Critical Realism and Gang Violence

  • John Pitts
Chapter
First Online:

Abstract

Although police officers, health, welfare and educational professionals, local residents and their children in gang-affected neighbourhoods are familiar with the effects of gangs and gang crime (Pitts 2008; Palmer 2009; Harding 2014), some academics remain sceptical (Brotherton and Barrios 2011; Hallsworth 2008, 2013). They argue that notwithstanding the stylistic differences between contemporary youth cultures and those of the past, the contemporary furore surrounding violent youth gangs is akin to the demonising discourses—the ‘moral panics’—which attended the Teddy boys in the 1950s, the mods and rockers in the 1960s, the punks in the 1970s, the lager louts in the 1980s and so on. They argue that these periodic expressions of popular outrage tell us more about the anxieties of an adult public, opinion formers and the media than the behaviour of young people (Hallsworth 2011), for example, claims that the problem of the ‘gang’ is not the gang itself but the media driven moral panic and ‘gang control industry’ that surrounds it.

Keywords

Young People Gang Member Violent Youth Moral Panic Social Field 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in to check access.

References

  1. Adorno, T., & Horkheimer, M. (1944). The dialectic of enlightenment: Philosophical fragments (G. S. Noerr (Eds.), trans: Jephcott, E.). London: Verso Classics.Google Scholar
  2. Aldridge, J., Medina, J., & Ralphs, R. (2008). Dangers and problems of doing gang research in the UK. In F. van Gemert, D. Peterson, & I.-l. Lien (Eds.), Street gangs, migration and ethnicity. Cullompton: Willan.Google Scholar
  3. Aldridge, J., Medina, J., & Ralphs, R. (2011). Collateral damage: Territory and policing in an english gang city. In B. Goldson (Ed.), Youth in crisis: Gangs territoriality and violence. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  4. Archer, M. (1995). Realist social theory: The morphogenetic approach. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Balasunderham, A. (2009, April). Gang-related violence amongst young people of the tamil refugee diaspora in London. Safer Communities, 8(2).Google Scholar
  6. Baum, D. (1996). Can integration succeed? Research into urban childhood and youth in a deprived area of Koblenz. Social Work in Europe, 3(3).Google Scholar
  7. Becker, H. S. (1966). Whose side are we on? Social Problems, 14(3), 239.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Beckett, H., Brodie, I., Factor, F., Melrose, M., Pearce, J., Pitts, J., et al. (2013). It’s wrong … But you get used to it, a qualitative study of gang-associated sexual violence towards, and exploitation of young people in England. London: The Children’s Commissioner for England.Google Scholar
  9. Bhaskar, R. (1989). Reclaiming reality. London: Verso.Google Scholar
  10. Bhaskar, R., & Callinicos, A. (2003). Marxism and critical realism: A debate. Journal of Critical Realism, 1(2).Google Scholar
  11. Bjerregaard, B., & Smith, C. (1993). Gender differences in gang participation, delinquency, and substance use. Journal of Quantitative Criminology, 9, 329–355.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Bourdieu, P. (1990). The logic of practice. Cambridge: Polity Press.Google Scholar
  13. Bowling, B., & Phillips, C. (2006, October). Young black people and the criminal justice system. Submission to the Home Affairs Committee Inquiry.Google Scholar
  14. Braga, A., Kennedy, D., Waring, E., & Morrison, A. (2001). Problem-oriented policing deterrence and youth violence: An evaluation of Boston’s operation Ceasefire. The Journal of Research in Crime and Delinquency, 38(3), 195–225.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Brand, A., & Ollerenshaw, R. (2009). Gangs at the grass roots: Community solutions to street violence. London: The New Local Government Network.Google Scholar
  16. BRAP. (2012). Stuck: Current approaches to the design and delivery of interventions to address gang-related violence in Birmingham: A research report. Birmingham: BRAP. Accessible at http://www.barrowcadbury.org.uk/wp-content/uploads/2012/09/stuck-brapresearchreport1.pdf
  17. Brotherton, D., & Barrios, L. (2004). The Almighty Latin King and Queen Nation: Street Politics and the Transformation of a New York City Gang. New York: Columbia University Press.Google Scholar
  18. Carter, R. (2012). History, affiliation, tactics and structure of the Gooch Close Gang. Unpublished, Greater Manchester Police.Google Scholar
  19. Centre for Social Justice. (2008). Broken Britain. London: Centre for Social Justice.Google Scholar
  20. Centre for Social Justice. (2009). Dying to belong: An in-depth review of street gangs in Britain. London: Centre for Social Justice.Google Scholar
  21. CIRV. (2011). The violence must stop. Glasgow: CIRV.Google Scholar
  23. Davies, A. (1998). Street gangs, crime and policing in Glasgow during the 1930s: The case of the beehive boys. Social History, 23(3), 251–267.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Davison, T., van Staden, L., Nicholas, S., & Feist, A. (2010). Process evaluation of data sharing between emergency departments and community safety partnerships in the South East (Home Office Research Report 46). London: Home Office.Google Scholar
  25. Disley, E., & Liddle, M. (2015). Urban street gangs in ending gang and youth violence areas: Local perceptions of the nature of gangs and whether they have changed in the last two years. London: Ministry of Justice.Google Scholar
  26. Elias, N. (2000). The civilizing process: Sociogenetic and psychogenetic investigations. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
  27. Farrington, D. P., Coid, J. W., & Murray, J. (2009). Family factors in the intergenerational transmission of offending. Criminal Behaviour and Mental Health, 19, 109–124.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Firmin, C. (2015). Peer on peer abuse: The safeguarding implications of contextualising peer on peer abuse between young people within their social fields. Doctoral Thesis, University Of Bedfordshire, Institute of Applied Social Research.Google Scholar
  29. Giddens, A. (1984). The constitution of society. Cambridge: Polity Press.Google Scholar
  31. Hagedorn, J. (2012). A world of gangs: Armed young men and gangsta culture. London: University of Minnesota Press.Google Scholar
  32. Hallsworth, S. (2013). The gang and beyond: Interpreting violent street worlds. Basingstoke: Palgrave/Macmillan.Google Scholar
  33. Hallsworth, S., & Duffy, K. (2011). Confronting London’s violent street world: The gang and beyond. A report for London council’s centre for social and evaluation research. London: London Metropolitan University.Google Scholar
  34. Hallsworth, S., & Young, T. (2008). Gang talk and gang talkers: A critique. Crime, Media and Culture, 4(2), 175–195.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Harding, S. (2014). The street Casino. Bristol: Policy Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Harding, S. (Ed.). (forthcoming). Global perspectives on youth violence gangs and weapons. Philadelphia: GIB Publishing.Google Scholar
  37. Jackson, M. (2010). Murder concentration and distribution patterns in London: An exploratory analysis of ten years of data. Cambridge: University of Cambridge. Accessible at http://www.crim.cam.ac.uk/alumni/theses/Jackson,%20M
  38. Katz, J. (1988). Seductions of crime: Moral and sensual attractions in doing evil. New York: Basic Books.Google Scholar
  39. Katz, J., & Jackson-Jacobs, C. (2004). The criminologists’ gang. In C. Sumner (Ed.), The Blackwell companion to criminology (pp. 91–124). Malden: Blackwell.Google Scholar
  40. Kennedy, D. (2007). How to stop young men shooting each other. London, Presentation to the Metropolitan Police Authority.Google Scholar
  41. Levi-Strauss, C. (1966). The savage mind (La Pensée Sauvage). Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
  42. Matthews, R. (2014). Realist criminology. Basingstoke: Palgrave/Macmillan.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Moynihan, D. (1965). The Negro family: The case for national action. Washington, DC: Office of Policy Planning and Research, U.S. Department of Labor.Google Scholar
  44. Murray, C. (1984). Losing ground: American social policy 1950–1980. New York: Basic Books.Google Scholar
  45. Muncie, J., & Hughes, G. (2002). Modes of Youth Governance: Political Rationalities, Criminalization and Resistance. In J. Muncie & G. Hughes (Eds.) Youth Justice: Critical Readings. London: Sage Publications.Google Scholar
  46. Palmer, S. (2009). The origins and emergence of youth ‘gangs’ in a British inner‐city neighbourhood. Safer Communities,8(2) 17–26.Google Scholar
  47. Patterson, O., & Fosse, E. (2015). The cultural matrix: Understanding black youth. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Pitts, J. (2008). Reluctant gangsters: The changing face of youth crime. Cullompton: Willan Publications.Google Scholar
  49. Pryce, K. (1979). Endless pressure. Harmondsworth: Penguin Books.Google Scholar
  50. Ritter, N. (2009, November). ‘Ceasefire’: A public health approach to reducing shootings and killings. Washington, National Institute for Justice, 264.Google Scholar
  51. Rose, N. (1996). The death of the social? Refiguring the territory of government. Economy and Society, 25(3), 327–346.Google Scholar
  52. Rodger, J. (2008). Criminalising social policy: Antisocial behaviour and welfare in a de- civilised society. Cullompton: Willan.Google Scholar
  53. Sampson, R., & Lauritsen, J. (1994). Violent victimisation and offending: Individual, situational and community-level risk factors. In A. Reiss & J. Roth (Eds.), Social influences: Understanding and preventing violence 3. Washington, DC: National Academy Press.Google Scholar
  54. Short, J. (1997). Poverty, ethnicity and violent crime. Boulder: Westview Press.Google Scholar
  55. Simon, J. (2007). Governing through crime. In I. Friedman & G. Fisher (Eds.), The crime conundrum: Essays on criminal justice. Boulder: Westview Press.Google Scholar
  56. Smith, D. (2005). The Edinburgh study of youth transitions. Edinburgh: University of Edinburgh.Google Scholar
  57. Social Science Research Unit. (2009). Commissioning public services. London: Institute for Education.Google Scholar
  58. Spergel, I., & Grossman, S. (1998). The little village project: A community approach to the gang problem. Social Work, 42, 456–470.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  59. Spergel, I., Curry, D., Chance, R., Kane, C., Ross, R., Alexander, A., Simmons, E., Oh, S. (1994). Gang suppression and intervention: Problem and response. National Youth Gang Suppression and Intervention Research and Development Program, School of Social Service Administration, University of Chicago.Google Scholar
  60. Suttles, G. (1972). The social construction of communities. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
  61. Thomas, W. I., & Thomas, D. S. (1928). The child in America: Behavior problems and programs. New York: Knopf.Google Scholar
  62. Unger, R. (1987). Social theory: Its situation and its task. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  63. van Gemert, F., Peterson, D., & Lien, I.-L. (Eds.) (2008). Street gangs, migration and ethnicity. London: Willan Publishing.Google Scholar
  64. Wacquant, L. (2008). Urban outcasts: A comparative sociology of advanced marginality. Cambridge: Polity Press.Google Scholar
  65. West, C. (1993). The Nihilistic threat to black America the major enemy of black survival in America is neither oppression nor exploitation but rather the loss of hope and absence of meaning. http://articles.philly.com/1993-05-09/news/25966287_1_black-america-black-business-expansion-second-camp
  66. Williams, P. (2014). Police, gangs and racism. http://www.crimeandjustice.org.uk/resources/police-gangs-and-racism
  67. Wilson, W. J. (1989/2012). The truly disadvantaged: The inner city, the underclass, and public policy (2nd ed.). Chicago: Chicago University Press.Google Scholar
  68. Young, J. (2011). The criminological imagination. Cambridge: Polity Press.Google Scholar
  69. Young, J., & Matthews, R. (1992). Rethinking criminology: The realist debate. London: Sage.Google Scholar
  70. Youth Justice Board. (2007). Groups gangs and weapons. London: Youth Justice Board.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© The Author 2016

Authors and Affiliations

  • John Pitts
    • 1
  1. 1.Vauxhall Centre for the Study of CrimeUniversity of BedfordshireBedfordshireUK

Personalised recommendations