The Legacy of the Surname Law and Defensive Nationalism in the Twenty-First Century

  • Meltem Türköz
Chapter

Abstract

Coinciding with the Language Reform’s search for a purified language, the Surname Law left behind it a plethora of words collected during a time of zealous language planning. A Turkish literary scholar argues that many current surnames are pure Turkish words that never made it into everyday spoken or written language but remained as relics of the Language Reform. Since the enforcement of the law in the 1930s, many families have taken their cases to court to reclaim old family names, or to claim a more flattering name.

Bibliography

  1. Agha, Asif. 2003. The Social Life of Cultural Value. Language and Communication 23 (3–4): 231–273.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Çagaptay, Soner. 2006. Islam, Secularism, and Nationalism in Modern Turkey: Who is a Turk? London: Routledge Press.Google Scholar
  3. Cover, Robert M. 1983. The Supreme Court, 1982 Term—Foreword: Nomos and Narrative. Faculty Scholarship Series. Paper 2705. http://digitalcommons.law.yale.edu/fss_papers/2705
  4. Irvine, Judith. 1989. When Talk isn’t Cheap: Language and Political Economy. American Ethnologist 16 (2): 248–267.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Makal, Ahmet. 1999. Türkiye’de tek partili dönemde çalışma ilişkileri: 1920–1946 [Labor Relations in Turkey During the Single Party Era]. Ankara: İmge Kitabevi Yayınları.Google Scholar
  6. Sevinçli, Efdal. 2011. Adlarımızda Soyadlarımızda Yaşayan Dil Devrimi [The Language Revolution that Lives in our Names and Surnames]. Journal of Yaşar University 1 (2): 277–292.Google Scholar
  7. Turinay, Faruk. 2014. Yabancı Irk ve Millet İsimlerinin Soyadı Olarak Kullanılması Yasağı ve Bir Anayasa Mahkemesi Kararının İncelenmesi [The Ban of the use of Foreign Race and Nation Surnames and the Examination of a Court Decision of the Constitutional Court].Google Scholar
  8. Üçüncüoğlu, Güngör A. 2005. Tarihsel Süreçten Soyadı Kanununa Lakap-Sülale Ansiklopedisi [Lakap-Lineage Encyclopedia, from Historical Process to the Surname Law]. Koza Davetiye Matbaası.Google Scholar
  9. Yıldız, Ahmet. 2001. Ne Mutlu Türküm Diyebilene: Türk Ulusal Kimliğinin Etno-seküler Sınırları (1919–1938) [So Happy is Who He Can Call Himself A Turk: The Ethno-Secular Boundaries of Turkish National Identity]. İstanbul: İletişim Yayınları.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© The Author(s) 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  • Meltem Türköz
    • 1
  1. 1.Işık UniversityŞile/İstanbulTurkey

Personalised recommendations