Advertisement

Enacting Community on Dartmoor: MED Theatre’s Badgerland: A Dartmoor Comedy (2015) and the Spatial Praxis of Community Performance Within a Conservation Zone

  • Kerrie SchaeferEmail author
Chapter
Part of the New Directions in Cultural Policy Research book series (NDCPR)

Abstract

The chapter examines the emergence of a community-based theatre organisation on Dartmoor in response to post-war practices of conservation management of the National Park area located in the South-West of England. Noting the tension between the governmental construction of the Dartmoor landscape as ‘nature’ conserved for national prosperity and alternative (locally lived) understandings of the landscape as anthropic, Schaefer examines how a community-based theatre attends to Dartmoor as, primarily, a cultural and ecological landscape. The chapter locates the practices of MED Theatre, an inter-generational, educational and developmental theatre organisation on Dartmoor, in relation to other, relevant (influencing) models of collective creation: rural-touring community theatre (Kershaw in Theatre Quarterly 8: 65–91, 1978) and the community play (Jellicoe in Community Plays: How to Put Them On. Methuen, London, 1987). Drawing on a dynamic notion of community extrapolated from analysis of community arts (including community theatre) practice, the argument is made that MED Theatre’s work actively resists, or exceeds, socio-spatial containment by national park conservation management and instrumental cultural policy discourse. The chapter considers how recovery of the concepts of dynamic community and cultural democracy might re-animate fundamental political arguments for a democratic public policy in the UK.

Bibliography

  1. Adam, B., Beck, U., & Van Loon, J. (Eds.). (2000). The Risk Society and Beyond: Critical Issues for Social Theory. London, Thousand Oaks, and Delhi: Sage.Google Scholar
  2. Atkinson, N. (2001). Things Can Only Get Better. Available online at: http://www.dartmoorsociety.com/files/debates/natpark.html#things%20better. Accessed 15 Apr 2015.
  3. Beck, U. (1992). The Risk Society: Towards a New Modernity. London, Thousand Oaks, and Delhi: Sage.Google Scholar
  4. Beeson, M. (1991, March 28). A Superficial View of Landscape. The Independent.Google Scholar
  5. Beeson, M. (1998). A Study of John Ford: John Ford and Dartmoor. Available online at: http://www.dartmoorresource.org.uk/performance/theatre-on-dartmoor/theatre-history-of/298-a-study-of-john-ford. Accessed 15 Aug 2016.
  6. Beeson, M. (2013, February 22). Interviewed by: Schaefer, K.Google Scholar
  7. Beeson, M. (2015). Badgers and the Scottish Referendum. Available online at: http://www.medtheatre.themoon.co.uk/wp-content/uploads/2015/03/Article-Badgers-and-the-Scottish-Referendum.pdf. Accessed 16 May 2015.
  8. Beeson, M., & Greeves, T. (1993). The Image of Dartmoor. Report and Transactions of the Devonshire Association for the Advancement of Science, 125, 127–154.Google Scholar
  9. Beeson, M., & Stobart, A. (2010, November 16). MED Theatre. Lecture and Workshop Presented at the University of Exeter.Google Scholar
  10. Belfiore, E. (2002). Art as a Means of Alleviating Social Exclusion: Does It Really Work? A Critique of Instrumental Cultural Policies and Social Impact Studies in the UK. International Journal of Cultural Policy, 8(1), 91–106.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Belfiore, E. (2006). The Social Impacts of the Arts—Myth or Reality? In M. Mirza (Ed.), Culture Vultures: Is UK Arts Policy Damaging the Arts? (pp. 20–37). London: Policy Exchange Limited.Google Scholar
  12. Bishop, C. (2012). Artificial Hells: Participatory Art and the Politics of Spectatorship. London and New York: Verso.Google Scholar
  13. Bourdieu, P. (1977). Outline of a Theory of Practice. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Bourdieu, P. (1984). Distinction: A Social Critique of the Judgement of Taste. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
  15. Braden, S. (1978). Artists and People. London: Routledge and Kegan Paul.Google Scholar
  16. Cohen, A. (1985). The Symbolic Construction of Community. Chichester: Ellis Horwood; London and New York: Tavistock.Google Scholar
  17. Crehan, K. (2011). Community Art: An Anthropological Perspective. Oxford and New York: Berg.Google Scholar
  18. Delanty, G. (2003). Community. London and New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
  19. Dickenson, S. (2003). MED Theatre. Available online at: http://www.dartmoorresource.co.uk/index.php?option=com_content&view=article&id=266. Accessed 16 May 2015.
  20. Dilsaver, L. M., & Wyckoff, W. (2005). The Political Geography of National Parks. Pacific Historical Review, 74(2), 237–266.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Dower, J. (1945). National Parks in England and Wales. London, UK: HMSO.Google Scholar
  22. Environment Act. (1995). Chapter 25 Part III National Parks. Available online at: http://www.legislation.gov.uk/ukpga/1995/25/part/III. Accessed 15 Apr 2015.
  23. Ertürk, I., Froud, J., Johal, S., Leaver, A., Moran, M., & Williams, K. (2011). City State Against the National Settlement: UK Economic Policy and Politics After the Financial Crisis (Working Paper No. 101). University of Manchester: CRESC. Available online at: http://www.cresc.ac.uk/medialibrary/workingpapers/wp101.pdf. Accessed 10 June 2014.
  24. Greeves, T. (2001). Twas Purty to Hear The Jumpers Going’—Dartmoor National Park: A Culture Misplaced. Available online at: http://www.dartmoorsociety.com/files/debates/natpark.html#purty. Accessed 15 Apr 2015.
  25. Hawkins, G. (1993). From Nimbin to Mardi Gras: Constructing Community Arts. St Leonards, NSW: Allen and Unwin.Google Scholar
  26. Hewison, R. (1992). The Future of the Pastoral, Management of Public Access to the Heritage Landscape Architectural Heritage, No. 24 (pp. 49–54). Strasbourg: Council of Europe Press.Google Scholar
  27. Ingold, T. (2000). The Perception of the Environment: Essays on Livelihood, Dwelling and Skill. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  28. Jamal, T. B., & Everett, J. (2007). Resisting Rationalisation in the Natural and Academic Life-World: Critical Tourism Research or Hermeneutic Charity? In I. Ateljevic, A. Pritchard, & N. Morgan (Eds.), The Critical Turn in Tourism Studies: Innovative Research Methodologies (pp. 57–76). Amsterdam: Elsevier.Google Scholar
  29. Jeffers, A., & Moriarty, G. (Eds.). (2017). Culture, Democracy and the Right to Make Art: The British Community Arts Movement. London: Bloomsbury Methuen Drama.Google Scholar
  30. Jellicoe, A. (1987). Community Plays: How to Put Them On. London: Methuen.Google Scholar
  31. Khan, R. (2015). Art in Community: The Provisional Citizen. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar
  32. Kelly, O. (1984). Community, Art and the State: Storming the Citadels. London: Comedia Publishing Group.Google Scholar
  33. Kelly, M. (2014, July 3). What the 70s Can Tell Us About Culling Badgers. The Guardian. Available online at: https://www.theguardian.com/environment/2014/jul/03/what-the-70s-can-tell-us-about-culling-badgers-gassing. Accessed 18 July 2016.
  34. Kelly, M. (2015). Quartz and Feldspar: Dartmoor: A British Landscape in Modern Times. London: Jonathan Cape.Google Scholar
  35. Kershaw, B. (1978). Theatre Art and Community Action: The Achievement of Medium Fair. Theatre Quarterly, 8(30), 65–91.Google Scholar
  36. Kershaw, B. (1991). Theatre and Community: Alternative and Community Theatre in Britain: 1960–1985. An Investigation into Cultural History and Performance Efficacy. Ph.D. thesis, University of Exeter, Exeter.Google Scholar
  37. Kershaw, B. (1992). The Politics of Performance: Radical Theatre as Cultural Intervention. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  38. Matarasso, F. (1997). Use or Ornament: The Social Impact of Participation in the Arts. London: Comedia.Google Scholar
  39. Matarasso, F. (2003). Smoke and Mirrors: A Response to Paola Merli’s “Evaluating the Social Impact of Participation in Arts Activities”, IJCP, 2002, vol. 8(1). International Journal of Cultural Policy, 9(3), 337–346.Google Scholar
  40. Matarasso, F. (2019). A Restless Art: How Participation Won and Why It Matters. Lisbon and London: Calouste Gulbenkian Foundation. https://arestlessart.com/.
  41. McConachie, B. (2001). Approaching the “Structure of Feeling” in Grassroots Theater. In S. C. Haedicke & T. Nellhaus (Eds.), Performing Democracy: International Perspectives on Urban Community-Based Performance. Ann Arbor: The University of Michigan Press.Google Scholar
  42. McEwen, C. (2008). Investing in Play: Expectations, Dependencies and Power in Australian Practices of Community Cultural Development. Ph.D. thesis, University of Sydney, NSW.Google Scholar
  43. MED Theatre. (2015). Badgerland: A Dartmoor Comedy. Playscript. Available online at: http://www.medtheatre.themoon.co.uk/wp-content/uploads/2015/01/Badgers-8.pdf. Accessed 20 Apr 2015.
  44. Merli, P. (2002). Evaluating the Social Impact of Participation in Arts Activities: A Critical Review of François Matarasso’s Use or Ornament? International Journal of Cultural Policy, 8(1), 107–118.Google Scholar
  45. Milner, A. (2002). Re-imagining Cultural Studies: The Promise of Cultural Materialism. London, Thousand Oaks, and New Delhi: Sage.Google Scholar
  46. Mirza, M. (Ed.). (2006). Culture Vultures: Is UK Arts Policy Damaging the Arts? London: Policy Exchange.Google Scholar
  47. Mulligan, M., & Smith, P. (2010). Art, Governance and the Turn to Community: Putting Art at the Heart of Local Government. Globalism Research Centre, RMIT University. Available online at: http://mams.rmit.edu.au/fc1d0uu0zhpm1.pdf. Accessed 12 July 2015.
  48. National Parks and Access to the Countryside Act 1949 Chapter 97 12, 13, 14 Geo 6. Available online at: http://www.legislation.gov.uk/ukpga/Geo6/12-13-14/97/enacted. Accessed 15 May 2015.
  49. Pitts, G., and Watt, D. (2001). The Imaginary Conference. Artwork Magazine, Issue 50. Available online at: http://www.ccd.net/pdf/art50_imaginary_conference.pdf. Accessed 15 May 2015.
  50. Rose, G. (1997a). Performing Inoperative Community: The Space and Resistance of Some Community Arts Projects. In S. Pile & M. Keith (Eds.), Geographies of Resistance (pp. 184–202). London and New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
  51. Rose, G. (1997b). Spatialities of ‘Community’, Power and Change: The Imagined Geographies of Community Arts Projects. Cultural Studies, 11(1), 1–16.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Schaefer, K., Edwards, D., & Milling, J. (2017). Performing Moretonhampstead: Rurality, Participation and Cultural Value. Cultural Trends, 26(1), 47–57.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. The Shelton Trust. (1986). Culture and Democracy: The Manifesto. London: Comedia.Google Scholar
  54. Standing, G. (2011). The Precariat: The New Dangerous Class. London and New York: Bloomsbury Academic.Google Scholar
  55. van Erven, E. (2013a). Community Art Power: Essays from ICAF 2011. Rotterdam: Rotterdams Wijktheater.Google Scholar
  56. van Erven, E. (2013b). Community Arts Dialogues. Utrecht: Treaty of Utrecht Foundation.Google Scholar
  57. Watt, D. (1991). Interrogating ‘Community’: Social Welfare Versus Cultural Democracy. In V. Binns (Ed.), Community and the Arts: History, Theory, Practice: Australian Perspectives (pp. 55–66). Leichhardt, NSW: Pluto Press.Google Scholar
  58. Williams, R. (1958). Culture and Society. London: Chatto and Windus.Google Scholar
  59. Williams, R. (1961). The Long Revolution. London: Chatto and Windus.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  60. Wyatt, D., MacDowell, L., & Mulligan, M. (2013). Critical Introduction: The Turn to Community in the Arts. Journal of Arts and Communities, 5(2–3), 81–91.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  61. Young, I. (1990). Justice and the Politics of Difference. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© The Author(s) 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.College of HumanitiesUniversity of ExeterExeterUK

Personalised recommendations