Metabolic Rift Theory and the Crisis of Our Foodways

  • Graham Sharp
Chapter
First Online:

Abstract

This chapter applies metabolic rift theory to a neglected area in food studies: Processed food in general and ultra-processed food in particular. It argues for a closer link between the study of production and the study of consumption. This raises questions of disciplinary belonging and boundaries. My analysis starts from the sociology of food but a similar argument might be made using other disciplines such as political science or history. The sociology of food, I argue, has focused on consumption, leaving production and distribution to other disciplines, notably human geography. Moreover, much research on food consumption is depoliticised, and refrains from challenging the underlying structures of contemporary food systems. This is despite the fact that producing, transporting, selling, and consuming food are an important contributor to anthropogenic climate change, responsible for as much as 30 % of all CO2 emissions (Foresight 2011). Further, there is increasing evidence that ultra-processed foods are having impacts on human health, in particular obesity and all the health risks associated with being overweight.

Keywords

Food System Food Sovereignty Capitalist Development Cane Sugar Late Eighteenth Century 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in to check access.

References

  1. Bakkavor (2013). Annual report and accounts 2013. Retrieved from http://ar13.bakkavor.com/market-trends.php
  2. Beardsworth, A., & Keil, T. (1996). Sociology on the menu. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  3. Bilwinco. (2011). Bilwinco: Your partner for customised multihead weigher packing lines. Retrieved from http://www.bilwinco.com
  4. Blythman, J. (2015). Swallow This. London: Fourth Estate.Google Scholar
  5. Boyd, W., Prudham, W. S., & Schurman, R. A. (2001). Industrial dynamics and the problem of nature. Society and Natural Resources, 14, 555–570.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Brown, J. (2008). Steam on the farm. Wiltshire: The Crowood Press.Google Scholar
  7. Buckley, M., Cowan, C., & McCarthy, M. (2007). The convenience food market in Great Britain: Convenience food lifestyle (CLF) segments. Appetite, 49, 600–617.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Carolan, M. (2012). The sociology of food and agriculture. Abingdon: Routledge.Google Scholar
  9. Celnik, D., Gillespie, L., & Lean, M. E. J. (2012). Time-scarcity, ready-meals, ill-health and the obesity epidemic. Trends in Food Science & Technology, 27(1), 4–11.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Chilled Food Association. (2015). Our market. Retrieved from http://www.chilledfood.org/market
  11. Dickens, P. (1996). Reconstructing Nature. Alienation, Emancipation and the Division of Labour. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  12. Dickens, P. (2004). Society and nature. Cambridge: Polity.Google Scholar
  13. Feagan, R. (2007). The place of food: Mapping out the ‘local’ in local food system. Progress in Human Geography, 31(1), 23–42.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Foresight. The Future of Food and Farming (2011) Challenges and Choices for Global Sustainability (Final Project Report) (1-211). London: The Government Office for Science.Google Scholar
  15. Foster, J. B. (1999). Marx’s theory of metabolic rift: Classical foundations for environmental sociology. American Journal of Sociology, 105(2), 366–405.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Foster, J. B. (2000). Marx’s ecology: Materialism and nature. New York: Monthly Review Press.Google Scholar
  17. Foster, J. B. (2009). The ecological revolution. New York: Monthly Review Press.Google Scholar
  18. Foster, J. B., & Magdoff, F. (2000). Hungry for profits. New York: Monthly Review Press.Google Scholar
  19. Freund, P. (2010). Capitalism, Time-Space, Environment and Human Well Being. Capitalism Nature Socialism, Vol 21 2 June.Google Scholar
  20. Freund, P. (2014). The revolution will not be motorised. Capitalism Nature Socialism, 25(4), 7–18.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Friedman, H. (1991). Changes in the international division of labour: Agrifood complexes and export agriculture. In W. Friedland, L. Busch, F. Buttel, & A. Rudy (Eds.), Towards a new political economy of agriculture (pp. 65–93). Boulder, CO: Westview.Google Scholar
  22. Goody, J. (2013) [1982]. Industrial food: Towards the development of a world cuisine. In Counihan, C. & Van Esterik, P. (Eds.). Food and culture (3rd ed.). London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  23. Halliday, S. (2009). The Great Stink of London. Stroud: The History Press.Google Scholar
  24. Hopkins, R. (2008). The transition handbook. Totnes: Green Books.Google Scholar
  25. Horn, P. (1980). The rural world 1780–1850. London: Hutchison.Google Scholar
  26. Howkins, H. (2003). The death of rural England. London: Routledge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Huber, M. (2008). Energizing historical materialism: Fossil fuels, space and the capitalist mode of production. Geoforum, 40, 105–115.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Johnston, J., & Baumann, S. (2009). Foodies: Democracy and distinction in the gourmet foodscape. New York: Taylor and Francis.Google Scholar
  29. Kloppenburg, J. (1988). First the seed: The political economy of plant biotechnology. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  30. Kloppenburg, J. (2010). Impeding dispossession, enabling repossession: Biological open source and the recovery of seed sovereignty. Journal of Agrarian Change, 10(3), 367–388.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Lang, T., & Heasman, M. (2004). Food wars. London: Earthscan.Google Scholar
  32. Lawrence, F. (2013). Not on the label. London: Penguin.Google Scholar
  33. Lawrence, G., & Grice, J. (2009). Agribusiness, genetic engineering and the corporatisation of food. In J. Germov & L. Williams (Eds.), A sociology of food and nutrition (3rd ed.). Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  34. Luxemburg, R. (1970). The Accumulation of Capital. New York: Monthly Review Press.Google Scholar
  35. Marx, K. (1968). Das Kapital, Vol. 1. Karl Marx-Friedrich Engels-Werke, Band 23, “Das Kapital”, Bd. I, Dritter Abschnitt (pp. 192–213). Berlin: S. Dietz Verlag.Google Scholar
  36. Marx, K. (1970). Capital (Vol. 1, Moore, S. & Aveling, E., Trans.). London: Lawrence & Wishart.Google Scholar
  37. Marx, K. (1972). Capital (Vol. 3). London: Lawrence and Wishart.Google Scholar
  38. Marx, K. (1973). Grundrisse Nicolaus, M. (Trans.). London: Penguin.Google Scholar
  39. Marx, K. (1976). Capital Vol. 1, Fowkes, B. (Trans.). London: Penguin.Google Scholar
  40. Mathew, W. M. (1970). Peru and the British guano market 1840–1870. Economic History Review, New Series, 23(1), 112–128.Google Scholar
  41. Mayer, A.-M. (1997). Historical changes in the mineral content of fruits and vegetables. British Food Journal, 99(6), 207–211.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. McMichael, P., & Schneider, M. (2010). Deepening and repairing the metabolic rift. Journal of Peasant Studies, 37(3), 461–484.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Mennell, S., Murcott, A., & Van der Otterloo, A. (1992). The sociology of food. London: Sage.Google Scholar
  44. Mintz, S. (1986). Sweetness and power. London: Penguin.Google Scholar
  45. Mintz, S. (2013 [1979]). Time, sugar and sweetness. In C. Counihan & P. Van Esterik (Eds.), Food and culture, a reader (3rd ed.). New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
  46. Monteiro, C. A., Moubarac, G., Cannon, S., Ng, S. W., & Popkin, B. (2013). Ultra-processed products are becoming dominant in the global food system. Obesity Reviews, 14(Suppl. 2), 21–28.Google Scholar
  47. Moodie, R., Stuckler, D., Monteiro, C., Sheron, N., Neal, B., Thaksaphon, T., Lincoln, P., & Casswell, S. (2013). Profits and pandemics. The Lancet, 381(9867), 670–679.Google Scholar
  48. Moore, J. (2014). The Capitalocene Part 1: On the nature and origin of our ecological crisis. Retrieved from http://www.jasonwmoore.com/uploads/The_Capitalocene__Part_I__June_2014.pdf
  49. Moore, J. (2000). Environmental crises and the metabolic rift in world-historical perspective. Organization and Environment, 13(2), 123–157.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Moore, J. (2002). The crisis of feudalism: An environmental history. Organization and Environment, 15(3), 301–322.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Moore, J. (2011). Transcending the metabolic rift: A theory of crises in the capitalist world-ecology. Journal of Peasant Studies, 38(1), 1–46.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. O’Connor, J. (2001). Introduction. Capitalism Nature Socialism, 12(2), 49–50.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. ONS Family Food 2013. Department for Environment, Food and Rural Affairs.Google Scholar
  54. Patel, R. (2008). Stuffed and starved. London: Portobello.Google Scholar
  55. Rogaly, B. (2006). Intensification of work-place regimes in British agriculture: The role of migrant workers (Sussex Migration Working Paper No 36). University of Sussex Centre for Migration Studies: Falmer, Sussex, UK.Google Scholar
  56. Sage, C. (2003). Social embeddedness and relations of regard: Alternative “good food” networks in South-West Ireland. Journal of Rural Studies, 19(1), 47–60.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  57. Sage, C. (2012). Environment and food. Abingdon: Routledge.Google Scholar
  58. Schumpeter. (2014). Digital Disruption on the Farm. The Economist May 24.Google Scholar
  59. Simms, A. (2007). Tescopoly. London: Constaple.Google Scholar
  60. Smith, A. (1982). The wealth of nations. Book 1. (A. Skinner, Ed.). London: Penguin.Google Scholar
  61. Smith, N. (2006). Nature as accumulation strategy. In L. Panitch & C. Leys (Eds.), Socialist register 2007. London: Merlin Press.Google Scholar
  62. Smith, R., “Should Meat be Displayed in Butcher Shop Windows?” Guardian Word of Mouth Blog. 24 February 2014. Online at http://www.theguardian.com/lifeandstyle/wordofmouth/2014/feb/24/butcher-meat-window-display-row-suffolk. Accessed 19 April 2016.
  63. Stuckler, D., & Nestlé, M. (2012). Big food, food systems, and global health. PLoS Medicine, 9(6), e1001242.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  64. Traub, L. G., & Odland, D. D. (1979). Convenience foods and home-prepared foods: Comparative costs, yield and quality. (Agricultural Economic Report No. 429). Washington, DC: US Department of Agriculture.Google Scholar
  65. ViaCampesina. (n.d.). La Via Campesina. Retrieved from http://www.viacampesina.org/en
  66. Wrigley, E. A. (1988). Continuity, chance and change. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© The Editor(s) (if applicable) and The Author(s) 2016

Authors and Affiliations

  • Graham Sharp
    • 1
  1. 1.University of BrightonBrightonUK

Personalised recommendations