An Organization-as-Platform and a Strategy-as-Practice for an Electronically Supported Booking Service in Healthcare

Chapter

Abstract

In Chapter 6, Resca starts from the consideration, suggested in the organizational and management literature, that bureaucratic structures have failed to manage businesses in turbulent markets or those that are subject to rapid technological innovation. Drawing from the case of the introduction of the first e-booking centres to access secondary care in Bologna in the late 1980s and early 1990s, this chapter proposes the concept of platform organization as a meta-organization able to deal with these changing markets. The author suggests that, although the platform organization concept offers a macro perspective, it falls short of shedding light on micro aspects related to such endeavours as the introduction of e-booking centres. Strategy-as-practice (or strategizing) is introduced to outline a model that includes both the macro and micro level.

References

  1. Baldwin, C., & von Hippel, E. (2011). Modeling a paradigm shift: From producer pnnovation to user and open collaborative innovation. Organization Science, 22(6), 1399–1417.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Benkler, Y. (2002). Coase’s Penguin, or, Linux and the nature of the firm. The Yale Law Journal, 112(3), 369–446.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Benkler, Y. (2006). The wealth of networks: How social production transforms markets and freedom. New Haven [Conn.]: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
  4. Chesbrough, H. (2003). The logic of open innovation: Managing intellectual property. California Management Review, 45(3), 33–58.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Ciborra, C. (1996). The platform organization: Recombining strategies, structures, and surprises. Organization Science, 7(2), 103–118.Google Scholar
  6. Ciborra, C. (2002). The Labyrinths of information: Challenging the wisdom of systems. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  7. Ciborra, C., & Lanzara, G. F. (1994). Formative contexts and information technology: Understanding the dynamics of innovation in organizations. Accounting, Management and Information Technologies, 4(2), 61–86.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Eisenhardt, K. M., & Schoonhoven, C. B. (1996). Resource-based view of strategic alliance formation: Strategic and social effects in entrepreneurial firms. Organization Science, 7(2), 136–150.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Fjeldstad, Ø. D., Snow, C. C., Miles, R. E., & Lettl, C. (2012). The architecture of collaboration. Strategic Management Journal, 33(6), 734–750.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Galliers, R. D. (2011). Further developments in information systems strategizing: Unpacking the concept. In R. D. Galliers & W. L. Currie (Eds.) The Oxford handbook of management information systems: Critical perspectives and new directions (pp. 329–345). Oxford; New York: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Giddens, A. (1984). The constitution of society: Outline of the theory of structuration. Berkley and Los Angeles: University of California Press.Google Scholar
  12. Golsorkhi, D., Rouleau, L., Seidl, D., & Vaara, E. (2010). Introduction: What is strategy as practice. In Damon Golsorkhi, Linda Rouleau, David Seidl, Eero Vaara (eds.), Cambridge handbook of strategy as practice. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Hagedoorn, J. (1993). Understanding the rationale of strategic technology partnering: Nterorganizational modes of cooperation and sectoral differences. Strategic Management Journal, 14(5), 371–385.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Hanseth, O., & Lyytinen, K. (2010). Design theory for dynamic complexity in information infrastructures: The case of building internet. Journal of Information Technology, 25(1), 1–19.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Huang, J., Newell, S., Huang, J., & Pan, S.-L. (2014). Site-shifting as the source of ambidexterity: Empirical insights from the field of ticketing. The Journal of Strategic Information Systems, 23(1), 29–44.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Jarzabkowski, P. (2005). Strategy as practice: An activity based approach. Sage.Google Scholar
  17. Jarzabkowski, P., Balogun, J., & Seidl, D. (2007). Strategizing: The challenges of a practice perspective. Human Relations, 60(1), 5–27.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Johnson, G., Melin, L., & Whittington, R. (2003). Micro strategy and strategizing: towards an activity‐based view. Journal of Management Studies, 40(1), 3–22.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Kogut, B. (1991). Joint ventures and the option to expand and acquire. Management Science, 37(1), 19–33.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Kogut, B. (1988). Joint ventures: Theoretical and empirical perspectives. Strategic Management Journal 9(4), 319–332.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Krol, E., & Hoffman, E. (1993). FYI on“ What is the Internet?”Google Scholar
  22. Leonard, J., & Higson, H. (2014). A strategic activity model of Enterprise System implementation and use: Scaffolding fluidity. The Journal of Strategic Information Systems, 23(1), 62–86. Retrieved from http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0963868713000772.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. March, J. G., & Simon, H. A. (1958). Organizations. Retrieved from http://psycnet.apa.org/psycinfo/1958–15040-000.
  24. Miles, R. E., & Snow, C. C. (1986). Organizations: New concepts for new forms. California Management Review, 28(3), 62–73. Retrieved from http://cmr.ucpress.edu/content/28/3/62.abstract CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Mintzberg, H. (1979). The professional bureaucracy. In M. C. Brown, II (Ed.) Organization and governance in higher education (pp. 50–70). Boston: Pearson Custom Publishing.Google Scholar
  26. Nonaka, I., & Takeuchi, H. (1995). The knowledge-creating company: How Japanese companies create the dynamics of innovation. Oxford: Oxford university press.Google Scholar
  27. Normann, R. (2001). Reframing business: When the map changes the landscape. Chichester: Wiley.Google Scholar
  28. Orlikowski, W. J., & Baroudi, J. J. (1991). Studying information technology in organizations: Research approaches and assumptions. Information Systems Research, 2(1), 1–28.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Ostrom, E. (1990). Governing the commons: The evolution of institutions for collective action. Cambridge, MA: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Ostrom, E. (2000). Collective action and the evolution of social norms. The Journal of Economic Perspectives, 14(3), 137–158.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Peppard, J., Galliers, R. D., & Thorogood, A. (2014). Information systems strategy as practice: Micro strategy and strategizing for IS. The Journal of Strategic Information Systems, 23(1), 1–10.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Perrow, C. (1967). A framework for the comparative analysis of organizations. American Sociological Review, 32, 194–208.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Powell, W. W., Koput, K. W., & Smith-Doerr, L. (1996). Interorganizational collaboration and the locus of innovation: Networks of learning in biotechnology. Administrative Science Quarterly, 41, 116–145.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Reed, M. (2011). The post-bureaucratic organization and the control revolution. In S. Clegg, M. Harris, & H. Hopfl (Eds.), Managing modernity: Beyond bureaucracy? (pp. 230–256). Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  35. Strauss, C. L. (1962). Savage mind. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago.Google Scholar
  36. Sturdy, A., Wright, C., & Wylie, N. (2015). Management as consultancy: Neo-bureaucracy and the consultant manager. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Thompson, J. D. (1967). Organization in Action: social science bases of administrative theory. New York: McGraw-Hill.Google Scholar
  38. Unger, R. M. (1986). False necessity: Anti-necessitarian social theory in the service of radical democracy: Part 1 of politics, a work in constructive social theory. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  39. Walsh, D. F. (1998). Structure/agency. In C. Jenks (Ed.) Core sociological dichotomies. London: Sage Publications.Google Scholar
  40. Weber, M. (1968). Economy and society; an outline of interpretive sociology. New York: Bedminster Press.Google Scholar
  41. Weick, K. E. (1993). Organizational redesign as improvisation. In G. P. Huber & W. H. Glick (Eds.) Science (Vol. 346, pp. 379). New York: Oxford University Press. Retrieved from http://doi.org/10.1126/science.162.3859.1243.Google Scholar
  42. Weick, K. E., Sutcliffe, K. M., & Obstfeld, D. (2005). Organizing and the process of sensemaking. Organization Science, 16(4), 409–421.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Wheelwright, S. C., & Clark, K. B. (1992). Creating project plans to focus product development. Harvard Business Review, 70(2), 70–82.Google Scholar
  44. Whittington, R. (1996). Strategy as practice. Long Range Planning, 29(5), 731–735.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Whittington, R. (2006). Completing the practice turn in strategy research. Organization Studies, 27(5), 613–634.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Williamson, O. E. (1975). Markets and hierarchies: Analysis and antitrust implications: A study in the economics of internal organization. New York: Free Press.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© The Author(s) 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Business and ManagementLUISS “Guido Carli” UniversityRomeItaly

Personalised recommendations