Families

  • Amy Shema
Chapter
Part of the Queer Studies and Education book series (QSTED)

Abstract

According to the US Census (2010), the number of school-aged children living in a two-parent heterosexual household continues to decline, yet the nuclear family remains the model for what constitutes a “traditional” or “natural” family. This model has been reproduced often enough that it is considered to be “natural” and thus the norm against which other family configurations are compared. Schools, particularly at the primary level, focus heavily on the concept of family, who counts as family, and a child’s position within family structures. However, many children with parents who identify as lesbian, gay, bisexual, and transgender (LGBT), and/or are in same-sex relationships, do not fit the normalized model of family. Current research regarding LGBT-headed families establishes that there is a disconnect between the family constellations these students experience in their everyday lives, and those that teachers include in the formal curriculum at schools. As a result, certain family models become marginalized or rendered invisible. This chapter serves as a place to examine traditional notions of family, review origins of the concept of the nuclear family and the problems/challenges it presents, and make the case for broadening the definition of family.

Keywords

Family Structure Nuclear Family Elementary Teacher Heterosexual Family Married Couple Household 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

References

  1. Blumenfeld, W. (Ed.). (1992). Homophobia: How we all pay the price. Boston: Beacon.Google Scholar
  2. Blumenfeld, W., & DeVore, E. (2014). The family, conservative Christianity, and lesbian and gay youth: A review of the literature. In A. Dessel & R. Bolen (Eds.), Conservative Christian beliefs and sexual orientation in social work: Privilege, oppression, and the pursuit of human rights. Alexandria: Council on Social Work Press.Google Scholar
  3. Bower, L., & Klecka, C. (2009). Lesbian mothers’ bid for normalcy in their children’s schools. The Educational Forum, 73, 230–239.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Carrington, V. (2001). Globalization, family and nation state: Reframing “family” in new times. Discourse: Studies in the Cultural Politics of Education, 22(2), 185–196.Google Scholar
  5. Casper, V., & Schultz, S. (1999). Gay parents/straight schools: Building communication and trust. New York: Teachers College Press.Google Scholar
  6. Cherlin, A. (2004). Deinstituionalization of American marriage. Journal of Marriage and Family, 66, 848–861.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Collier, J., Rosaldo, M. Z., & Yanagisako, S. (1982). Is there a family? New anthropological views. In B. Thorne & M. Yalom (Eds.), Rethinking the family: Some feminist questions (pp. 25–39). New York: Longman.Google Scholar
  8. Compton-Lilly, C. (2004). Confronting racism, poverty, and power: Classroom struggles to change the world. Portsmouth: Heinemann.Google Scholar
  9. Coontz, S. (1992). The way we never were: American families and the nostalgia trap. New York: Basic Books.Google Scholar
  10. Emfinger, L. K. (2007). Rethinking welcoming literacy environments for LGBT families. Childhood Education, 84(1), 24–28.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Epstein, D., & Johnson, R. (1998). Schooling sexualities. Buckingham: Open University Press.Google Scholar
  12. Erera, P. (2002). Family diversity: Continuity and change in the contemporary family. Thousand Oaks: Sage.Google Scholar
  13. Ferguson, S. (Ed.). (2007). Shifting the center: Understanding contemporary families (3rd ed.). New York: McGraw Hill.Google Scholar
  14. Finch, J. (2007). Displaying families. Sociology, 41(1), 65–81. doi: 10.1177/0038038507072284.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Fine, M. (1994). Chartering urban public school reform. New York: Teachers College Press.Google Scholar
  16. Folgero, T. (2008). Queer nuclear families? Reproducing and transgressing heteronormativity. Journal of Homosexuality, 54(1), 124–149.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Heinemann, I. (Ed.). (2012). Inventing the modern American family: Family values and social change in 20th century United States. New York: Camous Verlag.Google Scholar
  18. Kluth, P. (2003). “You’re going to love this kid”: Teaching students with autism in the inclusive classroom. Baltimore: P. H. Brookes Publishers.Google Scholar
  19. Kosciw, J. G., & Diaz, E. M. (2008). Involved, invisble, ignored: The experiences of lesbian, gay, bisexual, and transgender parents and their children in our nation’s K-12 schools. New York: GLSEN.Google Scholar
  20. Kreider, R. M., & Ellis, R. (2011). Living arrangements of children: 2009. Current Population Reports, P70-126, U.S. Census Bureau, Washington, DC.Google Scholar
  21. Ladson-Billings, G. (1994). The Dreamkeepers: Successful teachers of African American children. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.Google Scholar
  22. Larrabee, T., & Kim, Y. (2010). Preservice elementary teachers’ perecptions of family: Considering future instruction on lesbian- and gay-headed families. Journal of Research in Childhood Education, 24(4), 351–365. doi: 10.1080/02568543.2010.510085.
  23. Matthews, H., & Ewen, D. (2010). Early education programs and children of immigrants: Learning each other’s language. Washington, DC: The Urban Institute. Google Scholar
  24. Mercier, L., & Harold, R. (2003). At the interface: Lesbian-parent families and their children’s schools. Children & Schools, 25(1), 35–47.Google Scholar
  25. Meyer, E. (2012). From here to queer: Mapping sexualities in education. In E. Meiners & T. Quinn (Eds.), Sexualities in education: A reader (pp. 9–17). New York: Peter Lang.Google Scholar
  26. Pallotta-Chiarolli, M. (2010). Border sexualities, border families in schools. Lanham: Rowman & Littlefield.Google Scholar
  27. Patterson, C. (1995). Lesbian mothers, gay fathers, and their children. In A. D’Augelli & C. Patterson (Eds.), Lesbian, gay, and bisexual identities over the lifespan: Psychological perspectives (pp. 262–290). New York: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Pawelski, J., Perrin, E., Foy, J., Allen, C., Crawford, J., Del Monte, M., & Vickers, D. (2006). The effects of marriage, civil union, and domestic partnership laws on the health and well-being of children. Pediatrics, 118(1), 345–364. doi: 10.1542/peds.2006-1279.
  29. Perlesz, A., Brown, R., McNair, R., Lindsay, J., Pitts, M., & deVaus, D. (2006). Lesbian family disclosure: Authenticity and safety within private and public domains. Lesbian & Gay Psychology Review, 7(1), 53–64.Google Scholar
  30. Polikoff, N. D. (1989). This child does have two mothers: Redefining parenthood to meet the needs of children in lesbian-mother and other nontraditional families. Georgetown Law Journal, 78, 459.Google Scholar
  31. Press, A. (2009). Gender and family in television’s Golden Age and beyond. ANNALS, 625, 139–150.Google Scholar
  32. Riley, C. (1988). American kinship: A lesbian account. Feminist Issues, 8, 75–94.Google Scholar
  33. Roseneil, S., & Budgeon, S. (2004). Cultures of intimacy and care beyond “the family”: Personal life and social change in the early 21st century. Current Sociology, 52(2), 135–159.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Russell, S., & Muraco, J. (2013). The use of representative data sets to study LGBT-parent families: Challenges, advantages, and opportunities. In A. Goldberg & K. Allen (Eds.), LGBT-Parent families: Innovations in research and implications for practice (pp. 343–356). New York: Springer Science+Business Media.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Ryan, D., & Martin, A. (2000). Lesbian, gay, bisexual, and transgender parents in the school systems. School Psychology Review, 29(2), 207–216.Google Scholar
  36. Sapon-Shevin, M. (2007). Widening the circle: The power of inclusive classrooms. Boston: Beacon.Google Scholar
  37. Short, E., Riggs, D., Perlesz, A., Brown, R., & Kane, G. (2007). Lesbian, gay, bisexual and transgender (LGBT) Parented Families: A literature review prepared for The Australian Psychological Society. Melburne VIC: The Australian Psychological Society ltd.Google Scholar
  38. Simoni, J., & Walters, K. (2001). Heterosexual identity and heterosexism: Recognizing privilege to reduce prejudice. Journal of Homosexuality, 41(1), 157–172.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Souto-Manning, M., & Swick, K. J. (2006). Teachers’ beliefs about parent and family involvement: Rethinking our family involvement paradigm. Early Childhood Education Journal, 34(2), 187–193.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Stacey, J. (2011). Unhitched: Love, marriage, and family values from West Hollywod to Western China. New York: New York University Press.Google Scholar
  41. Thorne, B. (1982). Feminist rethinking of the family: An overview. In B. Thorne & M. Yalom (Eds.), Rethinking the family: Some feminist questions (pp. 1–24). New York: Longman.Google Scholar
  42. Torrant, J. (2011). The material family. Boston: Sense Publishers.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. van Gelderen, L., Gartrell, N., Bos, H., van Rooij, F., & Hermanns, J. (2012). Stigmatization associated with growing up in a lesbian-parented family: What do adolescents experience and how do they deal with it? Children and Youth Services Review, 34, 999–1006.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Weston, K. (1991). Families we choose: Lesbians, gays, kinship. New York: Columbia University Press.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© The Author(s) 2016

Authors and Affiliations

  • Amy Shema
    • 1
  1. 1.University of RochesterRochesterUSA

Personalised recommendations