). Regulatory capitalism: How it works, ideas for making it work better. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Braithwaite, V. (2009). Defiance in taxation and governance: Resisting and dismissing authority in a democracy. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Burris, S., Drahos, P., & Shearing, C. (2005). Nodal governance. Australian Journal of Legal Philosophy, 30, 30–58.Google Scholar
  19. Carson, W. G. (1980). The institutionalization of ambiguity: Early British factory acts. In E. Stotland & G. Geis (Eds.), White collar crime: Theory and research (pp. 142–173). Beverly Hills: Sage.Google Scholar
  20. Connor, T., & Haines, F. (2013). Networked regulation as a solution to human rights abuse in global supply chains? The case of trade union rights violations by Indonesian sports shoe manufacturers. Theoretical Criminology, 17(2), 197–214.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Curran, D. J. (1993). Dead laws for dead men: The politics of federal coal mine health and safety legislation. Pittsburgh: University of Pittsburgh Press.Google Scholar
  22. de Sousa Santos, B., & Rodríguez-Garavito, C. A. (2005). Law, politics, and the subaltern in counter-hegemonic globalization. In B. d. S. Santos & C. A. Rodríguez-Garavito (Eds.), Law and globalization from below: Towards a cosmopolitan legality (pp. 1–26). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Fry, R. (2014). Dissent in the coalfields: Miners, federal politics, and union reform in the United States, 1968–1973. Labor History, 55(2), 173–188.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Gilbert, M. J., & Russell, S. (2002). Globalization of criminal justice in the corporate context. Crime, Law & Social Change, 38(3), 211–238.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Gulalp, H. (1987). Capital accumulation, classes and the relative autonomy of the state. Science & Society, 51(3), 287–313.Google Scholar
  26. Gunningham, N. (2009). Environmental law, regulation, governance: Shifting architectures. Journal of Environmental Law, 21(2), 179–212.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Gunningham, N., & Grabosky, P. (1998). Smart regulation: Designing environmental policy. Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
  28. Gunningham, N., Kagan, R. A., & Thornton, D. (2004). Social license and environmental protection: Why businesses go beyond compliance. Law & Social Inquiry, 2, 307–341.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Habermas, J. (1979). Legitimation crisis. London: Heinemann.Google Scholar
  30. Haines, F. (1997). Corporate regulation: Beyond ‘punish or persuade’. Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
  31. Haines, F. (2011). The paradox of regulation: What regulation can achieve and what it cannot. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Haines, F. (2014). Corporate fraud as misplaced confidence? Exploring ambiguity in the accuracy of accounts and the materiality of money. Theoretical Criminology, 18(1), 20–37.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Haines, F. (2015). Realising justice for corporate crime? Exploring the impact of non-judicial redress mechanisms for human rights abuse by multi-national corporations. 3rd Annual Crime, Justice and Social Democracy Conference, Brisbane, QUT.Google Scholar
  34. Haines, F., & Beaton-Wells, C. (2012). Ambiguities in criminalizing cartels: A political economy. British Journal of Criminology, 52(5), 953–973.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Haines, F., & Gurney, D. (2003). The shadows of the law: Contemporary approaches to regulation and the problem of regulatory conflict. Law & Policy, 25(4), 353–380.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Haufler, V. (2009). The Kimberley process certification scheme: An innovation in global governance and conflict prevention. Journal of Business Ethics, 89, 403–416.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Heras-Saizarbitoria, I. (2014). The ties that bind? Exploring the basic principles of worker-owned organizations in practice. Organization, 21(5), 645–665.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Hutter, B. M. (2001). Risk and regulation. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. King, J., Alexander, F., & Brodie, J. (2013). Regulation of pesticides in Australia: The great barrier reef as a case study for evaluating effectiveness. Agriculture Ecosystems & Environment, 180, 54–67.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Kirby, P. (2006). Theorising globalisation’s social impact: Proposing the concept of vulnerability. Review of International Political Economy, 13(4), 632–655.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Klug, H. (2005). Campaigning for life: Building a new transnational solidarity in the face of HIV/AIDS and TRIPS. In B. de Sousa Santos & C. A. Rodrigues-Garavitos (Eds.), Law and globalization from below: Towards a cosmopolitan legality (pp. 118–139). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Köhne, M. (2014). Multi-stakeholder initiative governance as assemblage: Roundtable on sustainable palm oil as a political resource in land conflicts related to oil palm plantations. Agriculture & Human Values, 31(3), 469–480.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Levi-Faur, D. (2005). The rise of regulatory capitalism: The global diffusion of a new regulatory order. The Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science, 598(1), 12–32.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Macdonald, K. (2013). The politics of global supply chains. Cambridge, UK: Polity.Google Scholar
  45. Macdonald, K., Marshall, S., & Balaton-Chrimes, S. (2015). Demanding rights in company-community resource extraction conflicts: Examining the cases of POSCO and Vedanta in Odisha, India. In J. Nem Singh et al. (Eds.), Demanding justice in the global south. London: Palgrave Macmillan Press.Google Scholar
  46. Marmot, M., Friel, S., Bell, R., Houweling, T. A. J., & Taylor, S. (2008). Closing the gap in a generation: Health equity through action on the social determinants of health. The Lancet, 372(9650), 1661–1669.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Marshall, S. (2013). Institutional change in practice: Experimental displacement and complementary layering in labour law reform. SSRN- Social Science Research Network. Available from http://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=2342453
  48. Mascini, P. (2013). Why was the enforcement pyramid so influential? And what price was paid? Regulation & Governance, 7(1), 48–60.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Meidinger, E. E. (2006). The administrative law of global private-public regulation: The case of forestry. European Journal of International Law, 17, 47–87.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Mills, C. W. (1959). The sociological imagination. Oxford/New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  51. Morgan, B. (2003). The economization of politics: Meta-regulation as a form of nonjudicial legality. Social & Legal Studies, 12(4), 489–523.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Murphy, R. (2001). Nature’s temporalities and the manufacture of vulnerability: A study of a suddent disaster with implications for creeping ones. Time and Society, 10(2/3), 329–348.Google Scholar
  53. Overdevest, C. (2010). Comparing forest certification schemes: The case of ratcheting standards in the forest sector. Socio-Economic Review, 8(1), 47–76.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. Parker, C. (2012). Economic rationalities of governance and ambiguity in the criminalization of cartels. British Journal of Criminology, 52(5), 974–996.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. Picketty, T. (2014). Capital in the twenty first century. Cambridge, MA: The Belknap Press of Harvard University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. Polk, K., & Weston, W. (1990). Insider trading as an aspect of white collar crime. Australian and New Zealand Journal of Criminology, 28(1), 29–38.Google Scholar
  57. Punch, M. (1996). Dirty business: Exploring corporate misconduct: Analysis and cases. London/Thousand Oaks: Sage Publications.Google Scholar
  58. Redondo, G., Santa Cruz, I., & Rotger, J. M. (2011). Why Mondragon? Analyzing what works in overcoming inequalities. Qualitative Inquiry, 17(3), 277–283.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  59. Rees, J. V. (1988). Reforming the workplace: A study of self regulation in occupational safety. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press.Google Scholar
  60. Rennie, S., & Connor, T. (2015). The freedom of association protocol: A worker empowerment model for increasing respect for human rights in global supply chains (report on file with author).Google Scholar
  61. Rixen, T. (2013). Why reregulation after the crisis is feeble: Shadow banking, offshore financial centers, and jurisdictional competition. Regulation & Governance, 7(4), 435–459.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  62. Rodríguez-Garavito, C. A. (2005). Global governance and labor rights: Codes of conduct and anti-sweatshop struggles in global apparel factories in Mexico and Guatemala. Politics & Society, 33, 203–333.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  63. Ruggie, J. (2014a). A UN business and human rights treaty? Issues Brief, Harvard Kennedy School. Available from http://www.hks.harvard.edu/m-rcbg/CSRI/UNBusinessandHumanRightsTreaty.pdf. Accessed 28 Aug 2015.
  64. Ruggie, J. (2014b) International legalization in business and human rights. John F Kennedy School of Government: Harvard Kennedy School. Available from http://www.hks.harvard.edu/m-rcbg/CSRI/research/WFLS.pdf. Accessed 28 Aug 2015.
  65. Rusimbi, M., & Mbilinyi, M. (2005). Political and legal struggles over resources and democracy: Experiences with gender budgeting in Tanzania. In B. de Sousa Santos & C. A. Rodrigues-Garavito (Eds.), Law and globalization from below: Towards a subaltern cosmopolitan legality (pp. 283–309). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  66. Sayer, A. (2011). Habitus, work and contributive justice. Sociology, 45(1), 7–21.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  67. Shamir, R. (2004). The re-radicalization of corporate social responsibility. Critical Sociology, 30(3), 669–689.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  68. Shamir, R. (2010). Capitalism, governance, and authority: The case of corporate social responsibility. Annual Review of Law and Social Science, 6(1), 531–553.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  69. Simmons, E. (2014). Grievances do matter in mobilization. Theory and Society, 43(5), 513–546.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  70. Simon, W. H. (2004). Solving problems vs. claiming rights: The pragmatist challenge to legal liberalism. William & Mary Law Review, 46(1), 127–212.Google Scholar
  71. Snider, L. (2007). ‘This time we really mean it!’ Cracking down on stock market fraud. In H. N. Pontell & G. Geis (Eds.), International handbook of white-collar and corporate crime (pp. 627–647). New York: Springer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  72. Sutherland, E. H. (1983). White collar crime: The uncut version. New Haven: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
  73. Taibbi, M. (2014). The divide: American injustice in the age of the wealth gap. Brunswick: Scribe.Google Scholar
  74. The Economist. (2015). A fearful number: Banks and money-laundering. The Economist, Economist Intelligence Unit N.A. Incorporated. 67 Available from http://www.economist.com/news/finance-and-economics/21653673-bank-rejects-american-accusations-it-abetted-financial-crime-fearful. Accessed 28 Aug 2015.
  75. Tombs, S., & Whyte, D. (2007). Safety crime. Cullompton: Willan.Google Scholar
  76. Tombs, S., & Whyte, D. (2013). Transcending the deregulation debate? Regulation, risk, and the enforcement of health and safety law in the UK. Regulation & Governance, 7(1), 61–79.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  77. United Nations. (2011). Guiding principles of business and human rights: Implementing the United Nations ‘Protect, Respect and Remedy’ framework. New York/Geneva: Office of the High Commissioner, Human Rights. Available from http://www.ohchr.org/Documents/Publications/GuidingPrinciplesBusinessHR_EN.pdf. Accessed 28 Aug 2015.
  78. Walters, D., & Nichols, T. (Eds.) (2009). Workplace health and safety: International perspectives on worker representation. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar
  79. Williams, J. W. (2015). Dodging Dodd-Frank: Excessive speculation, commodities markets, and the burden of proof. Law & Policy, 37(1–2), 119–152.Google Scholar
  80. Woldeab, Y. (2015). ‘Americans: We love you, but we can’t afford you’: How the costly U.S.-Canada FATCA agreement permits ciscrimination of Americans in violation of international law. American University International Law Review, 30, 611–647.Google Scholar
  81. Wyatt-Nichol, H. (2011). The enduring myth of the American dream: Mobility, marginalization, and hope. International Journal of Organization Theory & Behavior (PrAcademics Press), 14(2), 258–279.Google Scholar
  82. Wynne, B. (2010). Strange weather, again: Climate science as political act. Theory, Culture & Society, 27(2–3), 289–305.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  83. Yeung, K. (2004). Securing compliance: A principled approach. Oxford: Hart.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© The Author 2016

Authors and Affiliations

  • Fiona Haines
    • 1
  1. 1.University of MelbourneMelbourneAustralia

Personalised recommendations