Advertisement

ICT, E-Government and E-Governance: Bits & Bytes for Public Administration

  • Vincent Homburg
Chapter

Abstract

This chapter identifies how electronic public service delivery has diffused in various public sector organizations in Europe. Three, in practice intertwined, sources of influence are identified: opportunity (the seemingly inevitable and autonomous impact of technologies), inscription of normative structures (the materialization of abstract ideas and rhetoric in specific types of information and communication technologies), and enthusiasms (the sometimes overstated beliefs, held by various stakeholders that technology is the answer to all kinds of questions). The way these sources of influences work out in practice is demonstrated by discussing the diffusion of a specific type of electronic government that is personalized electronic service delivery, in 10 Dutch municipalities. The chapter is ended with reflections and directions for future research.

References

  1. 6, P. (2004) Joined-up government in the western world in comparative perspective: A preliminary literature review and exploration. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 14, 103–138.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Andersen, K. V., & Henriksen, H. Z. (2006). E-government maturity models: Extension of the Layne and Lee model. Government Information Quarterly, 23, 236–248.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Ashworth, R., Boyne, G., & Delbridge, R. (2009). Escape from the iron cage? Organizational change and isomorphic pressures in the public sector. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 19, 165–187. doi: 10.1093/jopart/mum038.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Baum, C. H., & DiMaio, A. (2000). Gartner’s four phases of e-government model. (No. 317292). http://www.gartner.com//id=317292, date accessed 9 September 2016.
  5. Bekkers, V. J. J. M., & Homburg, V. M. F. (Eds.). (2005). The information ecology of e-government: E-government as institutional and technological innovation in public administration (2nd ed.). Amsterdam: IOS Press.Google Scholar
  6. Bekkers, V. J. J. M., & Homburg, V. M. F. (2007). The myths of E-government: Looking beyond the assumptions of a new and better government. Information Society, 23, 373–382.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Burstein, D., & Kline, D. (1995). Road warriors: Dreams and nightmares along the information superhighway. New York: Dutton.Google Scholar
  8. Coursey, D., & Norris, D. F. (2008). Models of e-government: Are they correct? An empirical assessment. Public Administration Review, 68, 523–536.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Czarniawska, B., & Sevon, B. (2005). Global ideas: How ideas, objects and practices travel in the global economy. Copenhagen: Copenhagen Business School Press.Google Scholar
  10. DiMaggio, P. J., & Powell, W. W. (1983). The iron cage revisited: Institutional isomorphism and collective rationality in organizational fields. American Sociological Review, 48, 147–160.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Gilbert, D., Balestrini, P., & Littleboy, D. (2004). Barriers and benefits in the adoption of e-government. International Journal of Public Sector Management, 17, 286–301.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Goldfinch, S. (2007). Pessimism computer failure, and information systems development in the public sector. Public Administration Review, 67, 917–929. doi: 10.1111/j.1540-6210.2007.00778.x.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Groth, L. (1999). Future organizational design. In L. Groth (Ed.), Future organizational design (pp. 325–344). Chicester: Wiley.Google Scholar
  14. Hiller, J. S., & Bélanger, F. (2001). Strategies for electronic government. Washington, DC: IBM Center for the Business of Government.Google Scholar
  15. Ho, A. T. (2002). Reinventing local governments and the e-government initiative. Public Administration Review, 62, 434–444.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Holden, S. H., Norris, D. F., & Fletcher, P. D. (2003). Electronic government at the local level. Public Performance & Management Review, 26, 325–344.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Homburg, V. M. F. (2000). Politics and property rights in information exchange. Knowledge, Policy and Technology, 13, 13–22.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Homburg, V. M. F. (2008). Information systems and public administration: Understanding e-government. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  19. Homburg, V. M. F., Dijkshoorn, A. J. D., & Thaens, M. (2013). Diffusion of personalised services among Dutch municipalities: Evolving channels of persuasion. Local Government Studies. doi: 10.1080/03003930.2013.79589.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Horst, M., Kuttschreuter, M., & Gutteling, J. M. (2007). Perceived usefulness, personal experiences, risk perception and trust as determinants of adoption of e-government services in the Netherlands. Computers in Human Behavior, 23, 1838–1852.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Isabella, L. (1990). Evolving interpretations as a change unfolds—How managers construe key organizational events. Academy of Management Journal, 33, 7–41. doi: 10.2307/256350.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Katz, D., & Kahn, R. L. (1978). The social psychology of organizations. New York: Wiley.Google Scholar
  23. Kim, L. (1998). Crisis construction and organizational learning: Capability building in catching-up at Hyundai motor. Organization Science, 9, 506–521.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Lai, K., Wong, C. W. Y., & Cheng, T. C. E. (2006). Institutional isomorphism and the adoption of information technology for supply chain management. Computers in Industry, 57, 93–98. doi: 10.1016/j.compind.2005.05.002.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Layne, K., & Lee, J. (2001). Developing fully functional e-government: A four stage model. Government Information Quarterly, 18, 122–136.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Leavitt, H. J., & Whisler, T. L. (1958). Management in the 1980s. Harvard Business Review, 36, 41–48.Google Scholar
  27. Levinthal, D. A., & March, J. G. A. (1981). A model of adaptive organizational search. Journal of Economic Behavior and Organization, 2, 307–333.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Ling, T. (2002). Delivering joined-up government in the UK: Dimensions, issues and problems. Public Administration, 80, 615–642. doi: 10.1111/1467-9299.00321.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Lips, A. M. B., Bekkers, V. J. J. M., & Zuurmond, A. (2005). ICT en openbaar bestuur. Utrecht: LEMMA.Google Scholar
  30. MacDonald, S. (1995). Learning to change—An information perspective on learning in the organization. Organization Science, 6, 557–568. doi: 10.1287/orsc.6.5.557.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. MacKenzie, D., & Wajcman, J. (Eds.). (1985). The social shaping of technology: How the refrigerator got its hum. Milton Keynes: Open University Press.Google Scholar
  32. Millard, J., Iversen, J. S., Kubicek, H., Westholm, H., & Cimander, R. (2004). Reorganisation of government back-offices for better electronic public services—European good practices (back-office reorganisation). Brussels: EU DG Information Society.Google Scholar
  33. Moon, M. J. (2002). The evolution of e-government among municipalities: Rhetoric or reality? Public Administration Review, 62, 424–433.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Moon, M. J., & Norris, D. F. (2005). Does managerial orientation matter? The adoption of reinventing government and e-government at the municipal level. Information Systems Journal, 15, 43–60.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Morton, M. S. S. (1991). The Corporation of the 1990s. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  36. Mosco, V. (2004). The digital sublime: Myth, power and cyberspace. Cambridge: The MIT Press.Google Scholar
  37. Norris, D. F., & Moon, M. J. (2005). Advancing e-government at the grassroots: Tortoise or hare? Public Administration Review, 65, 64–75.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. OECD. (2003). The e-government imperative. Paris: OECD.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Orlikowkski, W. J., & Barley, S. R. (2001). Technology and institutions: What can research on information technology and research on organizations learn from each other? MIS Quarterly, 25, 145–165.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Pawlowski, S. D., & Robey, D. (2004). Bridging user organizations: Knowledge brokering and the work of information technology professionals. MIS Quarterly, 28, 645–672.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Pieterson, W., Ebbers, W., & van Dijk, J. (2007). Personalisation in the public sector: An inventory of organizational and user obstacles towards personalisation of electronic services in the public sector. Government Information Quarterly, 24, 148–164.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Pollitt, C. P. (2003). Joined-up government: A survey. Political Studies Review, 1, 34–49. doi: 10.1111/1478-9299.00004.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Reddick, C. G. (2004). Empirical models of e-government growth in local governments. E-Service Journal, 3, 59–84.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Reddick, C. G. (2009). Factors that explain the perceived effectiveness of e-government: A survey of united states city government information technology directors. International Journal of E-Government Research, 5, 1–15.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Ronaghan, S. A. (2001). Benchmarking e-government: A global perspective. New York: United Nations Division for Public Economics and Public Administration and American Society for Public Administration.Google Scholar
  46. Sahlin, K., & Wedlin, L. (2008). Circulating ideas: Imitation, translation and editing. In R. Greenwood, C. Oliver, K. Sahlin, & R. Suddaby (Eds.), Organizational institutionalism (pp. 218–242). London: Sage.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Silva, L., & Hirschheim, R. (2007). Fighting against windmills: Strategic information systems and organizational deep structures. MIS Quarterly, 31, 327–354.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Symonds, M. (2000). The next revolution. The Economist, p. 355.Google Scholar
  49. Tapscott, D. (1995). The digital economy: Promise and peril in the age of networked intelligence. New York: McGraw-Hill.Google Scholar
  50. Tat-Kei Ho, A. (2002). Reinventing local governments and the e-government initiative. Public Administration Review, 62, 434–444. doi: 10.1111/0033-3352.00197.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Tidd, J., Bessant, J., & Pavitt, K. (2009). Managing innovation. Chichester: Wiley.Google Scholar
  52. Tyre, M. J., & Orlikowski, W. J. (1994). Windows of opportunity—Temporal patterns of technological adaptation in organizations. Organization Science, 5, 98–118.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. Van Os, G. S. (2011). The challenge of coordination: Coordinating integrated electronic service delivery in Denmark and the Netherlands. Information Polity, 16, 51–61.Google Scholar
  54. Van Os, G. S., Homburg, V. M. F., & Bekkers, V. J. J. M. (2013). Contingencies and convergence in european social security. In I. M. Miranda & M. M. Cruz-Cuhna (Eds.), Handbook of research on ICTs for healthcare and social services: Development and applications (IGI Global) (pp. 268–287).Google Scholar
  55. Williams, R., & Edge, D. (1996). The social shaping of technology. Research Policy, 25, 865–899. doi: 10.1016/0048-7333(96)00885-2.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. Wimmer, M., Traunmüller, R., & Lenk, K. (2001). Electronic business invading the public sector: Considerations on change and design. In Proceedings of the 34th Hawaii International Conference on Information Systems.Google Scholar
  57. Winter, S. G. (1987). Knowledge and competence as strategic assets. In D. Teece (Ed.), The competitive challenge – strategies for industrial innovation and renewal (pp. 159–184). Cambridge, MA: Ballinger.Google Scholar
  58. Yildiz, M. (2007). E-government research: Reviewing the literature, limitations, and ways forward. Government Information Quarterly, 24, 646–665. doi: 10.1016/j.giq.2007.01.002.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  59. Zahra, S. A., & George, G. (2002). Absorptive capacity: A review, reconceptualization, and extension. The Academy of Management Review, 27, 185–203.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  60. Zuboff, S. (1988). In the age of the smart machine: The future of work and power. New York: Basic Books.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© The Author(s) 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Public Administration and SociologyErasmus University RotterdamRotterdamThe Netherlands

Personalised recommendations