Attitude: How We Learn to Inhabit the Future

  • Mariam Thalos


It is common knowledge that young persons are different from older ones, and not just in the ways they look and behave. They also differ in how they think. This is not simply a matter of being more or less expert at intellectual tasks; often such differences are negligible. Adulthood is a matter of being differently cognitively organized and motivated, especially in relation to time. It’s surprising how little these differences have been studied scientifically. This essay is about the fundamentally cognitive ways that older people differ from their younger selves. It’s about being grown up.


Decision Theory Small World Expected Utility Maximization Causal Decision Theory Intellectual Task 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.


  1. Binmore, K. 2006. Making decisions in large worlds. Talk delivered at the 2006 ANDRES conference in Marseilles.Google Scholar
  2. Carstensen, L. 2006. The Influence of a Sense of Time on Human Development. Science 312(5782): 1913–5.Google Scholar
  3. Eckert, Mark A. et al. 2010. Age-Related Changes in Processing Speed: Unique Contributions of Cerebellar and Prefrontal Cortex. Front. Hum. Neurosci. doi: 10.3389/neuro.09.010.2010
  4. Joyce, J. 1999. The Foundations of Causal Decision Theory. New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  5. Paul, L.A. 2015. Transformative Experience. Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  6. Ramachandran, V.S. 2011. The Tell-Tale Brain. Norton.Google Scholar
  7. Savage, L. 1954/1972. Foundations of Statistics. New York: Dover.Google Scholar
  8. Scheffler, Samuel. 2013. Death and the Afterlife. Oxford.Google Scholar
  9. Smith, B. 1997. The Cognitive Geometry of War. In Peter Koller and Klaus Puhl (eds), Current Issues in Political Philosophy: Holder-Pickler-Tempsky, 394–403.Google Scholar
  10. Thalos, M. 2016. A Social Theory of Freedom. Routledge.Google Scholar
  11. Thalos, M. [under review]. Three Stances of Practical Reason, available at: accessed August 27, 2016.

Copyright information

© The Author(s) 2016

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.University of UtahSalt Lake CityUSA

Personalised recommendations