Advertisement

The Effect of Economic Trajectory and Speaker Profile on Lifespan Change: Evidence from Stative Possessives on Tyneside

  • Isabelle Buchstaller
  • Adam Mearns
Chapter

Abstract

Changes in the system of stative possessives have been playing out in the English language for centuries. Our analysis explores linguistic changes across the lifespan of the individual in a small panel study of six speakers recorded first in 1971 and again 2013 in the North East of England. Our analysis explores the effect of speaker-based factors, such as their personalities, their contact with children and the socio-economic trajectory of the individual on their participation in ongoing longitudinal change. Our findings add to the growing number of panel studies that report post-critical age speakers picking up (lifespan change) or, indeed, eschewing (retrograde change) changes in community norms.

References

  1. Bailey, G., Wikle, T., Tillery, J., & Sand, L. (1991). The apparent time construct. Language Variation and Change, 3, 241–264.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Barnfield, K., & Buchstaller, I. (2010). Intensification on Tyneside: Longitudinal developments and new trends. English World-Wide, 31, 252–287.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Beal, J. (2004a). English dialects in the North of England: Phonology. In B. Kortmann & E. W. Schneider (Eds.), A handbook of varieties of English, Phonology (Vol. 1, pp. 113–133). Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.Google Scholar
  4. Beal, J. (2004b). “Geordie Nation”: Language and regional identity in the Northeast of England. Lore and Language, 17, 33–48.Google Scholar
  5. Beal, J. (2009). Enregisterment, commodification and historical context: “Geordie” versus “Sheffieldish”. American Speech, 84(2), 138–156.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Beal, J., Burbano-Elizondo, L., & Llamas, C. (2012). Urban North-Eastern English. Tyneside to Teesside. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.Google Scholar
  7. Biber, D., Johansson, S., Leech, G., Conrad, S., & Finegan, E. (1999). The Longman grammar of spoken and written English. Harlow/Essex: Longman.Google Scholar
  8. Bigham, D. (2010). Mechanisms of accommodation among emerging adults in a university setting. Journal of English Linguistics, 38, 193–210.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Bowie, D., & Yaeger-Dror, M. (2015). Language change in real time. In P. Honeybone & J. Salmons (Eds.), Handbook of historical phonology (pp. 603–618). Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  10. Buchstaller, I. (2013–2017). Diagnostics of linguistic change: Mapping language change in real and apparent time. FP7 Marie Curie European Research Grant.Google Scholar
  11. Buchstaller, I. (2014). Quotatives: New trends and sociolinguistic implications. Oxford: Wiley-Blackwell.Google Scholar
  12. Buchstaller, I. (2015). Exploring linguistic malleability across the life-span: Age-specific patterns in quotative use. Language in Society, 44(4), 457–496.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Buchstaller, I. (2016). Investigating the effect of socio-cognitive salience and speaker-based factors in morphosyntactic life-span change. Journal of English Linguistics, 44(3), 1–31.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Buchstaller, I., & Alvanides, S. (2013). Employing geographical principles for sampling in state of the art dialectological projects. Journal of Linguistic Geography, 1(2), 96–114.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Buchstaller, I., Krause, A., Auer, A., & Otte, S. (2017). Levelling across the life-span? Tracing the FACE vowel in panel data from the North East of England. Journal of Sociolinguistics, 27(1), 3–33.Google Scholar
  16. Burbano-Elizondo, L. (2006). Regional variation and identity in Sunderland. In T. Omoniyi & G. White (Eds.), The sociolinguistics of identity (pp. 113–128). London: Continuum.Google Scholar
  17. Chambers, J. K. (2003). Sociolinguistic theory. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
  18. Colls, R., & Lancaster, B. (Eds.). (2001). Newcastle upon Tyne: A modern history. Chichester: Phillimore.Google Scholar
  19. Corrigan, K. P., Moisl, H., & Beal, J. (2005). The Newcastle Electronic Corpus of Tyneside English (NECTE). Newcastle University. Available online: http://research.ncl.ac.uk/necte
  20. Corrigan, K. P., Buchstaller, I., Mearns, A., & Moisl, H. (2012). The Diachronic Electronic Corpus of Tyneside English (DECTE). Newcastle University. Available online: http://research.ncl.ac.uk/decte
  21. Denis, D. (2011). Innovators and innovation: Tracking the innovators of and stuff in York English. University of Pennsylvania Working Papers in Linguistics, 17(2), 61–70.Google Scholar
  22. Geertz, C. (1973). Thick description: Toward an interpretive theory of culture. In C. Geertz (Ed.), The interpretation of cultures: Selected essays (pp. 3–30). New York: Basic Books.Google Scholar
  23. Gordon, E., & Trudgill, P. (1999). Shades of things to come: Embryonic variants in New Zealand English sound changes. English World-Wide, 20, 111–124.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Gregersen, F., & Barner-Rasmussen, M. (2011). The logic of comparability: On genres and phonetic variation in a project on language change in real time. Corpus Linguistics and Linguistic Theory, 7, 7–36.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Gumperz, J. (1982). Discourse strategies. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Heine, B. (2002). On the role of context in grammaticalization. In I. Wischer & G. Diewald (Eds.), New reflections on Grammaticalization (pp. 83–101). Amsterdam/Philadelphia: Benjamins.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Huddleston, R., & Pullum, G. (2002). The Cambridge grammar of the English language. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Jespersen, O. (1961). A modern English grammar on historical principles: Part IV syntax. London: George Allen and Unwin.Google Scholar
  29. Kroch, A. (1989). Reflexes of grammar in patterns of language change. Language Variation and Change, 1, 199–244.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Labov, W. (1994). Principles of linguistic change, volume 1: Internal factors. Oxford: Wiley.Google Scholar
  31. Labov, W. (2001). Principles of linguistic change, volume 2: Social factors. Philadelphia: Benjamins.Google Scholar
  32. Lenneberg, E. (1967). Biological foundations of language. New York: Wiley.Google Scholar
  33. Llamas, C. (2007). “A place between places”: Language and identities in a border town. Language in Society, 36(4), 579–604.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Mearns, A. (2015). Tyneside. In R. Hickey (Ed.), Researching Northern English (pp. 161–181). Amsterdam: John Benjamins.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Mearns, A., Corrigan, K. P., & Buchstaller, I. (2016). The Diachronic Electronic Corpus of Tyneside English and the Talk of the Toon: Issues in preservation and public engagement. In K. P. Corrigan & A. Mearns (Eds.), Creating and digitizing language corpora, Databases for public engagement (Vol. 3, pp. 177–210). London: Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar
  36. Milroy, L., Milroy, J., & Docherty, G. (1997). Phonological variation and change in contemporary spoken British English. Final Report to the ESRC, R00, 234892.Google Scholar
  37. Milroy, L., Milroy, J., Docherty, G., Foulkes, P., & Walshaw, D. (1999). Phonological variation and change in contemporary English: Evidence from Newcastle upon Tyne and derby. Cuadernos de Filologia Inglesa, 8(1), 35–46.Google Scholar
  38. Nevalainen, T., & Raumolin-Brunberg, H. (2003). Historical sociolinguistics: Language change in Tudor and Stuart England. London: Longman.Google Scholar
  39. OECD (Organisation for Economic Co-Operation and Development). (2006). Territorial review: Newcastle in the North East, United Kingdom. Paris: OECD Publishing.Google Scholar
  40. Pearce, M. (2011). Exploring a perceptual dialect boundary in North East England. Dialectologia et Geolinguistica, 19, 3–22.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Pellowe, J., Nixon, G., Strang, B., & McNeany, V. (1972). A dynamic modelling of linguistic variation: The urban (Tyneside) linguistic survey. Lingua, 30, 1–30.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Prichard, H., & Tamminga, M. (2012). The impact of higher education on Philadelphia vowels. University of Pennsylvania Working Papers in Linguistics, 18(2), 87–95.Google Scholar
  43. Rickford, J., & McNair-Knox, F. (1994). Addressee- and topic-influenced style shift: A quantitative sociolinguistic study. In D. Biber & E. Finegan (Eds.), Perspectives on register: Situating register variation within sociolinguistics (pp. 235–276). Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  44. Rickford, J., & Price, M. (2013). Girlz II women: Age-grading, language change, and stylistic variation. Journal of Sociolinguistics, 17(2), 143–179.Google Scholar
  45. Rogers, E. (2003). Diffusion of innovations. New York: Free Press.Google Scholar
  46. Sankoff, G. (2004). Adolescents, young adults and the critical period: Two case studies from “seven up”. In C. Fought (Ed.), Sociolinguistic variation: Critical reflections (pp. 121–139). Oxford/New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  47. Sankoff, G. (2005). Cross-sectional and longitudinal studies in sociolinguistics. In U. Ammon, N. Dittmar, K. J. Mattheier, & P. Trudgill (Eds.), Sociolinguistics: An international handbook of the science of language and society (pp. 1003–1013). Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.Google Scholar
  48. Sankoff, G. (2006). Age: Apparent time and real time. In K. Brown (Ed.), Encyclopedia of language and linguistics (2nd ed., pp. 110–116). Amsterdam: Elsevier.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Sankoff, G., & Blondeau, H. (2007). Language change across the lifespan: /r/ in Montreal French. Language, 83(3), 560–588.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Sankoff, G., & Evans Wagner, S. (2006). Age grading in retrograde movement: The inflected future in Montréal French. University of Pennsylvania Working Papers in Linguistics, 12(2), 203–216.Google Scholar
  51. Sankoff, G., & Evans Wagner, S. (2011). Age grading in the Montréal French future tense. Language Variation and Change, 23(3), 275–313.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Sankoff, D., & Laberge, S. (1978). The linguistic market and the statistical explanation of variability. In D. Sankoff (Ed.), Linguistic variation: Models and methods (pp. 239–250). New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar
  53. Sankoff, D., Cedergren, H., Kemp, W., Thibault, P., & Vincent, D. (1989). Montreal French: Language, class, and ideology. In R. Fasold & D. Schiffrin (Eds.), Language change and variation (pp. 107–118). Amsterdam: John Benjamins.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. Tagliamonte, S. (2012). The roots of English. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. Tagliamonte, S., D’Arcy, A., & Jankowski, B. (2010). Social work and linguistic systems: Marking possession in Canadian English. Language Variation and Change, 22(1), 149–173.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. Thibault, P., & Daveluy, M. (1989). Quelques traces du passage du temps dans le parler des Montréalais, 1971–1984. Language Variation and Change, 1, 19–45.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  57. Trudgill, P. (1988). Norwich revisited: Recent linguistic changes in an English urban dialect. English World-Wide, 9, 33–49.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  58. Vall, N. (2007). Cities in decline? A comparative history of Malmö and Newcastle after 1945. Malmö: Malmö University Press.Google Scholar
  59. Visser, F. (1963–1978). An historical syntax of the English language. Leiden: E.J. Brill.Google Scholar
  60. Wagner, S. E. (2008). Language change and stabilization in the transition from adolescence to adulthood. Unpublished PhD thesis, University of Pennsylvania.Google Scholar
  61. Wagner, S. E. (2012a). Age grading in sociolinguistic theory. Language and Linguistics Compass, 6(6), 371–382.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  62. Wagner, S. E. (2012b). Real-time evidence for age grad(ing) in late adolescence. Language Variation and Change, 24(2), 179–202.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  63. Wales, K. (2006). Northern English. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  64. Watt, D. (2000). Phonetic parallels between the close-mid vowels of Tyneside English: Are they internally or externally motivated? Language Variation and Change, 12, 69–101.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  65. Watt, D., & Milroy, L. (1999). Patterns of variation and change in three Newcastle vowels: Is this dialect levelling? In P. Foulkes & G. Docherty (Eds.), Urban voices: Accent studies in the British Isles (pp. 25–46). London: Arnold.Google Scholar
  66. Yaeger-Dror, M. (1994). Sound change in Montreal French. In P. Keating (Ed.), Phonological structure and Phonetic form: Papers in laboratory Phonology 3 (pp. 267–292). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  67. Yaeger-Dror, M. (1996). Phonetic evidence for the evolution of lexical classes: The case of a Montreal French vowel shift. In G. R. Guy, C. Feagin, J. Baugh, & D. Schiffrin (Eds.), Towards a social science of language: Papers in honor of William Labov, The linguistic structure of variation and change (Vol. 2, pp. 263–287). Amsterdam: John Benjamins.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© The Author(s) 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  • Isabelle Buchstaller
    • 1
  • Adam Mearns
    • 2
  1. 1.University of Duisburg-EssenNorth Rhine-WestphaliaGermany
  2. 2.Newcastle UniversityNewcastleUK

Personalised recommendations