Dealing with Tensions in Technology Enabled Healthcare Innovation: Two Cases from the Norwegian Healthcare Sector

  • Miria Grisot
  • Polyxeni Vassilakopoulou
  • Margunn Aanestad
Chapter

Abstract

In Chapter 5, Grisot, Vassilakopoulou and Aanestad examine patient-focused ICT applications, which extend traditional health information infrastructures and have the potential to transform the relation between patients and doctors, allowing for a more active patient role. However, new design challenges emerge because it is unclear how existing infrastructures can accommodate novel usage areas, and how they should be modified or even substituted. In this chapter, the authors’ research aim is to examine such challenges, framed as ‘design tensions’ in the context of ICT-enabled innovation processes in healthcare. Building on Information Infrastructure theory, the authors examine how such design tensions are dealt within practice, and the approaches used in two Norwegian initiatives where web-based technologies are implemented to enable new types of communication between patients and health providers.

References

  1. Barry, A. (2001). Political machines: Governing a technological society: A&C Black. London and New York: The Athlone Press.Google Scholar
  2. Berg, M. (1999). Accumulating and coordinating: Occasions for information technologies in medical work. Computer Supported Cooperative Work (CSCW), 8(4), 373–401.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Berg, M. (2001). Implementing information systems in health care organizations: myths and challenges. International Journal of Medical Informatics, 64(2), 143–156.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Bower, J., Reid, M., Barry, N., & Ibbotson, T. (2000). Aligning process and meaning: innovating in complex healthcare delivery systems. International Journal of Innovation Management, 4(3), 299–317.Google Scholar
  5. Bygstad, B., Hanseth, O., & Truong Le, D. (2015). From IT Silos to Integrated Solutions. A Study in E-Health Complexity. Paper presented at the Proceedings of the 23rd European Conference on Information Systems (ECIS).Google Scholar
  6. Ciborra, C. (2000). From control to drift: The dynamics of corporate information infrastructures. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  7. Contini, F., & Lanzara, G. F. (2008). ICT and innovation in the public sector: European studies in the making of e-government. Basingstoke, UK: Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar
  8. Currie, W. L., & Guah, M. W. (2007). Conflicting institutional logics: A national programme for IT in the organisational field of healthcare. Journal of Information Technology, 22(3), 235–247.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. David, P. A. (1990). The dynamo and the computer: An historical perspective on the modern productivity paradox. The American Economic Review, 80(2), 355–361.Google Scholar
  10. Edwards, P., Jackson, S., Bowker, G., & Knobel, C. (2007). Report of a Workshop on “History & Theory of Infrastructure: Lessons for New Scientific Cyberinfrastructures”.Google Scholar
  11. El Sawy, O. A., Malhotra, A., Park, Y., & Pavlou, P. A. (2010). Research commentary-seeking the configurations of digital ecodynamics: It takes three to Tango. Information Systems Research, 21(4), 835–848.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Ellingsen, G., & Monteiro, E. (2006). Seamless integration: Standardisation across multiple local settings. Computer Supported Cooperative Work (CSCW), 15(5–6), 443–466.Google Scholar
  13. Ellingsen, G., Monteiro, E., & Munkvold, G. (2007). Standardization of work: Co-constructed practice. Information Society, 23(5), 309–326. doi:  10.1080/01972240701572723 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Goldzweig, C., Towfigh, A., Maglione, M., & Shekelle, P. (2009). Costs and benefits of health information technology: New trends from the literature. Health Affairs, 28(2), w282–w293.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Greenhalgh, T., Hinder, S., Stramer, K., Bratan, T., & Russell, J. (2010a). Adoption, non-adoption, and abandonment of a personal electronic health record: case study of HealthSpace. BMJ: British Medical Journal, 341, c5814.Google Scholar
  16. Greenhalgh, T., Stramer, K., Bratan, T., Byrne, E., Russell, J., Hinder, S., & Potts, H. (2010b). The Devil’s in the Detail. Final Report of the Independent Evaluation of the Summary Care Record and Healthspace Programmes. University College London, London.Google Scholar
  17. Håkansson, H., & Waluszewski, A. (2011). Co-evolution in technological development. The role of friction. Sinergie rivista di studi e ricerche (58), 9–11.Google Scholar
  18. Hanseth, O., & Ciborra, C. (2007). Risk, complexity and ICT. Glos, UK: Edward Elgar Publishing.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Hanseth, O., & Lyytinen, K. (2010). Design theory for dynamic complexity in information infrastructures: The case of building internet. Journal of Information Technology, 25(1), 1–19.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Hanseth, O., Jacucci, E., Grisot, M., & Aanestad, M. (2006). Reflexive standardization: Side effects and complexity in standard making. MIS Quarterly, 30, 563–581.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Hoholm, T. (2011). The contrary forces of innovation: An ethnography of innovation in the food industry. Basingstoke, UK: Palgrave Macmillan.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Hughes, T. P. (1993). Networks of power: Electrification in Western society, 1880–1930. Baltimore, USA: JHU Press.Google Scholar
  23. Lanzara, G. F. (2009). Building digital institutions: ICT and the rise of assemblages in government. ICT and innovation in the public sector (pp. 9–48). Basingstoke, UK: Springer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Matic, J., Davidson, P., & Salamonson, Y. (2011). Review: Bringing patient safety to the forefront through structured computerisation during clinical handover. Journal of Clinical Nursing, 20(1–2), 184–189.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. McNulty, T., & Ferlie, E. (2002). Reengineering health care: The complexities of organizational transformation. Oxford, UK: OUP Oxford.Google Scholar
  26. Monteiro, E. (1998). Scaling information infrastructure: The case of next-generation IP in the Internet. The Information Society, 14(3), 229–245.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Pollock, N., & Williams, R. (2008). Software and organisations: The biography of the enterprise-wide system or how SAP conquered the world. New York, US: Routledge.Google Scholar
  28. Raptis, D., Fernandes, C., Chua, W., & Boulos, P. (2009). Electronic software significantly improves quality of handover in a London teaching hospital. Health Informatics Journal, 15(3), 191–198.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Ribes, D., & Finholt, T. A. (2009). The long now of technology infrastructure: Articulating tensions in development. Journal of the Association for Information Systems, 10(5), 375–398.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Tilson, D., Lyytinen, K., & Sørensen, C. (2010). Research commentary-digital infrastructures: the missing IS research agenda. Information Systems Research, 21(4), 748–759.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Timmermans, S., & Berg, M. (1997). Standardization in action: Achieving local universality through medical protocols. Social Studies of Science, 27(2), 273–305.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Tiwana, A., Konsynski, B., & Bush, A. A. (2010). Research commentary-Platform evolution: Coevolution of platform architecture, governance, and environmental dynamics. Information Systems Research, 21(4), 675–687.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Vikkelsø, S. (2005). Subtle redistribution of work, attention and risks: Electronic patient records and organisational consequences. Scandinavian Journal of Information Systems, 17(1), 10.Google Scholar
  34. Wilson, V.E. (2009). Patient-centered e-Health. Hershey, PA: IGI Publications.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Winthereik, B., & Vikkelsø, S. (2005). ICT and integrated care: Some dilemmas of standardising inter-organisational communication. Computer Supported Cooperative Work (CSCW), 14(1), 43–67.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© The Author(s) 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  • Miria Grisot
    • 1
  • Polyxeni Vassilakopoulou
    • 2
  • Margunn Aanestad
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of InformaticsUniversity of OsloOsloNorway
  2. 2.Department of Information SystemsUniversity of AgderKristiansandNorway

Personalised recommendations