Advertisement

Ethics and Integrity

  • Michael MacaulayEmail author
Chapter

Abstract

The last decade has borne witness to an extensive European contribution to the field of ethics and integrity in public administration from theoretical, empirical and methodological perspectives. This chapter begins by distinguishing two broad directions of travel—contributions from Europe and contributions about Europe—before highlighting what was initially identified as the baseline for European research on ethics and integrity. It will then briefly survey the empirical work that has been conducted, and also the conceptual contributions that have been made. In particular, it will look at the European trend to look at integrity from a system level—national, local and organisational. This chapter will conclude with some suggestions about future directions in the field, and gaps that still need to be more deeply addressed.

References

  1. Adams, D., Guy, B., Balfour, L., & Reed, G. E. (2006). Abu ghraib, administrative evil, and moral inversion: The value of putting cruelty first. Public Administration Review, 66, 689–693.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Becker, M., & Jitse, T. (2015). Adding colours to the shades of grey: Enriching the integrity discourse with virtue ethics concepts. In A. Lawton, Z. Van Der Wal, & L. Huberts (Eds.), Ethics in public policy and management a global research companion. London: RoutledgeGoogle Scholar
  3. Behnke, N., & Maesschalck, J. (2006). Integrity systems at work—Theoretical and empirical foundations. Public Administration Quarterly, 30.Google Scholar
  4. Binder, M. (2014). Should evolutionary economists embrace libertarian paternalism? Journal of Evolutionary Economics, 24, 515–539.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Christensen, T., & Lægreid, P. (2007). The whole-of-government approach to public sector reform. Public Administration Review, 67, 1059–1066.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Cowell, R. J. W., Downe, J., & Morgan, K. (2014). Managing politics? Ethics regulation and conflicting conceptions of good conduct. Public Administration Review, 74, 29–38.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Downe, J., Cowell, R. J. W., Chen, A., & Morgan, K. (2013). The determinants of public trust in English local government: How important is the ethical behaviour of elected councillors? International Review of Administrative Sciences, 79, 597–617.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Emerson, S. M. (2006). Corruption in Bulgaria. Public Integrity, 8, 65–76.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Ewoh, A., Matei, A., & Matei, L. (2013). Corruption, public integrity, and globalization in South-Eastern European states: A comparative analysis. Theoretical & Applied Economics, 20, 7–34.Google Scholar
  10. Garcia-Quesada, M., Jiménez-Sánchez, F., & Villoria, M. (2013). Building local integrity Systems in Southern Europe: The case of urban local corruption in Spain. International Review of Administrative Sciences, 79, 618–637.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Gissur Erlingsson, O., Linde, J., & Öhrvall, R. (2014). Not so fair after all? Perceptions of procedural fairness and satisfaction with democracy in the nordic welfare states. International Journal of Public Administration, 37, 106–119.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. De Graaf, G., & Van Exel, J. (2009). Using Q-methodology in administrative ethics. Public Integrity, 11, 63–78.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. De Graaf, G., & Van Der Wal, Z. (2009a). Managing conflicting public values: Governing with integrity and effectiveness. The American Review of Public Administration, 40, 623–630.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. De Graaf, G., & Van Der Wal, Z. (2009b). The need for methodological rigor and diversity in administrative ethics. Public Integrity, 11, 5–8.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Head, B., Brown, A. J., & Connors, C. (Eds.). (2009). Promoting integrity: Evaluating and improving public institutions. Farnham: Ashgate.Google Scholar
  16. Hoffman, M., Pyne, C. J., & Gajewski, M. (2012). The ten masks of administrative evil. Administrative Theory & Praxis, 34, 125–132.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Huberts, L. (2014). The integrity of governance. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Huberts, L., Anechiarico, F., & Six, F. E. (Eds.). (2008). Local 765 integrity systems: World cities fighting corruption and safeguarding integrity. The Hague: BJu.Google Scholar
  19. Jiménez, F., García-Quesada, M., & Villoria, M. (2014). Integrity systems values, and expectations: Explaining differences in the extent of corruption in three spanish local governments. International Journal of Public Administration, 37, 67–82.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Kjeldsen, A. M. (2014). Dynamics of public service motivation: Attraction-selection and socialization in the production and regulation of social services. Public Administration Review, 74(1), 101–112.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Kolthoff, E., Macaulay, M., & Anechiarico, F. (2013). Special issue on ethics: Integrity systems for safeguarding ethics and integrity of governance. International Review of Administrative Sciences, 79.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Krogsgaard, J. A., Thomsen, P., & Andersen, L. B. (2014). Only if we agree? How value conflicts moderate the relationship between transformational leadership and public service motivation. International Journal of Public Administration, 37(12), 895–907CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Lasthuizen, K. (2008). Leading to integrity: Empirical research into the effects of leadership on ethics and integrity. Amsterdam: VU University.Google Scholar
  24. Lawton, A. (2009). The language of ethics. Public Integrity, 11, 45–62.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Lawton, A., & Doig, A. (2006). Researching ethics for public service organisations: The view from Europe. Public Integrity, 8, 11–34.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Lawton, A., & Macaulay, M. (2009). Ethics management and ethical management. Ethics and integrity in public administration: Cases and concepts (Eds.), 3 (pp. 107–120). New York: M. E. Sharpe.Google Scholar
  27. Lawton, A., & Macaulay, M. (2014). Localism in practice: Investigating citizen participation and good governance in local government standards of conduct. Public Administration Review, 74.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Lawton, A., Macaulay, M., & Six, F. (2010) Ethical audit: Control, performance and review. In A. Ball & S. Osborne (Eds.), Social accounting and accountability. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  29. Lawton, A., & Rayner, J. (2015). Public service motivation in a complex public sector. In A. Lawton, Z. Van der Wal, & L. Huberts (Eds.), Ethics in public policy and management (pp. 215–238). London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  30. Macaulay, M., & Lawton, A. (2006). From virtue to competence—Changing the principles of public service? Public Administration Review, 66, 1–9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Macaulay, M., Newman, C., & Hickey, G. (2014). Towards a model of the local integrity system: Learning the lessons from Great Britain. International Journal of Public Administration, 37, 83–91.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Macaulay, M. (2009a). Adapted morality: The challenge of evolutionary psychology for administrative ethics. Public Integrity, 11, 35–44.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Macaulay, M. (2009b). The I that is we: Recognition and administrative ethics. In Ethics and integrity in public administration: Cases and concepts (pp. 26–40). New York: M. E. Sharpe.Google Scholar
  34. Macaulay, M., & Mulcahy, M. (2014). Exploring the impacts of the national integrity system assessments. In Conference paper presented at the corruption, Integrity Systems and the G20, 17–18 June 2014 Brisbane.Google Scholar
  35. Maesschalck, J., & Bertók, J. (2009). Towards a sound integrity framework: Instruments, processes, structures and conditions for implementation. 39th session of the public governance committee, OECD, GOV/PGC/GF(2009) 1.Google Scholar
  36. Matei, A., & Matei, L. (2009). Public integrity and performance of governance a comparative study for South-Eastern Europe. Theoretical & Applied Economics, 16, 3–28.Google Scholar
  37. Năstase, A. (2014). Catering to organizational needs in ethics management: The case of the European commission. International Journal of Public Administration, 37, 93–105.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Newman, C. (2015). The undiscovered country: Establishing an ethical paradigm for space activities in the twentieth century. In A. Lawton, Z. Van der Wal & L. Huberts (Eds.), Ethics in public policy and management (pp. 299–324). London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  39. Olsen, J. (2015). Democratic order autonomy, and accountability. Governance, 28, 425–440.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Palidauskaite, J. (2006). Codes of ethics in transitional democracies: A comparative perspective. Public Integrity, 8, 35–48.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Pope, J. (2009). National integrity systems: The key to building sustainable, just and honest government. In B. W. Head, A. J. Brown, & C. Connors (Eds.), Promoting integrity: Evaluating and improving public institutions, 790 (pp. 13–31). Farnham, UK: Ashgate.Google Scholar
  42. Rego, A., Sarrico, C. S., & Moreira, J. M. (2006). Trust in Portuguese public authorities. Public Integrity, 8, 77–92.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Reynaers, A.-M., & De Graaf, G. (2014). Public values in public-private partnerships. International Journal of Public Administration, 37, 120–128.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Saarniit, L. (2006). A public service code of ethics applied in a transitional setting: The case of Estonia. Public Integrity, 8, 49–64.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Sampford, C., Smith, R., & Brown, A. J. (2005). From Greek temple to bird’s nest: Towards a theory of coherence and mutual accountability for national integrity systems. Australian Journal of Public Administration, 64, 96–108.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Schubert. C. (2014). Evolutionary economics and the case for a constitutional libertarian paternalism—a comment on Martin Binder. Should evolutionary economists embrace libertarian paternalism? Journal of Evolutionary Economics, 24.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Six, F., & Lawton, A. (2013). Towards a theory of integrity systems: A configurational approach International Review of Administrative Sciences, 79, 618–637.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Stensöta, H. (2010). The conditions of care: Reframing the debate about public sector ethic. Public Administration Review, 70(2), 295–303CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Stensöta, H. (2015). Public ethics of care—A general public ethics. Ethics and social welfare, 9(2), 183–200.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Stouten, J., Van Dijke, M., Mayer, D. M., De Cremer, D., & Euwema, M. C. (2013). Can a leader be seen as too ethical? The curvilinear effects of ethical leadership. Leadership Quarterly, 24, 680.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Svensson, G., & Wood, G. (2009). Inculcating the ethos of public-sector codes of ethics in Sweden: A longitudinal approach. Corporate Governance: The International Journal of Effective Board Performance, 9, 175–188.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Van der Wal, Z., & de Graaf, G. (Eds.). (2010). Governing good and governing well, symposium. American Review of Public Administration, 40, 623–760.Google Scholar
  53. Van der Wal, Z., de Graaf, G., & Lasthuizen, K. (2008). What’s valued most? Similarities and differences between the organizational values of the public and private sector. Public Administration, 86, 465–482.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. Van der Wal, Z., de Graaf. G., & Lawton, A. (Eds.). (2011). Special issue competing values in public management. Public Management Review, 13, 331–477.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. Von Maravić, P. (2009). Studying methods not ethics: Exploring the methodological character of administrative ethics research. Public Integrity, 11, 9–34.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. Ward, K. D. (2014). Cultivating public service motivation through americorps service: A longitudinal study. Public Administration Review, 74(1), 114–125.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  57. Žemgulienė, J. (2013). Perceived ethical behavior and job involvement in the economy-specific context. Organizations & Markets in Emerging Economies, 4(1), 43–55Google Scholar

Copyright information

© The Author(s) 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.School of GovernmentVictoria University of WellingtonWellingtonNew Zealand

Personalised recommendations